Late Utility-Bill Settlement After Timely Mailing

10 C 388/05Tribunale di primo grado4 apr 2006Diritto di locazioneRespinto

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The plaintiffs’ action was dismissed by the Bonn Local Court. The judgment gives no further factual background and was issued without a statement of facts under § 313a(1) ZPO. On the utility-cost settlement issue, the court stated that a landlord may still assert claims on the basis of a settlement issued after the one-year period if the landlord proves that it was sent to the tenant by post within the required period. Costs were imposed on the plaintiffs, and the judgment was declared provisionally enforceable.

Massima Omnilex

BGB § 556 Abs. 3 sentence 3; timely dispatch of a utility-cost settlement. A landlord may rely on a settlement issued after expiry of the one-year period where the landlord proves that the settlement was sent to the tenant by post within that period. The tenant’s assertion that the settlement was not received does not, by itself, preclude the landlord from asserting claims where timely mailing is established.

Testo completo

Amtsgericht Bonn — 10 C 388/05 — Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2006-04-04

Aktenzeichen: 10 C 388/05

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2006:0404.10C388.05.00

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Spruchkörper: 10. Zivilabteilung

Normen: BGB § 556 Abs. 3 S. 3

Leitsätze

Behauptet der Mieter, er habe keine Nebenkostenabrechung erhalten, kann der Vermieter aus einer nach Ablauf eines Jahres nach dem Abrechnungszeitraum erteilten Abrechnung noch Ansprüche geltend machen, wenn er nachweist, dass er rechtzeitig die Abrechnung per Post an den Mieter versandt hat.

Tenor

Die Klage wird auf Kosten der Kläger abgewiesen.

Das Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar.

("Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits")

Ohne Tatbestand gem. § 313 a Abs. 1 ZPO.

Parole chiave

tenancyutility costsservice by postlimitation period

A landlord may assert claims based on a settlement issued after the one-year period if the landlord proves that it was timely sent to the tenant by post.

The stated rule turns on proof of timely postal dispatch, notwithstanding the tenant’s assertion of non-receipt.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.