us-irs-announcements-irb-2020-23-pdf•Internal Revenue Bulletin 2020-23 (PDF rendition): IRS Announcements
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2020-23 (PDF rendition): IRS Announcements
us-irs-announcements-irb-2020-23-pdfInternal Revenue Bulletin 2020-23 (PDF rendition): IRS AnnouncementsGuidance
Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.
Bulletin No. 2020–23 June 1, 2020 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations. EMPLOYEE PLANS Notice 2020-37, page 900. This notice sets forth updates on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, the corresponding spot segment rates for May 2020 used under § 417(e)(3)(D), the 24-month average segment rates applicable for May 2020, and the 30-year Treasury rates, as reflected by the application of § 430(h)(2)(C)(iv). INCOME TAX T.D. 9897, page 882. This document contains final regulations regarding the treatment of certain interests in corporations as stock or indebtedness. The final regulations generally affect corporations, including those that are partners of certain partnerships, when those corporations or partnerships issue purported indebtedness to related corporations or partnerships. Notice 2020-38, page 903. This notice provides the inflation adjustment factors and reference prices for calendar year 2020 that are used to determine the availability of the renewable electricity pro- duction credit, the refined coal production credit, and the Indian coal production credit under section 45. The notice also provides the credit amounts for calendar year 2020 under section 45. Rev. Proc. 2020-15, page 905. This revenue procedure updates and supersedes Rev. Proc. 2019-23 by providing an updated list of countries with which the United States has in force an information exchange agreement, such that bank deposit interest paid to residents of such countries must be reported by payors to the extent required under Treas. Reg. §§1.6049-8(a) and 1.6049-4(b)(5). This revenue procedure adds one country, Singapore, to this list. REG-104591-18, page 911. The proposed regulations provide guidance under amend- ed section 162(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), concerning the deduction of certain fines, penalties, and other amounts, and guidance concerning the information reporting requirements, under new section 6050X of the Code, with respect to respect to those fines, penalties, and other amounts. The proposed regulations affect taxpayers that pay or incur amounts to, or at the direction of, govern- ments or governmental entities in relation to the violation of a law or investigations or inquiries by governments or governmental entities into the potential violation of a law. The proposed regulations also affect governments or gov- ernmental entities subject to the related reporting require- ment. In general, the amendments to section 162(f) and new section 6050X apply to amounts paid or incurred on or after December 22, 2017. TAX CONVENTIONS Announcement 2020-6, page 911. This announcement provides the Treasury Department and IRS view on the interpretation of references to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) once that agree- ment is replaced by the Agreement between the United States Canada and Mexico (the USMCA). Once the USMCA goes into force, the Treasury Department and IRS will inter- pret any references to NAFTA in a U.S. income tax treaty as a reference to the USMCA. Finding Lists begin on page ii. The IRS Mission Provide America’s taxpayers top-quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and en- force the law with integrity and fairness to all. Introduction The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing of- ficial rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly. It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub- stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, modify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless other- wise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters of inter- nal management are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published. Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rul- ings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements. Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same. The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows: Part I.—1986 Code. This part includes rulings and decisions based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A, Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Legislation and Related Committee Reports. Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Secretary (Enforcement). Part IV.—Items of General Interest. This part includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar- ment and suspension lists, and announcements. The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index for the matters published during the preceding months. These monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period. The contents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate. June 1, 2020 Bulletin No. 2020–23 Part I 26 CFR 1.385-1; 26 CFR 1.385-3; 26 CFR 1.385- 4T.D. 9897 T.D. 9897 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 The Treatment of Certain Interests in Corporations as Stock or Indebtedness AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations. SUMMARY: This document contains fi- nal regulations regarding the treatment of certain interests in corporations as stock or indebtedness. The final regulations gen- erally affect corporations, including those that are partners of certain partnerships, when those corporations or partnerships issue purported indebtedness to related corporations or partnerships. DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective on May 14, 2020. Applicability dates: For dates of appli- cability, see §§1.385-3(j)(1) and (k) and 1.385-4(g). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CON- TACT: Azeka J. Abramoff or D. Peter Merkel of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International) at (202) 317-6938 or Jeremy Aron-Dine of the Office of As- sociate Chief Counsel (Corporate) at (202) 317-6848 (not toll-free numbers). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background I. Overview Section 385 authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary) to prescribe rules to determine whether an interest in a corporation is treated as stock or in- debtedness (or as in part stock and in part indebtedness). On October 21, 2016, the Treasury Department and the IRS pub- lished T.D. 9790 in the Federal Register (81 FR 72858), which included final reg- ulations under section 385 and temporary regulations under section 385 (2016 Final Regulations and Temporary Regulations, respectively, and together, the 2016 Reg- ulations). On the same date, the Treasury Department and the IRS also published a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG- 130314-16) in the Federal Register (81 FR 72751) (2016 Proposed Regulations) by cross-reference to the Temporary Reg- ulations, which included §§1.385-3T and 1.385-4T. Technical corrections to the 2016 Regulations were published in the Federal Register (82 FR 8169) on Janu- ary 24, 2017. The 2016 Regulations and the 2016 Proposed Regulations address the clas- sification of certain related-party debt as stock or indebtedness (or as in part stock and in part indebtedness) for U.S. Feder- al income tax purposes. The 2016 Final Regulations included documentation rules set forth in §1.385-2 (the Documentation Regulations). The 2016 Regulations also included §§1.385-3, 1.385-3T, and 1.385- 4T, which treat certain indebtedness as stock that is issued by a corporation to a controlling shareholder in a distribution or in another related-party transaction that achieves an economically similar result (the Distribution Regulations). The Distri- bution Regulations apply to taxable years ending on or after January 19, 2017. The Temporary Regulations set forth rules regarding the treatment under the Distribution Regulations of certain qual- ified short-term debt instruments, trans- actions involving controlled partnerships, and transactions involving consolidated groups. The Temporary Regulations apply to taxable years ending on or after Janu- ary 19, 2017. The Temporary Regulations expired on October 13, 2019. See section 7805(e); §1.385-3T(l); §1.385-4T(h). The 2016 Proposed Regulations are proposed to apply to taxable years ending on or after January 19, 2017. The pre- amble to the 2016 Regulations request- ed comments on all aspects of the Tem- porary Regulations, and the preamble to the 2016 Proposed Regulations requested comments on all aspects of the 2016 Pro- posed Regulations. REG-130314-16, 81 FR 72751, 72858 (October 21, 2016). The preamble to the 2016 Regulations also re- quested comments on certain aspects of the exception for qualified short-term debt instruments. On October 28, 2019, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2019-58, 2019-44 I.R.B. 1022, which announced that, following the expiration of the Temporary Regulations, a taxpay- er may rely on the 2016 Proposed Reg- ulations until further notice is given in the Federal Register, provided that the taxpayer consistently applies the rules in the 2016 Proposed Regulations in their entirety. On November 4, 2019, the Trea- sury Department and the IRS published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (84 FR 59318) (the ANPRM), which announced that the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to propose more streamlined and targeted Distribution Regulations. The ANPRM also obsoleted Notice 2019-58 and an- nounced that a taxpayer may rely on the 2016 Proposed Regulations until further notice is given in the Federal Register, provided that the taxpayer consistently ap- plies the rules in the 2016 Proposed Reg- ulations in their entirety. This Treasury decision finalizes the 2016 Proposed Reg- ulations without any substantive change (the 2020 Final Regulations). II. Executive Order 13789 Executive Order 13789 (E.O. 13789), issued on April 21, 2017, instructed the Secretary to review all significant tax reg- ulations issued on or after January 1, 2016, and to take concrete action to alleviate the burdens of regulations that (i) impose an undue financial burden on U.S. taxpayers; (ii) add undue complexity to the Feder- al tax laws; or (iii) exceed the statutory authority of the IRS. E.O. 13789 further instructed the Secretary to submit to the President within 60 days a report (First Report) that identifies regulations that meet these criteria. The First Report, No- tice 2017-38, 2017-30 I.R.B. 147, which June 1, 2020 882 Bulletin No. 2020–23 was published on July 24, 2017, included the 2016 Regulations in a list of eight reg- ulations identified by the Secretary in the First Report as meeting at least one of the first two criteria specified in E.O. 13789. E.O. 13789 further instructed the Sec- retary to submit to the President a report (Second Report) that recommended spe- cific actions to mitigate the burden im- posed by regulations identified in the First Report. On October 16, 2017, the Secre- tary published in the Federal Register the Second Report (82 FR 48013), which stated that (i) the Treasury Department and the IRS were considering a proposal to revoke the Documentation Regulations as issued and (ii) the Treasury Depart- ment will reassess the distribution regu- lations in light of impending tax reform, and the Treasury Department and the IRS may then propose more streamlined and targeted regulations. On September 24, 2018, the Treasury Department and the IRS published proposed regulations in the Federal Register that proposed removal of the Documentation Regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations. See 83 FR 48265 (September 24, 2018) (2018 Proposed Regulations). On November 4, 2019, the Treasury Department and the IRS published T.D. 9880 in the Federal Register (84 FR 59297), which finalized without change the proposed regulations removing the Documentation Regulations. In response to E.O. 13789 and the 2018 Proposed Regulations, several comments recommended that the Treasury Depart- ment and the IRS revoke the Distribution Regulations in addition to the Documen- tation Regulations, while one comment recommended that the Treasury Depart- ment and the IRS issue more streamlined and targeted Distribution Regulations. The ANPRM stated that the Treasury De- partment and the IRS are cognizant that a complete withdrawal of the Distribution Regulations could restore incentives for multinational corporations to generate ad- ditional interest deductions without new investment. Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS determined that the Distribution Regulations continue to be necessary at this time. The ANPRM also announced that the Treasury Depart- ment and the IRS intend to propose more streamlined and targeted Distribution Regulations. The 2016 Proposed Regulations cross-reference the Temporary Regula- tions, a part of the Distribution Regula- tions, which expired on October 13, 2019. Because of the general determination that the Distribution Regulations continue to be necessary at this time, the Treasury De- partment and the IRS are issuing the 2020 Final Regulations, which finalize the 2016 Proposed Regulations, while the Treasury Department and the IRS study the appro- priate approach to revising the Distribution Regulations, as discussed in the ANPRM. III. The Distribution Regulations Under the Distribution Regulations’ general rule, the issuance of a debt instru- ment by a member of an expanded group to another member of the same expanded group in a distribution, or an economically similar acquisition transaction, may result in the treatment of the debt instrument as stock. See §1.385-3(b)(2). The Distribu- tion Regulations also include a funding rule that treats as stock a debt instrument that is issued as part of a series of trans- actions that achieves a result similar to a general rule transaction. See §1.385-3(b) (3)(i). Specifically, §1.385-3(b) treats as stock a debt instrument that was issued in exchange for property, including cash, to fund a distribution to an expanded group member or another acquisition transac- tion that achieves an economically similar result. Id. Furthermore, the Distribution Regulations include a per se rule, which treats a debt instrument as funding a dis- tribution to an expanded group member or other acquisition transaction with a simi- lar economic effect if it was issued in ex- change for property during the period be- ginning 36 months before and ending 36 months after the issuer of the debt instru- ment made the distribution or undertook an acquisition transaction with a similar economic effect. See §1.385-3(b)(3)(iii). The Distribution Regulations also include several exceptions limiting their scope. See, e.g., §1.385-3(c). The Distribution Regulations general- ly apply to transactions among members of an expanded group of corporations, which is generally defined by reference to the term “affiliated group” in section 1504(a), with several modifications, such as including foreign corporations in the expanded group. See §1.385-1(c)(4). The Distribution Regulations also generally apply only to “covered debt instruments” that are issued by “covered members” oth- er than certain regulated financial compa- nies and regulated insurance companies. See §1.385-3(g)(3)(i). A covered member is a member of an expanded group that is a domestic corporation. See §1.385-1(c)(2). A covered debt instrument is generally a debt instrument that is issued after April 4, 2016, other than certain excluded spe- cialized debt instruments. See §1.385-3(g) (3). In addition to these scope limitations, the funding rule also excludes qualified short-term debt instruments, as defined in §1.385-3(b)(3)(vii). See §1.385-3(b)(3)(i). Summary of Comments The Treasury Department and the IRS have not received any comments specifi- cally in response to the Temporary Regu- lations or the 2016 Proposed Regulations. Accordingly, the 2016 Proposed Regu- lations are adopted as final regulations without any substantive change. In addi- tion, the Temporary Regulations are with- drawn. Comments on the 2016 Regula- tions that are not specific to the particular matters addressed in the Temporary Regu- lations or the 2016 Proposed Regulations are beyond the scope of this rulemaking and are not addressed in this preamble. Pursuant to E.O. 13789 and the AN- PRM, the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to issue proposed regulations modifying the Distribution Regulations to make them more streamlined and targeted, including by withdrawing the per se rule. In connection with the intended revisions, the Treasury Department and the IRS con- tinue to study all appropriate modifica- tions to the Distribution Regulations. Applicability Dates The amendments to §1.385-3, other than §1.385-3(f)(4)(iii), apply to tax- able years ending after January 19, 2017. Sections 1.385-3(f)(4)(iii) and 1.385-4 provide rules applicable to members of consolidated groups and are issued under section 1502. Section 1503(a) provides in general, that in any case in which a con- solidated return is made or is required to be made, the tax shall be determined, Bulletin No. 2020–23 883 June 1, 2020 June 1, 2020 884 Bulletin No. 2020–23 computed, assessed, collected, and ad- justed in accordance with the regulations under section 1502 prescribed before the last day prescribed by law for the filing of such return. Thus, §§1.385-3(f)(4)(iii) and 1.385-4 apply to taxable years for which the U.S. Federal income tax return is due, without extensions, after May 14, 2020. The Temporary Regulations apply to taxable years ending on or after Janu- ary 19, 2017, and before their expiration on October 13, 2019. For rules applying §§1.385-3T(f)(4)(iii) and 1.385-4T to taxable years ending on or after January 19, 2017 and for which the U.S. Federal income tax return was due, without ex- tensions, on or before May 14, 2020, see §§1.385-3T and 1.385-4T (as contained in 26 CFR in part 1 revised as of April 1, 2019). The provisions in the Temporary Regulations and the corresponding pro- visions in the 2020 Final Regulations are substantially identical. For certain taxable years for which the U.S. Federal income tax return was due, without extensions, on or before May 14, 2020, there may be a period after October 13, 2019, to which neither §§1.385-3T(f) (4)(iii) and 1.385-4T nor §§1.385-3(f)(4) (iii) and 1.385-4 apply. The 2020 Final Regulations allow a taxpayer to choose to apply §§1.385-3(f)(4)(iii), 1.385-4, or both to such period, provided that all members of the expanded group apply that section or sections. Accordingly, a taxpayer can choose to apply the 2020 Final Regulations to the period, if any, to which neither the Temporary Regulations nor the 2020 Final Regulations apply. Special Analyses I. Regulatory Planning and Review — Economic Analysis These regulations are not subject to re- view under section 6(b) of Executive Or- der 12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (April 11, 2018) between the Treasury Department and the Office of Management and Budget regarding re- view of tax regulations. II. Paperwork Reduction Act These regulations do not establish a new collection of information nor modi- fy an existing collection that requires the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). III. Regulatory Flexibility Act Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6), it is hereby cer- tified that the 2020 Final Regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Section 1.385-3 provides that certain interests in a corporation that are held by a member of the corporation’s expand- ed group and that otherwise would be treated as indebtedness for Federal tax purposes are treated as stock. The regu- lations under Section 1.385-3 finalized in the 2020 Final Regulations provide that for certain debt instruments issued by a controlled partnership, the holder is deemed to transfer all or a portion of the debt instrument to the partner or partners in the partnership in exchange for stock in the partner or partners. Section 1.385- 4 provides rules regarding the application of §1.385-3 to members of a consolidated group. Section 1.385-3 includes multiple exceptions that limit its application. In particular, the threshold exception pro- vides that the first $50 million of expand- ed group debt instruments that otherwise would be reclassified as stock or deemed to be transferred to a partner in a con- trolled partnership under §1.385-3 will not be reclassified or deemed transferred under §1.385-3. Although it is possible that the classification rules in the 2020 Final Regulations could have an effect on small entities, the threshold exception of the first $50 million of debt instruments otherwise subject to recharacterization or deemed transfer under §§1.385-3 and 1.385-4 makes it unlikely that a substan- tial number of small entities will be af- fected by these provisions. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the proposed regulations preced- ing these final regulations were submit- ted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on small busi- ness. No comments were received con- cerning the economic impact on small entities from the Small Business Admin- istration. IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Section 202 of the Unfunded Man- dates Reform Act of 1995 requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take certain other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a state, local, or tribal government, in the ag- gregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. This rule does not include any Federal mandate that may result in expenditures by state, local, or tribal gov- ernments, or by the private sector in ex- cess of that threshold. V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism Executive Order 13132 (entitled “Federalism”) prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on state and local governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive order. This final rule does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive order. Statement of Availability of IRS Documents IRS Notices and other guidance cit- ed in this preamble are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and are avail- able from the Superintendent of Doc- uments, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website at http://www. irs.gov. Drafting Information The principal authors of these final regulations are Azeka J. Abramoff and D. Peter Merkel of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). Howev- er, other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated in their development. Bulletin No. 2020–23 885 June 1, 2020 List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes, Reporting and record- keeping requirements. Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amend- ed as follows: PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by removing the entries for §§1.385-3T and 1.385-4T and adding an entry for §1.385-4 in numerical order to read in part as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * * * * * * Section 1.385-4 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 385 and 1502. * * * * * §1.385-1 [Amended] Par. 2. Section 1.385-1 is amended by: 1. In paragraph (c)(4)(vii), designating Examples 1 through 4 as paragraphs (c)(4) (vii)(A) through (D), respectively. 2. In newly designated paragraphs (c) (4)(vii)(A) through (D), redesignating the paragraphs in the first column as the para- graphs in the second column: Old paragraphsNew paragraphs (c)(4)(vii)(A)(i) and (ii) (c)(4)(vii)(A)(1) and (2) (c)(4)(vii)(B)(i) and (ii) (c)(4)(vii)(B)(1) and (2) (c)(4)(vii)(C)(i) and (ii) (c)(4)(vii)(C)(1) and (2) (c)(4)(vii)(D)(i) and (ii) (c)(4)(vii)(D)(1) and (2) 3. Revise the last sentence of newly re- designated paragraph (c)(4)(vii)(B)(1). 4. In newly designated paragraphs (c)(4)(vii)(C)(2) and (c)(4)(vii)(D)(2), redesignating the paragraphs in the first column as the paragraphs in the second column: Old paragraphsNew paragraphs (c)(4)(vii)(C)(2) (A) and (B) (c)(4)(vii)(C)(2)(i) and (ii) (c)(4)(vii)(D)(2) (A) through (C) (c)(4)(vii)(D)(2)(i) through (iii) 5. For each paragraph listed in the ta- ble, remove the language in the “Remove” column wherever it appears and add in its place the language in the “Add” column as set forth below: ParagraphRemoveAdd (a)1.385-4T1.385-4 (c) introductory text1.385-4T(e)1.385-4(e) (c)(4)(i) introductory text corporations described in sec- tion 1504(b)(8) S corporations (c)(4)(i) introductory text not described in section 1504(b) (6) or (b)(8) (an expanded group parent) that is not an S corporation or a regulated investment company or a real estate investment trust subject to tax under subchapter M of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code (a RIC or a REIT, respectively) (such common parent corporation, an expanded group parent) (c)(4)(vii) introducto- ry text described in section 1504(b)(6) or (b)(8) an S corporation, a RIC, or a REIT (c)(4)(vii)(B)(2) P is a real estate investment trust described in section 1504(b)(6) P is a REIT (c)(4)(vii)(B)(2) Although S2 is a corporation de- scribed in section 1504(b)(6), a corporation described in section 1504(b)(6) may Although S2 is a corporation that is a REIT, a REIT may (c)(4)(vii)(D)(1)Example 3paragraph (c)(4)(vii)(C)(1) of this section (Example 3) (d)(1)(iv)(A)1.385-3T(d)(4)1.385-3(d)(4) (d)(1)(iv)(B)1.385-3T(f)(4)1.385-3(f)(4) The revision reads as follows: §1.385-1 General provisions. * * * * * (c) * * * (4) * * * (vii) * * * (B) * * * (1) * * * Both P and S2 are REITs. * * * * * Par. 3. Section 1.385-3 is amended by: 1. Revising the section heading. 2. For each paragraph listed in the ta- ble, remove the language in the “Remove” column wherever it appears and add in its place the language in the “Add” column as set forth below: June 1, 2020 886 Bulletin No. 2020–23 ParagraphRemoveAdd (a)1.385-4T1.385-4 (b)(4) introductory text1.385-3T1.385-3 (b)(4)(i) introductory text1.385-3T1.385-3 (b)(4)(i)(E)1.385-3T(k)(2)1.385-3(k)(2) (b)(4)(ii) introductory text1.385-3T1.385-3 (b)(4)(ii)(D)1.385-4T1.385-4 (c)(1)1.385-3T(f)1.385-3(f) (c)(2)(i)(C)1.385-3T1.385-3 (c)(2)(iv)1.385-3T(f)(2)1.385-3(f)(2) (c)(2)(v)(B)1.385-3T(d)(4)1.385-3(d)(4) (c)(2)(v)(C)1.385-3T(f)(4) or (5)1.385-3(f)(4) or (5) (c)(3)(i)(C)(4) 1.385-3T(f)(4)(i)1.385-3(f)(4)(i) (c)(3)(ii)(D)(6) 1.385-3T1.385-3 (d)(2)(ii)(A)1.385-4T(c)(2)1.385-4(c)(2) (d)(2)(ii)(B)1.385-3T(f)(5)(i)1.385-3(f)(5)(i) (d)(7)(ii)1.385-3T(d)(4)1.385-3(d)(4) (g) introductory text1.385-3T and 1.385-4T1.385-3 and 1.385-4 (g)(3)(iii)(D)1.385-3T1.385-3 (j)(2)(i)1.385-1, 1.385-3T, and 1.385-4T1.385-1, 1.385-3, and 1.385-4 (j)(2)(ii)1.385-1, 1.385-3T, and 1.385-4T1.385-1, 1.385-3, and 1.385-4 (j)(2)(v)1.385-1, 1.385-3, 1.385-3T, and 1.385-4T1.385-1, 1.385-3, and 1.385-4 3. Revising paragraphs (b)(3)(vii), (d)(4), (f), and (g)(5) through (8), (15) through (17), (22), and (23). 4. In paragraph (h)(3), designating Ex- amples 1 through 19 as paragraphs (h)(3) (i) through (xix), respectively. 5. In newly designated paragraphs (h)(3)(i) through (xi), redesignating the paragraphs in the first column as the para- graphs in the second column: Old paragraphsNew paragraphs (h)(3)(i)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(i)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(ii)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(ii)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(iii)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(iii)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(iv)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(iv)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(v)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(v)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(vi)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(vi)(A) and (B) Old paragraphsNew paragraphs (h)(3)(vii)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(vii)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(viii)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(viii)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(ix)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(ix)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(x)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(x)(A) and (B) (h)(3)(xi)(i) and (ii)(h)(3)(xi)(A) and (B) 6. In newly designated paragraphs (h) (3)(ii)(B), (h)(3)(iii)(B), (h)(3)(vi)(B), (h)(3)(vii)(B), (h)(3)(viii)(B), (h)(3)(ix) (B), and (h)(3)(x)(B), redesignating the paragraphs in the first column as the para- graphs in the second column: Old paragraphs (h)(3)(ii)(B)(A) New paragraphs (h)(3)(ii)(B)(1) and and (B) (2) Old paragraphsNew paragraphs (h)(3)(iii)(B)(A) (h)(3)(iii)(B)(1) and and (B) (2) (h)(3)(vi)(B)(A) (h)(3)(vi)(B)(1) and and (B) (2) (h)(3)(vii)(B)(A) (h)(3)(vii)(B)(1) and (B) and (2) (h)(3)(viii)(B)(A) (h)(3)(viii)(B)(1) through (F) through (6) (h)(3)(ix)(B)(A) (h)(3)(ix)(B)(1) and and (B) (2) (h)(3)(x)(B)(A) (h)(3)(x)(B)(1) through (C) through (3) 7. For each newly designated para- graph listed in the table, remove the lan- guage in the “Remove” column wherever it appears and add in its place the language in the “Add” column as set forth below: ParagraphRemoveAdd (h)(3)(v)(A) Example 4 of this paragraph (h)(3)paragraph (h)(3)(iv)(A) of this section (Example 4) (h)(3)(v)(B) Example 4 of this paragraph (h)(3)paragraph (h)(3)(iv)(B) of this section (Example 4) (h)(3)(vii)(A) Example 6 of this paragraph (h)(3)paragraph (h)(3)(vi)(A) of this section (Example 6) Bulletin No. 2020–23 887 June 1, 2020 8. Revising newly designated para- graphs (h)(3)(xii) through (xix) and para- graph (j)(1). 9. Adding paragraphs (j)(3) and (k). The revisions and additions read as fol- lows: §1.385-3 Certain distributions of debt instruments and similar transactions. * * * * * (b) * * * (3) * * * (vii) Qualified short-term debt instru- ment. The term qualified short-term debt instrument means a covered debt instru- ment that is described in paragraphs (b)(3) (vii)(A) through (D) of this section. (A) Short-term funding arrangement. A covered debt instrument is described in this paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A) if the re- quirements of the specified current assets test described in paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A) (1) of this section or the 270-day test de- scribed in paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A)(2) of this section (the alternative tests) are sat- isfied, provided that an issuer may only claim the benefit of one of the alternative tests with respect to covered debt instru- ments issued by the issuer in the same tax- able year. (1) Specified current assets test—(i) In general. The requirements of this para- graph (b)(3)(vii)(A)(1) are satisfied with respect to a covered debt instrument if the requirement of paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A) (1)(ii) of this section is satisfied, but only to the extent the requirement of paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A)(1)(iii) of this section is sat- isfied. (ii) Maximum interest rate. The rate of interest charged with respect to the cov- ered debt instrument does not exceed an arm’s length interest rate, as determined under section 482 and §§ 1.482-1 through 1.482-9, that would be charged with re- spect to a comparable debt instrument of the issuer with a term that does not exceed the longer of 90 days and the issuer’s nor- mal operating cycle. (iii) Maximum outstanding balance. The amount owed by the issuer under cov- ered debt instruments issued to members of the issuer’s expanded group that satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(3)(vii) (A)(1)(ii), (b)(3)(vii)(A)(2) (if the cov- ered debt instrument was issued in a prior taxable year), or (b)(3)(vii)(B) or (C) of this section immediately after the covered debt instrument is issued does not exceed the maximum of the amounts of specified current assets reasonably expected to be reflected, under applicable accounting principles, on the issuer’s balance sheet as a result of transactions in the ordinary course of business during the subsequent 90–day period or the issuer’s normal op- erating cycle, whichever is longer. For purposes of the preceding sentence, in the case of an issuer that is a qualified cash pool header, the amount owed by the issu- er shall not take into account deposits de- scribed in paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(D) of this section. Additionally, the amount owed by any issuer shall be reduced by the amount of the issuer’s deposits with a qualified cash pool header, but only to the extent of amounts borrowed from the same quali- fied cash pool header that satisfy the re- quirements of paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A)(2) (if the covered debt instrument was issued in a prior taxable year) or (b)(3)(vii)(A)(1) (ii) of this section. (iv) Specified current assets. For pur- poses of paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A)(1)(iii) of this section, the term specified current assets means assets that are reasonably expected to be realized in cash or sold (including by being incorporated into in- ventory that is sold) during the normal operating cycle of the issuer, other than cash, cash equivalents, and assets that are reflected on the books and records of a qualified cash pool header. (v) Normal operating cycle. For pur- poses of paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A)(1) of this section, the term normal operating cycle means the issuer’s normal operating cycle as determined under applicable account- ing principles, except that if the issuer has no single clearly defined normal operating cycle, then the normal operating cycle is determined based on a reasonable analysis of the length of the operating cycles of the multiple businesses and their sizes relative to the overall size of the issuer. (vi) Applicable accounting principles. For purposes of paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A) (1) of this section, the term applicable accounting principles means the financial accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or an international financial accounting standard, that is ap- plicable to the issuer in preparing its finan- cial statements, computed on a consistent basis. (2) 270-day test—(i) In general. A cov- ered debt instrument is described in this paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A)(2) if the require- ments of paragraphs (b)(3)(vii)(A)(2)(ii) through (iv) of this section are satisfied. (ii) Maximum term and interest rate. The covered debt instrument must have a term of 270 days or less or be an advance under a revolving credit agreement or similar arrangement and must bear a rate of interest that does not exceed an arm’s length interest rate, as determined under section 482 and §§ 1.482-1 through 1.482- 9, that would be charged with respect to a comparable debt instrument of the issuer with a term that does not exceed 270 days. (iii) Lender-specific indebtedness limit. The issuer is a net borrower from the lend- er for no more than 270 days during the taxable year of the issuer, and in the case of a covered debt instrument outstanding during consecutive tax years, the issuer is a net borrower from the lender for no more than 270 consecutive days, in both cases taking into account only covered debt instruments that satisfy the require- ment of paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(A)(2)(ii) of this section other than covered debt instru- ments described in paragraph (b)(3)(vii) (B) or (C) of this section. (iv) Overall indebtedness limit. The is- suer is a net borrower under all covered debt instruments issued to members of the issuer’s expanded group that satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (b)(3)(vii) (A)(2)(ii) and (iii) of this section, other than covered debt instruments described in paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(B) or (C) of this section, for no more than 270 days during the taxable year of the issuer, determined without regard to the identity of the lender under such covered debt instruments. (v) Inadvertent error. An issuer’s failure to satisfy the 270-day test will be disregard- ed if the failure is reasonable in light of all the facts and circumstances and the failure is promptly cured upon discovery. A failure to satisfy the 270-day test will be consid- ered reasonable if the taxpayer maintains due diligence procedures to prevent such failures, as evidenced by having written policies and operational procedures in place to monitor compliance with the 270- day test and management-level employees of the expanded group having undertaken reasonable efforts to establish, follow, and enforce such policies and procedures. June 1, 2020 888 Bulletin No. 2020–23 (B) Ordinary course loans. A covered debt instrument is described in this para- graph (b)(3)(vii)(B) if the covered debt in- strument is issued as consideration for the acquisition of property other than money in the ordinary course of the issuer’s trade or business, provided that the obligation is reasonably expected to be repaid within 120 days of issuance. (C) Interest-free loans. A covered debt instrument is described in this paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(C) if the instrument does not provide for stated interest or no interest is charged on the instrument, the instrument does not have original issue discount (as defined in section 1273 and §§ 1.1273- 1 and 1.1273-2), interest is not imputed under section 483 or section 7872 and §§ 1.483-1 through 1.483-4 or §§ 1.7872-1 through 1.7872-16, respectively, and in- terest is not required to be charged un- der section 482 and §§ 1.482-1 through 1.482-9. (D) Deposits with a qualified cash pool header—(1) In general. A covered debt instrument is described in this paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(D) if it is a demand deposit received by a qualified cash pool header described in paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(D)(2) of this section pursuant to a cash-manage- ment arrangement described in paragraph (b)(3)(vii)(D)(3) of this section. This para- graph (b)(3)(vii)(D) does not apply if a purpose for making the demand deposit is to facilitate the avoidance of the purposes of this section with respect to a qualified business unit (as defined in section 989(a) and § 1.989(a)-1) (QBU) that is not a qual- ified cash pool header. (2) Qualified cash pool header. The term qualified cash pool header means an expanded group member, controlled part- nership, or QBU described in §1.989(a)- 1(b)(2)(ii), that has as its principal pur- pose managing a cash-management arrangement for participating expanded group members, provided that the excess (if any) of funds on deposit with such ex- panded group member, controlled partner- ship, or QBU (header) over the outstand- ing balance of loans made by the header is maintained on the books and records of the header in the form of cash or cash equivalents, or invested through deposits with, or the acquisition of obligations or portfolio securities of, persons that do not have a relationship to the header (or, in the case of a header that is a QBU described in §1.989(a)-1(b)(2)(ii), its owner) described in section 267(b) or section 707(b). (3) Cash-management arrangement. The term cash-management arrangement means an arrangement the principal pur- pose of which is to manage cash for par- ticipating expanded group members. For purposes of the preceding sentence, man- aging cash means borrowing excess funds from participating expanded group mem- bers and lending funds to participating expanded group members, and may also include foreign exchange management, clearing payments, investing excess cash with an unrelated person, depositing ex- cess cash with another qualified cash pool header, and settling intercompany ac- counts, for example through netting cen- ters and pay-on-behalf-of programs. * * * * * (d) * * * (4) Treatment of disregarded entities. This paragraph (d)(4) applies to the extent that a covered debt instrument issued by a disregarded entity, the regarded owner of which is a covered member, would, absent the application of this paragraph (d)(4), be treated as stock under this section. In this case, rather than the covered debt instru- ment being treated as stock to such extent (applicable portion), the covered member that is the regarded owner of the disregard- ed entity is deemed to issue its stock in the manner described in this paragraph (d)(4). If the applicable portion otherwise would have been treated as stock under para- graph (b)(2) of this section, then the cov- ered member is deemed to issue its stock to the expanded group member to which the covered debt instrument was, in form, issued (or transferred) in the transaction described in paragraph (b)(2) of this sec- tion. If the applicable portion otherwise would have been treated as stock under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, then the covered member is deemed to issue its stock to the holder of the covered debt in- strument in exchange for a portion of the covered debt instrument equal to the ap- plicable portion. In each case, the covered member that is the regarded owner of the disregarded entity is treated as the holder of the applicable portion of the debt instru- ment issued by the disregarded entity, and the actual holder is treated as the holder of the remaining portion of the covered debt instrument and the stock deemed to be is- sued by the regarded owner. Under Fed- eral tax principles, the applicable portion of the debt instrument issued by the dis- regarded entity generally is disregarded. This paragraph (d)(4) must be applied in a manner that is consistent with the prin- ciples of paragraph (f)(4) of this section. Thus, for example, stock deemed issued is deemed to have the same terms as the cov- ered debt instrument issued by the disre- garded entity, other than the identity of the issuer, and payments on the stock are de- termined by reference to payments made on the covered debt instrument issued by the disregarded entity. See §1.385-4(b)(3) for additional rules that apply if the re- garded owner of the disregarded entity is a member of a consolidated group. If the regarded owner of a disregarded entity is a controlled partnership, then paragraph (f) of this section applies as though the con- trolled partnership were the issuer in form of the debt instrument. * * * * * (f) Treatment of controlled partner- ships—(1) In general. For purposes of this section and §1.385-4, a controlled partnership is treated as an aggregate of its partners in the manner described in this paragraph (f). Paragraph (f)(2) of this section sets forth rules concerning the ag- gregate treatment when a controlled part- nership acquires property from a member of the expanded group. Paragraph (f)(3) of this section sets forth rules concerning the aggregate treatment when a controlled partnership issues a debt instrument. Para- graph (f)(4) of this section deems a debt instrument issued by a controlled part- nership to be held by an expanded group partner rather than the holder-in-form in certain cases. Paragraph (f)(5) of this sec- tion sets forth the rules concerning events that cause the deemed results described in paragraph (f)(4) of this section to cease. Paragraph (f)(6) of this section exempts certain issuances of a controlled partner- ship’s debt to a partner and a partner’s debt to a controlled partnership from the application of this section. For definitions applicable for this section, see paragraph (g) of this section. For examples illus- trating the application of this section, see paragraph (h) of this section. (2) Acquisitions of property by a con- trolled partnership—(i) Acquisitions of Bulletin No. 2020–23 889 June 1, 2020 property when a member of the expanded group is a partner on the date of the ac- quisition—(A) Aggregate treatment. Ex- cept as otherwise provided in paragraphs (f)(2)(i)(C) and (f)(6) of this section, if a controlled partnership, with respect to an expanded group, acquires property from a member of the expanded group (transferor member), then, for purposes of this sec- tion, a member of the expanded group that is an expanded group partner on the date of the acquisition is treated as acquiring its share (as determined under paragraph (f)(2)(i)(B) of this section) of the proper- ty. The expanded group partner is treated as acquiring its share of the property from the transferor member in the manner (for example, in a distribution, in an exchange for property, or in an issuance), and on the date on which, the property is actually ac- quired by the controlled partnership from the transferor member. Accordingly, this section applies to a member’s acquisition of property described in this paragraph (f)(2)(i)(A) in the same manner as if the member actually acquired the property from the transferor member, unless ex- plicitly provided otherwise. (B) Expanded group partner’s share of property. For purposes of paragraph (f)(2) (i)(A) of this section, a partner’s share of property acquired by a controlled partner- ship is determined in accordance with the partner’s liquidation value percentage (as defined in paragraph (g)(17) of this sec- tion) with respect to the controlled part- nership. The liquidation value percentage is determined on the date on which the controlled partnership acquires the prop- erty. (C) Exception if transferor member is an expanded group partner. If a transferor member is an expanded group partner in the controlled partnership, paragraph (f) (2)(i)(A) of this section does not apply to such partner. (ii) Acquisitions of expanded group stock when a member of the expanded group becomes a partner after the acquisi- tion—(A) Aggregate treatment. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (f)(2)(ii) (C) of this section, if a controlled partner- ship, with respect to an expanded group, owns expanded group stock, and a mem- ber of the expanded group becomes an expanded group partner in the controlled partnership, then, for purposes of this sec- tion, the member is treated as acquiring its share (as determined under paragraph (f) (2)(ii)(B) of this section) of the expanded group stock owned by the controlled part- nership. The member is treated as acquir- ing its share of the expanded group stock on the date on which the member becomes an expanded group partner. Furthermore, the member is treated as if it acquires its share of the expanded group stock from a member of the expanded group in ex- change for property other than expanded group stock, regardless of the manner in which the partnership acquired the stock and in which the member acquires its part- nership interest. Accordingly, this section applies to a member’s acquisition of ex- panded group stock described in this para- graph (f)(2)(ii)(A) in the same manner as if the member actually acquired the stock from a member of the expanded group in exchange for property other than expand- ed group stock, unless explicitly provided otherwise. (B) Expanded group partner’s share of expanded group stock. For purposes of paragraph (f)(2)(ii)(A) of this section, a partner’s share of expanded group stock owned by a controlled partnership is de- termined in accordance with the partner’s liquidation value percentage with respect to the controlled partnership. The liquida- tion value percentage is determined on the date on which a member of the expanded group becomes an expanded group partner in the controlled partnership. (C) Exception if an expanded group partner acquires its interest in a controlled partnership in exchange for expanded group stock. Paragraph (f)(2)(ii)(A) of this section does not apply to a member of an expanded group that acquires its interest in a controlled partnership either from another partner in exchange sole- ly for expanded group stock or upon a partnership contribution to the controlled partnership comprised solely of expanded group stock. (3) Issuances of debt instruments by a controlled partnership to a member of an expanded group—(i) Aggregate treat- ment. If a controlled partnership, with re- spect to an expanded group, issues a debt instrument to a member of the expanded group, then, for purposes of this section, a covered member that is an expanded group partner is treated as the issuer with respect to its share (as determined under para- graph (f)(3)(ii) of this section) of the debt instrument issued by the controlled part- nership. This section applies to the portion of the debt instrument treated as issued by the covered member as described in this paragraph (f)(3)(i) in the same manner as if the covered member actually issued the debt instrument to the holder-in-form, unless otherwise provided. See paragraph (f)(4) of this section, which deems a debt instrument issued by a controlled part- nership to be held by an expanded group partner rather than the holder-in-form in certain cases. (ii) Expanded group partner’s share of a debt instrument issued by a controlled partnership—(A) General rule. An ex- panded group partner’s share of a debt instrument issued by a controlled partner- ship is determined on each date on which the partner makes a distribution or acqui- sition described in paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(3)(i) of this section (testing date). An expanded group partner’s share of a debt instrument issued by a controlled partner- ship to a member of the expanded group is determined in accordance with the part- ner’s issuance percentage (as defined in paragraph (g)(16) of this section) on the testing date. A partner’s share determined under this paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(A) is ad- justed as described in paragraph (f)(3)(ii) (B) of this section. (B) Additional rules if there is a speci- fied portion with respect to a debt instru- ment—(1) An expanded group partner’s share (as determined under paragraph (f) (3)(ii)(A) of this section) of a debt instru- ment issued by a controlled partnership is reduced, but not below zero, by the sum of all of the specified portions (as defined in paragraph (g)(23) of this section), if any, with respect to the debt instrument that correspond to one or more deemed trans- ferred receivables (as defined in paragraph (g)(8) of this section) that are deemed to be held by the partner. (2) If the aggregate of all of the ex- panded group partners’ shares (as deter- mined under paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(A) of this section and reduced under paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(B)(1) of this section) of the debt instrument exceeds the adjusted issue price of the debt, reduced by the sum of all of the specified portions with respect to the debt instrument that correspond to one June 1, 2020 890 Bulletin No. 2020–23 or more deemed transferred receivables that are deemed to be held by one or more expanded group partners (excess amount), then each expanded group partner’s share (as determined under paragraph (f)(3) (ii)(A) of this section and reduced under paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(B)(1) of this section) of the debt instrument is reduced. The amount of an expanded group partner’s reduction is the excess amount multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the partner’s share, and the denominator of which is the aggregate of all of the ex- panded group partners’ shares. (iii) Qualified short-term debt instru- ment. The determination of whether a debt instrument is a qualified short-term debt instrument for purposes of paragraph (b) (3)(vii) of this section is made at the part- nership-level without regard to paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section. (4) Recharacterization when there is a specified portion with respect to a debt instrument issued by a controlled part- nership—(i) General rule. A specified portion, with respect to a debt instrument issued by a controlled partnership and an expanded group partner, is not treated as stock under paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(3)(i) of this section. Except as otherwise pro- vided in paragraphs (f)(4)(ii) and (iii) of this section, the holder-in-form (as defined in paragraph (g)(15) of this sec- tion) of the debt instrument is deemed to transfer a portion of the debt instrument (a deemed transferred receivable, as de- fined in paragraph (g)(8) of this section) with a principal amount equal to the ad- justed issue price of the specified portion to the expanded group partner in exchange for stock in the expanded group partner (deemed partner stock, as defined in para- graph (g)(6) of this section) with a fair market value equal to the principal amount of the deemed transferred receivable. Ex- cept as otherwise provided in paragraph (f)(4)(vi) of this section (concerning the treatment of a deemed transferred receiv- able for purposes of section 752) and para- graph (f)(5) of this section (concerning specified events subsequent to the deemed transfer), the deemed transfer described in this paragraph (f)(4)(i) is deemed to occur for all Federal tax purposes. (ii) Expanded group partner is the holder-in-form of a debt instrument. If the specified portion described in para- graph (f)(4)(i) of this section is with re- spect to an expanded group partner that is the holder-in-form of the debt instrument, then paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section will not apply with respect to that specified portion except that only the first sentence of paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section is ap- plicable. (iii) Expanded group partner is a con- solidated group member. This paragraph (f)(4)(iii) applies when one or more ex- panded group partners is a member of a consolidated group that files (or is re- quired to file) a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return. In this case, notwith- standing §1.385-4(b)(1) (which generally treats members of a consolidated group as one corporation for purposes of this section), the holder-in-form of the debt instrument issued by the controlled part- nership is deemed to transfer the deemed transferred receivable or receivables to the expanded group partner or partners that are members of a consolidated group that make, or are treated as making under para- graph (f)(2) of this section, the regarded distributions or acquisitions (within the meaning of §1.385-4(e)(5)) described in paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(3)(i) of this sec- tion in exchange for deemed partner stock in such partner or partners. To the extent those regarded distributions or acquisi- tions are made by a member of the consol- idated group that is not an expanded group partner (excess amount), the holder-in- form is deemed to transfer a portion of the deemed transferred receivable or receiv- ables to each member of the consolidated group that is an expanded group partner in exchange for deemed partner stock in the expanded group partner. The portion is the excess amount multiplied by a frac- tion, the numerator of which is the portion of the consolidated group’s share (as de- termined under paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this section) of the debt instrument issued by the controlled partnership that would have been the expanded group partner’s share if the partner was not a member of a con- solidated group, and the denominator of which is the consolidated group’s share of the debt instrument issued by the con- trolled partnership. (iv) Rules regarding deemed trans- ferred receivables and deemed partner stock—(A) Terms of deemed partner stock. Deemed partner stock has the same terms as the deemed transferred receiv- able with respect to the deemed transfer, other than the identity of the issuer. (B) Treatment of payments with respect to a debt instrument for which there is one or more deemed transferred receivables. When a payment is made with respect to a debt instrument issued by a controlled partnership for which there is one or more deemed transferred receivables, then, if the amount of the retained receivable (as defined in paragraph (g)(22) of this sec- tion) held by the holder-in-form is zero and a single deemed holder is deemed to hold all of the deemed transferred re- ceivables, the entire payment is allocat- ed to the deemed transferred receivables held by the single deemed holder. If the amount of the retained receivable held by the holder-in-form is greater than zero or there are multiple deemed holders of deemed transferred receivables, or both, the payment is apportioned among the re- tained receivable, if any, and each deemed transferred receivable in proportion to the principal amount of all the receivables. The portion of a payment allocated or apportioned to a retained receivable or a deemed transferred receivable reduces the principal amount of, or accrued interest with respect to, as applicable depending on the payment, the retained receivable or deemed transferred receivable. When a payment allocated or apportioned to a deemed transferred receivable reduces the principal amount of the receivable, the ex- panded group partner that is the deemed holder with respect to the deemed trans- ferred receivable is deemed to redeem the same amount of deemed partner stock, and the specified portion with respect to the debt instrument is reduced by the same amount. When a payment allocated or ap- portioned to a deemed transferred receiv- able reduces accrued interest with respect to the receivable, the expanded group partner that is the deemed holder with re- spect to the deemed transferred receivable is deemed to make a matching distribu- tion in the same amount with respect to the deemed partner stock. The controlled partnership is treated as the paying agent with respect to the deemed partner stock. (v) Holder-in-form transfers debt in- strument in a transaction that is not a specified event. If the holder-in-form transfers the debt instrument (which is Bulletin No. 2020–23 891 June 1, 2020 disregarded for Federal tax purposes) to a member of the expanded group or a controlled partnership (and therefore the transfer is not a specified event described in paragraph (f)(5)(iii)(F) of this section), then, for Federal tax purposes, the holder- in-form is deemed to transfer the retained receivable and the deemed partner stock to the transferee. (vi) Allocation of deemed transferred receivable under section 752. A partner- ship liability that is a debt instrument with respect to which there is one or more deemed transferred receivables is allocat- ed for purposes of section 752 without re- gard to any deemed transfer. (5) Specified events affecting owner- ship following a deemed transfer—(i) General rule. If a specified event (within the meaning of paragraph (f)(5)(iii) of this section) occurs with respect to a deemed transfer, then, immediately before the specified event, the expanded group part- ner that is both the issuer of the deemed partner stock and the deemed holder of the deemed transferred receivable is deemed to distribute the deemed transferred re- ceivable (or portion thereof, as determined under paragraph (f)(5)(iv) of this section) to the holder-in-form in redemption of the deemed partner stock (or portion there- of, as determined under paragraph (f)(5) (iv) of this section) deemed to be held by the holder-in-form. The deemed distribu- tion is deemed to occur for all Federal tax purposes, except that the distribution is disregarded for purposes of paragraph (b) of this section. Except when the deemed transferred receivable (or portion there- of, as determined under paragraph (f)(5) (iv) of this section) is deemed to be re- transferred under paragraph (f)(5)(ii) of this section, the principal amount of the retained receivable held by the holder-in- form is increased by the principal amount of the deemed transferred receivable, the deemed transferred receivable ceases to exist for Federal tax purposes, and the specified portion (or portion thereof) that corresponds to the deemed transferred re- ceivable (or portion thereof) ceases to be treated as a specified portion for purposes of this section. (ii) New deemed transfer when a spec- ified event involves a transferee that is a covered member that is an expanded group partner. If the specified event is de- scribed in paragraph (f)(5)(iii)(E) of this section, the holder-in-form of the debt instrument is deemed to retransfer the deemed transferred receivable (or portion thereof, as determined under paragraph (f) (5)(iv) of this section) that the holder-in- form is deemed to have received pursuant to paragraph (f)(5)(i) of this section, to the transferee expanded group partner in exchange for deemed partner stock issued by the transferee expanded group partner with a fair market value equal to the prin- cipal amount of the deemed transferred receivable (or portion thereof) that is re- transferred. For purposes of this section, this deemed transfer is treated in the same manner as a deemed transfer described in paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section. (iii) Specified events. A specified event, with respect to a deemed transfer, occurs when, immediately after the transaction and taking into account all related trans- actions: (A) The controlled partnership that is the issuer of the debt instrument either ceases to be a controlled partnership or ceases to have an expanded group partner that is a covered member. (B) The holder-in-form is a member of the expanded group immediately before the transaction, and the holder-in-form and the deemed holder cease to be mem- bers of the same expanded group for the reasons described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. (C) The holder-in-form is a controlled partnership immediately before the trans- action, and the holder-in-form ceases to be a controlled partnership. (D) The expanded group partner that is both the issuer of deemed partner stock and the deemed holder transfers (directly or indirectly through one or more partner- ships) all or a portion of its interest in the controlled partnership to a person that nei- ther is a covered member nor a controlled partnership with an expanded group part- ner that is a covered member. If there is a transfer of only a portion of the interest, see paragraph (f)(5)(iv) of this section. (E) The expanded group partner that is both the issuer of deemed partner stock and the deemed holder transfers (directly or indirectly through one or more part- nerships) all or a portion of its interest in the controlled partnership to a covered member or a controlled partnership with an expanded group partner that is a cov- ered member. If there is a transfer of only a portion of the interest, see paragraph (f) (5)(iv) of this section. (F) The holder-in-form transfers the debt instrument (which is disregarded for Federal tax purposes) to a person that is neither a member of the expanded group nor a controlled partnership. See para- graph (f)(4)(v) of this section if the hold- er-in-form transfers the debt instrument to a member of the expanded group or a controlled partnership. (iv) Specified event involving a transfer of only a portion of an interest in a con- trolled partnership. If, with respect to a specified event described in paragraph (f) (5)(iii)(D) or (E) of this section, an expand- ed group partner transfers only a portion of its interest in a controlled partnership, then, only a portion of the deemed transferred re- ceivable that is deemed to be held by the ex- panded group partner is deemed to be dis- tributed in redemption of an equal portion of the deemed partner stock. The portion of the deemed transferred receivable referred to in the preceding sentence is equal to the product of the entire principal amount of the deemed transferred receivable deemed to be held by the expanded group partner multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the portion of the expanded group partner’s capital account attributable to the interest that is transferred, and the de- nominator of which is the expanded group partner’s capital account with respect to its entire interest, determined immediately be- fore the specified event. (6) Issuance of a partnership’s debt instrument to a partner and a partner’s debt instrument to a partnership. If a con- trolled partnership, with respect to an ex- panded group, issues a debt instrument to an expanded group partner, or if a covered member that is an expanded group partner issues a covered debt instrument to a con- trolled partnership, and in each case, no partner deducts or receives an allocation of expense with respect to the debt instru- ment, then this section does not apply to the debt instrument. (g) * * * (5) Deemed holder. The term deemed holder means, with respect to a deemed transfer, the expanded group partner that is deemed to hold a deemed transferred re- ceivable by reason of the deemed transfer. June 1, 2020 892 Bulletin No. 2020–23 (6) Deemed partner stock. The term deemed partner stock means, with respect to a deemed transfer, the stock deemed issued by an expanded group partner as described in paragraphs (f)(4)(i) and (iii) and (f)(5)(ii) of this section. The amount of deemed partner stock is reduced as de- scribed in paragraphs (f)(4)(iv)(B) and (f) (5)(i) of this section. (7) Deemed transfer. The term deemed transfer means, with respect to a specified portion, the transfer described in para- graph (f)(4)(i) or (iii) or (f)(5)(ii) of this section. (8) Deemed transferred receivable. The term deemed transferred receivable means, with respect to a deemed trans- fer, the portion of the debt instrument de- scribed in paragraph (f)(4)(i) or (iii) or (f) (5)(ii) of this section. The deemed trans- ferred receivable is reduced as described in paragraphs (f)(4)(iv)(B) and (f)(5)(i) of this section. * * * * * (15) Holder-in-form. The term hold- er-in-form means, with respect to a debt instrument issued by a controlled partner- ship, the person that, absent the applica- tion of paragraph (f)(4) of this section, would be the holder of the debt instrument for Federal tax purposes. Therefore, the term holder-in-form does not include a deemed holder (as defined in paragraph (g)(5) of this section). (16) Issuance percentage. The term issuance percentage means, with respect to a controlled partnership and an expand- ed group partner, the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the partner’s reasonably anticipated distributive share of all the partnership’s interest expense over a rea- sonable period, divided by all of the part- nership’s reasonably anticipated interest expense over that same period, taking into account any and all relevant facts and circumstances. The relevant facts and cir- cumstances include, without limitation, the term of the debt instrument; whether the partnership anticipates issuing other debt instruments; and the partnership’s anticipated section 704(b) income and ex- pense, and the partners’ respective antic- ipated allocation percentages, taking into account anticipated changes to those allo- cation percentages over time resulting, for example, from anticipated contributions, distributions, recapitalizations, or provi- sions in the controlled partnership agree- ment. (17) Liquidation value percentage. The term liquidation value percentage means, with respect to a controlled partnership and an expanded group partner, the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the liquida- tion value of the expanded group partner’s interest in the partnership divided by the aggregate liquidation value of all the part- ners’ interests in the partnership. The liq- uidation value of an expanded group part- ner’s interest in a controlled partnership is the amount of cash the partner would receive with respect to the interest if the partnership (and any partnership through which the partner indirectly owns an inter- est in the controlled partnership) sold all of its property for an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of the property (taking into account section 7701(g)), sat- isfied all of its liabilities (other than those described in §1.752-7), paid an unrelated third party to assume all of its §1.752-7 li- abilities in a fully taxable transaction, and then the partnership (and any partnership through which the partner indirectly owns an interest in the controlled partnership) liquidated. * * * * * (22) Retained receivable. The term re- tained receivable means, with respect to a debt instrument issued by a controlled partnership, the portion of the debt in- strument that is not transferred by the holder-in-form pursuant to one or more deemed transfers. The retained receiv- able is adjusted for decreases described in paragraph (f)(4)(iv)(B) of this section and increases described in paragraph (f)(5)(i) of this section. (23) Specified portion. The term speci- fied portion means, with respect to a debt instrument issued by a controlled part- nership and a covered member that is an expanded group partner, the portion of the debt instrument that is treated under paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section as is- sued on a testing date (within the meaning of paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this section) by the covered member and that, absent the application of paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, would be treated as stock under paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(3)(i) of this section on the testing date. A specified portion is reduced as described in paragraphs (f)(4) (iv)(B) and (f)(5)(i) of this section. * * * * * (h) * * * (3) * * * (xii) Example 12: Distribution of a covered debt instrument to a controlled partnership—(A) Facts. CFC and FS are equal partners in PRS. PRS owns 100% of the stock in X Corp, a domestic corporation. On Date A in Year 1, X Corp issues X Note to PRS in a distribution. (B) Analysis. (1) Under §1.385-1(c)(4), in deter- mining whether X Corp is a member of the FP ex- panded group that includes CFC and FS, CFC and FS are each treated as owning 50% of the X Corp stock held by PRS. Accordingly, 100% of X Corp’s stock is treated as owned by CFC and FS, and X Corp is a member of the FP expanded group. (2) Together CFC and FS own 100% of the in- terests in PRS capital and profits, such that PRS is a controlled partnership under §1.385-1(c)(1). CFC and FS are both expanded group partners on the date on which PRS acquired X Note. Therefore, pursuant to paragraph (f)(2)(i)(A) of this section, each of CFC and FS is treated as acquiring its share of X Note in the same manner (in this case, by a distribution of X Note), and on the date on which, PRS acquired X Note. Likewise, X Corp is treated as issuing to each of CFC and FS its share of X Note. Under paragraph (f)(2)(i)(B) of this section, each of CFC’s and FS’s share of X Note, respectively, is determined in ac- cordance with its liquidation value percentage deter- mined on Date A in Year 1, the date X Corp distribut- ed X Note to PRS. On Date A in Year 1, pursuant to paragraph (g)(17) of this section, each of CFC’s and FS’s liquidation value percentages is 50%. Accord- ingly, on Date A in Year 1, under paragraph (f)(2)(i) (A) of this section, for purposes of this section, CFC and FS are each treated as acquiring 50% of X Note in a distribution. (3) Under paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (d)(1)(i) of this section, X Note is treated as stock on the date of issuance, which is Date A in Year 1. Under paragraph (f)(2)(i)(A) of this section, each of CFC and FS are treated as acquiring 50% of X Note in a distribution for purposes of this section. Therefore, X Corp is treated as distributing its stock to PRS in a distribu- tion described in section 305. (xiii) Example 13: Loan to a controlled partner- ship; proportionate distributions by expanded group partners—(A) Facts. DS, USS2, and USP are part- ners in PRS. USP is a domestic corporation that is not a member of the FP expanded group. Each of DS and USS2 own 45% of the interests in PRS profits and capital, and USP owns 10% of the interests in PRS profits and capital. The PRS partnership agreement provides that all items of PRS income, gain, loss, de- duction, and credit are allocated in accordance with the percentages in the preceding sentence. On Date A in Year 1, FP lends $200x to PRS in exchange for PRS Note with stated principal amount of $200x, which is payable at maturity. PRS Note also provides for annual payments of interest that are qualified stated interest. PRS uses all $200x in its business and does not distribute any money or other property to a partner. Subsequently, on Date B in Year 1, DS distributes $90x to USS1, USS2 distributes $90x to FP, and USP distributes $20x to its shareholder. Each of DS’s and USS2’s issuance percentage is 45% on Date B in Year 1, the date of the distributions and Bulletin No. 2020–23 893 June 1, 2020 therefore a testing date under paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(A) of this section. (B) Analysis. (1) DS and USS2 together own 90% of the interests in PRS profits and capital and therefore PRS is a controlled partnership under §1.385-1(c)(1). Under §1.385-1(c)(2), each of DS and USS2 is a covered member. (2) Under paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, each of DS and USS2 is treated as issuing its share of PRS Note, and under paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(A) of this sec- tion, DS’s and USS2’s share is each $90x (45% of $200x). USP is not an expanded group partner and therefore has no issuance percentage and is not treat- ed as issuing any portion of PRS Note. (3) The $90x distributions made by DS to USS1 and by USS2 to FP are described in paragraph (b)(3) (i)(A) of this section. Under paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, the portions of PRS Note treated as issued by each of DS and USS2 are treated as fund- ing the distribution made by DS and USS2 because the distributions occurred within the per se period with respect to PRS Note. Under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, the portions of PRS Note treated as issued by each of DS and USS2 would, absent the application of paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, be treated as stock of DS and USS2 on Date B in Year 1, the date of the distributions. See paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section. Under paragraph (g)(23) of this sec- tion, each of the $90x portions is a specified portion. (4) Under paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, the specified portions are not treated as stock un- der paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section. Instead, FP is deemed to transfer a portion of PRS Note with a principal amount equal to $90x (the adjusted is- sue price of the specified portion with respect to DS) to DS in exchange for deemed partner stock in DS with a fair market value of $90x. Similarly, FP is deemed to transfer a portion of PRS Note with a principal amount equal to $90x (the adjusted issue price of the specified portion with respect to USS2) to USS2 in exchange for deemed partner stock in USS2 with a fair market value of $90x. The principal amount of the retained receivable held by FP is $20x ($200x—$90x—$90x). (xiv) Example 14: Loan to a controlled partner- ship; disproportionate distributions by expanded group partners—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (h)(3)(xiii)(A) of this section (Example 13), except that on Date B in Year 1, DS distributes $45x to USS1 and USS2 distributes $135x to FP. (B) Analysis. (1) The analysis is the same as in paragraph (h)(3)(xiii)(B)(1) of this section (Example 13). (2) The analysis is the same as in paragraph (h) (3)(xiii)(B)(2) of this section (Example 13). (3) The $45x and $135x distributions made by DS to USS1 and by USS2 to FP, respectively, are described in paragraph (b)(3)(i)(A) of this section. Under paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, the portion of PRS Note treated as issued by DS is treat- ed as funding the distribution made by DS because the distribution occurred within the per se peri- od with respect to PRS Note, but under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, only to the extent of DS’s $45x distribution. USS2 is treated as issuing $90x of PRS Note, all of which is treated as funding $90x of USS2’s $135x distribution under paragraph (b)(3) (iii)(A) of this section. Under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, absent the application of paragraph (f) (4)(i) of this section, $45x of PRS Note would be treated as stock of DS and $90x of PRS Note would be treated as stock of USS2 on Date B in Year 1, the date of the distributions. See paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section. Under paragraph (g)(23) of this section, $45x of PRS Note is a specified portion with respect to DS and $90x of PRS Note is a specified portion with respect to USS2. (4) Under paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, the specified portions are not treated as stock under para- graph (b)(3)(i) of this section. Instead, FP is deemed to transfer a portion of PRS Note with a principal amount equal to $45x (the adjusted issue price of the specified portion with respect to DS) to DS in ex- change for stock of DS with a fair market value of $90x. Similarly, FP is deemed to transfer a portion of PRS Note with a principal amount equal to $90x (the adjusted issue price of the specified portion with respect to USS2) to USS2 in exchange for stock of USS2 with a fair market value of $90x. The principal amount of the retained receivable held by FP is $65x ($200x-$45x-$90x). (xv) Example 15: Loan to partnership; distribu- tion in later year—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (h)(3)(xiii)(A) of this section (Exam- ple 13), except that USS2 does not distribute $90x to FP until Date C in Year 2, which is less than 36 months after Date A in Year 1. On Date C in Year 2, DS’s, USS2’s, and USP’s issuance percentages under paragraph (g)(16) of this section are unchanged at 45%, 45%, and 10%, respectively. (B) Analysis. (1) The analysis is the same as in paragraph (h)(3)(xiii)(B)(1) of this section (Example 13). (2) The analysis is the same as in paragraph (h) (3)(xiii)(B)(2) of this section (Example 13). (3) With respect to the distribution made by DS, the analysis is the same as in paragraph (h)(3)(xiii) (B)(3) of this section (Example 13). (4) With respect to the deemed transfer to DS, the analysis is the same as in paragraph (h)(3)(xiii) (B)(4) of this section (Example 13). Accordingly, the amount of the retained receivable held by FP as of Date B in Year 1 is $110x ($200x-$90x). (5) Under paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(A) of this section, USS2’s share of PRS Note is determined on Date C in Year 2. On Date C in Year 2, DS’s, USS2’s, and USP’s respective shares of PRS Note under para- graph (f)(3)(ii)(A) of this section are $90x, $90x, and $20x. However, because DS is treated as the issuer with respect to a $90x specified portion of PRS Note, DS’s share of PRS Note is reduced by $90x to $0 under paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(B)(1) of this section. No reduction to either of USS2’s or USP’s share of PRS Note is required under paragraph (f)(3)(ii)(B)(2) of this section because the aggregate of DS’s, USS2’s, and USP’s shares of PRS Note as reduced is $110x (DS has a $0 share, USS2 has a $90x share, and USP has a $20x share), which does not exceed $110x (the $200x adjusted issue price of PRS Note reduced by the $90x specified portion with respect to DS). Un- der paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, USS2 is treat- ed as issuing its share of PRS Note. (6) The $90x distribution made by USS2 to FP is described in paragraph (b)(3)(i)(A) of this section. Under paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, the portion of PRS Note treated as issued by USS2 is treated as funding the distribution made by USS2, because the distribution occurred within the per se period with respect to PRS Note. Accordingly, the portion of PRS Note treated as issued by USS2 would, absent the application of paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, be treated as stock of USS2 under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section on Date C in Year 2. See paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section. Under paragraph (g)(23) of this section, the $90x portion is a specified portion. (7) Under paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, the specified portion of PRS Note treated as issued by USS2 is not treated as stock under paragraph (b)(3) (i) of this section. Instead, on Date C in Year 2, FP is deemed to transfer a portion of PRS Note with a principal amount equal to $90x (the adjusted issue price of the specified portion with respect to USS2) to USS2 in exchange for stock in USS2 with a fair market value of $90x. The principal amount of the retained receivable held by FP is reduced from $110x to $20x. (xvi) Example 16: Loan to a controlled partner- ship; partnership ceases to be a controlled partner- ship—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in para- graph (h)(3)(xiii)(A) of this section (Example 13), except that on Date C in Year 4, USS2 sells its entire interest in PRS to an unrelated person. (B) Analysis. (1) On date C in Year 4, PRS ceas- es to be a controlled partnership with respect to the FP expanded group under §1.385-1(c)(1). This is the case because DS, the only remaining partner that is a member of the FP expanded group, only owns 45% of the total interest in PRS profits and capital. Because PRS ceases to be a controlled partnership, a specified event (within the meaning of paragraph (f)(5)(iii)(A) of this section) occurs with respect to the deemed transfers with respect to each of DS and USS2. (2) Under paragraph (f)(5)(i) of this section, on Date C in Year 4, immediately before PRS ceases to be a controlled partnership, each of DS and USS2 is deemed to distribute its deemed transferred receiv- able to FP in redemption of FP’s deemed partner stock in DS and USS2. The specified portion that corresponds to each of the deemed transferred re- ceivables ceases to be treated as a specified portion. Furthermore, the deemed transferred receivables cease to exist, and the retained receivable held by FP increases from $20x to $200x. (xvii) Example 17: Transfer of an interest in a partnership to a covered member—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph (h)(3)(xiii)(A) of this section (Example 13), except that on Date C in Year 4, USS2 sells its entire interest in PRS to USS1. (B) Analysis. (1) After USS2 sells its interest in PRS to USS1, DS and USS1 together own 90% of the interests in PRS profits and capital and therefore PRS continues to be a controlled partnership under §1.385-1(c)(1). A specified event (within the mean- ing of paragraph (f)(5)(iii)(E) of this section) occurs as result of the sale only with respect to the deemed transfer with respect to USS2. (2) Under paragraph (f)(5)(i) of this section, on Date C in Year 4, immediately before USS2 sells its entire interest in PRS to USS1, USS2 is deemed to distribute its deemed transferred receivable to FP in redemption of FP’s deemed partner stock in USS2. Because the specified event is described in paragraph June 1, 2020 894 Bulletin No. 2020–23 (f)(5)(iii)(E) of this section, under paragraph (f)(5) (ii) of this section, FP is deemed to retransfer the deemed transferred receivable deemed received from USS2 to USS1 in exchange for deemed partner stock in USS1 with a fair market value equal to the princi- pal amount of the deemed transferred receivable that is retransferred to USS1. (xviii) Example 18: Loan to partnership and all partners are members of a consolidated group— (A) Facts. USS1 and DS are equal partners in PRS. USS1 and DS are members of a consolidated group, as defined in §1.1502-1(h). The PRS partnership agreement provides that all items of PRS income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit are allocated equal- ly between USS1 and DS. On Date A in Year 1, FP lends $200x to PRS in exchange for PRS Note. PRS uses all $200x in its business and does not distrib- ute any money or other property to any partner. On Date B in Year 1, DS distributes $200x to USS1, and USS1 distributes $200x to FP. If neither of USS1 or DS were a member of the consolidated group, each would have an issuance percentage under paragraph (g)(16) of this section, determined as of Date A in Year 1, of 50%. (B) Analysis. (1) Pursuant to §1.385-4(b)(6), PRS is treated as a partnership for purposes of this section. Under §1.385-4(b)(1), DS and USS1 are treated as one corporation for purposes of this section, and thus a single covered member under §1.385-1(c)(2). For purposes of this section, the single covered member owns 100% of the PRS profits and capital and there- fore PRS is a controlled partnership under §1.385- 1(c)(1). Under paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, the single covered member is treated as issuing all $200x of PRS Note to FP, a member of the same expanded group as the single covered member. DS’s distribu- tion to USS1 is a disregarded distribution because it is a distribution between members of a consolidated group that is disregarded under the one-corporation rule described in §1.385-4(b)(1). However, under paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, PRS Note, treated as issued by the single covered member, is treated as funding the distribution by USS1 to FP, which is described in paragraph (b)(3)(i)(A) of this section and which is a regarded distribution. Accord- ingly, PRS Note, absent the application of paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, would be treated as stock un- der paragraph (b) of this section on Date B in Year 1. Thus, pursuant to paragraph (g)(23) of this section, the entire PRS Note is a specified portion. (2) Under paragraphs (f)(4)(i) and (iii) of this section, the specified portion is not treated as stock and, instead, FP is deemed to transfer PRS Note with a principal amount equal to $200x to USS1 in ex- change for stock of USS1 with a fair market value of $200x. Under paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section, FP is deemed to transfer PRS Note to USS1 because only USS1 made a regarded distribution described in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section. (xix) Example 19: Loan to a disregarded enti- ty—(A) Facts. DS owns DRE, a disregarded entity within the meaning of §1.385-1(c)(3). On Date A in Year 1, FP lends $200x to DRE in exchange for DRE Note. Subsequently, on Date B in Year 1, DS distrib- utes $100x of cash to USS1. (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, $100x of DRE Note would be treated as funding the distribution by DS to USS1 because DRE Note is issued to a member of the FP expanded group during the per se period with respect to DS’s distribution to USS1. Accordingly, under paragraphs (b)(3)(i)(A) and (d)(1)(ii) of this section, $100x of DRE Note would be treated as stock on Date B in Year 1. However, under paragraph (d)(4) of this sec- tion, DS, as the regarded owner, within the mean- ing of §1.385-1(c)(5), of DRE is deemed to issue its stock to FP in exchange for a portion of DRE Note equal to the $100x applicable portion (as defined in paragraph (d)(4) of this section). Thus, DS is treated as the holder of $100x of DRE Note, which is disre- garded, and FP is treated as the holder of the remain- ing $100x of DRE Note. The $100x of stock deemed issued by DS to FP has the same terms as DRE Note, other than the issuer, and payments on the stock are determined by reference to payments on DRE Note. * * * * * (j) * * *(1) In general. Except as pro- vided in paragraph (j)(2) or (3) or (k) of this section, this section applies to taxable years ending on or after January 19, 2017. * * * * * (3) Paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section. Paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section applies to taxable years for which the U.S. Fed- eral income tax return is due, without ex- tensions, after May 14, 2020. For taxable years ending on or after January 19, 2017, and for which the U.S. Federal income tax return is due, without extensions, on or before May 14, 2020, see §1.385-3T(f) (4)(iii), as contained in 26 CFR in part 1 in effect on April 1, 2019. In the case of a taxable year that ends after October 13, 2019, and on or before May 14, 2020, a taxpayer may choose to apply paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section to the portion of the taxable year that occurs after the expiration of §1.385-3T on October 13, 2019, provided that all members of the taxpayer’s expanded group apply such paragraph. (k) Additional transition rules. See transition rules in §1.385-3T(k)(2) as contained in 26 CFR in part 1 in effect on April 1, 2019. §§1.385-3T and 1.385-4T [Removed] Par. 4. Sections 1.385-3T and 1.385-4T are removed. Par. 5. Section 1.385-4 is added to read as follows: §1.385-4 Treatment of consolidated groups. (a) Scope. This section provides rules for applying §1.385-3 to members of con- solidated groups. Paragraph (b) of this section sets forth rules concerning the ex- tent to which, solely for purposes of ap- plying §1.385-3, members of a consolidat- ed group that file (or that are required to file) a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return are treated as one corporation. Paragraph (c) of this section sets forth rules concerning the treatment of a debt instrument that ceases to be, or becomes, a consolidated group debt instrument. Para- graph (d) of this section provides rules for applying the funding rule of §1.385-3(b) (3) to members that depart a consolidated group. For definitions applicable to this section, see paragraph (e) of this section and §§1.385-1(c) and 1.385-3(g). For ex- amples illustrating the application of this section, see paragraph (f) of this section. (b) Treatment of consolidated groups— (1) Members treated as one corporation. For purposes of this section and §1.385-3, and except as otherwise provided in this section and §1.385-3, all members of a consolidated group (as defined in §1.1502- 1(h)) that file (or that are required to file) a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax re- turn are treated as one corporation. Thus, for example, when a member of a consol- idated group issues a covered debt instru- ment that is not a consolidated group debt instrument, the consolidated group gen- erally is treated as the issuer of the cov- ered debt instrument for purposes of this section and §1.385-3. Also, for example, when one member of a consolidated group issues a covered debt instrument that is not a consolidated group debt instrument and therefore is treated as issued by the consolidated group, and another member of the consolidated group makes a distri- bution or acquisition described in §1.385- 3(b)(3)(i)(A) through (C) with an expand- ed group member that is not a member of the consolidated group, §1.385-3(b)(3) (i) may treat the covered debt instrument as funding the distribution or acquisition made by the consolidated group. In ad- dition, except as otherwise provided in this section, acquisitions and distributions described in §1.385-3(b)(2) and (b)(3)(i) in which all parties to the transaction are members of the same consolidated group both before and after the transaction are disregarded for purposes of this section and §1.385-3. (2) One-corporation rule inapplicable to expanded group member determina- tion. The one-corporation rule described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not apply in determining the members of an Bulletin No. 2020–23 895 June 1, 2020 expanded group. Notwithstanding the pre- vious sentence, an expanded group does not exist for purposes of this section and §1.385-3 if it consists only of members of a single consolidated group. (3) Application of §1.385-3 to debt in- struments issued by members of a consol- idated group—(i) Debt instrument treated as stock of the issuing member of a con- solidated group. If a covered debt instru- ment treated as issued by a consolidated group under the one-corporation rule de- scribed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is treated as stock under §1.385-3, the covered debt instrument is treated as stock in the member of the consolidated group that would be the issuer of such debt in- strument without regard to this section. But see §1.385-3(d)(7) (providing that a covered debt instrument that is treated as stock under §1.385-3(b)(2), (3), or (4) and that is not described in section 1504(a)(4) is not treated as stock for purposes of de- termining whether the issuer is a member of an affiliated group (within the meaning of section 1504(a)). (ii) Application of the covered debt instrument exclusions. For purposes of determining whether a debt instrument is- sued by a member of a consolidated group is a covered debt instrument, each test described in §1.385-3(g)(3) is applied on a separate member basis without regard to the one-corporation rule described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. (iii) Qualified short-term debt instru- ment. The determination of whether a member of a consolidated group has is- sued a qualified short-term debt instru- ment for purposes of §1.385-3(b)(3)(vii) is made on a separate member basis with- out regard to the one-corporation rule de- scribed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. (4) Application of the reductions of §1.385-3(c)(3) to members of a consoli- dated group—(i) Application of the reduc- tion for expanded group earnings—(A) In general. A consolidated group maintains one expanded group earnings account with respect to an expanded group period, and only the earnings and profits, determined in accordance with §1.1502-33 (without regard to the application of §1.1502-33(b) (2), (e), and (f)), of the common parent (within the meaning of section 1504) of the consolidated group are considered in calculating the expanded group earnings for the expanded group period of the con- solidated group. Accordingly, a regarded distribution or acquisition made by a mem- ber of a consolidated group is reduced to the extent of the expanded group earnings account of the consolidated group. (B) Effect of certain corporate transac- tions on the calculation of expanded group earnings—(1) Consolidation. A consol- idated group succeeds to the expanded group earnings account of a joining mem- ber under the principles of §1.385-3(c)(3) (i)(F)(2)(ii). (2) Deconsolidation—(i) In general. Except as otherwise provided in para- graph (b)(4)(i)(B)(2)(ii) of this section, no amount of the expanded group earnings account of a consolidated group for an ex- panded group period, if any, is allocated to a departing member. Accordingly, im- mediately after leaving the consolidated group, the departing member has no ex- panded group earnings account with re- spect to its expanded group period. (ii) Allocation of expanded group earnings to a departing member in a distribution described in section 355. If a departing member leaves the consoli- dated group by reason of an exchange or distribution to which section 355 (or so much of section 356 that relates to sec- tion 355) applies, the expanded group earnings account of the consolidated group is allocated between the consoli- dated group and the departing member in proportion to the earnings and profits of the consolidated group and the earnings and profits of the departing member im- mediately after the transaction. (ii) Application of the reduction for qualified contributions—(A) In general. For purposes of applying §1.385-3(c)(3) (ii)(A) to a consolidated group— (1) A qualified contribution to any member of a consolidated group that re- mains a member of the consolidated group immediately after the qualified contribu- tion from a person other than a member of the same consolidated group is treated as made to the one corporation described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; (2) A qualified contribution that caus- es a member of a consolidated group to become a departing member of that con- solidated group is treated as made to the departing member and not to the consoli- dated group of which the departing mem- ber was a member immediately prior to the qualified contribution; and (3) No contribution of property by a member of a consolidated group to any other member of the consolidated group is a qualified contribution. (B) Effect of certain corporate trans- actions on the calculation of qualified contributions—(1) Consolidation. A con- solidated group succeeds to the qualified contributions of a joining member under the principles of §1.385-3(c)(3)(ii)(F)(2) (ii). (2) Deconsolidation—(i) In general. Except as otherwise provided in para- graph (b)(4)(ii)(B)(2)(ii) of this section, no amount of the qualified contributions of a consolidated group for an expanded group period, if any, is allocated to a de- parting member. Accordingly, immediate- ly after leaving the consolidated group, the departing member has no qualified contributions with respect to its expanded group period. (ii) Allocation of qualified contribu- tions to a departing member in a distri- bution described in section 355. If a de- parting member leaves the consolidated group by reason of an exchange or distri- bution to which section 355 (or so much of section 356 that relates to section 355) applies, each qualified contribution of the consolidated group is allocated between the consolidated group and the depart- ing member in proportion to the earnings and profits of the consolidated group and the earnings and profits of the departing member immediately after the transac- tion. (5) Order of operations. For purposes of this section and §1.385-3, the conse- quences of a transaction involving one or more members of a consolidated group are determined as provided in paragraphs (b)(5)(i) and (ii) of this section. (i) First, determine the characteriza- tion of the transaction under Federal tax law without regard to the one-corporation rule described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. (ii) Second, apply this section and §1.385-3 to the transaction as character- ized to determine whether to treat a debt instrument as stock, treating the consol- idated group as one corporation under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, unless otherwise provided. June 1, 2020 896 Bulletin No. 2020–23 (6) Partnership owned by a consoli- dated group. For purposes of this section and §1.385-3, and notwithstanding the one-corporation rule described in para- graph (b)(1) of this section, a partnership that is wholly owned by members of a con- solidated group is treated as a partnership. Thus, for example, if members of a con- solidated group own all of the interests in a controlled partnership that issues a debt instrument to a member of the consolidat- ed group, such debt instrument would be treated as a consolidated group debt in- strument because, under §1.385-3(f)(3)(i), for purposes of this section and §1.385-3, a consolidated group member that is an expanded group partner is treated as the issuer with respect to its share of the debt instrument issued by the partnership. (7) Predecessor and successor—(i) In general. Pursuant to paragraph (b)(5) of this section, the determination as to whether a member of an expanded group is a predecessor or successor of another member of the consolidated group is made without regard to paragraph (b)(1) of this section. For purposes of §1.385-3(b)(3), if a consolidated group member is a pre- decessor or successor of a member of the same expanded group that is not a member of the same consolidated group, the con- solidated group is treated as a predecessor or successor of the expanded group mem- ber (or the consolidated group of which that expanded group member is a mem- ber). Thus, for example, a departing mem- ber that departs a consolidated group in a distribution or exchange to which section 355 applies is a successor to the consol- idated group and the consolidated group is a predecessor of the departing member. (ii) Joining members. For purposes of §1.385-3(b)(3), the term predecessor also means, with respect to a consolidated group, a joining member and the term suc- cessor also means, with respect to a join- ing member, a consolidated group. (c) Consolidated group debt instru- ments—(1) Debt instrument ceases to be a consolidated group debt instrument but continues to be issued and held by ex- panded group members—(i) Consolidat- ed group member leaves the consolidated group. For purposes of this section and §1.385-3, when a debt instrument ceases to be a consolidated group debt instrument as a result of a transaction in which the member of the consolidated group that issued the instrument (the issuer) or the member of the consolidated group hold- ing the instrument (the holder) ceases to be a member of the same consolidated group but both the issuer and the holder continue to be members of the same ex- panded group, the issuer is treated as issu- ing a new debt instrument to the holder in exchange for property immediately after the debt instrument ceases to be a consol- idated group debt instrument. To the ex- tent the newly-issued debt instrument is a covered debt instrument that is treated as stock under §1.385-3(b)(3), the cov- ered debt instrument is then immediately deemed to be exchanged for stock of the issuer. For rules regarding the treatment of the deemed exchange, see §1.385-1(d). For examples illustrating the rule in this paragraph (c)(1)(i), see paragraphs (f)(3) (iv) and (v) of this section (Examples 4 and 5). (ii) Consolidated group debt instrument that is transferred outside of the consoli- dated group. For purposes of this section and §1.385-3, when a member of a con- solidated group that holds a consolidated group debt instrument transfers the debt instrument to an expanded group member that is not a member of the same consol- idated group (transferee expanded group member), the debt instrument is treated as issued by the consolidated group to the transferee expanded group member imme- diately after the debt instrument ceases to be a consolidated group debt instrument. Thus, for example, for purposes of this section and §1.385-3, the sale of a con- solidated group debt instrument to a trans- feree expanded group member is treated as an issuance of the debt instrument by the consolidated group to the transferee expanded group member in exchange for property. To the extent the newly-issued debt instrument is a covered debt instru- ment that is treated as stock upon being transferred, the covered debt instrument is deemed to be exchanged for stock of the member of the consolidated group treated as the issuer of the debt instrument (de- termined under paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section) immediately after the covered debt instrument is transferred outside of the consolidated group. For rules regard- ing the treatment of the deemed exchange, see §1.385-1(d). For examples illustrating the rule in this paragraph (c)(1)(ii), see paragraphs (f)(3)(ii) and (iii) of this sec- tion (Examples 2 and 3). (iii) Overlap transactions. If a debt instrument ceases to be a consolidated group debt instrument in a transaction to which both paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section apply, then only the rules of paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section apply with respect to such debt instrument. (iv) Subgroup exception. A debt in- strument is not treated as ceasing to be a consolidated group debt instrument for purposes of paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section if both the issuer and the hold- er of the debt instrument are members of the same consolidated group immediately after the transaction described in para- graph (c)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section. (2) Covered debt instrument treated as stock becomes a consolidated group debt instrument. When a covered debt instrument that is treated as stock under §1.385-3 becomes a consolidated group debt instrument, then immediately after the covered debt instrument becomes a consolidated group debt instrument, the issuer is deemed to issue a new covered debt instrument to the holder in exchange for the covered debt instrument that was treated as stock. In addition, in a manner consistent with §1.385-3(d)(2)(ii)(A), when the covered debt instrument that previously was treated as stock becomes a consolidated group debt instrument, other covered debt instruments issued by the issuer of that instrument (including a consolidated group that includes the issu- er) that are not treated as stock when the instrument becomes a consolidated group debt instrument are re-tested to determine whether those other covered debt instru- ments are treated as funding the regarded distribution or acquisition that previously was treated as funded by the instrument (unless such distribution or acquisition is disregarded under paragraph (b)(1) of this section). Further, also in a manner consis- tent with §1.385-3(d)(2)(ii)(A), a covered debt instrument that is issued by the issuer (including a consolidated group that in- cludes the issuer) after the application of this paragraph (c)(2) and within the per se period may also be treated as funding that regarded distribution or acquisition. (3) No interaction with the intercom- pany obligation rules of §1.1502-13(g). Bulletin No. 2020–23 897 June 1, 2020 The rules of this section do not affect the application of the rules of §1.1502- 13(g). Thus, any deemed satisfaction and reissuance of a debt instrument under §1.1502-13(g) and any deemed issuance and deemed exchange of a debt instru- ment under this paragraph (c) that arise as part of the same transaction or series of transactions are not integrated. Rather, each deemed satisfaction and reissuance under the rules of §1.1502-13(g), and each deemed issuance and exchange un- der the rules of this section, are respected as separate steps and treated as separate transactions. (d) Application of the funding rule of §1.385-3(b)(3) to members departing a consolidated group. This paragraph (d) provides rules for applying the funding rule of §1.385-3(b)(3) when a departing member ceases to be a member of a con- solidated group, but only if the departing member and the consolidated group are members of the same expanded group im- mediately after the deconsolidation. (1) Continued application of the one-corporation rule. A disregarded dis- tribution or acquisition by any member of the consolidated group continues to be disregarded when the departing member ceases to be a member of the consolidated group. (2) Continued recharacterization of a departing member’s covered debt instru- ment as stock. A covered debt instrument of a departing member that is treated as stock of the departing member under §1.385-3(b) continues to be treated as stock when the departing member ceases to be a member of the consolidated group. (3) Effect of issuances of covered debt instruments that are not consolidated group debt instruments on the departing member and the consolidated group. If a departing member has issued a covered debt instrument (determined without re- gard to the one-corporation rule described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section) that is not a consolidated group debt instrument and that is not treated as stock immedi- ately before the departing member ceases to be a consolidated group member, then the departing member (and not the con- solidated group) is treated as issuing the covered debt instrument on the date and in the manner the covered debt instru- ment was issued. If the departing member is not treated as the issuer of a covered debt instrument pursuant to the preced- ing sentence, then the consolidated group continues to be treated as issuing the cov- ered debt instrument on the date and in the manner the covered debt instrument was issued. (4) Treatment of prior regarded distri- butions or acquisitions. This paragraph (d)(4) applies when a departing member ceases to be a consolidated group member in a transaction other than a distribution to which section 355 (or so much of section 356 as relates to section 355) applies, and the consolidated group has made a regard- ed distribution or acquisition. In this case, to the extent the distribution or acquisition has not caused a covered debt instrument of the consolidated group to be treated as stock under §1.385-3(b) on or before the date the departing member leaves the con- solidated group, then— (i) If the departing member made the regarded distribution or acquisition (deter- mined without regard to the one-corpora- tion rule described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section), the departing member (and not the consolidated group) is treated as having made the regarded distribution or acquisition. (ii) If the departing member did not make the regarded distribution or acqui- sition (determined without regard to the one-corporation rule described in para- graph (b)(1) of this section), then the consolidated group (and not the departing member) continues to be treated as having made the regarded distribution or acqui- sition. (e) Definitions. The definitions in this paragraph (e) apply for purposes of this section. (1) Consolidated group debt instru- ment. The term consolidated group debt instrument means a covered debt instru- ment issued by a member of a consoli- dated group and held by a member of the same consolidated group. (2) Departing member. The term de- parting member means a member of an expanded group that ceases to be a mem- ber of a consolidated group but continues to be a member of the same expanded group. In the case of multiple members leaving a consolidated group as a result of a single transaction that continue to be members of the same expanded group, if such members are treated as one corpora- tion under paragraph (b)(1) of this section immediately after the transaction, that one corporation is a departing member with respect to the consolidated group. (3) Disregarded distribution or acqui- sition. The term disregarded distribution or acquisition means a distribution or ac- quisition described in §1.385-3(b)(2) or (b)(3)(i) between members of a consoli- dated group that is disregarded under the one-corporation rule described in para- graph (b)(1) of this section. (4) Joining member. The term joining member means a member of an expand- ed group that becomes a member of a consolidated group and continues to be a member of the same expanded group. In the case of multiple members joining a consolidated group as a result of a single transaction that continue to be members of the same expanded group, if such mem- bers were treated as one corporation under paragraph (b)(1) of this section immedi- ately before the transaction, that one cor- poration is a joining member with respect to the consolidated group. (5) Regarded distribution or acquisi- tion. The term regarded distribution or acquisition means a distribution or ac- quisition described in §1.385-3(b)(2) or (b)(3)(i) that is not disregarded under the one-corporation rule described in para- graph (b)(1) of this section. (f) Examples—(1) Assumed facts. Ex- cept as otherwise stated, the following facts are assumed for purposes of the ex- amples in paragraph (f)(3) of this section: (i) FP is a foreign corporation that owns 100% of the stock of USS1, a cov- ered member, and 100% of the stock of FS, a foreign corporation; (ii) USS1 owns 100% of the stock of DS1 and DS3, both covered members; (iii) DS1 owns 100% of the stock of DS2, a covered member; (iv) FS owns 100% of the stock of UST, a covered member; (v) At the beginning of Year 1, FP is the common parent of an expanded group comprised solely of FP, USS1, FS, DS1, DS2, DS3, and UST (the FP expanded group); (vi) USS1, DS1, DS2, and DS3 are members of a consolidated group of which USS1 is the common parent (the USS1 consolidated group); June 1, 2020 898 Bulletin No. 2020–23 (vii) The FP expanded group has out- standing more than $50 million of debt instruments described in §1.385-3(c)(4) at all times; (viii) No issuer of a covered debt in- strument has a positive expanded group earnings account, within the meaning of §1.385-3(c)(3)(i)(B), or has received a qualified contribution, within the meaning of §1.385-3(c)(3)(ii)(B); (ix) All notes are covered debt instru- ments, within the meaning of §1.385- 3(g)(3), and are not qualified short-term debt instruments, within the meaning of §1.385-3(b)(3)(vii); (x) All notes between members of a consolidated group are intercompany ob- ligations within the meaning of §1.1502- 13(g)(2)(ii); (xi) Each entity has as its taxable year the calendar year; (xii) No domestic corporation is a Unit- ed States real property holding corporation within the meaning of section 897(c)(2); (xiii) Each note is issued with ade- quate stated interest (as defined in section 1274(c)(2)); and (xiv) Each transaction occurs after Jan- uary 19, 2017. (2) No inference. Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is assumed for purposes of the examples in paragraph (f) (3) of this section that the form of each transaction is respected for Federal tax purposes. No inference is intended, how- ever, as to whether any particular note would be respected as indebtedness or as to whether the form of any particular transaction described in an example in paragraph (f)(3) of this section would be respected for Federal tax purposes. (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this section. (i) Example 1: Order of operations—(A) Facts. On Date A in Year 1, UST issues UST Note to USS1 in exchange for DS3 stock representing less than 20% of the value and voting power of DS3. (B) Analysis. UST is acquiring the stock of DS3, the non-common parent member of a consolidated group. Pursuant to paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this section, the transaction is first analyzed without regard to the one-corporation rule described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and therefore UST is treated as issuing a covered debt instrument in exchange for expand- ed group stock. The exchange of UST Note for DS3 stock is not an exempt exchange within the meaning of §1.385-3(g)(11) because UST and USS1 are not parties to an asset reorganization. Pursuant to para- graph (b)(5)(ii) of this section, §1.385-3 (including §1.385-3(b)(2)(ii)) is then applied to the transaction, thereby treating UST Note as stock for Federal tax purposes when it is issued by UST to USS1. The UST Note is not treated as property for purposes of section 304(a) because it is not property within the meaning specified in section 317(a). Therefore, UST’s acquisition of DS3 stock from USS1 in ex- change for UST Note is not an acquisition described in section 304(a)(1). (ii) Example 2: Distribution of consolidated group debt instrument—(A) Facts. On Date A in Year 1, DS1 issues DS1 Note to USS1 in a distri- bution. On Date B in Year 2, USS1 distributes DS1 Note to FP. (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this sec- tion, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as one corporation for purposes of §1.385-3. Accordingly, when DS1 issues DS1 Note to USS1 in a distribu- tion on Date A in Year 1, DS1 is not treated as issu- ing a debt instrument to another member of DS1’s expanded group in a distribution for purposes of §1.385-3(b)(2), and DS1 Note is not treated as stock under §1.385-3. When USS1 distributes DS1 Note to FP, DS1 Note is deemed satisfied and reissued under §1.1502-13(g)(3)(ii), immediately before DS1 Note ceases to be an intercompany obligation. Under para- graph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, when USS1 distrib- utes DS1 Note to FP, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as issuing DS1 Note to FP in a distribution on Date B in Year 2. Accordingly, DS1 Note is treated as stock under §1.385-3(b)(2)(i). Under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, DS1 Note is deemed to be exchanged for stock of the issuing member, DS1, immediately after DS1 Note is transferred outside of the USS1 consolidated group. Under paragraph (c) (3) of this section, the deemed satisfaction and re- issuance under §1.1502-13(g)(3)(ii) and the deemed issuance and exchange under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, are respected as separate steps and treat- ed as separate transactions. (iii) Example 3: Sale of consolidated group debt instrument—(A) Facts. On Date A in Year 1, DS1 lends $200x of cash to USS1 in exchange for USS1 Note. On Date B in Year 2, USS1 distributes $200x of cash to FP. Subsequently, on Date C in Year 2, DS1 sells USS1 Note to FS for $200x. (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this sec- tion, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as one corporation for purposes of §1.385-3. Accordingly, when USS1 issues USS1 Note to DS1 for property on Date A in Year 1, the USS1 consolidated group is not treated as a funded member, and when USS1 distributes $200x to FP on Date B in Year 2, that dis- tribution is a transaction described in §1.385-3(b)(3) (i)(A), but does not cause USS1 Note to be recharac- terized under §1.385-3(b)(3). When DS1 sells USS1 Note to FS, USS1 Note is deemed satisfied and reis- sued under §1.1502-13(g)(3)(ii), immediately before USS1 Note ceases to be an intercompany obligation. Under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, when the USS1 Note is transferred to FS for $200x on Date C in Year 2, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as issuing USS1 Note to FS in exchange for $200x on that date. Because USS1 Note is issued by the USS1 consolidated group to FS within the per se period as defined in §1.385-3(g)(19) with respect to the distri- bution by the USS1 consolidated group to FP, USS1 Note is treated as funding the distribution under §1.385-3(b)(3)(iii)(A) and, accordingly, is treated as stock under §1.385-3(b)(3). Under §1.385-3(d)(1)(i) and paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, USS1 Note is deemed to be exchanged for stock of the issuing member, USS1, immediately after USS1 Note is transferred outside of the USS1 consolidated group. Under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the deemed satisfaction and reissuance under §1.1502-13(g)(3) (ii) and the deemed issuance and exchange under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section are respected as separate steps and treated as separate transactions. (iv) Example 4: Treatment of consolidated group debt instrument and departing member’s regarded distribution or acquisition when the issuer of the in- strument leaves the consolidated group—(A) Facts. The facts are the same as provided in paragraph (f) (1) of this section, except that USS1 and FS own 90% and 10% of the stock of DS1, respectively. On Date A in Year 1, DS1 distributes $80x of cash and newly-issued DS1 Note, which has a value of $10x, to USS1. Also on Date A in Year 1, DS1 distributes $10x of cash to FS. On Date B in Year 2, FS purchas- es all of USS1’s stock in DS1 (90% of the stock of DS1), resulting in DS1 ceasing to be a member of the USS1 consolidated group. (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this sec- tion, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as one corporation for purposes of §1.385-3. Accordingly, DS1’s distribution of $80x of cash to USS1 on Date A in Year 1 is a disregarded distribution or acquisi- tion, and under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, con- tinues to be a disregarded distribution or acquisition when DS1 ceases to be a member of the USS1 con- solidated group. In addition, when DS1 issues DS1 Note to USS1 in a distribution on Date A in Year 1, DS1 is not treated as issuing a debt instrument to a member of DS1’s expanded group in a distribution for purposes of §1.385-3(b)(2)(i), and DS1 Note is not treated as stock under §1.385-3(b)(2)(i). DS1’s issuance of DS1 Note to USS1 is also a disregard- ed distribution or acquisition, and under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, continues to be a disregarded distribution or acquisition when DS1 ceases to be a member of the USS1 consolidated group. The distri- bution of $10x cash by DS1 to FS on Date A in Year 1 is a regarded distribution or acquisition. When FS purchases 90% of the stock of DS1’s from USS1 on Date B in Year 2 and DS1 ceases to be a mem- ber of the USS1 consolidated group, DS1 Note is deemed satisfied and reissued under §1.1502-13(g) (3)(ii), immediately before DS1 Note ceases to be an intercompany obligation. Under paragraph (c)(1) (i) of this section, for purposes of §1.385-3, DS1 is treated as issuing a new debt instrument to USS1 in exchange for property immediately after DS1 Note ceases to be a consolidated group debt instrument. Under paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section, the de- parting member, DS1 (and not the USS1 consol- idated group) is treated as having distributed $10x to FS on Date A in Year 1 (a regarded distribution or acquisition) for purposes of applying §1.385-3(b) (3) after DS1 ceases to be a member of the USS1 consolidated group. Because DS1 Note is reissued by DS1 to USS1 within the per se period (as defined in §1.385-3(g)(19)) with respect to DS1’s regarded distribution to FS, DS1 Note is treated as funding the distribution under §1.385-3(b)(3)(iii)(A) and, accordingly, is treated as stock under §1.385-3(b) (3). Under §1.385-3(d)(1)(i) and paragraph (c)(1)(i) Bulletin No. 2020–23 899 June 1, 2020 of this section, DS1 Note is immediately deemed to be exchanged for stock of DS1 on Date B in Year 2. Under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the deemed satisfaction and reissuance under §1.1502-13(g)(3) (ii) and the deemed issuance and exchange under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section are respected as separate steps and treated as separate transactions. Under §1.385-3(d)(7)(i), after DS1 Note is treated as stock held by USS1, DS1 Note is not treated as stock for purposes of determining whether DS1 is a member of the USS1 consolidated group. (v) Example 5: Treatment of consolidated group debt instrument and consolidated group’s regarded distribution or acquisition—(A) Facts. On Date A in Year 1, DS1 issues DS1 Note to USS1. On Date B in Year 2, USS1 distributes $100x of cash to FP. On Date C in Year 3, USS1 sells all of its interest in DS1 to FS, resulting in DS1 ceasing to be a member of the USS1 consolidated group. (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this sec- tion, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as one corporation for purposes of §1.385-3. Accordingly, when DS1 issues DS1 Note to USS1 in a distribution on Date A in Year 1, DS1 is not treated as issuing a debt instrument to a member of DS1’s expanded group in a distribution for purposes of §1.385-3(b) (2)(i), and DS1 Note is not treated as stock under §1.385-3(b)(2)(i). DS1’s issuance of DS1 Note to USS1 is also a disregarded distribution or acqui- sition, and under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, continues to be a disregarded distribution or acqui- sition when DS1 ceases to be a member of the USS1 consolidated group. The distribution of $100x cash by DS1 to USS1 on Date B in Year 2 is a regarded distribution or acquisition. When FS purchases all of the stock of DS1 from USS1 on Date C in Year 3 and DS1 ceases to be a member of the USS1 con- solidated group, DS1 Note is deemed satisfied and reissued under §1.1502-13(g)(3)(ii), immediately before DS1 Note ceases to be an intercompany obli- gation. Under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section, for purposes of §1.385-3, DS1 is treated as issuing a new debt instrument to USS1 in exchange for property immediately after DS1 Note ceases to be a consol- idated group debt instrument. Under paragraph (d) (4)(ii) of this section, the USS1 consolidated group (and not DS1) is treated as having distributed $100x to FP on Date B in Year 2 (a regarded distribution or acquisition) for purposes of applying §1.385-3(b)(3) after DS1 ceases to be a member of the USS1 con- solidated group. Because DS1 has not engaged in a regarded distribution or acquisition that would have been treated as funded by the reissued DS1 Note, the reissued DS1 Note is not treated as stock. (vi) Example 6: Treatment of departing mem- ber’s issuance of a covered debt instrument—(A) Facts. On Date A in Year 1, FS lends $100x of cash to DS1 in exchange for DS1 Note. On Date B in Year 2, USS1 distributes $30x of cash to FP. On Date C in Year 2, USS1 sells all of its DS1 stock to FP, re- sulting in DS1 ceasing to be a member of the USS1 consolidated group. (B) Analysis. Under paragraph (b)(1) of this sec- tion, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as one corporation for purposes of §1.385-3. Accordingly, on Date A in Year 1, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as issuing DS1 Note to FS, and on Date B in Year 2, the USS1 consolidated group is treated as distributing $30x of cash to FP. Because DS1 Note is issued by the USS1 consolidated group to FS within the per se period as defined in §1.385-3(g)(19) with respect to the distribution by the USS1consoldiated group of $30x cash to FP, $30x of DS1 Note is treat- ed as funding the distribution under §1.385-3(b)(3) (iii)(A), and, accordingly, is treated as stock on Date B in Year 2 under §1.385-3(b)(3) and §1.385-3(d)(1) (ii). Under paragraph (d)(3) of this section, DS1 (and not the USS1 consolidated group) is treated as the issuer of the remaining portion of DS1 Note for pur- poses of applying §1.385-3(b)(3) after DS1 ceases to be a member of the USS1 consolidated group. (g) Applicability date. This section ap- plies to taxable years for which the U.S. Federal income tax return is due, with- out extensions, after May 14, 2020. For taxable years ending on or after January 19, 2017, and for which the U.S. Federal income tax return is due, without exten- sions, on or before May 14, 2020, see §1.385-4T, as contained in 26 CFR in part 1 in effect on April 1, 2019. In the case of a taxable year that ends after October 13, 2019, and on or before May 14, 2020, a taxpayer may choose to apply this section to the portion of the taxable year that oc- curs after the expiration of §1.385-4T on October 13, 2019, provided that all mem- bers of the taxpayer’s expanded group ap- ply this section in its entirety. Sunita Lough Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. Approved: April 2, 2020 David J. Kautter Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy). (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on May 13, 2019, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for May 14, 2019, 85 F.R. 28867) June 1, 2020 900 Bulletin No. 2020–23 Part III Update for Weighted Average Interest Rates, Yield Curves, and Segment Rates Notice 2020-37 This notice provides guidance on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, the corresponding spot segment rates used under § 417(e)(3), and the 24-month aver- age segment rates under § 430(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, this notice provides guidance as to the interest rate on 30-year Treasury securities under § 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) as in effect for plan years beginning before 2008 and the 30- year Treasury weighted average rate under § 431(c)(6)(E)(ii)(I). YIELD CURVE AND SEGMENT RATES Section 430 specifies the minimum funding requirements that apply to sin- gle-employer plans (except for CSEC plans under § 414(y)) pursuant to § 412. Section 430(h)(2) specifies the inter- est rates that must be used to determine a plan’s target normal cost and funding target. Under this provision, present val- ue is generally determined using three 24-month average interest rates (“segment rates”), each of which applies to cash flows during specified periods. To the ex- tent provided under § 430(h)(2)(C)(iv), these segment rates are adjusted by the ap- plicable percentage of the 25-year average segment rates for the period ending Sep- tember 30 of the year preceding the cal- endar year in which the plan year begins. 1 However, an election may be made under § 430(h)(2)(D)(ii) to use the monthly yield curve in place of the segment rates. Notice 2007-81, 2007-44 I.R.B. 899, provides guidelines for determining the monthly corporate bond yield curve, and the 24-month average corporate bond segment rates used to compute the target normal cost and the funding target. Con- sistent with the methodology specified in Notice 2007-81, the monthly corporate bond yield curve derived from April 2020 data is in Table 2020-4 at the end of this notice. The spot first, second, and third segment rates for the month of April 2020 are, respectively, 1.58, 2.88, and 3.24 The 24-month average segment rates de- termined under § 430(h)(2)(C)(i) through (iii) must be adjusted pursuant to § 430(h) (2)(C)(iv) to be within the applicable mini- mum and maximum percentages of the cor- responding 25-year average segment rates. For plan years beginning before 2021, the applicable minimum percentage is 90% and the applicable maximum percentage is 110%. The 25-year average segment rates for plan years beginning in 2019 and 2020 were published in Notice 2018-73, 2018- 40 I.R.B. 526, and Notice 2019-51, 2019- 41 I.R.B. 866, respectively. 24-MONTH AVERAGE CORPORATE BOND SEGMENT RATES The three 24-month average corporate bond segment rates applicable for May 2020 without adjustment for the 25-year average segment rate limits are as follows: 24-Month Average Segment Rates Without 25-Year Average Adjustment Applicable Month First Segment Second Segment Third Segment May 2020 2.62 3.66 4.14 Based on § 430(h)(2)(C)(iv), the 24-month averages applicable for May 2020, adjusted to be within the applicable minimum and maximum percentages of the corresponding 25-year average seg- ment rates, are as follows: Adjusted 24-Month Average Segment Rates For Plan Years Beginning InApplicable MonthFirst SegmentSecond SegmentThird Segment 2019May 20203.745.356.11 2020May 20203.645.215.94 30-YEAR TREASURY SECURITIES INTEREST RATES Section 431 specifies the minimum funding requirements that apply to multi- employer plans pursuant to § 412. Section 431(c)(6)(B) specifies a minimum amount for the full-funding limitation described in § 431(c)(6)(A), based on the plan’s current liability. Section 431(c)(6)(E)(ii)(I) pro- vides that the interest rate used to calculate current liability for this purpose must be no more than 5 percent above and no more than 10 percent below the weighted aver- age of the rates of interest on 30-year Trea- 1 Pursuant to § 433(h)(3)(A), the 3 rd segment rate determined under § 430(h)(2)(C) is used to determine the current liability of a CSEC plan (which is used to calculate the minimum amount of the full funding limitation under § 433(c)(7)(C)). Bulletin No. 2020–23 901 June 1, 2020 sury securities during the four-year period ending on the last day before the beginning of the plan year. Notice 88-73, 1988-2 C.B. 383, provides guidelines for determining the weighted average interest rate. The rate of interest on 30-year Treasury securities for April 2020 is 1.27 percent. The Service determined this rate as the average of the daily determinations of yield on the 30-year Treasury bond maturing in February 2050. For plan years beginning in May 2020, the weighted average of the rates of interest on 30-year Treasury securities and the permis- sible range of rates used to calculate current liability are as follows: Treasury Weighted Average Rates For Plan Years Beginning In 30-Year Treasury Weighted Average Permissible Range 90% to 105% May 20202.642.38 to 2.78 MINIMUM PRESENT VALUE SEGMENT RATES In general, the applicable interest rates under § 417(e)(3)(D) are segment rates computed without regard to a 24-month average. Notice 2007-81 provides guide- lines for determining the minimum pres- ent value segment rates. Pursuant to that notice, the minimum present value seg- ment rates determined for April 2020 are as follows: Minimum Present Value Segment Rates Month First Segment Second Segment Third Segment April 2020 1.58 2.88 3.24 DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this notice is Tom Morgan of the Office of the Asso- ciate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes). However, other personnel from the IRS participated in the development of this guidance. For further information regarding this notice, contact Mr. Morgan at 202-317-6700 or Paul Stern at 202-317- 8702 (not toll-free calls). June 1, 2020 902 Bulletin No. 2020–23 Table 2020-4 Monthly Yield Curve for April 2020 Derived from April 2020 Data MaturityYieldMaturityYieldMaturityYieldMaturityYieldMaturityYield 0.51.4220.53.2640.53.2460.53.2580.53.25 1.01.4621.03.2541.03.2461.03.2581.03.25 1.51.5021.53.2541.53.2461.53.2581.53.25 2.01.5322.03.2542.03.2462.03.2582.03.25 2.51.5522.53.2542.53.2462.53.2582.53.25 3.01.5723.03.2443.03.2463.03.2583.03.25 3.51.6023.53.2443.53.2463.53.2583.53.25 4.01.6424.03.2444.03.2464.03.2584.03.25 4.51.7024.53.2444.53.2464.53.2584.53.25 5.01.7825.03.2445.03.2465.03.2585.03.25 5.51.8625.53.2445.53.2465.53.2585.53.25 6.01.9626.03.2446.03.2466.03.2586.03.25 6.52.0726.53.2446.53.2466.53.2586.53.25 7.02.1827.03.2447.03.2467.03.2587.03.25 7.52.2927.53.2347.53.2467.53.2587.53.25 8.02.3928.03.2348.03.2468.03.2588.03.25 8.52.5028.53.2448.53.2468.53.2588.53.25 9.02.5929.03.2449.03.2469.03.2589.03.25 9.52.6929.53.2449.53.2469.53.2589.53.25 10.02.7730.03.2450.03.2470.03.2590.03.25 10.52.8530.53.2450.53.2470.53.2590.53.25 11.02.9131.03.2451.03.2571.03.2591.03.25 11.52.9831.53.2451.53.2571.53.2591.53.25 12.03.0332.03.2452.03.2572.03.2592.03.25 12.53.0732.53.2452.53.2572.53.2592.53.25 13.03.1133.03.2453.03.2573.03.2593.03.25 13.53.1533.53.2453.53.2573.53.2593.53.25 14.03.1734.03.2454.03.2574.03.2594.03.25 14.53.2034.53.2454.53.2574.53.2594.53.25 15.03.2135.03.2455.03.2575.03.2595.03.25 15.53.2335.53.2455.53.2575.53.2595.53.25 16.03.2436.03.2456.03.2576.03.2596.03.25 16.53.2536.53.2456.53.2576.53.2596.53.25 17.03.2537.03.2457.03.2577.03.2597.03.25 17.53.2637.53.2457.53.2577.53.2597.53.25 18.03.2638.03.2458.03.2578.03.2598.03.25 18.53.2638.53.2458.53.2578.53.2598.53.25 19.03.2639.03.2459.03.2579.03.2599.03.25 19.53.2639.53.2459.53.2579.53.2599.53.25 20.03.2640.03.2460.03.2580.03.25100.03.25 Bulletin No. 2020–23 903 June 1, 2020 Credit for Renewable Electricity Production, Refined Coal Production, and Indian Coal Production, and Publication of Inflation Adjustment Factors and Reference Prices for Calendar Year 2020 Notice 2020-38 This notice publishes the inflation ad- justment factors and reference prices for calendar year 2020 for the renewable elec- tricity production credit, the refined coal production credit, and the Indian coal pro- duction credit under section 45 of the In- ternal Revenue Code. The 2020 inflation adjustment factors and reference prices are used in determining the availability of the credits and apply to calendar year 2020 sales of kilowatt hours of electricity produced in the United States or a pos- session thereof from qualified energy re- sources, and to calendar year 2020 sales of refined coal and Indian coal produced in the United States or a possession thereof. BACKGROUND Section 45(a) provides that the renew- able electricity production credit for any tax year is an amount equal to the prod- uct of 1.5 cents multiplied by the kilowatt hours of specified electricity produced by the taxpayer and sold to an unrelated person during the tax year. This electricity must be produced from qualified energy resources and at a qualified facility during the 10-year period beginning on the date the facility was originally placed in ser- vice. Section 45(b)(1) provides that the amount of the credit determined under section 45(a) is reduced by an amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of the credit as (A) the amount by which the reference price for the calendar year in which the sale occurs exceeds 8 cents, bears to (B) 3 cents. Under section 45(b) (2), the 1.5 cent amount in section 45(a), the 8 cent amount in section 45(b)(1), the $4.375 amount in section 45(e)(8)(A), and, in section 45(e)(8)(B)(i), the refer- ence price of fuel used as feedstock (with- in the meaning of section 45(c)(7)(A)) in 2002, are each adjusted by multiplying such amount by the inflation adjustment factor for the calendar year in which the sale occurs. If any amount as increased under the preceding sentence is not a mul- tiple of 0.1 cent, the amount is rounded to the nearest multiple of 0.1 cent. In the case of electricity produced in open-loop bio- mass facilities, landfill gas facilities, trash facilities, qualified hydropower facilities, and marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy facilities, section 45(b)(4)(A) re- quires the amount in effect under section 45(a)(1) (before rounding to the nearest 0.1 cent) to be reduced by one-half. Section 45(b)(5) provides that in the case of any facility using wind to produce electricity, the amount of the credit deter- mined under section 45(a) (determined af- ter the application of section 45(b)(1), (2), and (3) and without regard to section 45(b) (5)) shall be reduced by (A) in the case of any facility the construction of which begins after December 31, 2016, and be- fore January 1, 2018, 20 percent, (B) in the case of any facility the construction of which begins after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2019, 40 percent, (C) in the case of any facility the con- struction of which begins after December 31, 2018, and before January 1, 2020, 60 percent, and (D) in the case of any facili- ty the construction of which begins after December 31, 2019, and before January 1, 2021, 40 percent. Section 45(c)(1) defines qualified en- ergy resources as wind, closed-loop bio- mass, open-loop biomass, geothermal energy, municipal solid waste, qualified hydropower production, and marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy. Section 45(d)(1) defines a qualified facility using wind to produce electricity as any facility owned by the taxpayer that is originally placed in service after De- cember 31, 1993, and the construction of which begins before January 1, 2021. See section 45(e)(7) for rules relating to the inapplicability of the credit to electricity sold to utilities under certain contracts. Section 45(d)(2)(A) defines a qualified facility using closed-loop biomass to pro- duce electricity as any facility (i) owned by the taxpayer that is originally placed in service after December 31, 1992, and the construction of which begins before Janu- ary 1, 2021, or (ii) owned by the taxpayer which before January 1, 2021 is original- ly placed in service and modified to use closed-loop biomass to co-fire with coal, with other biomass, or with both, but only if the modification is approved under the Biomass Power for Rural Development Programs or is part of a pilot project of the Commodity Credit Corporation as described in 65 FR 63052. For purposes of section 45(d)(2)(A)(ii), a facility shall be treated as modified before January 1, 2021, if the construction of such modifica- tion begins before such date. Section 45(d) (2)(C) provides that in the case of a qual- ified facility described in section 45(d)(2) (A)(ii), (i) the 10-year period referred to in section 45(a) is treated as beginning no earlier than the date of the enactment of section 45(d)(2)(C)(i) (October 22, 2004), and (ii) if the owner of such facility is not the producer of the electricity, the person eligible for the credit allowable under section 45(a) is the lessee or the operator of such facility. A qualified facility using closed-loop biomass includes a new unit placed in service after the date of the en- actment of section 45(d)(2)(B) (October 3, 2008) in connection with a qualified facil- ity using closed-loop biomass, but only to the extent of the increased amount of elec- tricity produced at the facility by reason of such new unit. Section 45(d)(3)(A) defines a quali- fied facility using open-loop biomass to produce electricity as any facility owned by the taxpayer which (i) in the case of a facility using agricultural livestock waste nutrients, (I) is originally placed in service after the date of the enactment of section 45(d)(3)(A)(i)(I) (October 22, 2004) and the construction of which begins before January 1, 2021, and (II) the nameplate capacity rating of which is not less than 150 kilowatts, and (ii) in the case of any other facility, the construction of which begins before January 1, 2021. In the case of any facility described in section 45(d) (3)(A), if the owner of such facility is not the producer of the electricity, section 45(d)(3)(C) provides that the person eligi- ble for the credit allowable under section 45(a) is the lessee or the operator of such facility. A qualified facility using open- loop biomass includes a new unit placed in service after the date of the enactment June 1, 2020 904 Bulletin No. 2020–23 of section 45(d)(3)(B) (October 3, 2008) in connection with a qualified facility us- ing open-loop biomass, but only to the ex- tent of the increased amount of electricity produced at the facility by reason of such new unit. Section 45(d)(4) defines a qualified facility using geothermal energy to pro- duce electricity as any facility owned by the taxpayer which is originally placed in service after the date of the enactment of section 45(d)(4) (October 22, 2004) and the construction of which begins before January 1, 2021. A qualified facility using geothermal energy does not include any property described in section 48(a)(3) the basis of which is taken into account by the taxpayer for purposes of determining the energy credit under section 48. Section 45(d)(6) defines a qualified facility using gas derived from the bio- degradation of municipal solid waste to produce electricity as any facility owned by the taxpayer which is originally placed in service after the date of the enactment of section 45(d)(6) (October 22, 2004) and the construction of which begins before January 1, 2021. Section 45(d)(7) defines a qualified facility (other than a facility described in section 45(d)(6)) that uses municipal solid waste to produce electricity as any facility owned by the taxpayer which is original- ly placed in service after the date of the enactment of section 45(d)(7) (October 22, 2004) and the construction of which begins before January 1, 2021. A qualified facility using municipal solid waste in- cludes a new unit placed in service in con- nection with a facility placed in service on or before the date of the enactment of sec- tion 45(d)(7), but only to the extent of the increased amount of electricity produced at the facility by reason of such new unit. Section 45(d)(8) provides, in the case of a facility that produces refined coal (other than a facility producing steel in- dustry fuel), the term “refined coal pro- duction facility” means any facility pro- ducing refined coal placed in service after the date of the enactment of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (October 22, 2004) and before January 1, 2012. Section 45(d)(9) defines a qualified facility producing qualified hydroelectric production described in section 45(c)(8) as (i) any facility producing incremental hydropower production, but only to the extent of its incremental hydropower pro- duction attributable to efficiency improve- ments or additions to capacity described in section 45(c)(8)(B) placed in service after the date of the enactment of section 45(d)(9)(A)(i) (August 8, 2005) and be- fore January 1, 2021, and (ii) any other facility placed in service after the date of the enactment of section 45(d)(9)(A)(ii) (August 8, 2005) and the construction of which begins before January 1, 2021. Sec- tion 45(d)(9)(B) provides that, in the case of a qualified facility described in section 45(d)(9)(A), the 10-year period referred to in section 45(a) shall be treated as begin- ning on the date the efficiency improve- ments or additions to capacity are placed in service. Section 45(d)(9)(C) provides that for purposes of section 45(d)(9)(A) (i), an efficiency improvement or addition to capacity shall be treated as placed in service before January 1, 2021 if the con- struction of such improvement or addition begins before such date. Section 45(d)(10) provides that the term “Indian Coal Production Facility” means a facility that produces Indian coal. Section 45(d)(11) provides in the case of a facility producing electricity from marine and hydrokinetic renewable ener- gy, the term “qualified facility” means any facility owned by the taxpayer which (A) has a nameplate capacity rating of at least 150 kilowatts, and (B) is originally placed in service on or after the date of the enact- ment of section 45(d)(11)(B) (October 3, 2008) and the construction of which be- gins before January 1, 2021. Section 45(e)(8)(A) provides that the refined coal production credit is an amount equal to $4.375 per ton of qualified refined coal (i) produced by the taxpayer at a re- fined coal production facility during the 10-year period beginning on the date the facility was originally placed in service, and (ii) sold by the taxpayer (I) to an unre- lated person and (II) during such 10-year period and the tax year. Section 45(e)(8) (B) provides that the amount of credit determined under section 45(e)(8)(A) is reduced by an amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of the increase as (i) the amount by which the reference price of fuel used as feedstock (within the meaning of section 45(c)(7)(A)) for the calendar year in which the sale occurs ex- ceeds an amount equal to 1.7 multiplied by the reference price for such fuel in 2002, bears to (ii) $8.75. Section 45(e)(10)(A) provides in the case of a producer of Indian coal, the cred- it determined under section 45 for any tax- able year is an amount equal to the appli- cable dollar amount per ton of Indian coal (i) produced by the taxpayer at an Indian coal production facility during the 15-year period beginning on January 1, 2006, and (ii) sold by the taxpayer (I) to an unrelated person, and (II) during such 15-year peri- od and such taxable year. Section 45(e)(10)(B)(i) defines “appli- cable dollar amount” for any taxable year as (I) $1.50 in the case of calendar years 2006 through 2009, and (II) $2.00 in the case of calendar years beginning after 2009. Section 45(e)(2)(A) requires the Secre- tary to determine and publish in the Feder- al Register each calendar year the inflation adjustment factors and the reference pric- es for such calendar year. The inflation ad- justment factors and the reference prices for the 2020 calendar year were published in the Federal Register at 85 FR 28698 on May 13, 2020. Section 45(e)(2)(B) defines the infla- tion adjustment factor for a calendar year as a fraction the numerator of which is the GDP implicit price deflator for the pre- ceding calendar year and the denominator of which is the GDP implicit price defla- tor for the calendar year 1992. The term “GDP implicit price deflator” means the most recent revision of the implicit price deflator for the gross domestic product as computed and published by the Depart- ment of Commerce before March 15 of the calendar year. Under section 45(e)(10)(B)(ii), in the case of any calendar year after 2006, each of the dollar amounts under section 45(e) (10)(B)(i) shall be equal to the product of such dollar amount and the inflation ad- justment factor determined under section 45(e)(2)(B) for the calendar year, except that section 45(e)(2)(B) shall be applied by substituting 2005 for 1992. Section 45(e)(2)(C) provides that the reference price is the Secretary’s determi- nation of the annual average contract price per kilowatt hour of electricity generated from the same qualified energy resource and sold in the previous year in the United Bulletin No. 2020–23 905 June 1, 2020 States. Only contracts entered into after December 31, 1989 are taken into account. Under section 45(e)(8)(C), the deter- mination of the reference price for fuel used as feedstock within the meaning of section 45(c)(7)(A) is made according to rules similar to the rules under section 45(e)(2)(C). INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS AND REFERENCE PRICES The inflation adjustment factor for cal- endar year 2020 for qualified energy re- sources and refined coal is 1.6687. The in- flation adjustment factor for calendar year 2020 for Indian coal is 1.2851. The reference price for calendar year 2020 for facilities producing electrici- ty from wind (based upon information provided by the Department of Energy) is 4.16 cents per kilowatt hour. The ref- erence prices for fuel used as feedstock within the meaning of section 45(c)(7)(A), relating to refined coal production (based upon information provided by the Depart- ment of Energy) are $31.90 per ton for calendar year 2002 and $48.58 per ton for calendar year 2020. The reference prices for facilities producing electricity from closed-loop biomass, open-loop biomass, geothermal energy, municipal solid waste, qualified hydropower production, and marine and hydrokinetic energy have not been determined for calendar year 2020. PHASEOUT CALCULATION Because the 2020 reference price for electricity produced from wind (4.16 cents per kilowatt hour) does not exceed 8 cents multiplied by the inflation adjust- ment factor (1.6687), the phaseout of the credit provided in section 45(b)(1) does not apply to such electricity sold during calendar year 2020. However, refer to sec- tion 45(b)(5) for an additional phaseout of the credit for wind facilities the construc- tion of which begins after December 31, 2016. Because the 2020 reference price of fuel used as feedstock for refined coal ($48.58) does not exceed $90.49 (which is the $31.90 reference price of such fuel in 2002 multiplied by the inflation adjust- ment factor (1.6687) and 1.7), the phase- out of the credit provided in section 45(e) (8)(B) does not apply to refined coal sold during calendar year 2020. Further, for electricity produced from closed-loop biomass, open-loop biomass, geothermal energy, municipal solid waste, qualified hydropower production, and marine and hydrokinetic energy, the phaseout of the credit provided in section 45(b)(1) does not apply to such electricity sold during calendar year 2020. CREDIT AMOUNT BY QUALIFIED ENERGY RESOURCE AND FACILITY, REFINED COAL, AND INDIAN COAL As required by section 45(b)(2), the 1.5 cent amount in section 45(a)(1), and the $4.375 amount in section 45(e)(8)(A) are each adjusted by multiplying such amount by the inflation adjustment fac- tor for the calendar year in which the sale occurs. If any amount as increased under the preceding sentence is not a multiple of 0.1 cent, such amount is rounded to the nearest multiple of 0.1 cent. In the case of electricity produced in open-loop biomass facilities, landfill gas facilities, trash facil- ities, qualified hydropower facilities, and marine and hydrokinetic renewable ener- gy facilities, section 45(b)(4)(A) requires the amount in effect under section 45(a)(1) (before rounding to the nearest 0.1 cent) to be reduced by one-half. Under the cal- culation required by section 45(b)(2), the credit for renewable electricity production for calendar year 2020 under section 45(a) is 2.5 cents per kilowatt hour on the sale of electricity produced from the qualified energy resources of wind, closed-loop biomass, and geothermal energy, and 1.3 cents per kilowatt hour on the sale of elec- tricity produced in open-loop biomass fa- cilities, landfill gas facilities, trash facil- ities, qualified hydropower facilities, and marine and hydrokinetic energy facilities. Under the calculation required by section 45(b)(2), the credit for refined coal pro- duction for calendar year 2020 under sec- tion 45(e)(8)(A) is $7.301 per ton on the sale of qualified refined coal. As required by section 45(e)(10)(B) (ii), the $2.00 amount in section 45(e) (10)(B)(i) is adjusted by multiplying such amount by the inflation adjustment factor for the calendar year. Under the calcula- tion required by section 45(e)(10)(B)(ii), the credit for Indian coal production for calendar year 2020 under section 45(e) (10)(B) is $2.570 per ton on the sale of Indian coal. DRAFTING AND CONTACT INFORMATION The principal author of this notice is Charles Hyde of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries). For further information re- garding this notice contact Mr. Hyde at (202) 317-6853 (not a toll-free number). 26 CFR 601.601: Rules and regulations (Also Part 1, §§ 6049; 1.6049-4, 1.6049-8) Implementation of Nonresident Alien Deposit Interest Regulations Rev. Proc. 2020-15 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This revenue procedure provides a list of the jurisdictions with which the United States has in effect a relevant information exchange agreement such that the report- ing requirement of §§ 1.6049-4(b)(5) and 1.6049-8(a) of the Income Tax Regula- tions may apply with respect to certain deposit interest paid to residents of such jurisdictions. This revenue procedure also provides a list of the jurisdictions with which the Department of the Treasury (Treasury De- partment) and the Internal Revenue Ser- vice (IRS) have determined that it is ap- propriate to have an automatic exchange relationship with respect to the informa- tion collected under §§ 1.6049-4(b)(5) and 1.6049-8(a). These lists are updated and restated ver- sions of those set forth in Rev. Proc. 2019- 23, 2019-38 I.R.B. 725. Singapore has been added to the list of jurisdictions with which the United States has in effect a relevant in- formation exchange agreement. June 1, 2020 906 Bulletin No. 2020–23 SECTION 2. BACKGROUND Sections 1.6049-4(b)(5) and 1.6049- 8(a), as revised by TD 9584, 2012-20 I.R.B. 900, require the reporting of certain deposit interest paid to nonresident alien individ- uals on or after January 1, 2013. Section 1.6049-4(b)(5) provides that in the case of interest aggregating $10 or more paid to a nonresident alien individual (as defined in section 7701(b)(1)(B)) that is reportable under § 1.6049-8(a), the payor is required to make an information return on Form 1042-S, Foreign Person’s U.S. Source In- come Subject to Withholding, for the cal- endar year in which the interest is paid. Interest that is reportable under § 1.6049-8(a) is interest described in sec- tion 871(i)(2)(A) that relates to a deposit maintained at an office within the United States. The regulations also provide that such deposit interest is reportable only if paid to a resident of a jurisdiction that is identified as a jurisdiction with which the United States has in effect an income tax or other convention or bilateral agreement relating to the exchange of tax informa- tion within the meaning of section 6103(k) (4), under which the competent authori- ty is the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate and the United States agrees to provide, as well as receive, information. Finally, the regulations provide that ju- risdictions are so identified in an applica- ble revenue procedure (see § 601.601(d) (2)) as of December 31 before the calen- dar year in which the interest is paid. The preamble to the regulations (at 2012-20 I.R.B. 901-02) notes that the IRS will not exchange information with another juris- diction, even if an information exchange agreement is in effect, if there are con- cerns about confidentiality, safeguarding of data exchanged, the use of the informa- tion, or other factors that would make the exchange of information inappropriate. Rev. Proc. 2012-24, 2012-20 I.R.B. 913, was published contemporaneously with the publication of TD 9584 to provide a list of those jurisdictions with which the United States has in effect an information exchange agreement, such that interest paid to residents of such jurisdictions must be reported by payors to the extent required under §§ 1.6049-4(b)(5) and 1.6049-8(a), and to provide a separate list identifying those jurisdictions with which the automat- ic exchange of the information collected under the regulations has been determined by the Treasury Department and the IRS to be appropriate. Before issuance of this rev- enue procedure, the most current versions of those lists were set forth in Rev. Proc. 2019-23. SECTION 3. JURISDICTIONS OF RESIDENCE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE DEPOSIT INTEREST REPORTING REQUIREMENT APPLIES The following are the jurisdictions with which the United States has in effect an income tax or other convention or bi- lateral agreement relating to the exchange of tax information within the meaning of section 6103(k)(4) pursuant to which the United States agrees to provide, as well as receive, information and under which the competent authority is the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate: JurisdictionRev. Proc. First Identifying Jurisdiction Antigua & Barbuda2012-24 Argentina2018-36 Aruba2012-24 Australia2012-24 Austria2012-24 Azerbaijan2012-24 Bangladesh2012-24 Barbados2012-24 Belgium2012-24 Bermuda2012-24 Brazil2014-64 British Virgin Islands2012-24 Bulgaria2012-24 Canada2012-24 Cayman Islands2014-64 China2012-24 Colombia2014-64 Costa Rica2012-24 Croatia2014-64 Curaçao2014-64 Cyprus2012-24 Bulletin No. 2020–23 907 June 1, 2020 JurisdictionRev. Proc. First Identifying Jurisdiction Czech Republic2012-24 Denmark2012-24 Dominica2012-24 Dominican Republic2012-24 Egypt2012-24 Estonia2012-24 Faroe Islands2017-46 Finland2012-24 France2012-24 Georgia2019-23 Germany2012-24 Gibraltar2012-24 Greece2012-24 Greenland2017-46 Grenada2012-24 Guernsey2012-24 Guyana2012-24 Honduras2012-24 Hong Kong2014-64 Hungary2012-24 Iceland2012-24 India2012-24 Indonesia2012-24 Ireland2012-24 Isle of Man2012-24 Israel2012-24 Italy2012-24 Jamaica2012-24 Japan2012-24 Jersey2012-24 Kazakhstan2012-24 Korea, Republic of2012-24 Latvia2012-24 Liechtenstein2012-24 Lithuania2012-24 Luxembourg2012-24 Malta2012-24 Marshall Islands2012-24 Mauritius2014-64 Mexico2012-64 Moldova2018-36 Monaco2012-24 Morocco2012-24 Netherlands2012-24 June 1, 2020 908 Bulletin No. 2020–23 JurisdictionRev. Proc. First Identifying Jurisdiction Netherlands special municipalities: Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba 2012-24 New Zealand2012-24 Norway2012-24 Pakistan2012-24 Panama2012-24 Peru2012-24 Philippines2012-24 Poland2012-24 Portugal2012-24 Romania2012-24 Russian Federation2012-24 Saint Lucia2016-56 Singapore2020-15 Sint Maarten2014-64 Slovak Republic2012-24 Slovenia2012-24 South Africa2012-24 Spain2012-24 Sri Lanka2012-24 Sweden2012-24 Switzerland2012-24 Thailand2012-24 Trinidad and Tobago2012-24 Tunisia2012-24 Turkey2012-24 Ukraine2012-24 United Kingdom2012-24 Venezuela2012-24 SECTION 4. JURISDICTIONS WITH WHICH THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT AND THE IRS HAVE DETERMINED THAT AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF DEPOSIT INTEREST INFORMATION IS APPROPRIATE The following list identifies the ju- risdictions with which the automatic ex- change of the information collected under §§ 1.6049-4(b)(5) and 1.6049-8 has been determined by the Treasury Department and the IRS to be appropriate: JurisdictionRev. Proc. First Memorializing Determination on Automatic Exchange with Jurisdiction Australia2014-64 Azerbaijan2016-18 Belgium2017-31 Brazil2015-50 Canada2012-24 Colombia2017-31 Bulletin No. 2020–23 909 June 1, 2020 JurisdictionRev. Proc. First Memorializing Determination on Automatic Exchange with Jurisdiction Croatia2017-46 Curaçao2019-23 Cyprus2019-23 Czech Republic2015-50 Denmark2014-64 Estonia2015-50 Finland2014-64 France2014-64 Germany2014-64 Gibraltar2015-50 Greece2018-36 Guernsey2014-64 Hungary2015-50 Iceland2015-50 India2015-50 Ireland2014-64 Isle of Man2014-64 Israel2016-56 Italy2014-64 Jamaica2016-18 Jersey2014-64 Korea, Republic of2016-56 Latvia2015-50 Liechtenstein2015-50 Lithuania2015-50 Luxembourg2015-50 Malta2014-64 Mauritius2014-64 Mexico2014-64 Netherlands2014-64 New Zealand2015-50 Norway2014-64 Panama2017-46 Poland2015-50 Portugal2017-31 Saint Lucia2016-56 Slovak Republic2016-18 Slovenia2015-50 South Africa2015-50 Spain2014-64 Sweden2015-50 United Kingdom2014-64 June 1, 2020 910 Bulletin No. 2020–23 SECTION 5. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS Rev. Proc. 2019-23 is superseded. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATES For purposes of the reporting require- ment of § 1.6049-4(b)(5), the list of ju- risdictions in Section 3 of this revenue procedure is effective: (i) with respect to Singapore, for interest paid on or after January 1, 2021; and (ii) with respect to each other listed jurisdiction, for interest paid on or after January 1 of the calendar year following the issuance of the revenue procedure (as cited in Section 3) first iden- tifying the jurisdiction as having in effect an agreement with the United States as de- scribed in § 1.6049-8(a). The list of jurisdictions in Section 4 of this revenue procedure is effective from the date of issuance of this revenue pro- cedure with respect to information report- ed to the IRS pursuant to §§ 1.6049-4(b) (5) and 1.6049-8(a) for any tax year for which the jurisdiction was included in the list in Section 3. The revenue procedure citations in the Section 4 list are included for historical reference. SECTION 7. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue procedure is Jackie Bennett Manasterli of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact Ms. Manasterli at (202) 317-6941 (not a toll-free number). Bulletin No. 2020–23 911 June 1, 2020 Part IV Announcement related to income tax treaty references to the NAFTA in light of its pending replacement by the USMCA Announcement 2020-6 Since January 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (the “NAFTA”) has governed trade relations between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. On November 30, 2018, the Governments of the United States, Mex- ico, and Canada signed the Protocol Re- placing the North American Free Trade Agreement with the Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada (the “Agree- ment”). The Agreement was amended by a Protocol signed on December 10, 2019 (the “Protocol of Amendment” and, col- lectively with the Agreement, the “USM- CA”). The USMCA, upon its entry into force, will supersede the NAFTA. The USMCA sets forth modernized standards for trade and investment among the three countries going forward. Most U.S. bilateral income tax treaties contain Limitation on Benefits (“LOB”) articles, which set forth provisions de- signed to prevent entities resident in a treaty jurisdiction from inappropriately accessing tax treaty benefits. Most LOB articles in U.S. bilateral income tax trea- ties provide a series of objective tests pursuant to which a resident may qualify for a treaty benefit provided such resident meets all other requirements specified in the treaty for claiming the benefit. A num- ber of these LOB tests contain explicit references to the NAFTA. For example, under Article 28(3) of the U.S.-Germany Income Tax Treaty, otherwise known as the “derivative benefits” test, a resident company not otherwise entitled to ben- efits may claim treaty benefits if it is at least 95 percent owned by seven or few- er “equivalent beneficiaries.” Paragraph 8(e) of Article 28 provides that, in order to be an equivalent beneficiary, a person must be a resident of a country that is a party to either the NAFTA, the European Union, or the European Economic Area. As another example, paragraph 2(c) of Article 30 of the U.S.-France Income Tax Treaty permits a U.S. company to qualify for benefits if its principal class of shares is primarily traded on a recognized stock exchange located in the United States or another country that is a party to the NAFTA. Upon the USMCA’s entering into force, for purposes of applying an applica- ble U.S. income tax treaty, the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury Department”) and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), including the U.S. Competent Authority, believe that any reference to the NAFTA in a U.S. bilateral income tax treaty should be interpreted as a reference to the USM- CA. The USMCA modernizes and replac- es the NAFTA, is entered into by the same parties, and governs the terms of trade among those parties. The Treasury Department and the IRS will reach out to countries that have an ap- plicable tax treaty containing references to the NAFTA to confirm that they agree with this interpretation. The principal author of this announce- ment is Richard F. Owens of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). For further information regarding this an- nouncement contact Richard F. Owens at (202) 317-6501 (not a toll-free number). Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Denial of Deduction for Certain Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts; Information With Respect To Certain Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts REG-104591-18 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: This document contains pro- posed regulations that provide guidance on section 162(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as amended by legislation enacted in 2017, concerning the deduc- tion of certain fines, penalties, and other amounts. This document also contains proposed regulations that provide guid- ance relating to the information reporting requirements under new section 6050X of the Code with respect to those fines, pen- alties, and other amounts. The proposed regulations affect taxpayers that pay or incur amounts to, or at the direction of, governments, governmental entities or certain nongovernmental entities treated as governmental entities (nongovernmen- tal entities) in relation to the violation of a law or investigations or inquiries by such governments, governmental entities, or nongovernmental entities into the po- tential violation of a law. The proposed regulations also affect governments, gov- ernmental entities, and nongovernmental entities subject to the related reporting requirement. DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by July 13, 2020. Requests for a public hearing must be submitted as pre- scribed in the “Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing” section. ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments electronically. Submit electronic submis- sions via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-104591-18) by following the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted to the Federal eRulemak- ing Portal, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The IRS expects to have limited personnel available to process public comments that are submitted on paper through mail. Until further notice, any comments submitted on paper will be considered to the extent practicable. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS will publish for public availability any comment submit- June 1, 2020 912 Bulletin No. 2020–23 ted electronically, and to the extent practi- cable on paper, to its public docket. Send paper submissions to: CC:PA:LP- D:PR (REG-104591-18), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CON- TACT: Concerning the proposed regula- tions on amended section 162(f), Sharon Y. Horn (202) 317-4426; concerning the information reporting requirement, Nan- cy L. Rose (202) 317-5147; concerning submissions of comments and/or requests for a public hearing, Regina Johnson, (202) 317-5177 (not toll-free numbers). The phone numbers above may also be reached by individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, or who have speech dis- abilities, through the Federal Relay Ser- vice toll-free at (800) 877-8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This document contains proposed revi- sions to 26 CFR part 1 under section 162(f) and proposed additions to 26 CFR part 1 under section 6050X. The proposed re- visions implement the disallowance of deductions for amounts paid or incurred to, or at the direction of, a government, governmental entity, or nongovernmen- tal entity in relation to the violation, or investigation or inquiry into the potential violation, of a law under section 162(f), as amended by section 13306(a) of Public Law No. 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (2017), commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The proposed additions implement the reporting requirements, un- der section 6050X, added to the Code by section 13306(b) of the TCJA. Prior law under section 162(f) was en- acted in 1969. Public Law No. 91-172, 83 Stat. 487 (1969). Unless certain exceptions applied, prior law under section 162(f) disallowed an ordinary and necessary de- duction, under section 162(a), for any fine or similar penalty paid to a government for the violation of a law. This provision codified existing case law that denied an ordinary and necessary business expense deduction for fines or similar penalties be- cause ‘‘allowance of the deduction would frustrate sharply defined national or State policies proscribing the particular types of conduct evidenced by some governmen- tal declaration thereof.’’ See S. Rep. No. 552-91 at 273 - 274 (1969). On February 20, 1975, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued final regulations concern- ing prior law under section 162(f) (TD 7345, 40 FR 7437) (1975 regulations). See §1.162-21. Amendments were pub- lished on July 11, 1975 (T.D. 7366, 40 FR 29290). Section 1.162-21(a) of the 1975 regulations describe the term “paid to” a government. Section 1.162-21(b)(1) of the 1975 regulations describes certain amounts that constitute fines or similar penalties; §1.162-21(b)(2) provides that compensatory damages paid to a govern- ment do not constitute a fine or penalty. Section 1.162-21(c) provides examples to illustrate the application of the 1975 reg- ulations. As amended by section 13306(a) (1) of the TCJA, the general rule of sec- tion 162(f)(1) provides that no deduction otherwise allowable under chapter 1 of the Code (chapter 1) shall be allowed for any amount paid or incurred (whether by suit, agreement, or otherwise) to, or at the direction of, a government, governmental entity, or nongovernmental entity in rela- tion to the violation of a law or the inves- tigation or inquiry by such government or governmental entity into the potential violation of a law. Section 162(f)(5) describes certain self-regulating nongovernmental entities treated as governmental entities. Because section 162(f)(5) treats these nongovern- mental entities as governmental entities, exclusively for purposes of section 162(f) and the related provisions of section 6050X, the term “governmental entities” includes those nongovernmental entities treated as governmental entities. Section 162(f)(2) provides an excep- tion to the general rule and allows a tax- payer to deduct certain amounts paid or incurred that are otherwise allowable un- der chapter 1 for restitution, remediation, or paid to come into compliance with a law. Section 162(f)(3) provides an excep- tion to the general rule for amounts paid or incurred with respect to private party suits; section 162(f)(4) provides an excep- tion for certain taxes due. Under section 162(f)(2)(A)(i) and (ii), section 162(f)(1) shall not disallow a de- duction for amounts that (i) the taxpayer establishes were paid or incurred as res- titution (including remediation of prop- erty) or to come into compliance with a law (establishment requirement), and (ii) are identified in the court order (order) or settlement agreement (agreement) as res- titution, remediation, or amounts paid or incurred to come into compliance with a law (identification requirement). Section 162(f)(2)(B) states that resti- tution, remediation, and amounts paid to come into compliance with a law do not include any amount paid or incurred as re- imbursement to a government or govern- mental entity for the costs of any investi- gation or litigation. To the extent that the amount paid would otherwise be deductible under chapter 1, section 162(f)(2)(A)(iii), (f)(3), and (f)(4) provide that section 162(f)(1) shall not disallow a deduction for amounts paid or incurred (1) as restitution for fail- ure to pay any tax imposed under Title 26 had it been timely paid; (2) pursuant to an order or agreement with respect to a suit in which no government or governmental entity is a party; or (3) as taxes due. Section 13306(b) of the TCJA added new section 6050X. Section 6050X(a) (1) and 6050X(a)(2)(A) requires the ap- propriate official of any government or any entity described in section 162(f)(5), involved in a suit, agreement, or other- wise to which section 162(f) applies, to file an information return if the aggregate amount involved in all orders or agree- ments with respect to the violation, in- vestigation, or inquiry is $600 or more. Section 6050X(a)(2)(B) authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury or his dele- gate (Secretary) to adjust the threshold amount for filing the information return as necessary to ensure the efficient ad- ministration of the internal revenue laws. Pursuant to section 6050X(a)(1), the in- formation return must set forth (1) the amount required to be paid as a result of the order or agreement; (2) any amount required to be paid as a result of the order or agreement that constitutes restitution or remediation of property; and (3) any amount required to be paid as a result of the order or agreement for the purpose of coming into compliance with a law that Bulletin No. 2020–23 913 June 1, 2020 was violated or involved in the investiga- tion or inquiry. Section 6050X(a)(3) provides that the government or governmental entity shall file the information return at the time the agreement is entered into, as determined by the Secretary. Section 6050X(b) re- quires the government or governmental entity to furnish to each person who is a party to the suit, agreement, or otherwise a written statement, at the time the infor- mation return is filed with the IRS, that in- cludes (1) the name of the government or entity and (2) the information submitted to the IRS. Under section 13306(a)(2) and (b) (3) of the TCJA, the amendments to sec- tion 162(f) and new section 6050X apply to amounts paid or incurred on or after the date of the enactment of the TCJA (De- cember 22, 2017). However, they do not apply to amounts paid or incurred under any binding order or agreement entered into before December 22, 2017 and, if such order or agreement requires court ap- proval, the required approval is obtained before December 22, 2017. On April 9, 2018, the IRS published Notice 2018-23, 2018-15 I.R.B. 474, to provide transitional guidance on the iden- tification requirement of section 162(f) (2)(A)(ii) and the information reporting requirement under section 6050X. No- tice 2018-23 provides that information reporting is not required until the date specified in proposed regulations under section 6050X. Notice 2018-23 also pro- vides that, until the Treasury Department and the IRS issue proposed regulations, the identification requirement is treated as satisfied if the order or agreement spe- cifically states on its face that an amount is paid or incurred as restitution, reme- diation, or to come into compliance with a law. Under these proposed regulations, the identification requirement applies to tax- able years beginning on or after the date the proposed regulations are adopted as fi- nal regulations. Until that date, taxpayers, governments, and governmental entities may rely on the identification requirement as provided in Notice 2018-23. Alterna- tively, if taxpayers, governments, and governmental entities, apply the rules in their entirety and in a consistent manner, taxpayers, governments, and governmen- tal entities may rely on the proposed reg- ulations. Explanation of Provisions 1. Denial of Deduction for Certain Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts The proposed regulations revise §1.162-21 and provide operational and definitional guidance concerning the ap- plication of section 162(f), as amend- ed by the TCJA. The terms used in section 162(f), and throughout these proposed regulations, are defined in pro- posed §1.162-21(f) and discussed in this section. In addition, this section describes the exceptions to the general rule of sec- tion 162(f)(1). Proposed §1.162-21(g) provides examples for the application of this section. A. General rule Proposed §1.162-21(a) provides gener- ally that a taxpayer may not take a deduc- tion under any provision of chapter 1 (see section 161, and the related regulations, concerning items allowed as deductions) for amounts (1) paid or incurred by suit, agreement, or otherwise; (2) to, or at the direction of, a government or governmen- tal entity; (3) in relation to the violation, or investigation or inquiry into the potential violation, of any civil or criminal law. This general rule applies regardless of whether the taxpayer admits guilt or liability or pays the amount imposed for any other reason, including to avoid the expense or uncertain outcome of an investigation or litigation. Proposed §1.162-21(b) describes an exception to the general rule, which allows a deduction for certain amounts identified in the order or agreement as restitution, remediation, or paid or incurred to come into compliance with a law and the tax- payer establishes that the amount was paid or incurred for the purpose identified. In general, section 6050X imposes a reporting requirement on governments and governmental entities with respect to the payment amount identified pursuant to certain suits, agreements, or otherwise. Proposed §1.6050X-1 provides rules for complying with the reporting require- ment. Under sections 162(f) and 6050X and proposed §§1.162-21 and 1.6050X-1, suit, agreement, or otherwise includes, but is not limited to, settlement agreements; non-prosecution agreements; deferred prosecution agreements; judicial pro- ceedings; administrative adjudications; decisions issued by officials, committees, commissions, or boards of a government or governmental entity; and any legal ac- tions or hearings in which a liability for the taxpayer is determined or pursuant to which the taxpayer assumes liability. B. Definitions Proposed §1.162-21(f) provides defini- tions relating to section 162(f). Government, governmental entity, or nongovernmental entity treated as a gov- ernmental entity The definition of “government or gov- ernmental entity” under proposed §1.162- 21(f)(1) reflects the term “paid to” a government as described in the 1975 regu- lations but uses the term “territory” instead of “possession” and “Commonwealth” and includes additional territories. The definition of government or governmen- tal entity under proposed §1.162-21(f) (1) also includes (1) the government of a federally recognized Indian tribal govern- ment or a subdivision of an Indian tribal government; (2) a political subdivision of, or corporation or other entity serving as an agency or instrumentality of, any gov- ernment; or (3) a nongovernmental entity treated as a governmental entity. Under proposed §1.162-21(f)(2)(i), certain non- governmental entities are treated as gov- ernmental entities. Proposed §1.162-21(f)(2)(ii) adopts the definition of a nongovernmental en- tity in section 162(f)(5) in its entirety. Proposed §1.162-21(f)(2)(ii) provides that a nongovernmental entity is treat- ed as a governmental entity if it (1) ex- ercises self-regulatory powers (including imposing sanctions) in connection with a qualified board or exchange (as defined in section 1256(g)(7)); or (2) exercises self-regulatory powers, including adopt- ing, administering, or enforcing laws and imposing sanctions, as part of performing an essential governmental function. Al- though nongovernmental entities are not governmental entities, for purposes of June 1, 2020 914 Bulletin No. 2020–23 proposed §§1.162-21 and 1.6050X-1 only, the term “governmental entities” includes the nongovernmental entities treated as governmental entities. Restitution and remediation Under proposed §1.162-21(f)(3)(i), an amount is paid or incurred for restitution or remediation if it restores, in whole or in part, the person, as defined in section 7701(a)(1); the government; the govern- mental entity; or property harmed by the violation or potential violation of a law. In response to Notice 2018-23, commenters disagreed about whether restitution, for purposes of section 162(f), includes for- feiture and disgorgement. Forfeiture and disgorgement focus on the unjust enrichment of the wrongdoer, not the harm to the victim. In Kokesh v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 137 S. Ct. 1635, 1643 (2017), the Supreme Court held that disgorgement, when im- posed as a sanction for violating a Feder- al securities law, was treated as a penalty for purposes of the related five-year stat- ute of limitations because “[t]he primary purpose of disgorgement orders is to deter violations of the securities laws by depriv- ing violators of their ill-gotten gains.” In Nacchio v. United States, 824 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2239 (2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit noted that, “[w]hile restitution seeks to make victims whole by reimbursing them for their loss- es, forfeiture is meant to punish the defen- dant by transferring his ill-gotten gains to the United States Department of Justice.” Nacchio, 824 F.3d at 1378 (citing Unit- ed States v. Joseph, 743 F.3d 1350, 1354 (11th Cir. 2014)). Section 162(f)(2)(A)(i)(I) provides that restitution and remediation payments re- late to the damage or harm caused, or that may be caused, by the violation, or the po- tential violation, of a law. The statute does not characterize restitution or remediation in connection with an unjust enrichment to a wrongdoer. Consistent with the stat- utory language, proposed §1.162-21(f)(3) (i) provides that the purpose of restitution or remediation is to restore the person or property, in whole or in part, to the same or substantially similar position or condition as before the harm caused by the taxpay- er’s violation, or potential violation, of a law. Hence, under proposed §1.162-21(f) (3)(iii)(B)-(C), restitution, remediation, and amounts paid to come into compli- ance with a law do not include any amount paid or incurred which the taxpayer elects to pay in lieu of a fine or penalty or as forfeiture or disgorgement. In addition, under proposed §1.162-21(f)(3)(iii)(D), restitution, remediation, and amounts paid to come into compliance with a law do not include any amount paid or incurred to an entity; to a fund, including a restitution, remediation, or other fund; to a group; or to a government or governmental enti- ty, to the extent it was not harmed by the taxpayer’s violation or potential violation of a law. In addition, proposed §1.162- 21(f)(3)(iii)(A) adopts the rule in sec- tion 162(f)(2)(B) to exclude any amounts paid or incurred as reimbursement to the government or governmental entity for investigation costs or litigation costs from restitution or remediation. Coming into compliance with a law Under proposed §1.162-21(f)(3)(ii), a payment for a specific corrective action, or to provide specific property, is treated as an amount paid to come into compli- ance with a law. Proposed §1.162-21(f)(3) (iii) lists amounts that will not be treated as paid or incurred to come into compli- ance with a law. C. Investigation or inquiry into a potential violation of a law In response to Notice 2018-23, a com- menter requested clarification that an amount paid or incurred in relation to the investigation or inquiry into the potential violation of a law does not include amounts paid in the ordinary course of business as required by law. In general, section 162(f) does not disallow a deduction for amounts paid or incurred for audits, inspections, or reviews conducted in the ordinary course of business if the payment is otherwise deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense and is not related to the violation of a law or the investigation or inquiry into the potential violation of a law as described in section 162(f)(1). The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments about specific examples of au- dits, inspections, or reviews conducted in the ordinary course of business that are not investigations or inquiries of potential violations of law intended to fall within the ambit of section 162(f). D. Material change A commenter asked for clarification that an amendment to an order or agree- ment, entered into before December 22, 2017, that does not change the nature or purpose of the payment obligation or cre- ate a new payment obligation, does not cause the order or agreement to be treated as entered into after December 22, 2017. Proposed §1.162-21(e) provides that, if the parties to an order or agreement, that became binding under applicable law, be- fore December 22, 2017, make a material change to the terms of this original order or agreement on or after the applicabili- ty date of the final regulations, proposed §1.162-21(a) will apply to any amounts paid or incurred, or any obligation to pro- vide property or services, after the date of the material change. Material changes are described in proposed §1.162-21(e)(2). E. Establishment requirement Section 162(f)(2)(A)(i) requires that a taxpayer establish that an amount was paid as restitution or remediation, or that the amount was paid to come into compli- ance with a law. Proposed §1.162-21(b)(3)(i) provides that the taxpayer may satisfy the estab- lishment requirement by providing doc- umentary evidence (1) That the taxpayer was legally obligated to pay the amount the order or agreement identified as resti- tution, remediation, or to come into com- pliance with a law; (2) of the amount paid or incurred; and (3) of the date on which the amount was paid or incurred. Commenters requested that the regula- tions address the documents, or other evi- dence, that a taxpayer may present to meet the establishment requirement. In addi- tion, commenters expressed concern that it may be difficult for taxpayers to meet the requirement when the government has control of the information that estab- lishes the amount identified in the order or agreement. Proposed §1.162-21(b)(3) (ii) provides a non-exhaustive list of doc- Bulletin No. 2020–23 915 June 1, 2020 uments that taxpayers may use to satisfy the establishment requirement. Reporting of the amount by a government or gov- ernmental entity under section 6050X and proposed §1.6050X-1(a) alone does not satisfy the establishment requirement. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments about other evidence and sup- porting documentation taxpayers may use to meet the establishment requirement. F. Identification requirement Section 162(f)(2)(A)(ii) requires an order or agreement to identify an amount paid or incurred as restitution, remedia- tion, or to come into compliance with a law. Under proposed §1.162-21(b)(2)(i), an order or agreement identifies a pay- ment by stating the nature of, or purpose for, each payment each taxpayer is obli- gated to pay and the amount of each pay- ment identified. To satisfy the identification require- ment, proposed §1.162-21(b)(2)(ii) re- quires the order or agreement to spe- cifically state that the payment, and the amount of the payment, constitutes res- titution, remediation, or an amount paid to come into compliance with a law. The proposed rule provides that the identifica- tion requirement may be met if the order or agreement uses a different form of the requisite words, such as “remediate” or “comply with a law.” Commenters expressed the concern that it may not be possible to satisfy the identification requirement in an order or agreement that imposes lump-sum judg- ments or settlements, multiple damage awards, or involves multiple taxpayers because it is unlikely that the order or agreement will distinguish the amount to be paid as restitution, remediation, or to come into compliance with a law from the disallowed amounts, or allocate the payments among the multiple taxpayers. Therefore, the commenters recommended that the regulations exclude these orders and agreements from the identification requirement of section 162(f)(2)(A)(ii) altogether. The proposed regulations do not adopt the commenters’ recommenda- tion because such an exception would be inconsistent with the statute. The Treasury Department and the IRS request com- ments on how taxpayers may meet the identification requirement with respect to lump-sum payments, multiple damage awards, and multiple taxpayers. One commenter expressed the concern that it is beyond the expertise of a gov- ernment or governmental entity to place a value on restitution or remediation costs, or costs to come into compliance with a law. Another stated that, in general, the compliance or restitution provisions of an order or agreement may not include quantified amounts because neither the up-front, nor ultimate, costs can be de- termined. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments about orders or agreements meeting the identification requirement, including when an order or agreement identifies a payment amount which is less than the amount the taxpayer establishes was paid as restitution, reme- diation, or to come into compliance with a law. Other commenters explained that an order or agreement may require the tax- payer to provide services, provide proper- ty, or undertake specific action, to satisfy the legal obligation. These commenters requested that the regulations provide a rule that an order or agreement may meet the identification requirement if it identi- fies the in-kind settlement or the specified performance as restitution, remediation, or amount paid to come into compliance with a law, even if an actual payment amount is not identified. To treat taxpayers that, pursuant to the order or agreement, in whole or in part, discharge their liability in-kind in the same manner as taxpayers who make a monetary payment, and to administer the statute in a manner consistent with con- gressional intent, proposed §1.162-21(b) (2)(iii) addresses how an order or agree- ment may meet the identification require- ment with respect to any amount paid or incurred that is not identified. The pro- posed rule provides, if the order or agree- ment identifies a payment as restitution, remediation, or to come into compliance with a law but does not identify some or all of the aggregate amount the taxpayer must pay, the order or agreement must describe the damage done, harm suffered, or manner of noncompliance with a law, and describe the action required by the taxpayer (such as incurring costs to pro- vide services or to provide property) with respect to the damage, harm, or noncom- pliance. Under proposed §1.162-21(b)(2)(iv), the IRS may challenge the characteriza- tion of an amount identified under pro- posed §1.162-21(b)(2). No deduction is allowable unless the identification re- quirement is met. H.R. Rep. No. 115-466, at 430 (2017). Reporting of the amount by a government or governmental en- tity under section 6050X and proposed §1.6050X-1(a) alone does not satisfy the identification requirement. G. Suits between private parties If the amount is otherwise deductible under chapter 1, section 162(f)(3) allows a deduction for an amount paid or in- curred pursuant to an order or agreement in which no government or governmental entity is a party to a suit. Therefore, sec- tion 162(f)(1) disallows a deduction for amounts paid or incurred to, or at the di- rection of, a government or governmental entity only when a government or govern- mental entity is a complainant or investi- gator with respect to the violation or po- tential violation of a law. A court-directed payment or the entry of a judgment in a lawsuit between private parties is not a payment made at the direction of a gov- ernment. H.R. Rep. No. 115-466, at 430 (2017). Proposed section 1.162-21(c)(1) provides that section 162(f)(1) does not apply to any amount paid or incurred by reasons of any order or agreement in a suit in which no government or governmental entity is a party. H. Taxes and related interest Section 162(f)(4) provides that sec- tion 162(f)(1) does not apply to any amount paid or incurred as “taxes due.” “Taxes due” includes interest on taxes but not interest, if any, with respect to any related penalties imposed. See Joint Com- mittee on Taxation, General Explanation of Public Law 115-97, at 194 (December 2018). Proposed §1.162-21(c)(2) provides that proposed §1.162-21(a) does not apply to amounts paid or incurred as otherwise deductible taxes or related interest. How- ever, if penalties are imposed with respect to those otherwise deductible taxes, pro- posed §1.162-21(a) disallows a deduction June 1, 2020 916 Bulletin No. 2020–23 for the interest paid with respect to such penalties. I. Failure to pay Title 26 tax In accordance with section 162(f)(2) (A)(iii), proposed §1.162-21(c)(3) pro- vides that, in the case of any amount paid or incurred as restitution for failure to pay tax imposed under Title 26, section 162(f) (1) does not disallow a deduction other- wise allowed under chapter 1. For ex- ample, section 162(f)(1) and proposed §1.162-21(a) do not disallow a deduction of an amount paid or incurred as restitu- tion for failure to pay certain excise or employment taxes otherwise deductible under chapter 1. However, a deduction for amounts paid or incurred as restitution for failure to pay a Federal income tax is disallowed because section 275(a)(1) pro- vides that no deduction is allowed for Fed- eral income taxes. J. Taxable year of deduction Under proposed §1.162-21(d)(1), de- ductions allowed under proposed §§1.162- 21(b) or (c), are taken into account under the rules of section 461 and the related regulations, or the rules specifically appli- cable to the allowed deduction, such as the rules of §1.468B-3(c). K. Tax benefit income If the deduction allowed under pro- posed §1.162-21(b) or (c) results in a tax benefit to the taxpayer, proposed §1.162- 21(d)(2) requires the taxpayer to include in income, under sections 61 and 111, the recovery of any amount deducted in a prior taxable year to the extent the prior year’s deduction reduced the taxpayer’s tax liability. 2. Reporting Information With Respect To Certain Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts The purpose of the proposed regula- tions under section 6050X is to provide appropriate officials of governments or governmental entities the operational, administrative, and definitional rules for complying with the statutory information reporting requirements with respect to certain suits or agreements to which sec- tion 162(f) and proposed §1.162-21(f)(4) apply. In general, under proposed §1.6050X-1(a), if the aggregate amount a payor is required to pay pursuant to an order or agreement with respect to a vio- lation, investigation, or inquiry to which section 162(f) and proposed §1.162-21 apply equals or exceeds the threshold amount under proposed §1.6050X-1(g) (5), the appropriate official of a govern- ment or governmental entity that is a par- ty to the order or agreement must file an information return with the IRS with re- spect to the amounts paid or incurred and any additional information required by the information return and the related instruc- tions, including the payor’s taxpayer iden- tification number. The appropriate official of a government or governmental entity that is a party to the order or agreement must also furnish a written statement with the same information to the payor. Reporting of the amount by a govern- ment or governmental entity under sec- tion 6050X and proposed §1.6050X-1(a) alone does not satisfy the identification requirement under section 162(f)(2)(A) (ii) and proposed §1.162-21(b)(2)(ii) or the establishment requirement under sec- tion 162(f)(2)(A)(i) and proposed §1.162- 21(b)(3). A. Definitions Government, governmental entity, or nongovernmental entity treated as a governmental entity To lessen the administrative burden on certain entities, the proposed definition of “government or governmental entity” in §1.6050X-1(g)(2) is narrower than the definition provided in proposed §1.162- 21(f)(1) because it requires reporting only from certain of the governments and gov- ernmental entities described in proposed §1.162-21(f)(1). Specifically, the gov- ernment of the United States, a State, or the District of Columbia, under proposed §1.162-21(f)(1)(i), or a political subdi- vision, or a corporation or other entity serving as an agency or instrumentality, thereof, are each treated under the pro- posed regulations as a government or gov- ernmental entity that must comply with the information reporting requirements of section 6050X and proposed §1.6050X- 1. In addition, a nongovernmental entity, under proposed §1.162-21(f)(2), that ex- ercises self-regulatory powers (including imposing sanctions) in connection with a qualified board or exchange (as defined in section 1256(g)(7)) or exercises self-regu- latory powers, including adopting, admin- istering, or enforcing laws and imposing sanctions, as part of performing an es- sential governmental function, also must comply with the information reporting requirements of section 6050X and pro- posed §1.6050X-1. In contrast, as a result of govern- ment-to-government consultation with tribal leaders, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that impos- ing the reporting requirements of sec- tion 6050X and proposed §1.6050X-1 on Indian tribal governments, as defined in section 7701(a)(40), subdivisions of Indian tribal governments, as determined in accordance with section 7871(d), or a corporation or other entity serving as an agency or instrumentality of any Indian tribal government would not contribute to the efficient administration of the inter- nal revenue laws. Additionally, consistent with general principles of comity, the pro- posed definition of “government or gov- ernmental entity” in §1.6050X-1(g)(2) ex- cludes foreign governments, governments of U.S. territories, or any political subdivi- sion, or corporation or other entity serving as an agency or instrumentality, thereof. Although a particular entity is exclud- ed from the information reporting require- ments of section 6050X and proposed §1.6050X-1, amounts paid or incurred to all categories of entities described in pro- posed §1.162-21(f)(1) are subject to the limitations on deductibility set forth in proposed §1.162-21. Appropriate official Section 6050X(c) defines “appropriate official” of a government or governmental entity as the officer or employee having control of the suit, investigation, or inqui- ry, or an appropriately designated person. Proposed §1.6050X-1(g)(1) adopts this statutory definition and further provides that the appropriate official may instead be the officer or employee of the govern- Bulletin No. 2020–23 917 June 1, 2020 ment or governmental entity assigned to comply with the information reporting re- quirements of section 6050X. One commenter observed that more than one government or governmental en- tity may be involved in the same order or agreement and suggested that the appro- priate official be an official from only one government or governmental entity. The Treasury Department and the IRS agree with this comment generally. To minimize the burden on governments or governmen- tal entities from having to report the same amount more than once, and to ensure the efficient administration of the internal rev- enue laws, proposed §1.6050X-1(g)(1)(ii) (A) provides a general rule that, if more than one government or governmental entity is a party to an order or agreement, only the appropriate official of the govern- ment or governmental entity listed first, for example as the first signatory, on the most recently executed order or agreement is responsible for complying with all sec- tion 6050X information reporting and fur- nishing requirements. To provide govern- ments or governmental entities with greater flexibility, proposed §1.6050X-1(g)(1)(ii) (B) permits the governments or govern- mental entities to appoint one or more oth- er appropriate officials to be responsible for complying with the information reporting and furnishing requirements. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments about assigning an appropriate official to comply with the information reporting and furnishing requirements if more than one government or governmental entity are parties to the order or agreement. Payor Proposed §1.6050X-1(g)(4) defines “payor” as the person, as defined in sec- tion 7701(a)(1), which, pursuant to an or- der or agreement, has paid or incurred, or is liable to pay or incur, an amount to, or at the direction of, the government or gov- ernmental entity in relation to the violation or potential violation of a law. In general, the payor will be the person to which sec- tion 162(f) and proposed §1.162-21 apply. Threshold amount Section 6050X(a)(2)(B) provides the Secretary with the authority to adjust the statutory reporting threshold of $600 as necessary to ensure the efficient adminis- tration of the internal revenue laws. Based on comments received from governments and governmental entities concerned about the burden of informa- tion reporting and to ensure the efficient administration of the internal revenue laws, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that a threshold higher than $600 is appropriate to address these concerns. Proposed §1.6050X-1(g) (5) provides that reporting is required for payment amounts equal to or in excess of $50,000 (threshold amount). The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments concerning the pro- posed threshold amount in consideration of the anticipated compliance burden on filers. In particular, the Treasury Depart- ment and the IRS request data on the an- nual number of relevant orders issued, or agreements entered into, by governments or governmental entities as well as the financial, time, and administrative bur- dens associated with different threshold amounts. B. Requirement to file return Under proposed §1.6050X-1(b)(1), the information return filed by the govern- ment or governmental entity must provide the aggregate amount a payor is required to pay as a result of the order or agree- ment, the separate amounts required to be paid as restitution, remediation, or to come into compliance with a law as a result of the order or agreement, and any additional information required by the information return and the related instructions. Section 6050X(a)(3) requires the infor- mation return to be filed at the time the agreement is entered into, as determined by the Secretary. Commenters observed that it would be burdensome and ineffi- cient to file information returns each time an agreement is entered into or an order is issued. In order to reduce the reporting burden, several commenters suggested that the regulations require annual filing of information returns to be made by a specific date in the year following the date the agreement is entered into or the order is issued. The Treasury Department and the IRS agree with this comment and have adopted it in the proposed regulations. Accordingly, the appropriate official of a government or governmental entity must comply with the information reporting re- quirement of proposed §1.6050X-1(a) and (b) by filing Form 1098-F, Fines, Penal- ties, and Other Amounts (or any successor form), with Form 1096, Annual Summary and Transmittal of U.S. Information Re- turns, on or before the annual due date as provided in proposed §1.6050X-1(b)(2). Several commenters expressed con- cerns about the information reporting requirements with respect to an order or agreement pursuant to which payments are made over the course of several years. To minimize the burden on governments or governmental entities and to ensure the efficient administration of the internal rev- enue laws, proposed §1.6050X-1 does not require an appropriate official to file in- formation returns for each taxable year in which a payor makes a payment pursuant to a single order or agreement. Instead, the appropriate official must file only one in- formation return for the aggregate amount identified in the order or agreement. C. Requirement to furnish written statement Proposed §1.6050X-1(c) requires the appropriate official of a government or governmental entity who fulfills the re- quirement under section 6050X(a) and proposed §1.6050X-1(a)(1) to furnish a written statement to each payor with respect to which it is required to file an information return under paragraphs (a) (1) and (b) of §1.6050X-1. For purposes of tax administration, the requirement to “furnish” written statements requires that those with a reporting obligation must provide statements to certain recipients containing the information reported to the IRS and, in some cases, additional infor- mation. Under section 6050X, the payor is the recipient. The written statement must include the information that was reported on the information return and a legend that identifies the statement as important tax information that is being furnished to the IRS. To minimize the burden on govern- ments or governmental entities, the pro- posed regulations permit the appropriate official to comply with the requirements under section 6050X(b) and proposed §1.6050X-1(a)(2) by furnishing a copy June 1, 2020 918 Bulletin No. 2020–23 of Form 1098-F to the payor. Regardless of when the appropriate official furnishes the statement to the payor, the timing of any deduction allowed under proposed §1.162-21 is governed by the general principles of Federal income tax law, as set forth in proposed §1.162-21(d). D. Due dates Section 6050X(a)(3) provides that the information return shall be filed at a time the agreement is entered into, as determined by the Secretary. Further, section 6050X(b) requires the written statement to be furnished to the payor at the same time the information return is filed with the IRS. Under proposed §1.6050X-1(b)(2), the information return must be filed on or before January 31 of the year following the calendar year in which the order or agreement becomes binding under applicable law, even if all appeals have not been exhausted with re- spect to the suit, agreement, or otherwise. The return is due on or before January 31 whether it is filed on paper or electron- ically. Although the due date for filing electronic Forms 1098-F under proposed §1.6050X-1(b)(2) differs from the gen- eral March 31 due date provided in sec- tion 6071(b), which applies with respect to electronically filed information returns under sections 6041 through 6050Y, the specific provisions of section 6050X take precedence over the general March 31 due date. To ensure that the payor has the in- formation necessary to prepare the payor’s income tax return, and as directed by sec- tion 6050X(b), proposed §1.6050X-1(c) (3) requires the appropriate official to fur- nish the written statement, under proposed §1.6050X-1(c)(1), on or before the date that the appropriate official files the Form 1098-F with the IRS (January 31). E. Rules for multiple payors Proposed §1.6050X-1(d) describes the application of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of §1.6050X-1 if, pursuant to the order or agreement, the aggregate amount multiple payors are required to pay, or the costs to provide the property or the service, equals or exceeds the threshold amount. If, pur- suant to the order or agreement, more than one payor is individually liable for some or all of the payment amount, proposed §1.6050X-1(d)(1) requires the appropriate official to file an information return for the separate amount that each individually liable payor is required to pay, even if a payor’s payment liability is less than the threshold amount, and to furnish a written statement containing this information to each payor. If more than one person (as defined in section 7701(a)(1)) is a party to an order or agreement, there is no infor- mation reporting requirement, or require- ment to furnish a written statement, with respect to any person who does not have a payment obligation or obligation for costs to provide services or to provide property. Proposed §1.6050X-1(d)(2) provides that, if an order or agreement identifies multiple jointly and severally liable pay- ors, the appropriate official must file an information return for each payor report- ing the aggregate amount to be paid by all jointly and severally liable payors. The appropriate official must furnish a written statement containing this information to each of those payors, regardless of which payor makes the payment. F. Payment amount not identified Some orders or agreements may iden- tify a payment, or an obligation to provide property or to provide services, as resti- tution, remediation, or an amount paid to come into compliance with a law, without identifying some or all of the aggregate amount the payor must pay, or some or all of the aggregate cost to provide property or services. Proposed §1.6050X-1(e) pro- vides that, if the government or govern- mental entity expects, under the facts and circumstances, that the amount the payor must pay, plus any other costs the payor will incur, pursuant to the order or agree- ment will equal or exceed the threshold amount, the appropriate official of such government or governmental entity must file an information return on Form 1098-F (or any successor form), as provided in the instructions to the Form 1098-F, and fur- nish a written statement to the payor with the information supplied to the IRS on Form 1098-F. For example, if the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issues an order requiring a payor to come into compliance with the underlying legal requirements of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. section 1251 et seq., by under- taking work, and the EPA expects, under the facts and circumstances, that the pay- or will incur $50,000 or more of costs to come into compliance with the law, the EPA must file Form 1098-F and furnish a written statement including this infor- mation, as directed by the form and form instructions, to the payor. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments about reporting of pay- ment amounts that are not identified and the factors governments and governmen- tal entities may consider to determine if the amounts are expected to equal or ex- ceed the threshold amount. G. Material change If there is a material change to the terms of an order or agreement, as defined in proposed §1.162-21(e)(2) for which the appropriate official has filed an informa- tion return, proposed §1.6050X-1(f) re- quires the appropriate official to update the IRS by filing a corrected information return, and to furnish an amended written statement to the payor, with respect to the entire order or agreement, and not just the terms modified. The proposed rules require the appropriate official to file the correct- ed Form 1098-F, on paper or electronical- ly, as provided by the General Instructions for Certain Information Returns, on or be- fore January 31 of the year following the calendar year in which the parties make a material change to the terms of the order or agreement. The proposed rules also re- quire the appropriate official to furnish an amended written statement to the payor on or before the date that the corrected Form 1098-F is filed with the IRS. Proposed Applicability Dates The rules of proposed §1.162-21 are proposed to apply to taxable years begin- ning on or after the date of publication of the Treasury decision adopting the rules of proposed §1.162-21 as final regula- tions in the Federal Register, except that such rules do not apply to amounts paid or incurred under any order or agreement which became binding under applicable law before such date. Until that date, tax- payers may rely on the rules of proposed §1.162-21, for any order or agreement, Bulletin No. 2020–23 919 June 1, 2020 but only if the taxpayers apply the rules in their entirety and in a consistent man- ner. See section 7805(b)(7). Additionally, the rules of proposed §1.6050X-1 are pro- posed to apply only to orders and agree- ments that become binding under applica- ble law on or after January 1, 2022. Special Analyses I. Regulatory Planning and Review – Economic Analysis Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess costs and ben- efits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmoniz- ing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The preliminary EO 13771 designation is reg- ulatory. The proposed regulations have been designated as subject to review under Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement (April 11, 2018) between the Treasury Department and by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regarding review of tax regulations. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has designat- ed the proposed rulemaking as significant under section 1(c) of the Memorandum of Agreement. Accordingly, the proposed regulations have been reviewed by OMB. A. Background Prior to the TCJA, section 162(f) of the Code disallowed a deduction for any fine or similar penalty paid to a government for the violation of a law. This provision, enacted in 1969, codified existing case law that denied business deductions for fines or similar penalties. The general rule of section 162(f)(1), as amended by sec- tion 13306(a) of the TCJA, disallows any deduction for amounts paid or incurred (whether by suit, agreement, or otherwise) to, or at the direction of, a government or governmental entity or certain nongovern- mental entities treated as governmental entities, in relation to the violation of a law or the investigation or inquiry by such government or entity into the potential violation of a law. Section 13306(a) also provides certain exceptions to this disal- lowance. Section 162(f)(2) does not dis- allow deduction for amounts that (1) the taxpayer establishes were paid or incurred as restitution (including remediation of property) or to come into compliance with a law, and (2) are identified in the court or- der or settlement agreement as restitution, remediation, or to come into compliance with a law. In addition, under prior law, the Trea- sury Department and the IRS did not receive information returns from gov- ernments or governmental entities that received fines or penalties. Section 6050X of the Code, enacted by section 13306(b) of the TCJA, requires appropriate officials to file an information return if the ag- gregate amount involved in all orders or agreements with respect to the violation, investigation, or inquiry is $600 or more. The information return must include (1) The amount required to be paid as a result of the order or agreement; (2) any amount that constitutes restitution or remediation of property; and (3) any amount required to be paid for the purpose of coming into compliance with a law that was violated or involved in the investigation or inqui- ry. Section 6050X provides the Secretary with the authority to adjust the $600 re- porting threshold in order to ensure effi- cient tax administration. B. Need for the Proposed Regulations The Treasury Department and the IRS have received several questions and com- ments from Federal, state, local, and tribal governments, as well as the public, re- garding the meaning of various provisions in each section and issues not explicitly addressed in the statute. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that such comments warrant the issuance of further guidance. In addition, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that increas- ing the reporting threshold to reduce the reporting burden and to enhance the effi- ciency of tax administration is appropri- ate. C. Overview of the Proposed Regulations The proposed regulations provide guidance regarding sections 162(f) and 6050X. The following analysis provides further detail regarding the anticipated impacts of the proposed regulations. Part I.D specifies the baseline for the economic analysis. Part I.E.1. summarizes the eco- nomic effects of the rulemaking, relative to this baseline. Part I.E.2. describes the economic effects of specific provisions covering (1) the reporting threshold, (2) the timing of information reporting, and (3) information reporting requirements when payment amounts are not identified. D. Baseline The Treasury Department and the IRS have assessed the benefits and costs of the proposed regulations relative to a no-ac- tion baseline reflecting anticipated Feder- al income tax-related behavior in the ab- sence of these proposed regulations. E. Economic Analysis of the Proposed Regulation I. Summary of Economic Effects The proposed section 162(f) regula- tions provide definitions for restitution, remediation, and amounts paid to come into compliance with the law. These definitions clarify for taxpayers which amounts paid or incurred may be deduct- ible under the statute. The proposed reg- ulations also clarify (1) how the taxpayer meets the establishment requirement; and (2) how the order or agreement meets the identification requirement. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the burden reduction associated with the proposed regulations for section 162(f) is modest. In addition, while the proposed regulations reduce uncertainty for taxpay- ers, they are unlikely to affect firms’ eco- nomic decision-making because most of the amounts to be paid or incurred which are subject to section 162(f) are non-dis- cretionary. The proposed regulations under section 6050X provide certainty and consistency for affected governments and govern- mental entities by defining and clarifying the statute’s terms and rules. Further, the June 1, 2020 920 Bulletin No. 2020–23 proposed regulations use the authority provided by the statute to the Secretary to set information reporting requirements to minimize the burden on governments and governmental entities and to ensure the ef- ficient administration of the internal reve- nue laws. Most importantly, the proposed regulations increase the reporting thresh- old from $600 to $50,000, thereby elimi- nating information reporting requirements for an estimated 1 to 5 million orders or agreements. Using the midpoint of this range (3 million), the estimated burden reduction from this exercise of regulato- ry discretion is $74 million (2018 dollars) per year. The Treasury Department and the IRS acknowledge that limited quanti- tative data makes estimates of the number of affected orders and agreements uncer- tain, and request comments or data that can help improve these estimates. II. Economic Analysis of Specific Provisions The effects of the information report- ing requirements are discussed in more detail in sections II.A, B, and C. The Treasury Department and the IRS solicit comments on the economics of each of the items discussed subsequently and of any other items of the proposed regulations not discussed in this section. The Treasury Department and the IRS particularly solic- it comments that provide data, other evi- dence, or models that could enhance the rigor of the process by which provisions might be developed for the final regula- tions. A. Reporting Threshold Section 6050X requires governments and governmental entities which enter orders or agreements to which section 162(f) applies to file an information return if the aggregate amount paid or incurred in all orders or agreements with respect to the violation, investigation, or inquiry is equal to or exceeds a threshold of $600. Section 6050X also provides the Secretary with the authority to adjust the statutory reporting threshold as necessary to ensure efficient tax administration. In response to multiple comments received from gov- ernments and governmental entities con- cerned about the burden of information reporting for smaller payment amounts pursuant to orders or agreements, the proposed regulations raise the reporting threshold to $50,000. The Treasury De- partment and the IRS request comments on this proposed threshold amount. In particular, data on the annual number of orders or agreements by governments or governmental entities would be helpful. The Treasury Department and the IRS considered a range of alternative thresh- olds including the statutory threshold of $600, along with much higher thresholds suggested by some commenters. Upon consideration of both the enforcement needs of the IRS and the reporting burden on governments and governmental enti- ties, the Treasury Department and the IRS exercised the authority provided to the Secretary by the statute to set the reporting threshold amount at $50,000. The Treasury Department and the IRS do not know of any data on the number of orders or agreements requiring taxpayers to pay amounts to, or at the direction of, governments or governmental entities, or the distribution of these amounts, such as the number that are above or below $600. Based on communications with stake- holders, the Treasury Department and the IRS estimate that the increase in reporting threshold from $600 to $50,000 will re- duce the number of required information returns by 1 to 5 million. The Treasury Department and the IRS further estimate that the average time to complete the in- formation return is between 0.387 and 0.687 hours. Using the midpoint of each of these ranges (3 million information returns and .537 hours) and labor cost of $46 per hour, 1 the Treasury Department and the IRS estimate that increasing the reporting threshold will reduce annual compliance burdens by $74 million dol- lars (2018 dollars) per year. It should be noted that many of the lower level fines and penalties are likely to be assessed to non-businesses that are not able to deduct business expenses so they would be unaf- fected by any reporting requirement. Increasing the reporting threshold from $600 to $50,000 is unlikely to have a significant effect on revenues as fines over $50,000 likely account for the vast majority of fines and penalties in terms of dollar values. Based on financial reporting values disclosed on tax returns of C corpo- rations, S corporations and Partnerships, firms with over $50,000 in total fines and penalties account for 99% of all fines and penalties. However, this data should be in- terpreted with caution. Financial reporting of fines and penalties includes both inter- national and domestic fines, and all fines and penalties are aggregated into yearly totals. Furthermore, firms with less than $10 million in assets are not required to provide financial reporting values with their tax returns. The Treasury Department and the IRS solicit comments on this threshold and cost estimates and particularly solicit comments that provide data that would enhance the rigor by which the threshold is decided for the final regulations. B. Time of Reporting Section 6050X provides that the gov- ernment or governmental entity shall file the information return at the time the or- der or agreement is entered into, as deter- mined by the Secretary. The Treasury De- partment and the IRS received comments from governments and governmental en- tities observing that it would be burden- some and inefficient to file information returns each time an order or agreement becomes binding under applicable law. Several commenters suggested that annual filing of information returns would mean- ingfully reduce this reporting burden. The Treasury Department and the IRS agree with this comment and have adopted it in the proposed regulations. Several commenters also expressed un- certainty and concern about the informa- tion reporting requirements for an order or agreement pursuant to which payments are made over the course of several years. To reduce uncertainty, and to minimize the burden on governments and governmental entities, the proposed regulations clarify that information reporting is required only for the year in which the order or agree- ment becomes binding under applicable law, and not required for each taxable year in which a payor makes a payment. 1 This data point is derived by the IRS as part of the burden analysis described in the Paperwork Reduction Act section below. Bulletin No. 2020–23 921 June 1, 2020 A reasonable burden estimate for the average time to complete Form 1098-F is between 0.387 and 0.687 hours (ap- proximately 23 to 41 minutes). This es- timate is based on survey data collected from similar information return issuers. In addition, the increase in the reporting threshold under section 6050X will lead to a decrease in the number of informa- The Treasury Department and the IRS considered requiring information report- ing at the time the order is issued or the agreement is entered. The Treasury De- partment and the IRS also considered re- quiring information reporting in each year in which an amount is paid or incurred pursuant to the order or agreement. How- ever, both alternative approaches were determined to impose unnecessary burden for governments and governmental enti- ties without creating accompanying bene- fits for tax administration or for taxpayers. The Treasury Department and the IRS solicit comments on the timing of report- ing and particularly solicit comments that provide data regarding how timing of re- porting affects compliance burdens. C. Payment Amount Not Identified When the expected amount paid or in- curred pursuant to an order or agreement equals or exceeds the threshold amount, section 6050X requires governments or governmental entities to file an informa- tion return including (1) The amount re- quired to be paid as a result of the order or agreement; (2) any amount that consti- tutes restitution or remediation of proper- ty; and (3) any amount required to be paid for the purpose of coming into compliance with a law that was violated or involved in the investigation or inquiry. However, some orders or agreements may involve uncertain payments or costs to provide property or services without identifying some or all of the aggregate amount the payor must pay (or some or all of the ag- gregate cost to provide property or ser- vices). The Treasury Department and the IRS received comments expressing con- cern that amounts paid or incurred are of- ten difficult to assess, and strict valuation requirements would impose undue burden on governments and governmental enti- ties. For situations in which the amount is not identified, the proposed regulations direct governments and governmental en- tities to the instructions to Form 1098-F. To address commenters’ concerns, these instructions will permit governments and governmental entities to report the thresh- old amount of $50,000 when the amount is unknown but expected to equal or ex- ceed $50,000. This rule is necessary to improve taxpayer compliance. The Treasury Department and the IRS considered requiring governments and governmental entities to provide an estimate of each amount to be paid or incurred; however this approach was re- jected because it would impose significant burden for governments and governmen- tal entities. D. Summary In summary, the proposed sec- tion 162(f) regulations and section 6050X regulations result in modest burden reduc- tion, with the exception of the increase in the threshold amount, which is estimated to reduce burden by $74 million (2018 dollars) per year. The Treasury Depart- ment and the IRS projected that the pro- posed regulations, taken together, would have a non-revenue economic effect of less than $100 million (2018 dollars) per year. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on the economic effects of these proposed regulations. Paperwork Reduction Act Collection of Information – Form 1098-F In general, the collection of informa- tion in the proposed regulations is re- quired under section 6050X of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). The collection of information in these proposed regula- tions is set forth in proposed §1.6050X- 1. The IRS intends that the collection of information pursuant to section 6050X will be conducted by way of Form 1098- F, Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts. For purposes of the PRA, the reporting burden associated with the collection of information with respect to section 6050X will be reflected in the IRS Forms 14029 Paperwork Reduction Act Submission as- sociated with Form 1098-F. Form 1098-F will be used by all governments, govern- mental entities, and nongovernmental en- tities treated as governmental entities with a reporting requirement. The Treasury De- partment and the IRS request comments on all aspects of information collection burdens related to the proposed regula- tions. In addition, when available, drafts of IRS forms are posted for comment at www.irs.gov/draftforms. The current status of the PRA submis- sions related to section 6050X are provid- ed in the following table. FormType of FilerOMB NumberStatus 1098-FGovernments, Governmental Entities, And Certain Nongovernmental Entities 1545-2284Form 1098-F is approved through 1/31/2023. Related New or Revised Tax Forms NewRevision of Existing FormNumber of Respondents (2018, estimated) Form 1098-FYe s90,100 (85,500 small governmental jurisdictions, 4,500 large govern- mental jurisdictions and 100 nongovernmental entities). June 1, 2020 922 Bulletin No. 2020–23 tion returns filed by between 1 million to 5 million returns. Using the midpoint of these ranges, or 3 million and 0.537 hours, the estimated burden reduction is $74 million per year. Estimated average time per form: .537 hours. Estimated number of respondents: 90,100. Estimated total annual burden hours: 48,383.70. Estimated change in number of infor- mation returns resulting from increased reporting threshold: (3,000,000). Estimated change in burden (hours): (1,611,150). Estimated change in burden (Dollars): ($74,161,235). The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of these estimates. Comments on the collection of infor- mation in proposed §1.6050X-1(a) should be sent to the Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Depart- ment of the Treasury at oira_submission@ omb.eop.gov or Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503, with copies to the Internal Reve- nue Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer, SE:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washing- ton, DC 20224. Comments on the collec- tion of information should be received by June 12, 2020. Comments are specifically requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the duties of the IRS, in- cluding whether the information will have practical utility (including underlying as- sumptions and methodology); The accuracy of the estimated burden associated with the proposed collection of information; How the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected may be en- hanced; How the burden of complying with the proposed collection of information may be minimized, including through the application of automated collection tech- niques or other forms of information tech- nology; and Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and pur- chase of services to provide information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it dis- plays a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget. Books or records relating to a collec- tion of information must be retained as long as their contents may become mate- rial in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as re- quired by 26 U.S.C. 6103. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) requires agencies to “prepare and make available for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility analysis,” which will “describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities.” 5 U.S.C. 603(a). Section 605(b) of the RFA allows an agency to certify a rule if the proposed rulemaking is not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Pursuant to the RFA, it is hereby cer- tified that these proposed regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of section 601(6) of the RFA. The RFA generally applies to regula- tions that affect small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of the RFA, small governmental jurisdictions are gov- ernments of cities, counties, towns, town- ships, villages, school districts, or special districts with a population of less than 50,000. This proposed rule would affect States, as well as local governments, some of which may meet the definition of small governmental jurisdiction. Approximately 90,100 governments, governmental enti- ties, and nongovernmental entities treated as governmental entities may be subject to the reporting requirements of section 6050X. Of those governments and gov- ernmental entities, approximately 85,500 (or 95%) are small governmental jurisdic- tions. Although the regulations may affect a substantial number of small governmen- tal jurisdictions, the economic impact of the proposed regulations is not likely to be significant. The proposed regulations set a reporting threshold that is higher than the minimum required by statute and also provide for governments and governmental entities to file annual re- turns. Both of these provisions reduce the potential burden on small governmental jurisdictions. In particular, the increase in the reporting threshold will lead to a decrease in the number of information re- turns filed by between 1 million to 5 mil- lion returns. Using the midpoint of this range, or 3 million, the estimated burden reduction is $74 million per year (2018 dollars). It is estimated that after read- ing and learning about the requirements of the regulations, the burden associated with filing the annual form is approxi- mately 23 to 41 minutes and the average cost per information return is approxi- mately $24.72, which would not result in a significant economic impact on small entities. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on the burden associated with filing the annual form. Notwithstanding this certification, the Treasury Department and the IRS invite comments on any impact this rule would have on small entities. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of pro- posed rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small entities. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take certain other actions be- fore issuing a final rule that includes any Federal mandate that may result in expen- ditures in any one year by a state, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for infla- tion. This rule does not include any Fed- eral mandate that may result in expendi- tures by state, local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector in excess of that threshold. Executive Order 13132: Federalism Executive Order 13132 (entitled Federalism) prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that has Federalism Bulletin No. 2020–23 923 June 1, 2020 implications if the rule either imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on state and local governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts state law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order. These proposed rules do not have Federalism implica- tions, and do not impose substantial di- rect compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law, within the meaning of the Executive Order. The compliance costs, if any, are imposed on state and local governments by section 6050X, as enacted by the TCJA. Not- withstanding, the Treasury Department and the IRS have engaged in efforts to consult and work cooperatively with af- fected State and local officials in the pro- cess of developing the proposed rules by participating in a teleconference with the National League of Cities on September 27, 2019, and the National Governors As- sociation on October 2, 2019. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in section 8(a) of Executive Order 13132, the Treasury Department and the IRS certify that they have complied with the requirements of Executive Order 13132. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments Executive Order 13175 (entitled Con- sultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments) requires consulta- tion and collaboration with tribal officials in the development of Federal policies that may have tribal implications. In order to obtain tribal input in accordance with Executive Order 13175 and consistent with Treasury’s Tribal Consultation Pol- icy (80 FR 57434, September 23, 2015), the Treasury Department and the IRS held a Tribal Consultation with tribal officials on September 12, 2019. The Treasury De- partment and the IRS will obtain addition- al input on the tribal implications of the proposed rules before publishing them as final rules. Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing Before these proposed amendments to the regulations are adopted as final regulations, consideration will be given to comments that are submitted timely to the IRS as prescribed in the preamble under the “ADDRESSES” section. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of the proposed regulations. Any electronic comments submitted, and to the extent practicable any paper comments submitted, will be made available at www.regulations.gov or upon request. A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any person who timely submits electronic or written com- ments. Requests for a public hearing are also encouraged to be made electronically. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date and time for the public hearing will be published in the Federal Regis- ter. Announcement 2020-4, 2020-17 IRB 1, provides that until further notice, pub- lic hearings conducted by the IRS will be held telephonically. Any telephonic hear- ing will be made accessible to people with disabilities. Statement of Availability of IRS Documents IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue Rulings, Notices and other guidance cited in this document are published in the In- ternal Revenue Bulletin and are available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website at http://www.irs.gov. Drafting Information The principal author of these regula- tions is Sharon Y. Horn of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), IRS. However, other personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS partic- ipated in their development. List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes; Reporting and record- keeping requirements Proposed Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is pro- posed to be amended as follows: PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding entries in nu- merical order to read in part as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * Section 1.6050X-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6050X(a), (b). ***** Par. 2. Section 1.162-21 is revised to read as follows: §1.162-21 Denial of deduction for cer- tain fines, penalties, and other amounts. (a) Deduction Disallowed. Except as otherwise provided in this section, no de- duction is allowed under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for any amount that is paid or incurred— (1) By suit, settlement agreement (agreement), or otherwise; (2) To or at the direction of a govern- ment or governmental entity, as defined in paragraph (f)(1) of this section, or a non- governmental entity, as defined in para- graph (f)(2) of this section; and (3) In relation to the violation, or inves- tigation or inquiry into the potential viola- tion, of any civil or criminal law. (b) Exception for restitution, remedia- tion, and amounts paid to come into com- pliance with a law—(1) In general. Para- graph (a) of this section does not apply to amounts paid or incurred for restitution, remediation, or to come into compliance with a law, as defined in paragraphs (f) (3) of this section, provided that both the identification and the establishment re- quirements of paragraphs (b)(2) and (b) (3) of this section are met. (2) Identification requirement. (i) In general. A court order (order) or an agreement identifies a payment by stat- ing the nature of, or purpose for, each pay- ment each taxpayer is obligated to pay and the amount of each payment identified. (ii) Meeting the identification require- ment. The identification requirement is presumed to be met if an order or agree- ment specifically states that the payment, and the amount of the payment, described in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, con- stitutes restitution, remediation, or an amount paid to come into compliance with a law or if the order or agreement uses a different form of the required words, such as, “remediate” or “comply with a law.” Meeting the establishment requirement June 1, 2020 924 Bulletin No. 2020–23 of paragraph (b)(3) of this section alone is not sufficient to meet the identification requirement of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. (iii) Payment amount not identified. If the order or agreement identifies a pay- ment as restitution, remediation, or to come into compliance with a law but does not identify some or all of the aggregate amount the taxpayer must pay, the iden- tification requirement may be met, with respect to any payment amount not iden- tified, if the order or agreement describes the damage done, harm suffered, or man- ner of noncompliance with a law, and de- scribes the action required of the taxpayer, such as paying or incurring costs to pro- vide services or to provide property. (iv) Challenge by the IRS. The IRS may challenge the characterization of an amount identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section. To rebut the presumption described in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, the IRS must develop sufficient contrary evidence that the amount paid or incurred was not for the purpose identified in the order or agreement. (3) Establishment requirement. (i) Meeting the establishment require- ment. The establishment requirement is met if the taxpayer substantiates, with documentary evidence, the taxpayer’s legal obligation, pursuant to the order or agreement, to pay the amount identified as restitution, remediation, or to come into compliance with a law, the amount paid, and the date the amount was paid or in- curred. Meeting the identification require- ment of paragraph (b)(2) of this section alone is not sufficient to meet the estab- lishment requirement of paragraph (b)(3) of this section. (ii) Substantiating the establishment requirement. The documentary evidence described in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section includes, but is not limited to, re- ceipts; the legal or regulatory provision related to the violation or potential vio- lation of a law; documents issued by the government or governmental entity relat- ing to the investigation or inquiry; docu- ments describing how the amount to be paid was determined; and correspondence exchanged between the taxpayer and the government or governmental entity before the order or agreement became binding under applicable law. (c) Other Exceptions. (1) Suits between private parties. Para- graph (a) of this section does not apply to any amount paid or incurred by reason of any order or agreement in a suit in which no government or governmental entity is a party. (2) Taxes and related interest. Para- graph (a) of this section does not apply to amounts paid or incurred as otherwise deductible taxes or related interest. How- ever, if penalties are imposed with respect to these taxes, paragraph (a) of this section applies to disallow a deduction for any interest payments related to the penalties imposed. (3) Failure to pay Title 26 tax. In the case of any amount paid or incurred as restitution for failure to pay tax imposed under Title 26 of the United States Code, paragraph (a) of this section does not dis- allow a deduction for Title 26 taxes which is otherwise allowed under chapter 1 of the Code. (d) Application of general principles of Federal income tax law. (1) Taxable year of deduction. If, un- der paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, the taxpayer is allowed a deduction for the amount paid or incurred pursuant to an order or agreement, the deduction is taken into account under the rules of section 461 and the related regulations, or under a provision specifically appli- cable to the allowed deduction, such as §1.468B-3(c). (2) Tax benefit rule applies. If the de- duction allowed under paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section results in a tax benefit to the taxpayer, the taxpayer must include in income, under sections 61 and 111, the re- covery of any amount deducted in a prior taxable year to the extent the prior year’s deduction reduced the taxpayer’s tax lia- bility. (i) A tax benefit to the taxpayer in- cludes a reduction in the taxpayer’s tax liability for that year or the creation of a net operating loss carryback or carryover. (ii) A taxpayer’s recovery of any amount deducted in a prior taxable year includes, but is not limited to— (A) Receiving a refund, recoupment, rebate, reimbursement, or otherwise re- covering some or all of the amount the taxpayer paid or incurred, or (B) Being relieved of some or all of the payment liability under the order or agree- ment. (e) Material change to order or agree- ment. (1) In general. If the parties to an or- der or agreement, entered before Decem- ber 22, 2017, make a material change to the terms of that order or agreement on or after the applicability date in para- graph (h) of this section, paragraph (a) of this section applies to any amounts paid or incurred, or any obligation to provide property or services, after the date of the material change. (2) Material change. A material change to the terms of an order or agreement un- der paragraph (e)(1) of this section may include: changing the nature or purpose of a payment obligation; or changing, adding to, or removing a payment obligation, an obligation to provide services, or an ob- ligation to provide property. A material change does not include changing a pay- ment date or changing the address of a party to the order or agreement. (f) Definitions. For purposes of section 162(f) and §1.162-21, the following defi- nitions apply: (1) Government or governmental enti- ty. A government or governmental entity means— (i) The government of the United States, a State, or the District of Colum- bia; (ii) The government of a territory of the United States, including American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Is- lands, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Is- lands; (iii) The government of a foreign coun- try; (iv) An Indian tribal government, as defined in section 7701(a)(40), or a sub- division of an Indian tribal government, as determined in accordance with section 7871(d); or (v) A political subdivision of (i), (ii), or (iii), or a corporation or other entity serving as an agency or instrumentality of any of paragraph (f)(1)(i)-(f)(iv) of this section. (2) Nongovernmental entity treated as a governmental entity. (i) A nongovernmental entity described in paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section is treated as a governmental entity. Bulletin No. 2020–23 925 June 1, 2020 (ii) A nongovernmental entity treated as governmental entity is an entity that— (A) Exercises self-regulatory powers (including imposing sanctions) in connec- tion with a qualified board or exchange (as defined in section 1256(g)(7)); or (B) Exercises self-regulatory powers, including adopting; administering; or en- forcing laws and imposing sanctions, as part of performing an essential govern- mental function. (3) Restitution, remediation of proper- ty, and amounts paid to come into compli- ance with a law. (i) An amount is paid or incurred for restitution or remediation pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section if it re- stores, in whole or in part, the person, as defined in section 7701(a)(1); the govern- ment; the governmental entity; or property harmed by the violation or potential viola- tion of a law described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section. (ii) An amount is paid or incurred to come into compliance with a law that the taxpayer has violated, or is alleged to have violated, by performing services; taking action, such as modifying equipment; pro- viding property; or doing any combination thereof. (iii) Regardless of whether the order or agreement identifies them as such, resti- tution, remediation, and amounts paid to come into compliance with a law do not include any amount paid or incurred— (A) To reimburse the government or governmental entity for investigation costs or litigation costs; (B) At the payor’s election, in lieu of a fine or penalty; (C) As forfeiture or disgorgement; or (D) To the extent the payment or con- tribution does not meet the requirements of paragraph (f)(3)(i) or (ii) of this section, to an entity; fund, including a restitution, remediation, or other fund; group; govern- ment or governmental entity . (4) Suit, agreement, or otherwise. A suit, agreement, or otherwise includes, but is not limited to, settlement agreements, non-prosecution agreements, deferred prosecution agreements, judicial pro- ceedings, administrative adjudications, decisions issued by officials, committees, commissions, boards of a government or governmental entity, and any legal actions or hearings which impose a liability on the taxpayer or pursuant to which the taxpay- er assumes liability. (g) Examples. The application of this section may be illustrated by the follow- ing examples. (1) Example 1. Identification and establishment requirements. (i) Facts. Corp. A enters into an agreement with State Y’s environmental enforcement agency (Agen- cy) for violating state environmental laws. Under the terms of the agreement, Corp. A must pay $40,000 to the Agency in civil penalties, $80,000 in restitution for environmental harm, $50,000 for remediation of contaminated sites, and $60,000 to conduct compre- hensive upgrades to Corp. A’s operations to come into compliance with the state environmental laws. (ii) Analysis. The identification requirement is satisfied for those amounts the agreement identifies as restitution, remediation, or to come into compli- ance with a law. If Corp. A establishes, as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, that the amounts it paid or incurred are for restitution, remediation, and to come into compliance with state environ- mental laws, paragraph (a) of this section does not preclude Corp. A from deducting $190,000. Under paragraph (a) of this section, Corp. A may not de- duct the $40,000 in civil penalties. Section 162(f) and §1.162-21(a) will not disallow Corp. A’s deduc- tion for the $60,000 paid to come into compliance with the state environmental laws. However, Corp. A may deduct the $60,000 paid only if, under the facts and circumstances, the payment would be otherwise deductible under chapter 1 of the Code. See section 161, concerning items allowed as deductions, and section 261, concerning items for which no deduc- tion is allowed, and the regulations related to sec- tions 161 and 261. (2) Example 2. Restitution. (i) Facts. Corp. A enters into an agreement with State T’s securities agency (Agency) for violating a securities law by inducing B to make a $100,000 investment in Corp. C stock, which B lost when the Corp. C stock became worthless. As part of the agreement, Corp. A agrees to pay $100,000 to B as restitution for B’s investment loss, incurred as a re- sult of Corp. A’s actions. The agreement specifically states that the $100,000 payment by Corp. A to B is restitution. The agreement also requires Corp. A to pay a $40,000 fine to the Agency as a result of Corp. A’s misconduct. (ii) Analysis. Corp. A’s $100,000 payment to B is identified in the agreement as restitution. If Corp. A establishes, as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, that the amount paid was for that purpose, Corp. A may deduct the $100,000 payment. Para- graph (a) of this section precludes Corp. A from deducting its payment of $40,000 to the Agency be- cause the payment of a fine is not treated as restitu- tion, remediation, or as paid to come into compliance with a law. (3) Example 3. Amount paid to come into com- pliance with a law. (i) Facts. Corp. B, an accrual method taxpayer, is under investigation by State X’s environmental en- forcement agency for a potential violation of State X’s law governing emissions standards. Corp. B enters into an agreement with State X under which it agrees to upgrade the engines in a fleet of vehi- cles that Corp. B operates to come into compliance with State X’s law. Although the agreement does not provide the specific amount Corp. B will incur to upgrade the engines to come into compliance with State X’s law, it identifies that Corp. B must upgrade existing engines to lower certain emissions. Under the agreement, Corp. B also agrees to bring certain machinery, already in compliance with State X law, up to a standard higher than that which the law re- quires, and to construct a nature center in a local park for the benefit of the community. Corp. B presents invoices, as described in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section, to substantiate that the expenses Corp. B will incur to upgrade the engines will be amounts paid to come into compliance with State X’s law. (ii) Analysis. Because the agreement describes the specific action Corp. B must take to come into compliance with State X’s law, and Corp. B provides evidence, as described in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section, to establish that the agreement obligates it to incur costs to come into compliance with a law, paragraph (a) of this section would not preclude a deduction for the amounts Corp. B incurs to come into compliance. However, Corp. B may not deduct the amounts paid to bring its machinery up to a higher standard than required by State X’s law or to construct the nature center because no facts exist to establish that either amount was paid to come into compliance with a law or as restitution or remediation. (4) Example 4. At the direction of a government. (i) Facts. Corp. D enters into an agreement with governmental entity, Consumer Board, for violat- ing consumer protection laws by failing to provide debt-relief services it promised its customers. The agreement requires Corp. D to pay $60,000 as res- titution to the customers harmed by Corp. D’s vio- lation of the law. (ii) Analysis. At the direction of Consumer Board, Corp. D must pay $60,000 to its customers as a result of its violation of the law. The agreement identifies the $60,000 as restitution. Provided Corp. D establishes, under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, that the $60,000 constitutes restitution, paragraph (a) of this section does not apply. (h) Applicability date. The rules of this section are proposed to apply to tax- able years beginning on or after the date of publication of the Treasury decision adopting these rules as final regulations is published in the Federal Register, except that such rules do not apply to amounts paid or incurred under any order or agree- ment that became binding under applica- ble law before such date. Until that date, taxpayers may rely on these proposed rules for any order or agreement, but only if the taxpayers apply the rules in their en- tirety and in a consistent manner. Par. 3. Add §1.6050X-1 to read as fol- lows: §1.6050X-1 Information reporting for fines, penalties, and other amounts by governments, governmental entities, and June 1, 2020 926 Bulletin No. 2020–23 nongovernmental entities treated as gov- ernmental entities. (a) Information reporting requirement. The appropriate official (as described in paragraph (g)(1) of this section) of a government or governmental entity (as described in paragraph (g)(2) of this sec- tion) or nongovernmental entity treated as a governmental entity (as described in paragraph (g)(3) of this section) that is a party to a suit, agreement, or otherwise to which section 162(f) and §1.162-21(f)(4) apply, must— (1) File an information return (as de- scribed in paragraph (b) of this section) if the aggregate amount the payor (as de- scribed in paragraph (g)(4) of this section) is required to pay pursuant to all court or- ders (orders) and settlement agreements (agreements), with respect to the violation of a law, or the investigation or inquiry into the potential violation of a law, equals or exceeds the threshold amount provided in paragraph (g)(5) of this section; and (2) Furnish a written statement as de- scribed in paragraph (c) of this section to each payor. (b) Requirement to file return. (1) Content of information return. The information return must provide the fol- lowing: (i) The aggregate amount required to be paid to, or at the direction of, a govern- ment or governmental entity as a result of the order or agreement; (ii) The separate amounts required to be paid as restitution, remediation, or to come into compliance with a law, as de- fined in §1.162-21(f)(3), as a result of the order or agreement; and (iii) Any additional information re- quired by the information return and the related instructions. (2) Form, manner, and time of report- ing. The appropriate official required, un- der paragraph (a)(1) of this section, to file an information return must file Form 1098- F, Fines, Penalties, and Other Amounts, (or any successor form), with Form 1096, Annual Summary and Transmittal of U.S. Information Returns. The information re- turn must be filed with the Internal Rev- enue Service (IRS) on or before January 31 of the year following the calendar year in which the order or agreement becomes binding under applicable law. The January 31 due date applies to both paper and elec- tronically filed information returns. (c) Requirement to furnish written statement. (1) In general. The appropriate official must furnish a written statement to each payor with respect to which it is required to file an information return under para- graphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section. The written statement must include: (i) The information that was reported to the IRS with respect to such payor; and (ii) A legend that identifies the state- ment as important tax information that is being furnished to the IRS. (2) Copy of the Form 1098-F. The ap- propriate official may satisfy the require- ment of this paragraph (c) by furnishing a copy of the Form 1098-F (or any succes- sor form) filed with respect to the payor, or another document that contains the in- formation required by paragraph (c)(1) if the document conforms to applicable rev- enue procedures (see §601.601) or other guidance relating to substitute statements. (3) Time for furnishing written state- ment. The appropriate official must fur- nish the written statement to the payor on or before the date that the appropriate of- ficial files the Form 1098-F with the IRS, as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. (d) Rules for multiple payors. (1) Multiple payors — individual liabil- ity. If, pursuant to an order or agreement, the sum of the aggregate amount that mul- tiple individually liable payors must pay with respect to a violation, investigation, or inquiry equals, or exceeds, the thresh- old amount under paragraph (g)(5) of this section, the appropriate official must file an information return under paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section to report the amount required to be paid by each payor, even if a payor’s payment liability is less than the threshold amount. The appropri- ate official must furnish a written state- ment, under paragraph (c) of this section, to each payor. If more than one person (as defined in section 7701(a)(1)) is a party to an order or agreement, there is no infor- mation reporting requirement, or require- ment to furnish a written statement, with respect to any person who does not have a payment obligation or obligation for costs to provide services or to provide property. (2) Multiple payors — joint and several liability. If, pursuant to an order or agree- ment, multiple payors are jointly and sev- erally liable to pay an amount that, in the aggregate, equals or exceeds the threshold amount under paragraph (g)(5) of this sec- tion, the appropriate official must file an information return, under paragraphs (a) (1) and (b) of this section for each of the jointly and severally liable payors. Each information return must report the aggre- gate amount required to be paid by all of the payors. The appropriate official must furnish a written statement, under para- graph (c) of this section, to each of the jointly and severally liable payors. (e) Payment amount not identified. If, as provided by §1.162-21(b)(2)(iii), the order or agreement identifies a payment (or the cost to provide property or to pro- vide services) as restitution, remediation, or an amount paid to come into compli- ance with a law (as defined in §1.162- 21(f)(3)), but does not identify some or all of the aggregate amount the payor must pay (or some or all of the aggregate cost to provide property or to provide services) and, under the facts and circumstances, the government or governmental entity expects the amount to equal or exceed the threshold amount under paragraph (g)(5) of this section, for purposes of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, the appro- priate official must file an information re- turn, and furnish the written statement to the payor, as provided by the instructions to Form 1098-F (or any successor form), including instructions as to the amounts (if any) to include on Form 1098-F. (f) Material change. If the parties make a material change, as described in §1.162- 21(e)(2), to the terms of an order or agree- ment for which an appropriate official has filed Form 1098-F (or any successor form), the appropriate official must update the IRS by filing a corrected Form 1098- F (or any successor form), as provided by the form instructions, with respect to the entire amended order or agreement, not just the terms modified. The appropriate official must file the corrected Form 1098- F with the IRS on or before January 31 of the year following the calendar year in which the parties make a material change to the terms of the order or agreement. The appropriate official must furnish an Bulletin No. 2020–23 927 June 1, 2020 amended written statement to the payor on or before the date that the appropriate official files the corrected Form 1098-F with the IRS. (g) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply— (1) Appropriate official. (i) One government or governmental entity. If the government or governmental entity has not assigned one of its officers or employees to comply with the report- ing requirements of paragraph (a), (b), and (c) of this section, the term “appropriate official” means the officer or employee of a government or governmental entity hav- ing control of the suit, investigation, or in- quiry. If the government or governmental entity has assigned one of its officers or employees to comply with the reporting requirements of paragraph (a), (b), and (c) of this section, such officer or employee is the appropriate official. (ii) More than one government or gov- ernmental entity. (A) In general. If more than one gov- ernment or governmental entity is a party to an order or agreement, only the appro- priate official of the government or gov- ernmental entity listed first on the most recently executed order or agreement is responsible for complying with all report- ing requirements under paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, unless another appropriate official is appointed by agree- ment under paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(B) of this section. (B) By agreement. The governments or governmental entities that are parties to an order or agreement may agree to appoint one or more other appropriate officials to be responsible for complying with the in- formation reporting requirements of para- graphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section. (2) Government or governmental en- tity. For purposes of this section, govern- ment or governmental entity means— (i) The government of the United States, a State, or the District of Colum- bia; or (ii) A political subdivision of, or a corporation or other entity serving as an agency or instrumentality of any of para- graph (g)(2)(i) of this section. (3) Nongovernmental entity treated as governmental entity. For purposes of this section, the definition of nongovern- mental entity set forth in §1.162-21(f)(2) applies. (4) Payor. The payor is the person (as defined in section 7701(a)(1)) who, pur- suant to an order or agreement has paid or incurred, or is liable to pay or incur, an amount to, or at the direction of, a gov- ernment or governmental entity in relation to the violation or potential violation of a law. In general, the payor will be the per- son to which section 162(f) and §1.162-21 of the regulations apply. (5) Threshold amount. The threshold amount is $50,000. (h) Applicability date. The rules of this section are proposed to apply only to or- ders and agreements that become binding under applicable law on or after January 1, 2022. Sunita Lough Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on May 12, 2019, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for May 13, 2019, 85 F.R. 28524) Bulletin No. 2020–23 i June 1, 2020 Definition of Terms Revenue rulings and revenue procedures (hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that have an effect on previous rulings use the following defined terms to describe the effect: Amplified describes a situation where no change is being made in a prior pub- lished position, but the prior position is being extended to apply to a variation of the fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if an earlier ruling held that a principle ap- plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the same principle also applies to B, the earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare with modified, below). Clarified is used in those instances where the language in a prior ruling is be- ing made clear because the language has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a prior rul- ing is being changed. Distinguished describes a situation where a ruling mentions a previously pub- lished ruling and points out an essential difference between them. Modified is used where the substance of a previously published position is being changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a principle applied to A but not to B, and the new ruling holds that it applies to both A and B, the prior ruling is modified because it corrects a published position. (Compare with amplified and clarified, above). Obsoleted describes a previously pub- lished ruling that is not considered deter- minative with respect to future transactions. This term is most commonly used in a ruling that lists previously published rulings that are obsoleted because of changes in laws or regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted because the substance has been included in regulations subsequently adopted. Revoked describes situations where the position in the previously published ruling is not correct and the correct position is being stated in a new ruling. Superseded describes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than restate the substance and situation of a previously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same position published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single ruling a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings. If the new ruling does more than restate the sub- stance of a prior ruling, a combination of terms is used. For example, modified and superseded describes a situation where the substance of a previously published ruling is being changed in part and is continued without change in part and it is desired to restate the valid portion of the previous- ly published ruling in a new ruling that is self contained. In this case, the previously published ruling is first modified and then, as modified, is superseded. Supplemented is used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original ruling has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the additions, and supersedes all prior rul- ings in the series. Suspended is used in rare situations to show that the previous published rulings will not be applied pending some future action such as the issuance of new or amended regulations, the outcome of cas- es in litigation, or the outcome of a Ser- vice study. Abbreviations The following abbreviations in current use and formerly used will appear in material published in the Bulletin. A—Individual. Acq.—Acquiescence. B—Individual. BE—Beneficiary. BK—Bank. B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals. C—Individual. C.B.—Cumulative Bulletin. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations. CI—City. COOP—Cooperative. Ct.D.—Court Decision. CY—County. D—Decedent. DC—Dummy Corporation. DE—Donee. Del. Order—Delegation Order. DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation. DR—Donor. E—Estate. EE—Employee. E.O.—Executive Order. ER—Employer. ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act. EX—Executor. F—Fiduciary. FC—Foreign Country. FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act. FISC—Foreign International Sales Company. FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company. F.R.—Federal Register. FUTA—Federal Unemployment Tax Act. FX—Foreign corporation. G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum. GE—Grantee. GP—General Partner. GR—Grantor. IC—Insurance Company. I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin. LE—Lessee. LP—Limited Partner. LR—Lessor. M—Minor. Nonacq.—Nonacquiescence. O—Organization. P—Parent Corporation. PHC—Personal Holding Company. PO—Possession of the U.S. PR—Partner. PRS—Partnership. PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption. Pub. L.—Public Law. REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust. Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure. Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling. S—Subsidiary. S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules. Stat.—Statutes at Large. T—Target Corporation. T.C.—Tax Court. T.D.—Treasury Decision. TFE—Transferee. TFR—Transferor. T.I.R.—Technical Information Release. TP—Taxpayer. TR—Trust. TT—Trustee. U.S.C.—United States Code. X—Corporation. Y—Corporation. Z—Corporation. June 1, 2020 ii Bulletin No. 2020–23 Numerical Finding List 1 Bulletin 2020–23 AOD: 2020-1, 2020-12 I.R.B. 521 2020-2, 2020-14 I.R.B. 558 2020-3, 2020-17 I.R.B. 663 Announcements: 2020-1, 2020-5 I.R.B. 552 2020-2, 2020-15 I.R.B. 609 2020-3, 2020-15 I.R.B. 655 2020-4, 2020-17 I.R.B. 667 2020-5, 2020-19 I.R.B. 796 2020-6, 2020-23 I.R.B. 911 Notices: 2020-1, 2020-2 I.R.B. 290 2020-2, 2020-3 I.R.B. 327 2020-3, 2020-3 I.R.B. 330 2020-4, 2020-4 I.R.B. 380 2020-5, 2020-4 I.R.B. 380 2020-6, 2020-7 I.R.B. 411 2020-7, 2020-7 I.R.B. 411 2020-8, 2020-7 I.R.B. 415 2020-9, 2020-7 I.R.B. 417 2020-10, 2020-10 I.R.B. 456 2020-11, 2020-11 I.R.B. 492 2020-12, 2020-11 I.R.B. 495 2020-13, 2020-11 I.R.B. 502 2020-14, 2020-13 I.R.B. 555 2020-15, 2020-14 I.R.B. 559 2020-16, 2020-14 I.R.B. 559 2020-17, 2020-15 I.R.B. 590 2020-18, 2020-15 I.R.B. 590 2020-19, 2020-15 I.R.B. 591 2020-20, 2020-16 I.R.B. 660 2020-21, 2020-16 I.R.B. 660 2020-22, 2020-17 I.R.B. 664 2020-23, 2020-18 I.R.B. 742 2020-26, 2020-18 I.R.B. 744 2020-27, 2020-19 I.R.B. 778 2020-28, 2020-19 I.R.B. 781 2020-30, 2020-19 I.R.B. 781 2020-31, 2020-19 I.R.B. 783 2020-32, 2020-21 I.R.B. 837 2020-34, 2020-21 I.R.B. 838 2020-36, 2020-21 I.R.B. 840 2020-25, 2020-22 I.R.B. 863 2020-29, 2020-22 I.R.B. 864 2020-33, 2020-22 I.R.B. 868 2020-37, 2020-23 I.R.B. 900 2020-38, 2020-23 I.R.B. 903 Proposed Regulations: REG-107431-19, 2020-3 I.R.B. 332 REG-122180-18, 2020-3 I.R.B. 342 REG-100956-19, 2020-4 I.R.B. 383 REG-125710-18, 2020-5 I.R.B. 554 REG-132741-17, 2020-10 I.R.B. 458 REG-100814-19, 2020-12 I.R.B. 542 REG-132529-17, 2020-12 I.R.B. 667 REG-106013-19, 2020-18 I.R.B. 757 REG-117138-17, 2020-19 I.R.B. 796 REG-106864-18, 2020-20 I.R.B. 805 REG-113295-18, 2020-22 I.R.B. 875 REG-104591-18, 2020-23 I.R.B. 911 Revenue Procedures: 2020-1, 2020-01 I.R.B. 1 2020-2, 2020-01 I.R.B. 107 2020-3, 2020-01 I.R.B. 131 2020-4, 2020-01 I.R.B. 148 2020-5, 2020-01 I.R.B. 241 2020-7, 2020-01 I.R.B. 281 2020-9, 2020-02 I.R.B. 294 2020-10, 2020-02 I.R.B. 295 2020-11, 2020-06 I.R.B. 406 2020-8, 2020-08 I.R.B. 447 2020-12, 2020-11 I.R.B. 511 2020-13, 2020-11 I.R.B. 515 2020-17, 2020-12 I.R.B. 539 2020-18, 2020-15 I.R.B. 592 2020-14, 2020-16 I.R.B. 661 2020-22, 2020-18 I.R.B. 745 2020-23, 2020-18 I.R.B. 749 2020-24, 2020-18 I.R.B. 750 2020-26, 2020-18 I.R.B. 753 2020-25, 2020-19 I.R.B. 785 2020-28, 2020-19 I.R.B. 792 2020-20, 2020-20 I.R.B. 801 2020-27, 2020-20 I.R.B. 803 2020-29, 2020-21 I.R.B. 859 2020-19, 2020-22 I.R.B. 871 2020-21, 2020-22 I.R.B. 872 2020-30, 2020-22 I.R.B. 873 2020-15, 2020-23 I.R.B. 905 Revenue Rulings: 2020-1, 2020-3 I.R.B. 296 2020-2, 2020-3 I.R.B. 298 2020-3, 2020-3 I.R.B. 409 2020-4, 2020-4 I.R.B. 444 2020-5, 2020-5 I.R.B. 454 2020-6, 2020-11 I.R.B. 490 2020-7, 2020-12 I.R.B. 522 2020-9, 2020-15 I.R.B. 563 2020-10, 2020-15 I.R.B. 565 Revenue Rulings:—Continued 2020-8, 2020-19 I.R.B. 775 2020-11, 2020-19 I.R.B. 776 Treasury Decisions: 9886, 2020-2 I.R.B. 285 9887, 2020-3 I.R.B. 302 9888, 2020-3 I.R.B. 306 9891, 2020-8 I.R.B. 419 9892, 2020-8 I.R.B. 439 9893, 2020-9 I.R.B. 449 9895, 2020-15 I.R.B. 565 9896, 2020-18 I.R.B. 681 9897, 2020-23 I.R.B. 882 1 A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2018–27 through 2018–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2018–52, dated December 27, 2018. Bulletin No. 2020–23 iii June 1, 2020 Finding List of Current Actions on Previously Published Items 1 Bulletin 2020–23 1 A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2018–27 through 2018–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2018–52, dated December 27, 2018. Internal Revenue Service Washington, DC 20224 Official Business Penalty for Private Use, $300 INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue Bulletins are available at www.irs.gov/irb/. We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be pleased to hear from you. You can email us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page www.irs.gov) or write to the Internal Revenue Service, Publishing Division, IRB Publishing Program Desk, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, IR-6230 Washington, DC 20224.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.