progetti

Revision allowed on annual turnover information for collection company

BVerwG 7 B 8/16, 7 B 8/16 (7 C 15/17)Bverwg / Division 711 mag 2017Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's complaint and admitted the revision. The decisive point was whether, under Section 18(2) No. 1 KrWG, an authority may require a collection company to provide information on its annual turnover. The court held that this question has fundamental importance and is suitable for clarification in revision proceedings. The decision also set the value in dispute for the complaint and revision stages.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for a question of fundamental importance; the appeal court need not itself resolve the substantive legal issue if the case is capable of clarification in revision. A revision is to be admitted where the disputed point is not settled and its answer may contribute to the development or uniform application of the law. Where the contested question concerns the scope of information obligations under § 18 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 KrWG, the requirement of fundamental importance may be met if it is uncertain whether the provision also authorizes demands for annual turnover data of a collection undertaking (consid. 1).

Testo completo

BVerwG — 7 B 8/16, 7 B 8/16 (7 C 15/17), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-05-11

Aktenzeichen: 7 B 8/16, 7 B 8/16 (7 C 15/17)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:110517B7B8.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 18 Abs 2 Nr 1 KrWG, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt, 17. März 2016, Az: 2 L 45/14, Urteilvorgehend VG Halle (Saale), 25. März 2014, Az: 2 A 206/13

Spruchkörper: 7. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Angaben zum Jahresumsatz eines Sammlungsunternehmens

Gründe

1 Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich jedenfalls zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob nach § 18 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 KrWG auch Angaben zum Jahresumsatz des Sammlungsunternehmens gefordert werden können.

2 Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 sowie § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.

Parole chiave

revision admissibilityfundamental importanceinformation obligationcollection companyannual turnovercircular economy

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether revision should be allowed for the question whether Section 18(2) No. 1 KrWG permits requiring annual turnover information from a collection company.

Decisione estratta

Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance that may clarify whether annual turnover information can be required under Section 18(2) No. 1 KrWG.

Motivazione estratta

The court considered the legal question unresolved and capable of contributing to clarification in the revision proceedings, satisfying Section 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.