Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the federal appeal met the reasoning requirements for challenging provisional marital measures.
Decisione estratta
No. The appellant did not address the cantonal reasoning and failed to show any constitutional violation.
Motivazione estratta
Protective measures of the marital union are provisional measures under Art. 98 LTF; before the Federal Supreme Court only constitutional rights may be invoked. The appeal contained no specific constitutional criticism and therefore lacked the substantiated reasoning required by Arts. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF.