Complaint against private acts inadmissible ratione personae

150002033Giurisprudenza amministrativa delle autorità federali (VPB)12 mag 1994Inadmissible

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

Jean and Leïla Szilasi lodged an application against Switzerland alleging a violation of Article 8 ECHR. The European Commission of Human Rights held that the complaints concerned acts of an agent of an insurance company, i.e. private conduct not attributable to the State. As the Commission cannot deal with applications directed against private persons, the application was declared inadmissible under Article 27 § 2 ECHR.

Massima Omnilex

Art. 27 § 2 ECHR; admissibility ratione personae of complaints directed against private persons. Applications are inadmissible where the impugned conduct is attributable solely to a private individual and not to the State. The Commission has no competence to examine complaints against private persons, even if the applicant invokes Article 8 ECHR; the decisive criterion is whether the alleged interference can be imputed to a public authority. If State responsibility is lacking, the application must be rejected as incompatible ratione personae (consid. 1).

Testo completo

JAAC 58.126

Dec. de la Comm. eur. DH du 12 mai 1994, déclarant irrecevable la req. Nº 23702/94, Jean et Leïla Szilasi c / Suisse

Art. 27 § 2 CEDH. Incompatibilité ratione personae. Irrecevabilité de requêtes dirigées contre des particuliers.

Art. 27 § 2 EMRK. Unvereinbarkeit ratione personae. Unzulässigkeit von Beschwerden, die sich gegen Private richten.

Art. 27 § 2 CEDU. Incompatibilità ratione personae. Irricevibilità di domande avanzate contro privati.

S'agissant des griefs des requérants tirés de l'art. 8 CEDH, la Commission relève que ces griefs concernent les agissements du mandataire d'une compagnie d'assurances. Or, force est de constater que ces agissements ne relèvent pas de l'Etat. La Commission rappelle qu'elle ne peut pas être saisie de requêtes dirigées contre des particuliers (voir par exemple déc. du 11 octobre 1988 sur la req. Nº 12327/86, DR 58, p. 85). Cette partie de la requête doit dès lors être rejetée pour incompatibilité ratione personae avec les dispositions de la convention.

Il s'ensuit que la requête doit être rejetée conformément à l'art. 27 CEDH.

1

Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

JAAC 58.126 - Dec. de la Comm. eur. DH du 12 mai 1994, déclarant irrecevable la req. Nº 23702/94, Jean et Leïla Szilasi c / Suisse

In

Verwaltungspraxis der Bundesbehörden

Dans In

Jurisprudence des autorités administratives de la Confédération Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione

Jahr Année

1994

Anno

58

Band Volume

Volume

Seite Page


Pagina

Ref. No

150 002 033

Das Dokument wurde durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv und die Bundeskanzlei konvertiert. Le document a été digitalisé par les Archives Fédérales Suisses et la Chancellerie fédérale. Il documento è stato convertito dall'Archivio federale svizzero e della Cancelleria federale.

Parole chiave

inadmissibilityratione personaeprivate conductstate responsibilityarticle 8human rights commission

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the Article 8 complaint was admissible where it targeted conduct of a private insurance agent.

Decisione estratta

The complaint was inadmissible because the impugned conduct was attributable to a private person and not to the State; the Commission cannot entertain applications directed against private individuals.

Motivazione estratta

Article 27 § 2 ECHR excludes applications incompatible ratione personae with the Convention. The alleged acts concerned a private insurance agent, so they fell outside State responsibility.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.