Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the filing met the Federal Supreme Court's representation and reasoning requirements.
Decisione estratta
The submission could be considered despite the defective authorization issue, because the appellant had signed it himself; however, it did not address the formal grounds of the challenged decision and therefore failed the reasoning requirements.
Motivazione estratta
The purported representative lacked authority under Art. 40(1) BGG, but the appellant's own signature cured the filing. On the merits, the complaint did not engage with the formal reasons for the lower court's non-entry, so it did not satisfy Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG and could not be examined under Art. 108 BGG.