Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the subsidary constitutional complaint was admissible despite lacking comprehensible reasoning against the cantonal court's grounds.
Decisione estratta
The complaint was inadmissible because it did not contain comprehensible reasoning and did not meet the statutory motivation requirements.
Motivazione estratta
The filing failed to address the cantonal court's reasoning and thus did not satisfy Art. 117 and Art. 106(2) LTF; the matter was manifestly inadmissible and could be decided in simplified procedure.