progetti

Compensation may be reduced only if accused caused proceedings

ZZ.1992.24Altro tribunale12 mar 1992

Apri la fonte

Estratto da Omnilex

Sintesi Omnilex

The Anklagekammer held that compensation for disadvantages under § 36 StPO and party compensation under § 37 StPO may be reduced or refused only on the same grounds as a costs order against the accused. Such a departure is justified only if the accused caused or worsened the investigation by reprehensible or reckless conduct. In principle, the compensation decision should follow the allocation of procedural costs. The decision is framed by §§ 36 f. StPO and Art. 6(2) ECHR.

Massima Omnilex

§§ 36 f. StPO; Art. 6 Ziff. 2 EMRK; compensation after acquittal or discontinuance of proceedings: a reduction or denial of compensation for disadvantages under § 36 StPO and of party costs under § 37 StPO is admissible only under the same conditions as a costs order against the accused. This requires culpable conduct by the accused that caused or aggravated the investigation in a reprehensible or reckless manner. As a rule, the compensation ruling follows the allocation of procedural costs (consid. 1).

Testo completo

Geschäftsnummer:** ZZ.1992.24**
Instanz:Anklagekammer
Entscheiddatum:13.03.1992
FindInfo-Nummer:O_AK.2015.4
Titel:** Entschädigung bei Freispruch oder Einstellung des Verfahrens**
Resümee:§§ 36 f. StPO; Art. 6 Ziff. 2 EMRK. Entschädigung bei Freispruch oder Einstellung des Verfahrens.
SOG 1992 Nr. 24 **§§ 36 f. StPO; Art. 6 Ziff. 2 EMRK.*Entschädigung bei Freispruch oder Einstellung des Verfahrens. Die Herabsetzung oder Verweigerung einer Entschädigung für Nachteile gemäss § 36 StPO bzw. einer Parteientschädigung gemäss § 37 StPO ist unter den gleichen Voraussetzungen zulässig, wie die Kostenauflage zu Lasten des Beschuldigten (SOG 1991 Nr. 32).Sie kommt nur in Frage, wenn der Beschuldigte die Untersuchung durch verwerfliches oder leichtfertiges Verhalten veranlasst oder erschwert hat. Das bedeutet, dass der Entscheid über die Ausrichtung von Entschädigungen gemäss § 36 f. StPO grundsätzlich demjenigen über die Tragung der Verfahrenskosten zu folgen hat (vgl. BGE 116 Ia 164 f., 115 Ia 310). * Obergericht Anklagekammer, Urteil vom 13. März 1992

Parole chiave

compensationacquittaldiscontinuanceprocedural costsreckless conductparty costs

Estratto da Omnilex

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Omnilex

Questione giuridica chiave

When may compensation for disadvantages and party costs be reduced or denied after acquittal or discontinuance?

Decisione estratta

A reduction or denial is permissible only under the same conditions as a costs order against the accused: the accused must have caused or aggravated the investigation through reprehensible or reckless conduct.

Motivazione estratta

The court held that decisions on compensation under §§ 36 f. StPO should in principle follow the allocation of procedural costs. The cited case law and Art. 6(2) ECHR support that compensation cannot be withheld merely because proceedings ended without conviction; a restrictive standard applies.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.