progetti

Cash transport driver breaks co-possession in theft

BGH 5 StR 203/11Bgh / Criminal Chamber 522 giu 2011Dismissed

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Court dismissed the defendant’s revision against the Lübeck Regional Court judgment as unfounded. It held that, in the staged robbery involving a cash transport driver who was informed of the plan, the participants had at least broken the co-possession of DB AG when they took secured cash boxes from the transport vehicle. The driver’s involvement did not prevent a theft under § 242 Abs. 1 StGB. The appellant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Massima Omnilex

§ 242 Abs. 1 StGB; co-possession and theft in a staged robbery involving an informed transport driver: At least co-possession of the owner is broken when cash boxes secured in a transport vehicle are taken by the participants, even if the driver is privy to the plan. A person participating in the taking cannot rely on the driver’s collaboration to exclude a taking from another’s possession; decisive is whether the factual power sphere of the owner remains protected (consid. as cited with reference to prior case law). Revision dismissed under § 349 Abs. 2 StPO when no legal error appears.

Testo completo

BGH — 5 StR 203/11, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-06-22

Aktenzeichen: 5 StR 203/11

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 242 Abs 1 StGB

Vorinstanz: vorgehend LG Lübeck, 19. Januar 2011, Az: 3 KLs 17/10

Spruchkörper: 5. Strafsenat

Titelzeile

Diebstahl: Gewahrsamsbruch durch einen Geldtransportfahrer

Tenor

Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Lübeck vom 19. Januar 2011 wird nach § 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegründet verworfen.

Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.

Ergänzend bemerkt der Senat:

Der nach den Feststellungen eingeweihte Fahrer eines Geldtransporters der DB Cash-Center Hamburg und die Angeklagten haben bei ihrem fingierten Raub wenigstens Mitgewahrsam der DB AG gebrochen (vgl. BGH, Urteil vom 23. Juni 1988 – 4 StR 110/88, und Beschluss vom 17. August 1993 – 4 StR 393/93, BGHR StGB § 242 Abs. 1 Gewahrsam 3 und 6). Sie haben verschlossene, zuvor während einer festen Route aus Fahrscheinautomaten entnommene und im Fahrzeug besonders gesicherte Geldkassetten an sich genommen. Ein zu tätigender Notruf war und wurde an die Cashzentrale gerichtet.

Basdorf Raum Brause

Schneider Bellay

Parole chiave

theftpossessionco-possessioncash transportstaged robberyrevisioncourt costs

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the taking of secured cash boxes by the informed driver and the accused constituted theft by breaking co-possession.

Decisione estratta

Yes. The informed driver and the accused broke at least the co-possession of DB AG when they removed the secured cash boxes from the vehicle.

Motivazione estratta

The boxes had been removed from ticket machines during a fixed route, stored in the vehicle in specially secured form, and then taken by the participants in the staged robbery; an alarm was to be and was directed to the cash center.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the defendant’s revision against the Landgericht judgment had merit.

Decisione estratta

No. The revision was unfounded.

Motivazione estratta

The court saw no legal error in the lower court judgment and rejected the revision under the summary procedure.

Questione giuridica chiave

Court costs on the unsuccessful revision.

Decisione estratta

The appellant must bear the costs of the remedy.

Motivazione estratta

Costs follow the unsuccessful revision.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.