Further interim relief refused for G20 protest camp

BVerfG 1 BvR 1387/17Bverfg / 1. Senat 3. Kammer30 giu 2017Dismissed

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected an application for a further interim order relating to a protest camp in connection with the Hamburg G20 summit. It held that interim constitutional relief was subsidiary to the emergency protection offered by the specialized courts, and that the weighing of assembly freedom against public interests was primarily the task of the competent local courts.

Massima Omnilex

§ 15 VersammlG; subsidiarity of constitutional interim relief in protest and assembly disputes; the Federal Constitutional Court will not ordinarily replace specialized courts in balancing assembly freedom against public interests. Where effective fachgerichtlicher Eilrechtsschutz is available, a further constitutional interim order is generally refused; the decisive assessment of the local circumstances belongs first to the specialized courts on site.

Testo completo

BVerfG — 1 BvR 1387/17, Ablehnung einstweilige Anordnung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-06-30

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 1387/17

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170630.1bvr138717

Dokumenttyp: Ablehnung einstweilige Anordnung

Normen: GG, § 15 VersammlG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Hamburgisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, 22. Juni 2017, Az: 4 Bs 125/17, Beschlussvorgehend BVerfG, 28. Juni 2017, Az: 1 BvR 1387/17, Einstweilige Anordnungnachgehend BVerfG, 26. Februar 2018, Az: 1 BvR 1387/17, Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 3. Kammer

Titelzeile

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer weiteren eA bzgl eines Protestcamps anlässlich des G20-Gipfels in Hamburg: Subsidiarität gegenüber fachgerichtlichem Eilrechtsschutz - Ausgleich zwischen Demonstrationsfreiheit und öffentlichen Interessen obliegt in erster Linie fachnahen Instanzen vor Ort

Tenor

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.

Parole chiave

interim reliefsubsidiarityassembly freedomprotest campG20 summitbalancing of interests

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether a further interim order should be issued concerning the protest camp at the Hamburg G20 summit

Decisione estratta

The application was refused because interim constitutional relief is subsidiary to specialized court emergency protection, and the balancing of assembly freedom against public interests is primarily for the competent local courts.

Motivazione estratta

The Court found no basis to displace the prior allocation of responsibility to the specialized courts; the applicant had to rely on the fachgerichtlicher Eilrechtsschutz already available or granted.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.