Asylum removal complaints under Articles 3, 6, 8, 13 and 14 ECHR

150001856Giurisprudenza amministrativa delle autorità federali (VPB)14 mag 1993Inadmissible

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The European Commission of Human Rights declared inadmissible the application by a Turkish asylum-seeking family against Switzerland concerning their removal after rejection of asylum. The applicants relied on Articles 3, 6, 8, 13 and 14 ECHR. The Commission held that the Article 3 complaint was based only on the general situation in Turkey, that Article 6 did not apply to removal proceedings, that Article 8 was not engaged because the family could remain together in the country of origin, that the asylum review procedure satisfied Article 13, and that there was no indication of discrimination under Article 14.

Massima Omnilex

Art. 3, 6, 8, 13 and 14 ECHR; admissibility of complaints against removal of rejected asylum seekers. A removal based solely on the general political situation in the State of origin does not, without individualized risk factors, disclose an arguable claim under Article 3. Expulsion proceedings are neither civil nor criminal and therefore fall outside Article 6. Article 8 is not infringed where it is reasonably possible for the family to continue family life in the country of origin. A domestic asylum-review remedy may satisfy Article 13 if it affords effective scrutiny. A discrimination complaint under Article 14 requires concrete indications of differential treatment; mere reference to foreign nationality or ethnic minority status is insufficient (cf. consid. relevant admissibility reasoning).

Testo completo

JAAC 57.57

Déc. rendue en anglais par la Comm. eur. DH le 14 mai 1993, déclarant irrecevable la req. Nº 21840/93, Y. et cons. c / Suisse

Renvoi de requérants d'asile dont la demande a été rejetée.

Art. 3 CEDH. Aucune violation dans le cas d'un requérant d'asile turc (membre du parti des travailleurs du Kurdistan PKK) et de sa famille, qui fondaient leur grief à l'égard du renvoi uniquement sur la situation politique générale dans leur pays d'origine.

Art. 6 CEDH. Inapplicabilité du droit à un procès équitable, étant donné que la décision de renvoi n'a ni un caractère civil, ni un caractère pénal (confirmation de la jurisprudence).

Art. 8 CEDH. La question de la séparation de la famille ne se posait pas, car il était raisonnablement possible à ses membres de mener une vie de famille dans le pays d'origine.

Art. 13 CEDH. La procédure devant la Commission de recours en matière d'asile répond aux exigences de cette disposition.

Art. 14 CEDH. Aucun indice ne fonde le grief selon lequel les requerants auraient été discriminés, lors de la décision de renvoi, du fait qu'ils étaient étrangers et membres d'une minorité ethnique.

Wegweisung abgewiesener Asylbewerber.

Art. 3 EMRK. Keine Verletzung im Fall eines türkischen Asylbewerbers (Mitglied der kurdischen Arbeiterpartei PKK) und seiner Familie, deren Rüge gegen die Wegweisung lediglich auf der allgemeinen politischen Lage im Herkunftsstaat gründete.

1

Art. 6 EMRK. Keine Anwendbarkeit des Anspruchs auf ein billiges (faires) Verfahren, da die Wegweisungsverfügung weder zivil- noch strafrechtlicher Natur ist (Bestätigung der Rechtsprechung).

Art. 8 EMRK. Die Frage der Trennung der Familie stellte sich nicht, weil das Familienleben zumutbarerweise im Herkunftsstaat gelebt werden konnte.

Art. 13 EMRK. Das Verfahren vor der Asylrekurskommission genügt dieser Bestimmung.

Art. 14 EMRK. Keine Anhaltspunkte für die Begründetheit der Rüge, die Beschwerdeführer seien beim Erlass der Wegweisungsverfügung als Ausländer und Angehörige einer ethnischen Minderheit diskriminiert worden.

Allontanamento di richiedenti l'asilo la cui domanda è stata respinta.

Art. 3 CEDU. Nessuna violazione nel caso di un turco richiedente l'asilo (membro del partito dei lavoratori del Kurdistan PKK) e della sua famiglia la cui censura contro l'allontanamento era basata unicamente sulla situazione politica generale nel Paese d'origine.

Art. 6 CEDU. Inapplicabilità del diritto a un processo equo, poiché la decisione d'allontanamento non ha carattere né civile né penale (conferma della giurisprudenza).

Art. 8 CEDU. La questione della separazione della famiglia non si poneva, poiché era ragionevolmente possibile ai componenti avere una vita familiare nel Paese d'origine.

Art. 13 CEDU. La procedura davanti alla Commissione di ricorso in materia d'asilo soddisfa tale disposizione.

Art. 14 CEDU. Nessun indizio per la motivazione della censura secondo cui i richiedenti sarebbero stati discriminati, all'atto della decisione di allontanamento, in quanto stranieri e membri di una minoranza etnica.

Cette décision a été rendue en anglais. Le texte peut être:

· commandé par courrier au Greffe de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme, Conseil de l'Europe, B.P. 431 R 6, F - 67075 Strasbourg Cedex.

· ou consulté sur Internet à l'adresse http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ à l'aide d'une recherche dans HUDOC avec le nº de la req. et le type de texte (Arrêt ou Décision sur la recevabilité)

2

Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

JAAC 57.57 - Dec. rendue en anglais par la Comm. eur. DH le 14 mai 1993, déclarant irrecevable la req. Nº 21840/93, Y. et cons. c / Suisse

In

Dans In

Verwaltungspraxis der Bundesbehörden Jurisprudence des autorités administratives de la Confédération Giurisprudenza delle autorità amministrative della Confederazione

Jahr Année

1993

Anno

57

Band Volume

Volume

Seite Page

Pagina

Ref. No

150 001 856

Das Dokument wurde durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv und die Bundeskanzlei konvertiert. Le document a été digitalisé par les Archives Fédérales Suisses et la Chancellerie fédérale. Il documento è stato convertito dall'Archivio federale svizzero e della Cancelleria federale.

Parole chiave

asylumremovalinadmissibilityarticle 3article 6article 8article 13article 14discriminationfamily life

Estratto da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether removal of the Turkish asylum-seeking family would violate Article 3 ECHR because of the general political situation in Turkey.

Decisione estratta

No. The applicants relied only on the general political situation in the country of origin; this was insufficient to show a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3.

Motivazione estratta

The complaint did not establish individualized grounds showing that the applicants themselves faced a Convention-prohibited risk on return.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether Article 6 ECHR applied to the removal decision.

Decisione estratta

No. The removal decision was neither civil nor criminal in nature, so Article 6 did not apply.

Motivazione estratta

The Commission confirmed its case-law that expulsion/removal proceedings are outside the civil or criminal limbs of Article 6.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether removal would breach Article 8 ECHR by separating the family.

Decisione estratta

No. Family life could reasonably be continued in the country of origin, so no separation issue arose.

Motivazione estratta

Since the family could live together in the country of origin, the removal did not interfere with family life in a Convention-relevant way.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the asylum appeal procedure satisfied Article 13 ECHR.

Decisione estratta

Yes. The procedure before the asylum review commission met the requirements of Article 13.

Motivazione estratta

The available domestic remedy was considered effective for the purposes of the Convention provision.

Questione giuridica chiave

Whether the applicants were discriminated against under Article 14 ECHR because they were foreigners and members of an ethnic minority.

Decisione estratta

No substantiated indication of discriminatory treatment was shown.

Motivazione estratta

The file contained no elements supporting an arguable case of discrimination in the removal decision.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.