Revision dismissed; costs borne by claimant

BAG 4 AZR 188/13Bag / 4a divisione18 giu 2014Dismissed

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Bundesarbeitsgericht dismissed the claimant’s revision against the judgment of the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht. The court noted that, in light of a parallel proceeding, the parties waived the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Massima Omnilex

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in a labour-law revision decision. Where the parties, in view of a parallel proceeding, waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide without setting out a full factual record and reasons pursuant to the statutory provisions governing abbreviated judgments. The disposition then contains only the operative part, including dismissal of the revision and allocation of costs.

Testo completo

BAG — 4 AZR 188/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 188/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 193/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 345/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 345/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG , § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Parole chiave

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabour law

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the claimant’s revision against the appellate judgment was well-founded

Decisione estratta

The revision was unfounded and therefore rejected.

Motivazione estratta

The decision states only the dispositive ruling and notes that the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel case; no further reasoning is set out.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.