Questione giuridica chiave
Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental significance concerning the interpretation of 'customary' services under § 48(1) sentence 1 no. 2 BAföG.
Decisione estratta
Yes. The case raises a question of fundamental importance because the meaning of 'customary' in § 48(1) sentence 1 no. 2 BAföG requires clarification in revision proceedings.
Motivazione estratta
The complaint was admissible and well-founded. The proposed revision can clarify a legal question of general significance regarding the interpretation of § 48(1) sentence 1 no. 2 BAföG, specifically the criterion of customary nature of services.