Child benefit paid to only one entitled person

BVerfG 2 BvR 1615/12Bverfg / 2. Senat 1. Kammer16 feb 2015Dismissed

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Constitutional Court, sitting as a chamber, issued an unreasoned order on a constitutional complaint concerning payment of child benefit to only one entitled person under Section 64(1) EStG. The complaint was not admitted. The prior decisions of the Fiscal Court of Düsseldorf and the Federal Fiscal Court remained in place.

Massima Omnilex

§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint by chamber order without reasons. A chamber may decline to accept a constitutional complaint for decision without stating reasons where the statutory requirements for acceptance are not met. In such a case, the challenged lower-court decisions remain unaffected; the order has no substantive merits review and does not itself pronounce on the correctness of the interpretation of the underlying tax provision.

Testo completo

BVerfG — 2 BvR 1615/12, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-02-16

Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 1615/12

ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150216.2bvr161512

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 64 Abs 1 EStG 2009

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BFH, 15. Februar 2012, Az: XI S 25/11 (PKH), Beschlussvorgehend FG Düsseldorf, 19. Juli 2011, Az: 10 K 2787/10 Kg, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 1. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Kindergeldzahlung an nur einen Berechtigten (§ 64 Abs 1 EStG)

Parole chiave

constitutional complaintnon-admissionchild benefitentitlementtax procedure

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the constitutional complaint is accepted for decision

Decisione estratta

The complaint was not admitted.

Motivazione estratta

No reasons were given in the chamber order.

Questione giuridica chiave

Challenge to child benefit payment under Section 64(1) EStG

Decisione estratta

The prior decisions were left undisturbed.

Motivazione estratta

The chamber order without reasons did not disturb the prior rulings.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.