progetti

Revision allowed on limitation of reimbursement claim

BVerwG 10 B 2/16, 10 B 2/16 (10 C 3/16)Bverwg / Division 1026 apr 2016Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint seeking leave to appeal. It held that the case raises an unresolved question of fundamental importance: whether a reimbursement claim under § 49a(1) VwVfG in conjunction with Rhineland-Palatinate administrative procedure law is subject to limitation and, if so, under what conditions limitation occurs. The Court emphasized that the question has not yet been clarified in its case law and is relevant in many cases.

Massima Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal for fundamental importance; a complaint is successful where it identifies an unresolved, revisable legal question capable of clarification in revision and of relevance beyond the individual case. The contested question whether a reimbursement claim under § 49a Abs. 1 VwVfG in conjunction with § 1 LVwVfG RP is subject to limitation, and what requirements govern the commencement or occurrence of limitation, was previously unsettled in the case law of the Federal Administrative Court and therefore warranted revision (consid. 1).

Testo completo

BVerwG — 10 B 2/16, 10 B 2/16 (10 C 3/16), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-04-26

Aktenzeichen: 10 B 2/16, 10 B 2/16 (10 C 3/16)

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2016:260416B10B2.16.0

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 49a Abs 1 VwVfG, § 1 VwVfG RP

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz, 17. November 2015, Az: 6 A 10633/15, Urteilvorgehend VG Koblenz, 8. Dezember 2014, Az: 3 K 1066/13.KO

Spruchkörper: 10. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Verjährung eines Erstattungsanspruchs (§ 49a Abs. 1 VwVfG i.V.m. § 1 VwVfG RP)

Gründe

1 Die auf die grundsätzliche Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) gestützte Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage geben, ob der Erstattungsanspruch nach § 49a Abs. 1 VwVfG i.V.m. § 1 LVwVfG RP, der gemäß § 137 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 VwGO dem revisiblen Recht angehört, der Verjährung unterliegt und von welchen Voraussetzungen der Eintritt der Verjährung abhängt. Diese für eine Vielzahl von Fällen bedeutsame Rechtsfrage ist in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts bislang nicht geklärt.

Parole chiave

revision leavefundamental importancelimitationreimbursement claimadministrative procedure law

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the complaint established a ground for leave to appeal based on the fundamental importance of the case.

Decisione estratta

Yes. The complaint could lead to clarification of a legal question of fundamental importance.

Motivazione estratta

The legal question whether the reimbursement claim under § 49a(1) VwVfG in conjunction with § 1 LVwVfG RP is subject to limitation, and under what conditions limitation occurs, had not yet been clarified in the Federal Administrative Court's case law and is important for many cases.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.