37 XVII T 451•Remuneration for a procedural guardian after appointment of a guardian
37 XVII T 451Tribunale di primo grado3 giu 2008Diritto di famigliaParzialmente accolto
Estratto da Omnilex
The procedural guardian applied for remuneration and expense reimbursement in connection with proceedings to appoint a guardian. The Bonn Local Court fixed remuneration including expenses at €138.60 and separately recognized €6.37 in expenses, for a total payment of €144.97 from the State Treasury. It rejected the balance of the application. The court held that procedural guardianship serves the affected person’s interests in the guardian-appointment proceedings and does not continue indefinitely merely because an appeal against the guardianship order may be filed without a time limit. Work undertaken after recognition of that order therefore does not attract remuneration.
FGG § 67a; BGB § 1836 Abs. 1; VBVG §§ 1–3; scope of a procedural guardianship and entitlement to remuneration. A procedural guardian appointed to safeguard the interests of the affected person in proceedings concerning appointment of a guardian is appointed for those proceedings, not for an indefinite period. The availability of an appeal against the order establishing guardianship without a time limit does not itself extend the procedural guardianship. Accordingly, activity undertaken after recognition of the order establishing guardianship does not give rise to a claim for remuneration.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2008-06-03
Aktenzeichen: 37 XVII T 451
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2008:0603.37XVII.T451.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 37. Betreuungsabteilung
Normen: FGG §67a; BGB §1836 Abs. 1; VBVG §§1-3
Die Tatsache, dass gegen den Beschluss zur Einrichtung der Betreuung eine unbefristete Beschwerde statthaft ist, bedeutet nicht, dass die zur Wahnehmung der Interessen des Betroffenen im Verfahren zur Bestellung eines Betreuers eingerichtete Verfahrenspflegschaft auf unbestimmte Zeit angelegt ist. Für nach der Anerkennung des Beschlusses zur Einrichtung der Betreuung entwickelte Tätigkeit besteht kein Vergütungsanspruch.
wird der Verfahrenspflegerin für ihre Tätigkeit eine Vergütung nebst Auslagenersatz in Höhe von 138,60 Euro gegen die Landeskasse festgesetzt. Ferner werden Auslagen in Höhe von 6,37 Euro anerkannt.
Insgesamt ist daher ein Betrag in Höhe von 144,97 Euro aus der Landeskasse zu erstatten.
Der weitergehende Antrag der Verfahrenspflegerin wird zurückgewiesen.
Whether the procedural guardian may receive remuneration and reimbursement for the claimed work and expenses, including activity after recognition of the order establishing guardianship.
The guardian may be reimbursed for the allowed amount, but activity after recognition of the guardianship order is not compensable.
The procedural guardianship is for protecting the affected person's interests in the appointment proceedings; an unlimited right of appeal does not extend it indefinitely.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.