Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the subsidiary constitutional appeal complied with the federal reasoning requirements
Decisione estratta
It did not: the appellant alleged no constitutional violation and failed to show clearly and precisely which constitutional right was breached and why.
Motivazione estratta
Because the appeal did not engage with the reasoning of the challenged cantonal decision and contained no substantiated constitutional complaint, it did not satisfy Arts. 116, 117 and 106(2) LTF; simplified inadmissibility applied.