6 OWi 313/18•Intentional prohibited mobile phone use while driving
6 OWi 313/18Tribunale di primo grado29 gen 2019Diritto della regolamentazioneCondannato
Estratto da Omnilex
The Castrop-Rauxel Local Court convicted the defendant of intentionally using a mobile phone unlawfully while driving and imposed a €125 fine. The defendant had held a smartphone horizontally toward a crashed vehicle while passing it. The court considered that conduct consistent with using the phone to film or photograph the vehicle. It also held that a detailed description in the traffic offence report could be relied upon even if the witness had no present recollection. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings and his necessary expenses.
§ 23 Abs. 1a StVO; reference to an offence report and outward conduct indicating mobile-phone use while driving. A concrete and detailed description of external events in an administrative-offence report may be incorporated into the decision even where the witness no longer remembers the events. Holding a smartphone horizontally toward a crashed vehicle while driving is an act from which use of a phone function may be inferred: the apparent purpose is to film or photograph the vehicle. (Following AG Dortmund, order of 8 October 2018.)
Entscheidungsdatum: 2019-01-29
Aktenzeichen: 6 OWi 313/18
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGCAS:2019:0129.6OWI313.18.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: Einzelrichter
Befinden sich konkrete und detaillierte Beschreibungen des äußeren Geschehens in der Ordnungswidrigkeitenanzeige, ist die Bezugnahme auf die Ordnungswidrigkeitenanzeige auch bei fehlender Erinnerung des Zeugen weiterhin zulässig (Fortführung von AG Dortmund, Beschluss vom 08.10.2018, BeckRS 2018, 27559 = SVR 2019, 33).
Wer beim Vorbeifahren mit dem PKW ein Mobiltelefon (Smartphone“) horizontal deutlich in Richtung eines verunfallten Fahrzeuges hält kann nach Ansicht des Gerichtes damit auch nur eine Funktion des Mobiltelefones nutzen. Entweder filmt er das verunfallte Fahrzeug oder er fotografiert es. Einen anderen Sinn kann diese äußere Handlung kaum ergeben.
Der Betroffene wird wegen vorsätzlicher verbotswidriger Benutzung eines Mobiltelefons als Kraftfahrzeugführer zu einer Geldbuße von 125,00 € verurteilt. Die Kosten des Verfahrens und seine notwendigen Auslagen trägt der Betroffene (§§ 23 Abs. 1a, 49 StVO, 24 StVG, 246.1 BKat).
Whether the defendant intentionally used a mobile phone unlawfully while driving.
Holding a smartphone horizontally toward a crashed vehicle while driving constitutes use of a phone function, such as filming or photographing.
The outward conduct of pointing the phone toward the crashed vehicle has no plausible purpose other than filming or photographing it.
Whether the court could rely on the detailed description of the external events in the traffic offence report despite the witness having no independent recollection.
Reference to the traffic offence report remains permissible where it contains concrete and detailed descriptions of the external events.
The report's detailed account can be relied upon even if the witness no longer remembers the events.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.