Questione giuridica chiave
Whether the Federal Supreme Court judgment required clarification under Art. 129 BGG
Decisione estratta
The request was inadmissible in substance because the applicant merely sought the Court's view on his interpretation of the judgment, not clarification of an unclear, contradictory, incomplete, or mistaken dispositive.
Motivazione estratta
Art. 129 para. 1 BGG allows clarification only for ambiguity, inconsistency, incompleteness, or drafting/calculation errors in the dispositive. The request did not allege such defects.