Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the state constitutional complaint met the reasoning requirements of Art. 90 para. 1 lit. b OG
Decisione estratta
No. The complaint did not address the reasons given in the cantonal decisions and failed to explain in a constitutionally sufficient way why they were allegedly unlawful.
Motivazione estratta
The Federal Supreme Court reviews only clearly and specifically raised constitutional claims; unsubstantiated objections and mere appellate criticism are inadmissible. The submissions contained no proper challenge to the April 2 and April 18, 2002 decisions.