Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the appeal met the formal requirements of Art. 42 LTF.
Decisione estratta
No. The filing did not state admissible conclusions or a sufficient explanation of why the challenged judgment was unlawful.
Motivazione estratta
The appellant merely expressed disagreement with the lower court and referred to an accident, treatment, and continuing sequelae. This did not show any factual error under Art. 97(1) LTF or any violation of law.