progetti

Mandatory coverage of hospital rehabilitation after acute illness

ATA/126/1997Corte di giustizia / Camera amministrativa18 feb 1997Granted

Apri la fonte

Sintesi

The insured was hospitalized following an infarction and then underwent a rehabilitation stay of more than four months at Beau-Séjour. The court held that because the rehabilitation treatment followed immediately after hospitalization for an acute illness, it had to be borne by the compulsory health insurance under LAMA art. 12 para. 2. The insurer was therefore ordered to assume the costs of the stay.

Regest

LAMA art. 12 para. 2; hospital rehabilitation immediately following treatment for an acute illness is compulsory coverage. A rehabilitation stay that is the direct and immediate continuation of acute hospital treatment falls within the mandatory benefits of health insurance and must be borne by the caisse-maladie; the decisive factor is the close temporal and medical connection with the acute episode, not the duration of the rehabilitation stay.

Testo completo

Descripteurs

ASSURANCE SOCIALE; AM; SEJOUR A L'HOPITAL; MESURE MEDICALE DE READAPTATION; INFARCTUS; PRESTATION OBLIGATOIRE; ASSU

Normes

LAMA.12 al.2

Résumé

- Un traitement hospitalier de rééducation qui suit immédiatement une hospitalisation pour maladie aiguë est obligatoirement à la charge des caisses-maladie (application de la LAMA).

- La caisse-maladie a été condamnée à prendre en charge une hospitalisation de plus de 4 mois à Beau-Séjour, lequel faisait suite à un infarctus.

Parole chiave

social insurancehealth insurancehospital rehabilitationacute illnessmyocardial infarctionmandatory coverage