Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the federal complaint met the reasoning requirements for admissibility.
Decisione estratta
The complaint did not address the cantonal court's reasoning and therefore failed to satisfy the statutory reasoning requirements.
Motivazione estratta
The appellant merely repeated his own view about service and time limits, but did not engage with the lower court's reasons as required by Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG.