BVerfG 1 BvQ 1/16•Interim relief denied for insufficient substantiation and no exhaustion
BVerfG 1 BvQ 1/16Bverfg / 1. Senat 1. Kammer19 gen 2016Dismissed
Estratto da Omnilex
The Federal Constitutional Court rejected an application for interim constitutional relief. It held the request inadmissible because the applicant had not met the substantiation requirements applicable under § 23(1) sentence 2 BVerfGG, even in summary proceedings, and had not exhausted the remedies before the specialized courts as required by § 90(2) sentence 1 BVerfGG.
§ 23 Abs. 1 S. 2, § 32 Abs. 1, § 90 Abs. 2 S. 1 BVerfGG; interim constitutional relief is inadmissible if the application is not sufficiently substantiated and the path to the ordinary courts has not been exhausted. The substantiation requirement applies equally in interim-relief proceedings; absent exhaustion of the specialised courts’ remedies, a constitutional application is generally barred (consid. 1).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-01-19
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvQ 1/16
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:qk20160119.1bvq000116
Dokumenttyp: Ablehnung einstweilige Anordnung
Normen: § 23 Abs 1 S 2 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs 1 BVerfGG, § 90 Abs 2 S 1 BVerfGG
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 1. Kammer
Ablehnung des Erlasses einer einstweiligen Anordnung bei unzureichender Substantiierung und mangelnder Rechtswegerschöpfung
1 Der Antrag ist unzulässig. Er genügt weder den - auch im Verfahren des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes geltenden (vgl. BVerfGE 122, 63 <74>) - Begründungsanforderungen des § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BVerfGG noch ist der Rechtsweg zu den Fachgerichten erschöpft worden (§ 90 Abs. 2 Satz 1 BVerfGG).
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether the application for an interim injunction was admissible despite insufficient substantiation.
No. The application did not satisfy the reasoning requirements applicable even in interim-relief proceedings.
The application failed to meet the requirements of § 23(1) sentence 2 BVerfGG.
Whether the applicant had exhausted the remedies before the ordinary courts.
No. The Court found that the judicial path to the specialized courts had not been exhausted.
Under § 90(2) sentence 1 BVerfGG, constitutional relief generally requires prior exhaustion of the available legal remedies, which was lacking here.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.