progetti

Leave to appeal on police video recordings at assemblies

BVerwG 6 B 22/16, 6 B 22/16 (6 C 45/16)Bverwg / 6a divisione5 ott 2016Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff’s complaint against the refusal to admit revision. It held that the case has fundamental importance because revision may clarify whether police overview video recordings made in advance of an assembly amount to an interference with freedom of assembly under Article 8(1) GG. The decision also sets the dispute value for the complaint proceedings and provisionally for the revision proceedings.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; police overview video recordings before an assembly and interference with Art. 8(1) GG: Leave to appeal is to be granted where the case raises a revisable question capable of clarifying whether, and under what conditions, such recordings constitute an encroachment on the freedom of assembly. Fundamental importance exists if the legal issue is unresolved and is decisive for the dispute; it is sufficient that revision may contribute to the clarification of the constitutional dimensions of police observation measures (consid. 1).

Testo completo

BVerwG — 6 B 22/16, 6 B 22/16 (6 C 45/16), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-10-05

Aktenzeichen: 6 B 22/16, 6 B 22/16 (6 C 45/16)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:051016B6B22.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, Art 8 Abs 1 GG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 15. Juli 2015, Az: 3 L 13/12, Urteilvorgehend VG Schwerin, 29. September 2011, Az: 1 A 799/07, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Videoaufnahme; Versammlungsrecht

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen polizeiliche Übersichtsaufnahmen im Vorfeld einer Versammlung einen Eingriff in das Grundrecht aus Art. 8 Abs. 1 GG darstellen.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Parole chiave

freedom of assemblypolice surveillancevideo recordingleave to appealfundamental importance

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether leave to appeal should be granted for the question whether police overview video recordings made before an assembly interfere with Article 8(1) of the Basic Law.

Decisione estratta

Yes. The matter has fundamental importance because the legal question is capable of clarification in revision.

Motivazione estratta

The complaint was well-founded under section 132(2) no. 1 VwGO because the case may clarify whether, and under what conditions, such recordings constitute an interference with the freedom of assembly.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.