progetti

Streitwert in eviction proceedings not by headcount

BGH XII ZR 110/07Bgh / Civil Chamber 1227 gen 2010Partially Granted

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Federal Court dealt with defendant no. 3's objection to the Senate's earlier dispute-value order in an eviction case. It held that she was involved only as to the eviction of the contested premises, so her individual dispute value was limited to EUR 18,595. It rejected any further reduction and specifically ruled that § 41 GKG does not allow valuation by headcount in this context. The prior order of 23 September 2009 was modified accordingly; the proceeding was declared fee-free and no out-of-court costs were awarded.

Massima Omnilex

§ 63 Abs. 3 GKG; dispute value in eviction proceedings and scope of participation of an individual defendant; a reconsideration is partly well-founded if the party is only concerned with the eviction claim, but a further reduction is excluded where no statutory basis exists. § 41 GKG does not permit determination of the dispute value by headcount in such a case; the relevant value must be fixed according to the actual subject matter of the party's involvement (consid. 2-3).

Testo completo

BGH — XII ZR 110/07, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-01-27

Aktenzeichen: XII ZR 110/07

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 41 GKG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BGH, 23. September 2009, Az: XII ZR 110/07, Beschlussvorgehend OLG Stuttgart, 16. Juli 2007, Az: 5 U 214/06, Urteilvorgehend LG Stuttgart, 24. November 2006, Az: 22 O 318/06, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 12. Zivilsenat

Leitsatz

(Streitwertbemessung im Räumungsverfahren)

Tenor

Auf die als Gegenvorstellung zu wertende Eingabe der Beklagten zu 3 wird unter Zurückweisung im Übrigen der Beschluss des Senats vom 23. September 2009 abgeändert:

Der Streitwert des Beschwerdeverfahrens beträgt 50.437 €.

Im Verhältnis zur Beklagten zu 3 beträgt er nur 18.595 €.

Das Verfahren ist gebührenfrei. Außergerichtliche Kosten werden nicht erstattet.

Gründe

1 Die nach § 63 Abs. 3 GKG zulässige Gegenvorstellung der Beklagten zu 3 ist nur zum Teil begründet.

2 Zu Recht weist die Beklagte zu 3 darauf hin, dass sie am Rechtsstreit nur beteiligt ist, soweit die Räumung der streitgegenständlichen Räume in Rede steht, also lediglich in Höhe von 18.595 €.

3 Für eine weitere Herabsetzung des Streitwerts ist demgegenüber kein Raum. Entgegen der Auffassung der Beklagten zu 3 kommt eine Bemessung des Streitwerts gemäß § 41 GKG nach Kopfteilen nicht in Betracht.

Dose Wagenitz Vézina

Klinkhammer Schilling

Parole chiave

dispute valueevictioncostsreconsiderationprocedural value§ 41 GKG

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the dispute value for the appeal proceedings had to be reduced for defendant no. 3 because she was only involved as to the eviction claim.

Decisione estratta

The dispute value was reduced to EUR 18,595 for defendant no. 3, because her participation in the proceedings extended only to the eviction of the disputed premises.

Motivazione estratta

The court accepted that defendant no. 3 was involved only to the extent the eviction of the premises was at issue. However, it rejected any further reduction and held that valuation under Section 41 GKG by headcount was not appropriate.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the dispute value had to be assessed under § 41 GKG by headcount.

Decisione estratta

No. A valuation under § 41 GKG according to headcount was not permissible in this case.

Motivazione estratta

The court expressly rejected the defendant's view that the value should be determined by headcount; no basis existed for a further reduction beyond the value corresponding to the eviction claim affecting defendant no. 3.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.