Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the complaint against the refusal to open criminal proceedings was sufficiently reasoned under the Federal Supreme Court Act.
Decisione estratta
The complaint did not explain, in a legally cognizable way, how the refusal to open proceedings violated federal law; the reasoning requirements were not met.
Motivazione estratta
The marginal notes on the contested decision did not show any violation within the meaning of Art. 95 BGG. Therefore the complaint was inadmissible under the summary non-entry procedure.