BGE 1 I 285•Federal Court lacks jurisdiction over trade-regulation complaint
BGE 1 I 285Raccolta ufficiale del Tribunale federale (DTF) / Volume I4 set 1875Inadmissible
Estratto da Omnilex
The appellant challenged a Bern administrative decision imposing the minimum fine for a fire-insurance-related matter, invoking constitutional freedom of trade and commerce. The Federal Court held that the dispute was an administrative controversy assigned to the Federal Council under the applicable constitutional and organizational provisions. Because the matter did not fall within the Federal Court's jurisdiction, the complaint was not entered into.
Art. 113 Abs. 2 BV; Art. 59 Abs. 2 Ziff. 3 OG; administrative disputes concerning trade and commerce are assigned to the Federal Council and not to the Federal Court. A constitutional reference to freedom of trade and commerce does not, by itself, create Federal Court jurisdiction where the contested measure remains a public-law administrative dispute within the competence of the Federal Council. The Federal Court therefore declares itself incompetent and does not enter into the complaint (consid. 1-2).
XIII. Competenz der Bundesbehrerden. No 71 u. 72. 285 getid)t "mefd) 1.1erben ,)on 115ti ,)aten eber stcrnorationen 'betteffenb erfelJung berjenigen 9ted)te, 1.1efd)e innen burd) Me munbeg .. ,)erfaffung ge 1.1lint(eiftet finb/ nur unter im oraugfelJung, ba biefe mefd) 1.1erben gegen etfügungen tantonaler menörben ge tid)tet finb. :lJiefe otaunfelJung ttifft im 1)0rHegenben %affe nid)t Ut inbem bie mefd) 1.1erbe gegen bie o1ftifd)en munbegbenötben ge .. tid)tet ift. :lJemnad) at ba munbeßgetid)t edannt: SUuf bie mefd) 1.1erbe 1.1itb mange1g stOnt1 etenA beg munbe .. geriel)teg nid)t eingetreten. 2. Des Bundesrathes. -Du Conseil federal. Vergl. N° 68, 69, 70 u. 89. 72. UttneH I)om 4. Sentember 1875 tn Sad)en mafd). A. 9teturrent atte fein ebiiube 'bei ber %euetl)erfid)erungg", gefefffd)aft g;,eluetia in St. affen gegen %euerfd)aben uerfid)ert unb 1.1urbe beÜ 1.1egen I)Qm 9thf)teramte mter geftüljt auf SUtt. ) beg beruifd)en 'l etrete ,lom 11. 'l embet 1852 betreffenb mranb ,)etfid)uung ber g;,iiufer, 1.1e d)eg bie SUufnanme i)on e bäuben in eine frembe mtanbaffefuranöimfta t unter %olge ber Ungüftigfeit beg merttageg unb einet mUße ,)on 40-400 ffr. unterlagt, burel) rfenntniß bom 5. Suni b. S. mit bemIDlinimum bief er mUße belegt. B. Ueber biefeg rfenntniß beid) 1.1ett fiel) mlßfel) nun unb .letXangt, baß erfannt 1.1etbe, b.er . 5 beg er 1.1iinnten 'l ehet ftene im iberfnruel)e mit ber neuen munbegi)erfaffung unb fet bemgemäb bag Uttljei beg 9tid)teramteg mter, 1.1eH ein tonft! tutioneffeg .9teel)t ,)erfelJenb, u taffixen. ,Sur megrünbung bief megenteng beruft fid) 9tefurrent barauf, bab burd) SUd. 31 ber neuen munbeguerfaffung bie %reineit beg g;,anbelg unb ber e
86 I. Abschnitt. Bundesverfassung. werbe im gan!en Umfange ber ibgenoffenfa,aft gewetl;tleiftet unb bamit aua, ba metfia,erunggroefen )on ben effe n be Wlononolg frei geworben fet c. 1)ie ffi.egierung )on metn beantragt m:'6roeifung ber me ra,roerbe, roeil ber egenftanb berfelßen nia,t in bie stomnetenö i)eß munbenge1!ia,teg, fonbern be munbeßratneß falle. 1)ag munbeggeria,t 6iel t in rroägung:
Estratto da Omnilex
Whether the Federal Court had jurisdiction to hear the complaint against the cantonal authority's decision.
The Federal Court lacked jurisdiction and did not enter into the complaint.
Claims based on freedom of trade and commerce did not remove the matter from the competence assigned to the Federal Council for administrative disputes under the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions.
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.