Correction of erroneous decision date in trademark matter

BPatG 25 W (pat) 558/11Tribunale federale dei brevetti / Division 2519 giu 2012Granted

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

In a trademark appeal matter, the Federal Patent Court corrected a clerical mistake in a prior order. The decision date stated in the served order had been given as 30 May 2011, but the court clarified that the correct date was 30 May 2012. The correction was made under § 80(1) MarkenG. The correction request was granted; no substantive trademark issue was decided.

Massima Omnilex

§ 80 Abs. 1 MarkenG; correction of obvious clerical errors in a decision: where the wording of an order contains an incorrect date designation, the court may correct it ex officio or on application if the mistake is apparent from the record and concerns no substantive reconsideration. The correction serves solely to align the operative wording with the intended procedural act and does not affect the substantive content of the decision.

Testo completo

BPatG — 25 W (pat) 558/11, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-06-19

Aktenzeichen: 25 W (pat) 558/11

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: 25. Senat

Tenor

In der Beschwerdesache

betreffend die Markenanmeldung 30 2011 034 388.8

hier: Berichtigungsbeschluss

hat der 25. Senat (Marken-Beschwerdesenat) des Bundespatentgerichts am 19. Juni 2012 unter Mitwirkung des Vorsitzenden Richters Knoll, des Richters am Oberlandesgericht Heimen und der Richterin Grote-Bittner

beschlossen:

Das in dem der Anmelderin am 11. Juni 2012 zugestellten Beschluss als Zeitpunkt der Entscheidung angegebene Datum 30. Mai 2011 wird dahingehend berichtigt, dass es richtig lauten muss 30. Mai 2012 (§ 80 Abs. 1 MarkenG).

Parole chiave

trademarkcorrectionclerical errordecision dateappeal procedure

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the decision date in the prior order should be corrected from 30 May 2011 to 30 May 2012.

Decisione estratta

The date in the served decision was corrected to 30 May 2012.

Motivazione estratta

The court treated the wrong date as a clerical error and corrected it under Section 80(1) of the Trademark Act.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.