us-irs-announcements-irb-2005-26-pdf•Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-26 (PDF rendition): IRS Announcements
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-26 (PDF rendition): IRS Announcements
us-irs-announcements-irb-2005-26-pdfInternal Revenue Bulletin 2005-26 (PDF rendition): IRS AnnouncementsGuidance
Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.
Bulletin No. 200 5-26 June 27, 2005 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations. INCOME TAX Rev. Rul. 2005–37, page 1343. LIFO; price indexes; department stores.The April 2005 Bureau of Labor Statistics price indexes are accepted for use by department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory methods for valuing inventories for tax years ended on, or with reference to, April 30, 2005. T.D. 9207, page 1344. REG–10673 6–00, page 1376. Final, tem porary, and proposed regulations under section 752 of the Code relate to the definition of liabilities. These reg- ulations p rovide rules regarding a partnership’s assumption of certai n fixed and contingent obligations in connection with the issua nce of a partnership interest and provide conforming changes t o certain regulations. These regulations also pro- vide rule s under section 358(h) for assumptions of liabilities by corpo rations from partners and partnerships. In addition, to preve nt the abuse that section 358(h) was designed to pre- vent, th ese regulations also provide rules that, with respect to an excha nge to which section 358(a)(1) applies, remove the excepti on for transfers in which substantially all of the assets associ ated with a liability are transferred to the person assum- ing the liability as part of the exchange. Rev. Proc. 2005–31, page 1374. This procedure provides safe harbors for determining the final- ity of the adoption of eligible foreign-born children for purposes of the adoption credit and the exclusion for employer-provided assistance for qualified adoption expenses. The expenses of a re-adoption proceeding may be qualified adoption expenses. Notice 2003–15 modified and superseded. Announcement 2005–45, page 1377. This announcement discusses comments received in response to a revenue procedure proposed in Notice 2003–15, 2003–1 C.B. 540, and differences between the proposed revenue pro- cedure and Rev. Proc. 2005–31. EMPLOYEE PLANS Rev. Rul. 2005–36, page 1368. Individual Retirement Account (IRA); decedent; benefi- ciary’s disclaimer.This ruling discusses whether a benefi- ciary’s disclaimer of a beneficial interest in a decedent’s IRA is a qualified disclaimer under section 2518 of the Code even though prior to making the disclaimer, the beneficiary receives from the IRA the required minimum distribution for the year of the decedent’s death. Notice 2005–46, page 1372. Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities.The weighted aver- age interest rate for June 2005 and the resulting permissible range of interest rates used to calculate current liability and to determine the required contribution are set forth. EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS Announcement 2005–44, page 1377. E.N.Y.P. Charity Fund of Brooklyn, NY, no longer qualifies as an organization to which contributions are deductible under sec- tion 170 of the Code. (Continued on the next page) Finding Lists begin on page ii. Index for January through June begins on page vi. ESTATE TAX Rev. Rul. 2005–36, page 1368. Individual Retirement Account (IRA); decedent; benefi- ciary’s disclaimer.This ruling discusses whether a benefi- ciary’s disclaimer of a beneficial interest in a decedent’s IRA is a qualified disclaimer under section 2518 of the Code even though prior to making the disclaimer, the beneficiary receives from the IRA the required minimum distribution for the year of the decedent’s death. GIFT TAX Rev. Rul. 2005–36, page 1368. Individual Retirement Account (IRA); decedent; benefi- ciary’s disclaimer.This ruling discusses whether a benefi- ciary’s disclaimer of a beneficial interest in a decedent’s IRA is a qualified disclaimer under section 2518 of the Code even though prior to making the disclaimer, the beneficiary receives from the IRA the required minimum distribution for the year of the decedent’s death. ADMINISTR ATIVE Notice 200 5–47, page 1373. This notic e provides an interim definition of state or local bond opinions u nder section 10.35(b)(9) of Treasury Department Cir- cular No. 2 30 and provides information relating to changes to the propos ed requirements for state or local bond opinions that are under consideration. Announcement 2005–43, page 1376. The IRS announces that effective upon the publication of this announcement, filers of Form 8693 no longer have to attach the approved and returned copy to their income tax return. June 27, 20052005–26 I.R.B. The IRS Mission Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all. Introduction The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven- tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins, which are sold on a single-copy basis. It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub- stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod- ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi- cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man- agement are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published. Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements. Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same. The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows: Part I.—19 86 Code. This part i ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of the Intern al Revenue Code of 1986. Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A, Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg- islation and Related Committee Reports. Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul- ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec- retary (Enforcement). Part IV .—Items of General Interest. This par t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar- ment an d suspension lists, and announcements. The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index for the matters published during the preceding months. These monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period. The c ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. 2005–26 I.R.B.June 27, 2005 Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 Section 137.—Adoption Assistance Programs Safe harbors are provided for determining the fi- nality of the adoption of eligible foreign-born chil- dren for purposes of the exclusion for employer-pro- vided assistance for qualified adoption expenses. The expenses of a re-adoption proceeding may be qual- ified adoption expenses. See Rev. Proc. 2005-31, page 1374. Section 401.—Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plans 26 CFR 1.401(a)(9)–5: Required minimum distribu- tions from defined contribution plans. Where a beneficiary accepts the required min- imum distribution from adecedent’s individual retirement account (IRA), the beneficiary is not precluded from making a qualified disclaimer under section 2518 of the Code of a beneficial interest in the IRA. See Rev. Rul. 2005-36, page 1368. Section 472.—Last-in, First-out Inventories 26 CFR 1.472–1: Last-in, first-out inventories. LIFO; price indexes; department stores.The April 2005 Bureau of Labor Statistics price indexes are accepted for use by department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out in- ventory methods for valuing inventories for tax years ended on, or with reference to, April 30, 2005. Rev. Rul. 2005–37 The following Department Store In- ventory Price Indexes for April 2005 were issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The indexes are accepted by the Inter- nal Revenue Service, under § 1.472–1(k) of the Income Tax Regulations and Rev. Proc. 86–46, 1986–2 C.B. 739, for ap- propriate application to inventories of department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory methods for tax years ended on, or with reference to, April 30, 2005. The Department Store Inventory Price Indexes are prepared on a national basis and include (a) 23 major groups of depart- ments, (b) three special combinations of the major groups — soft goods, durable goods, and miscellaneous goods, and (c) a store total, which covers all departments, including some not listed separately, ex- cept for the following: candy, food, liquor, tobacco, and contract departments. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DEPARTMENT STORE INVENTORY PRICE INDEXES BY DEPARTMENT GROUPS (January 1941 = 100, unless otherwise noted) GroupsApr 2004Apr 2005 Percent Ch ange from Apr 20 04 to Apr 2005 1 1. PieceGoods .............................................491.0469.8-4.3 2. Domestic sandDraperies.................................. 539.7539.1-0.1 3. Women’sandChildren’sShoes ............................654.5679.73.9 4. Men’sShoes.............................................856.4876.62.4 5. Infants ’Wear ............................................ 586.1582.7-0.6 6. Women’sUnderwear......................................493.2545.210.5 7. Women’sHosiery ........................................336.2342.92.0 8. Women’s andGirls’Accessories ........................... 564.2599.66.3 9. Women’sOuterwearandGirls’Wear .......................389.2376.2-3.3 10. Men’sClothing ..........................................545.9565.63.6 11. Men’s F urnishings........................................ 592.7586.6-1.0 12. Boys’ClothingandFurnishings............................459.4440.4-4.1 13. Jewelry..................................................893.0879.9-1.5 14. Notio ns ................................................. 799.3779.0-2.5 15. ToiletArticlesandDrugs..................................987.5994.40.7 16. FurnitureandBedding ....................................618.0604.2-2.2 17. Floo rCoverings.......................................... 598.8601.00.4 18. Housewares..............................................715.3714.1-0.2 19. MajorAppliances.........................................201.8202.80.5 20. Rad ioandTelevision...................................... 42.739.5-7.5 21. Recreation and Education 2 .................................81.278.3-3.6 22. Home Improvements 2 .....................................128.0136.46.6 23. Aut omotive Accessories 2 .................................. 112.1114.42.1 2005–26 I.R.B.1343June 27, 2005 BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DEPARTMENT STORE INVENTORY PRICE INDEXES BY DEPARTMENT GROUPS (January 1941 = 100, unless otherwise noted) GroupsApr 2004Apr 2005 Percent Change from Apr 2004 to Apr 2005 1 Groups1–15:SoftGoods .......................................572.0572.40.1 Groups16–20:DurableGoods...................................385.6380.8-1.2 Groups 21–23: Misc. Goods 2 ....................................93.693.0-0.6 Store Total 3 ..............................................504.8503.5-0.3 1 Absence of a minus sign before the percentage change in this column signifies a price increase. 2 Indexes on a January 1986 = 100 base. 3 The store t otal index covers all departments, including some not listed separately, except for the following: candy, food, liquor, tobacco and contract departments. DRA FTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue rul ing is Michael Burkom of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax an d Accounting). For further informa- ti on regarding this revenue ruling, contact Mr . Burkom at (202) 622–7924 (not a to ll-free call). Section 752.—Treatment of Certain Liabilities 26 CFR 1.752–1: Treatment of partnership liabilities. T.D. 9207 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Parts 1 and 602 Assumption of Partner Liabilities AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Final and temporary regula- tions; and removal of temporary regula- tions. SUMMARY: This document contains fi- nal regulations relating to the definition of liabilities under section 752 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). These regulations provide rules regarding a partnership’s assumption of certain fixed and contingent obligations in connection with the issuance of a partnership interest and provide con- for ming changes to certain regulations. Th ese regulations also provide rules under se ction 358(h) for assumptions of liabil- it ies by corporations from partners and pa rtnerships. Finally, this document also co ntains temporary regulations relating to t he assumption of certain liabilities under s ection 358(h). The text of the temporary r egulations also serves as the text of the p roposed regulations (REG–106736–00) s et forth in the notice of proposed rule- making on this subject in this issue of the Bulletin. DATES:Effective Date:These regulations are effective May 26, 2005. Applicability Dates:The final §1.752–6 regulations apply to assumptions of liabilities by a partnership occurring af- ter October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003. All of the other final regulations in this Treasury Decision, as well as the temporary regulations under section 358, apply to liabilities assumed on or after June 24, 2003, except as otherwise noted. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Fields at (202) 622–3050 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Paperwork Reduction Act The collection of information con- tained in these final regulations has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 199 5 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) under control num ber 1545–1843. Responses to these co llections of information are mandatory an darerequiredtoobtainabenefit. The co llections of information in this final re gulation is in §1.752–7(e), (f), (g), and (h ). This information is required for a f ormer or current partner of a partnership t o take deductions, losses, or capital ex- p enses attributable to the satisfaction of t he §1.752–7 liability. This information w ill be used by the partner in order to take a deduction, loss, or capital expense. An additional collection of information in this final regulation is in §1.752–7(k)(2). This information is required to inform the IRS of partnerships making the designated election and to report income appropri- ately. The collectionofinformationis required to obtain a benefit,i.e., to elect to apply the provisions of §1.752–7 of the regulations in lieu of §1.752–6. The likely respondents are business or other for-profit institutions and small businesses or organizations. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by the Of- fice of Management and Budget. Estimated total annual reporting bur- den: 125 hours. The estimated annual burden per re- spondent varies from 20 to 40 minutes, de- pending on individual circumstances, with an estimated average of 30 minutes. Estimated number of respondents: 250. Estimated annual frequency of re- sponses: On occasion. June 27, 200513442005–26 I.R.B. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and sugges- tions for reducing this burden should be sent to theInternal Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clearance Officer, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224, and to theOffice of Manage- ment and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503. Books or records relating to this col- lection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become mate- rial in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as re- quired by 26 U.S.C. 6103. Background This document contains amendments to 26 CFR part 1 under sections 358, 704, 705, 737 and 752 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). As part of the Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000 (the Act) (114 Stat. 2763), Congress enacted, on December 15, 2000, section 358(h), effective October 18, 1999, to address certain situations in which property is transferredtoacorporationin exchange for both stock and the corpora- tion’s assumption of certain obligations of the transferor. In these situations, transfer- ors took the position that the obligations were not liabilities within the meaning of section 357(c) or that they were described in section 357(c)(3), and, therefore, the obligations did not reduce the basis of the transferor’s stock. These assumed obliga- tions, however, did reduce the value of the stock. The transferors then sold the stock and claimed a loss. In this way, taxpay- ers attempted to duplicate a loss in corpo- rate stock and to accelerate deductions that typically are allowed only on the economic performance of these types of obligations. Section 358(h) addresses these transac- tions by requiring that, after the applica- tion of section 358(d), the basis in stock received in an exchange to which section 351, 354, 355, 356, or 361 applies be re- duced (but not below the fair market value of the stock) by the amount of any liability assumed in the exchange. Exceptions to section 358(h) are provided where: (1) the trade or business with which the li- ability is associated is transferred to the person assuming the liability as part of the exchange; or (2) substantially all of the assets with which the liability is associ- ated are transferred to the person assuming the liability as part of the exchange. The Secretary, however, has the authority to limit these exceptions. The termliability for purposes of section 358(h) includes any fixed or contingent obligation to make payment without regard to whether the obligation is otherwise taken into account for purposes of the Code. Congress recognized that taxpayers were attempting to use partnerships and S corporations to carry out the same types of abuses that section 358(h) was designed to deter. Therefore, in sections 309(c) and (d)(2) of the Act, Congress directed the Secretary to prescribe rules to provide “appropriate adjustments under subchap- ter K of chapter 1 of the Code to prevent the acceleration or duplication of losses through the assumption of (or transfer of assets subject to) liabilities described in section 358(h)(3) . . . in transactions involving partnerships.” Under the statute, these rules are to “apply to assumptions of liability after October 18, 1999, or such later date as may be prescribed in such rules.” In response to this directive, a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–106736–00, 2003–2 C.B. 60) under sections 358, 704, 705, and 752 was published in theFederal Register(68 FR 37434) on June 24, 2003. In addition, temporary regulations (T.D. 9062, 2003–2 C.B. 46) were published on that same day (68 FR 37414). The proposed and temporary regulations pro- vide rules to prevent the duplication and acceleration of loss through the assump- tion by a partnership of certain liabilities from a partner. Section 1.752–6T of the temporary regulations (the temporary reg- ulations) applies to liabilities assumed by a partnership after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003. Section 1.752–7 of the proposed regulations (the proposed regulations) applies to liabilities assumed by a partnership on or after June 24, 2003. However, taxpayers may elect to apply the proposed regulations, instead of the tem- porary regulations, to liabilities assumed by a partnership after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003. The temporary regulations adopt the ap- proach of section 358(h), with some mod- ifications. For example, the exception for contributions of “substantially all of the as- sets with which the liability is associated” does not apply to certain abusive transac- tions described in Notice 2000–44, 2000–2 C.B. 255, released to the public on August 11, 2000, and published on September 5, 2000. The proposed regulations deviate some- what from the rules of section 358(h). In particular, the proposed regulations do not reduce the partner’s basis in the partner- ship at the time of the assumption of a §1.752–7 liability by the partnership, but delay that reduction until an event occurs that separates the partner from the liability (triggering event). The triggering events are: (1) a disposition (or partial disposi- tion) of the partnership interest by the part- ner; (2) a liquidation of the partner’s inter- est in the partnership; and (3) the assump- tion of the liability by another partner. Af- ter a triggering event, the partnership’s (or the assuming partner’s) deduction on the economic performance of the §1.752–7 li- ability is limited. However, if the part- nership (or the assuming partner) notifies the partner of the economic performance of the §1.752–7 liability, then the partner may take a loss or deduction in the amount of the prior basis reduction. The proposed regulations include an ex- ception, similar to the exception in section 358(h)(2)(A), for transactions in which the partner contributes to the partnership the trade or business with which the liability is associated as part of the exchange (the trade or business exception), but do not in- clude an exception, similar to the excep- tion in section 358(h)(2)(B), for transac- tions in which the partner contributes to the partnership substantially all of the as- sets associated with the liability as part of the exchange. The proposed regula- tions also include an additional exception for situations in which, immediately be- fore the triggering event, the amount of the remaining built-in loss with respect to all §1.752–7 liabilities assumed by the part- nership (other than §1.752–7 liabilities as- sumedbythepartnershipwithanasso- ciated trade or business) in one or more §1.752–7 liability transfers is less than the lesser of 10% of the gross value of partner- ship assets or $1,000,000 (thede minimis exception). In addition, the proposed regulations provide detailed rules to address the treat- ment of the liability between the date of the 2005–26 I.R.B.1345June 27, 2005 assumption of that liability by the partner- ship and the date of a triggering event and to address tiered entity situations. The proposed regulations distinguish between a §1.752–1 liability, for which a basis reduction is required when the liabil- ity is assumed by the partnership from a partner, and a §1.752–7 liability, for which a basis reduction is not required until the occurrence of a triggering event. Under the proposed regulations, an obligation is a §1.752–1 liability to the extent the obli- gation creates or increases the basis of any of the obligor’s assets (including cash), gives rise to an immediate deduction to the obligor, or gives rise to an expense that is not deductible in computing the obligor’s taxable income and is not properly charge- able to capital. All remaining obligations are §1.752–7 liabilities. Under the pro- posed regulations,§1.752–7 liabilities are subject to the rules of section 704(c) and the regulations thereunder. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Public Law 108–357 (118 Stat. 1418) (the Act), was enacted on Octo- ber 22, 2004. Section 833(a) of the Act amended section 704(c) of the Code by adding section 704(c)(1)(C), effective for contributions of property to a partnership after October 22, 2004. Under new section 704(c)(1)(C), if “built-in loss” property is contributed to a partnership, the built-in loss shall be taken into account only in determining the items allocated to the con- tributing partner, and, except as provided in regulations, in determining the amount of items allocated to the other partners, the basis of the contributed property shall be treated as being equal to its fair market value at the time of contribution. For this purpose, a “built-in loss” is defined to mean the excess of the adjusted basis of the property in the hands of the contribut- ing partner over its fair market value at the time of its contribution to the partnership. Section 833(b) of the Act requires basis adjustments to be made following certain transfers of interests in partnerships for which no section 754 election is in effect. As amended by the Act, section 743(a) and (b) of the Code requires a partnership to re- duce the basis of partnership property upon the transfer of an interest in the partner- ship by sale or exchange or upon the death of a partner, if, at the time of the relevant transfer, the partnership has a “substan- tial built-in loss.” Section 743(d)(1) pro- vides that, for purposes of section 743, a partnership has a substantial built-in loss with respect to a transfer of a partnership interest if the partnership’s adjusted basis in the partnership’sproperty exceeds by more than $250,000 the fair market value of such property. Exceptions are provided for electing investment partnerships and for securitization partnerships, as defined in the Act. See also sections 734(b) and (d), as amended by section 833(c) of the Act (requiring a basis adjustment to be made following a distribution from a part- nershipforwhichnosection754election is in effect in the case of a “substantial ba- sis reduction”). The IRS and the Treasury Department are aware of certain similarities between the treatment of §1.752–7 liabilities in these regulations and the treatment of built-in losses under sections 704(c)(1)(C), 734, and 743 of the Code, as added by the Act. For example, it is possible to view the contribution of property with an adjusted tax basis equal to the fair market value of the property, determined without regard to any §1.752–7 liabilities, as “built-in loss” property after the §1.752–7 liability is taken into account in those cases where the §1.752–7 liability is related to the contributed property. Although a partner- ship’s assumption of a §1.752–7 liability as part of the contribution of property to the partnership can be analogized to a property with an adjusted tax basis greater than fair market value, the purposes of section 704(c)(1)(C) and §1.752–7 are different in certain respects. Section 704(c)(1)(C) and the other changes in sec- tion 833 of the Act are directed toward loss duplication whereas §1.752–7 is di- rected at both loss duplication and loss acceleration. Therefore, to the extent of any built-in loss attributable to a §1.752–7 liability, §1.752–7 shall be applied with- out regard to the amendments made by the Act, unless future guidance provides to the contrary. Any such guidance would be prospective in application. Written comments were received in re- sponse to the notice of proposed rulemak- ing, and a public hearing was held on Oc- tober 14, 2003. Two commentators re- quested to speak at that hearing. After con- sideration of the comments, the proposed and temporary regulations are adopted as modified by this Treasury decision. Explanation of Provisions These final regulations generally fol- low the proposed and temporary regula- tions with the changes described below. 1.Comments on §1.752–6T Several commentators suggested that the issuance of §1.752–6T exceeded the authority granted to the Secretary in section 309 of the Act. More specifi- cally, some commentators suggested that §1.752–6T results in the inappropriate denial of abona fideloss, that §1.752–6T was issued to bootstrap the IRS’s litigating position regarding transactions described in Notice 2000–44, 2000–2 C.B. 255, and that section 309 of the Act only granted the Secretary the authoritytoprescriberules to address situations in which a partner- ship liability is assumed by a corporation. In addition, several commentators argued that the Treasury Department and the IRS exceeded their authority in providing that §1.752–6T applies retroactively to assumptions of liabilities occurring after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003, the date the regulations were issued. The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that §1.752–6T does not result in the inappropriate denial of abona fide loss. The exceptions in §1.752–6T gener- ally limit the application of the regulations to transactions thatare abusive in nature and that lack a business purpose. In ad- dition, the regulations allow taxpayers to elect into §1.752–7 so as to avoid the im- mediate basis reduction under §1.752–6T. Recognizing, however, that some taxpay- ers may not have expected the approach taken in §1.752–7 when engaging in trans- actions in prior years, §1.752–6T employs rules similar to section 358(h) for partner- ship transactions. Those commentators who suggested that the IRS issued §1.752–6T to “boot- strap” its litigating position in Notice 2000–44 pointed to the fact that Notice 2000–44 did not mention that regulations would be issued in the future to challenge the transactions described in that notice. As discussed earlier, the Act was en- acted with a retroactive effective date and granted the Treasury Department and the IRS the authority to issue retroactive regu- lations. The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that they have appropriately June 27, 200513462005–26 I.R.B. exercised this grantof authority. Also, Notice 2000–44 was released on August 11, 2000. The Act was not enacted into law until December 15, 2000, after the release of Notice 2000–44. Therefore, the Treasury Department and the IRS could not reference regulations promulgated un- der the Act in Notice 2000–44. The Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that the Secretary’s au- thority under section 309(c) is not limited to addressing assumptions of liabilities by corporations from partnerships. The plain language of the legislative directive is not so limited and the legislative history does not support such a limitation. To the contrary, the Treasury Depart- ment and the IRS believe that the rules of §1.752–6T carry out the explicit di- rective of section 309(c) of the Act by applying to partnership transactions rules that are analogous to the rules that ap- ply to corporate transactions under sec- tion 358(h). For example, if the transac- tions described in Notice 2000–44 were ef- fected through a contribution to a corpora- tion, rather than a contribution to a partner- ship, section 358(h) would generally ap- ply to such a transaction, causing a ba- sis reduction identical to that provided by §1.752–6T. Section 7805(b) addresses when a reg- ulation (temporary, proposed, or final) may be effective retroactively. Section 7805(b)(1) generally provides that no temporary, proposed, or final regulations relating to the internal revenue laws shall applytoanytaxableperiodendingbefore the earliest of the following dates: (A) the date on which such regulation is filed with the Federal Register; (B) in the case of any final regulation, the date on which any proposed or temporary regulation to which such final regulation relates was filed with the Federal Register; or (C) the date on which any notice substantially describing the expected contents of any temporary, proposed, or final regulation is issued to the public. However, section 7805(b) provides a list of exceptions to the general rule stated above. Included in that list, and relevant in this context, is section 7805(b)(6). Section 7805(b)(6) provides that the limitation may be superseded “by a legislative grant from Congress au- thorizing the Secretary to prescribe the effective date with respect to any regula- tion.” Also included among the exceptions to the general rule insection 7805(b)(1) is section 7805(b)(3).Section 7805(b)(3) states that the “Secretary may provide that any regulation may take effect or apply retroactively to prevent abuse.” The retroactive effective date of §1.752–6T is in accordance with the direc- tive in section 309(c) and (d)(2) of the Act and section 7805(b)(6). Furthermore, pur- suant to section 7805(b)(3), the Secretary has determined that a retroactive effective date is appropriate to prevent abuse. For these reasons, the Treasury De- partment and the IRS have concluded that §1.752–6T is a valid exercise of the Secre- tary’s regulatory authority under the Code and section 309 of the Act. 2.Extension of Time to Adopt the Provisions of §1.752–7 in lieu of §1.752–6T Section 1.752–6T(d)(2) provides that partnerships may elect to apply the provi- sions of §1.752–7 of the proposed regu- lations to all assumptions of liabilities by the partnership occurring after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003, in lieu of applying §1.752–6T of the temporary reg- ulations. The election must be filed with the first Federal income tax return filed by the partnership on or after September 24, 2003. Several commentators expressed a need for additional time to make this election. In response to these comments, the elec- tion period described in §1.752–6T(d)(2) has been extended. Under the extension, an election to apply the regulations under §1.752–7, rather than the regulations un- der §1.752–6, to all liabilities assumed by a partnership after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003, must be filed with a Federal income tax return filed by the part- nership on or after September 24, 2003, and on or before December 31, 2005. 3.Section 1.358–5T, Special Rules For Assumption of Liabilities The preamble to the proposed regula- tions advised taxpayers that, with respect to an exchange to which §358(a)(1) ap- plies, the Treasury Department and the IRS were considering exercising their au- thority under §358(h)(2) to issue regula- tions that would limit the exceptions to §358(h)(1) to follow the exceptions set forth in the proposed regulations under §1.752–7 (other than thede minimisex- ception). The preamble indicated that such regulations would be retroactive to the ex- tent necessary to prevent abuse. No com- ments were received regarding the appro- priate scope or substance of such regula- tions. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that removing the ex- ception of §358(h)(2)(B) (which applies where substantially all of the assets with which the liability is associated are trans- ferred to the person assuming the liability as part of the exchange) is necessary to pre- vent the abuse that §358(h) was designed to prevent. Therefore, with respect to an exchange to which §358(a)(1) applies, this document contains temporary regulations providing that the exception contained in §358(h)(2)(B) does not apply to exchanges under §358(a)(1) in which liabilities are assumed on or after June 24, 2003. 4.Section 1.752–7 Liability Commentators have asked for clarifica- tion on whether an obligation could be a §1.752–1 liability in part and a §1.752–7 liability in part. Certain obligations that create liabilities under §1.752–1 may also create §1.752–7 liabilities. For example, a fixed obligation that gives rise to basis can have a component portion that changes in value between the time the obligation is first incurred by the partner and the time that the partnership assumes the obligation due to changes in interest rates, stock price, or other similar factors. In these and other cases, the value of the obligation to the holder has increased and, as a result, the cost to the obligor has increased by a like amount. The final regulations clarify that an obligation can be treated in part as a §1.752–7 liability and in part as a §1.752–1 liability. 5.Satisfaction Other than by Economic Performance The proposed regulations allow the §1.752–7 liability partner to claim a loss or deduction upon “economic per- formance” of the obligation. Certain §1.752–7 liabilities may be settled in cash or in kind, extinguished, satisfied or otherwise resolved under circumstances where there may not be an “economic performance” of the obligation within the meaning of that term. See section 461(h) 2005–26 I.R.B.1347June 27, 2005 and §1.461–4. In addition, economic per- formance only applies to “liabilities” as defined in §1.446–1(c)(1)(ii)(B), and it is possible that some §1.752–7 liabilities may not come within the meaning of that term. As a result, the final regulations allow the §1.752–7 liability partner to claim a loss or deduction under §1.752–7 upon the “satisfaction of the §1.752–7 li- ability”. A §1.752–7 liability is treated as satisfied on the date upon which, but for §1.752–7, the partnership, or the assum- ing partner, would have been allowed to take the §1.752–7 liability into account for federal tax purposes. The final regulations provide a nonexclusive list of examples of when the §1.752–7 liability would be taken into account for these purposes. 6.Application of Section 704(c) Under §1.752–7(c), any §1.752–7 li- ability assumed by a partnership in a §1.752–7 liability transfer is treated un- der section 704(c) principles as having a built-in loss equal to the amount of the §1.752–7 liability as of the date of the partnership’s assumption of the §1.752–7 liability. The proposed regulations pro- vide that, if a §1.752–7 liability is assumed from the partnership by a partner other than the §1.752–7 liability partner, and the trade or business orde minimisexceptions do not apply, then section 704(c)(1)(B) does not apply to the assumption and instead the rules of §1.752–7(g) apply. Commentators asked whether section 704(c)(1)(B) applies to the assumption of a §1.752–7 liability by another partner if the trade or business orde minimisexcep- tions apply to that assumption. In addition, commentators questioned whether the successor partner ruleof §1.704–3(a)(7) applies to the built-in loss amount of the §1.752–7 liability. The successor part- ner rule provides that, if a contributing partner transfers a partnership interest, built-in gain or loss must be allocated to the transferee partner as it would have been allocated to the transferor partner. The intent of the Treasury Department and the IRS was that all of the rules of section 704(c), §1.704–3, and §1.704–4, including section 704(c)(1)(B), apply to §1.752–7 liabilities unless otherwise specifically stated. The §1.752–7 regu- lations have been modified to make this clear. In addition, §1.704–3 has been amended to provide that §1.752–7 lia- bilities are section 704(c) property and to provide that in general, the successor partner rule does not apply to §1.752–7 liabilities. Comments were also received regard- ing the application of section 704(c) prin- ciples to the extent that a §1.752–7 liabil- ity has decreased after the partnership’s assumption of the liability. Consistent with the principles of §1.704–3, the fi- nal regulations provide that, if there is a post-assumption change in the value of the §1.752–7 liability, resulting in an obliga- tion amount that is either greater or less than the initial amount of the obligation, the change in the amount will be treated as a section 704(b) and not a section 704(c) item, thereby creating book income or loss to be allocated to the partners. The final regulations also provide that, if the value of the §1.752–7 liability decreases after the assumption of the obligation by the partnership, the “ceiling rule” applies, and the partnership and the partners are entitled to adopt one of the reasonable methods specified in §1.704–3 to correct any ceiling rule disparities. 7.Section 1.752–7 Liabilities that are Capitalized and Not Deducted The proposed regulations make refer- ence in several places to a “deduction or capital expense”, but no rules are provided as to how the capital expense is taken into account. For example, no rules are pro- vided in the proposed regulations for situa- tions where the contributing partner is still a partner in the partnership at the time that the obligation is recognized for federal tax purposes and capitalized into the tax basis of one or more assets of the partnership. The final regulations add a rule to §1.704–3 providing that, to the extent a partnership properly capitalizes all or a portion of an item as described in para- graph §1.704–3(a)(12), then the item or items to which such cost is properly capitalized is treated as section 704(c) property with the same amount of built-in loss as corresponds to the amount capi- talized. Similar rules are provided under §§1.704–4 and 1.737–2. In addition, the proposed regulations do not provide any guidance as to the appro- priate tax treatment if a triggering event occurs after a §1.752–7 liability has been capitalized into the basis of one or more assets of the partnership. Under the final regulations, no reduction in the partner’s basis in the partnership interest is required with respect to such a capitalized amount as a result of the triggering event, but, af- ter the triggering event, neither the partner- ship nor the remaining partners may use the capitalized basis. 8.Exception for Trading and Investment Partnerships. The proposed regulations contain an exception to §1.752–7(e), (f), and (g) for assumptions of liabilities in connection with the contribution of an associated trade or business, provided that the part- nership continues to carry on that trade or business after the contribution. The proposed regulations provide that, for this purpose, a trade or business generally does not include the activity of acquiring, hold- ing, or disposing of financial instruments, unless such activity is carried on by an entity registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a management company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (15 U.S.C. 80a). The exception for entities registered as management companies was intended to apply narrowly to master-feeder partner- ships; however, it appears that the excep- tion could apply to a broader range of en- tities, some of which could be carrying on the types of transactions that section 309 of the Act and these regulations were intended to address. Consequently, the Treasury Department and the IRS have re- moved the exception for entities registered as management companies. The Treasury Department and the IRS do not believe that eliminating the ex- ception will create a substantial burden for master-feeder partnerships, because interests in these partnerships are not reg- ularly sold, and because distributions by these partnerships typically take the form of nonliquidating distributions of cash. Accordingly, master-feeder partnerships are unlikely to engage in triggering events that would implicate this regulation. Therefore, under thefinal regulations, the activity of acquiring, holding, dealing in, or disposing of financial instruments is not treated as a trade or business even if en- gagedinbyanentityregisteredasaman- agement company. For assumptions of li- June 27, 200513482005–26 I.R.B. abilities on or after June 24, 2003, and be- fore May 26, 2005, however, entities regis- tered as management companies may rely on the exception to the trade or business definition in the proposed regulations. 9.Technical Terminations, Mergers, and Divisions Section 1.708–1(b)(4) provides that if a partnership is terminated under section 708(b)(1)(B) by a sale or exchange of an interest, the partnership is deemed to con- tribute all of its assets and liabilities to a new partnership in exchange for an inter- est in the new partnership; and, immedi- ately thereafter, the terminated partnership is deemed to distribute interests in the new partnership to the purchasing partner and the other remaining partners. A commentator asked whether the rules provided in §1.752–7 apply to the contribution and distribution of partner- ship interests deemed to occur under §1.708–1(b)(4). Rules have been added to the final regulations to clarify how the regulations apply to technical terminations and partnership mergers and divisions. These rules are designed to ensure that, after a technical termination, merger, or division, the partners that were §1.752–7 liability partners of the prior partnership continue to be §1.752–7 liability partners of the new partnership, and that built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability does not shift from one partner to another partner. In addition, these rules are de- signed to ensure that a deemed assumption of a liability as a result of a technical ter- mination of a partnership does not create any new §1.752–7 liabilities that did not exist prior to the technical termination. Accordingly, §1.752–7(b)(6)(ii) of the final regulations provides that, in deter- mining if a deemed contribution of as- sets and assumption of liability as a result of a technical termination is treated as a §1.752–7 liability transfer, only liabilities that were §1.752–7 liabilities of the termi- nating partnership are taken into account and, then, only to the extent of the amount of the liability that was subject to §1.752–7 prior to the technical termination. In addition, the definition of a §1.752–7 liability partner has been amended to clar- ify that, if, in a transaction described in §1.752–7(e)(3), a partnership (lower-tier partnership) assumes a §1.752–7 lia- bility from another partnership (up- per-tier partnership), then any partners that were §1.752–7 liability partners of the upper-tier partnership continue to be §1.752–7 liability partners of the lower-tier partnership with respect to the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability at the time of the as- sumption of the §1.752–7 liability by the lower-tier partnership from the upper-tier partnership. Any new built-in loss asso- ciated with the §1.752–7 liability that is created on the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability from the upper-tier partnership by the lower-tier partnership is shared by all the partners of the upper-tier partnership in accordance with their interests in the upper-tier partnership, and each partner of the upper-tier partnership is treated as a §1.752–7 liability partner with respect to that new built-in loss. The definition of §1.752–7 liability partner has also been amended to pro- vide that, if, in a transaction described in §1.752–7(e)(3), an interest in a partnership (lower-tier partnership) that has assumed a §1.752–7 liability is distributed by a partnership (upper-tier partnership) that is the §1.752–7 liability partner with respect to that liability, then the persons receiving interests in the lower-tier partnership are §1.752–7 liability partners with respect to the lower-tier partnership to the same extent that they were prior to the distri- bution. In addition, §1.752–7(e)(3) has been amended to provide that a distribu- tion of an interest in a lower-tier partner- ship is exempt from the application of §1.752–7(e) only if the partners that were §1.752–7 liability partners with respect to the lower-tier partnership prior to the distribution continue to be §1.752–7 liabil- ity partners with respect to the lower-tier partnership after the distribution. 10.Disguised Sale Rules Section 707(a)(2)(B) provides that where there is a direct or indirect transfer of money or other property by a partner to a partnership and a related direct or indirect transfer of money or property by the partnership to such partner and the transfers, when viewed together, are prop- erly characterized as a sale or exchange, such transfers shall be treated either as a transaction between the partnership and one who is not a partner, or as a transac- tion between two or more partners acting other than in their capacity as members of the partnership. Section 1.752–7(a)(2) of the proposed regulations provides that the assumption of a §1.752–7 liability is not treated as an assumption of a liability or as a transfer of cash for purposes of section 707(a)(2)(B). One commentator noted that the language contained in the proposed regulations was not consistent with §1.707–5(a), which takes into ac- count all liabilities, regardless of whether those liabilities are taken into account un- der section 752. The intent of the proposed regulations under section 752 was not to override the disguised sale rules under section 707, which may include §1.752–7 liabilities as consideration. Therefore, §1.752–7(a)(2) has been removed. 11.Revisions to §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv) Under section 704(b), a partner’s dis- tributive share of income, gain, loss, de- duction, or credit (or item thereof) is deter- mined in accordance with the partnership agreement provided that those allocations have substantial economic effect. If the al- locations under the partnership agreement do not have substantial economic effect or the partnership agreement does not pro- vide as to a partner’s distributive share of partnership items, then the partner’s dis- tributive share of such items is determined in accordance with the partner’s interest in the partnership (determined by taking into account all facts and circumstances). Section 1.704–1(b) describes various requirements that must be met for part- nership allocations to have substantial economic effect. Among these require- ments is that (except as otherwise provided in §1.704–1(b)) the partnership agreement must provide for the determination and maintenance of capital accounts in accor- dance with the rules of §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv). Section 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b) generally requires that a partner’s capital account be increased by the value of property con- tributed by the partner to the partnership net of liabilities secured by such con- tributed property that the partnership is considered to assume or take subject to under section 752, and be decreased by the value of property distributed by the partnership to the partner net of liabilities secured by such distributed property that 2005–26 I.R.B.1349June 27, 2005 the partner is considered to assume or take subject to under section 752. Section 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(c) requires that a part- ner’s capital account be increased by lia- bilities of the partnership that are assumed by such partner (other than liabilities described in §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b)(5)), and be decreased by liabilities of the partner that are assumed by the partner- ship (other than liabilities described in §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b)(2)). The proposed regulations revised §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b) to take into account all liabilities to which the contributed or distributed property is subject, not just liabilities described in section 752. The proposed regulations did not revise §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(c), because that section is not limited to assumptions of liabilities described in section 752. Acommentatorsuggested that, if all liabilities are covered by§1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b),then §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(c) did not have any effect and should be removed. The final regulations do not adopt this comment, because the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(c) has significance even though §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b)isno longer limited to liabilities described in section 752. Section 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b) applies only to situations in which liabili- tiesareassumedbythepartnershiporthe partner in connection with the contribution or distribution of property, or contributed or distributed property is taken subject to liabilities. Section 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b) does not apply if liabilities are assumed by the partnership or a partner other than in connection with a contribution or distribution; these assumptions are covered by §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(c). 12.Notification upon Satisfaction of the §1.752–7 Liability One commentator suggested that, to prevent the loss of a deduction to the §1.752–7 partner, the regulations should require the assuming partnership or part- ner to notify the §1.752–7 liability partner of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 lia- bility. The proposed regulations impose no penalty on the partnership for failure to notify the §1.752–7 liability partner. The commentator also suggested that the §1.752–7 liability partner be required to keep contact information current with the assuming partnership or partner. The Treasury Department and the IRS do not believe that imposing additional re- quirements is necessary in these circum- stances. It is anticipated that the §1.752–7 liability partner, upon entering the partner- ship, will negotiate with the partnership for the necessary notification. Therefore, this comment was not adopted. 13.Treatment of §1.752–7 Liabilities Commentators have requested that the final regulations include guidance on the recourse or nonrecourse treatment of §1.752–7 liabilities for all purposes of subchapter K. Under the proposed regula- tions, a §1.752–7 liability is treated as a nonrecourse liability solely for purposes of §1.704–2, dealing with the allocation of nonrecourse deductions among the partners. The only other provision that the Treasury Department and the IRS are aware of for which the characterization of a §1.752–7 liability as recourse or nonre- course is §1.707–5 (addressing the treat- ment of liabilities for purposes of the dis- guised sale rules of section 707(a)(2)(B)), and §1.707–5 already provides adequate rules for determining if a §1.752–7 liabil- ity is recourse or nonrecourse. Because a §1.752–7 liability is not, by definition, a §1.752–1 liability, the recourse or non- recourse nature of a §1.752–7 liability is not relevant for purposes of §§1.752–1 through 1.752–5. For this reason, this comment was not adopted. 14.Valuation of §1.752–7 Liabilities Comments were received requesting that the final regulations include guidance on acceptable methods for identifying and valuing §1.752–7 liabilities, as well as identifying the appropriate discount rate for determining the liability’s present value. The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that such matters are best left to the negotiation of the financial arrange- ment among the parties and are beyond the scope of this regulation. In an arm’s length transaction, the parties will take the potential occurrence of these obligations into account in arriving at the agreement among the parties that will govern their af- fairs, including the appropriate valuation methodology to apply to these obligations. Accordingly, the final regulations do not adopt this comment. However, the final regulations clar- ify that, if the obligation arose under a contract in exchange for rights granted to the obligor under that contract, and those contractual rights are contributed to the partnership in connection with the partnership’s assumption of the contrac- tual obligation, then the amount of the §1.752–7 liability is the amount of cash, if any, that a willing assignor would pay to a willing assignee to assume the entire contract. Effective Date The final §1.752–6 regulations apply to assumptions of liabilities by a partnership occurring after October 18, 1999, and be- fore June 24, 2003. All of the other final regulations in this Treasury decision apply to liabilities assumed on or after June 24, 2003, except as otherwise noted. Special Analyses These final and temporary regulations are necessary to prevent abusive transac- tions involving transfers to partnerships and corporations of the type section 358(h) was enacted to prevent. Accordingly, good cause is found for dispensing with notice and public procedure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) with respect to the temporary regulations, and for dispensing with a de- layed effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and (3) with respect to the final and temporary regulations. It has been determined that this Trea- sury decision is not asignificant regula- tory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It is hereby certified that the final regulations in this document will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This certification is based upon the fact that few partnerships engage in the type of transactions that are subject to these regu- lations (assumptions of liabilities not de- scribed in section 752(a) and (b) from a partner). In addition, available data in- dicates that most partnerships that engage in the type of transactions that are subject to these regulations are large partnerships. Certain broad exceptions to the application June 27, 200513502005–26 I.R.B. of these regulations (including ade min- imisexception) further limit the economic impact of these regulations on small en- tities. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibil- ity Analysis under the Regulatory Flexi- bility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is not re- quired. For the applicability of the Regula- tory Flexibility Act to the temporary regu- lations in this document (§1.358–5T), refer to the cross-reference notice of proposed rulemaking published in this issue of the Bulletin. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking that preceded these regulations was sub- mitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small BusinessAdministration for comment on its impact on small business. Drafting Information The principal author of these regula- tionsisLauraNash,OfficeofAssociate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), IRS. However, other person- nel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development. ***** Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 602 are amended as follows: PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding entries in nu- merical order to read, in part, as follows: Authority:26U.S.C.7805*** Section 1.358–5T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 358(h)(2). * * * Section 1.358–7 also issued under Public Law 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–638 (2001) * * * Section 1.752–1(a) also issued under Public Law 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–638 (2001). Section 1.752–6 also issued under Public Law 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–638 (2001). Section 1.752–7 also issued under Public Law 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–638 (2001). * * * Par. 2. Section 1.358–5T is added to read as follows: §1.358–5T Special rules for assumption of liabilities (temporary). (a)In general. Section 358(h)(2)(B) does not apply to an exchange occurring on or after June 24, 2003. (b)Effective dates. This section applies to exchanges occurring on or after June 24, 2003. Par. 3. Section 1.358–7 is added to read as follows: §1.358–7 Transfers by partners and partnerships to corporations. (a)Transfers by partners of partnership interests. For purposes of section 358(h), a transfer of a partnership interest to a cor- poration is treated as a transfer of the part- ner’s share of each of the partnership’s as- setsandanassumptionbythecorporation of the partner’s share of partnership liabili- ties (including section 358(h) liabilities, as defined in paragraph (d) of this section). See paragraph (e)Example 2of this sec- tion. (b)Transfers by partnerships.Ifacor- poration assumes a section 358(h) liabil- ity from a partnership in an exchange to which section 358(a) applies, then, for pur- poses of applying section 705 (determi- nation of basis of partner’s interest) and §1.704–1(b), any reduction, under section 358(h)(1), in the partnership’s basis in cor- porate stock received in the transaction is treated as an expenditure of the part- nership described in section 705(a)(2)(B). See paragraph (e)Example 1of this sec- tion. This expenditure must be allocated among the partners in accordance with sec- tion 704(b) and (c) and §1.752–7(c). If a partner’s share of the reduction, under section 358(h)(1), in the partnership’s ba- sis in corporate stock exceeds the partner’s basis in the partnership interest, then the partner recognizes gain equal to the excess, which is treated as gain from the sale or exchange of a partnership interest. This paragraph does not apply to the extent that §1.752–7(j)(4) applies to the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by the corpora- tion. (c)Assumption of section 358(h) liabil- ity by partnership followed by transfer of partnership interest or partnership prop- erty to a corporation—trade or business exception. Where a partnership assumes a section 358(h) liability from a partner and, subsequently, the partner transfers all or part of the partner’s partnership interest to a corporation in an exchange to which section 358(a) applies, then, for purposes of applying section 358(h)(2), the section 358(h) liability is treated as associated only with the contribution made to the partnership by that partner. See paragraph (e)Example 2of this section. Similar rules apply where a partnership assumes a section 358(h) liability of a partner and a corporation subsequently assumes that section 358(h) liability from the part- nership in an exchange to which section 358(a) applies. (d)Section 358(h) liabilities defined. For purposes of this section, section 358(h) liabilities are liabilities described in sec- tion 358(h)(3). (e)Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of this section. As- sume, for purposes of these examples, that the obligation assumed by the corporation does not reduce the shareholder’s basis in the corporate stock under section 358(d). The examples are as follows: Example 1. Transfer of partnership property to corporation. In 2004, in an exchange to which section 351(a) applies, PRS, a cash basis taxpayer, transfers $2,000,000 cash to Corporation X, also a cash basis taxpayer, in exchange for Corporation X shares and the assumption by Corporation X of $1,000,000 of accounts payable incurred by PRS. At the time of the exchange, PRS has two partners, A, a 90% partner, who has a $2,000,000 basis in the PRS interest, and B, a 10% partner, who has a $50,000 basis in the PRS interest. Assume that, under section 358(h)(1), PRS’s basis in the Corporation X stock is reduced by the accounts payable assumed by Corporation X ($1,000,000). Under paragraph (b) of this section, A’s and B’s bases in PRS must be reduced, but not below zero, by their respective shares of the section 358(h)(1) basis reduction. If either partner’s share of the section 358(h)(1) basis reduction exceeds the partner’s basis in the partnership interest, then the partner recognizes gain equal to the excess. A’s share of the section 358(h) basis reduction is $900,000 (90% of $1,000,000). Therefore, A’s basis in the PRS interest is reduced to $1,100,000 ($2,000,000 - $900,000). B’s share of the section 358(h) basis reduction is $100,000 (10% of $1,000,000). Be- cause B’s share of the section 358(h) basis reduction ($100,000) exceeds B’s basis in the PRS interest ($50,000), B’s basis in the PRS interest is reduced to $0 and B recognizes $50,000 of gain. This gain is treated as gain from the sale of the PRS interest. Example 2. Transfer of partnership interest to corporation. In 2004, A contributes undeveloped land with a value and basis of $4,000,000 in exchange fora50%interestinPRSandanassumptionbyPRS of $2,000,000 of pension liabilities from a separate business that A conducts. A’s basis in the PRS inter- est immediately after the contribution is A’s basis in 2005–26 I.R.B.1351June 27, 2005 the land, $4,000,000, unreduced by the amount of the pension liabilities. PRS develops the land as a land- fill. Before PRS has economically performed with respect to the pension liabilities, A transfers A’s in- terest in PRS to Corporation X, in an exchange to which section 351 applies. At the time of the ex- change, the value of A’s PRS interest is $2,000,000, A’s basis in PRS is $4,000,000, and A has no share of partnership liabilities other than the pension lia- bilities. For purposes of applying section 358(h), the transfer of the PRS interest to Corporation X is treated as a transfer to Corporation X of A’s share of PRS as- sets and an assumption by Corporation X of A’s share of the pension liabilities of PRS ($2,000,000). Be- cause the pension liabilities were not assumed by PRS from A in an exchange in which the trade or busi- ness associated with the liability was transferred to PRS, the transfer of the PRS interest to Corporation X is not excepted from section 358(h) under section 358(h)(2). See paragraph (c) of this section. Under section 358(h), A’s basis in the Corporation X stock is reduced by the $2,000,000 of pension liabilities. (f)Effective date. This section applies to assumptions of liabilities by a corpora- tion occurring on or after June 24, 2003. Par. 4. Section 1.704–1 is amended as follows: 1. Paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(a)isamended by removing the language “The” at the be- ginning of the first sentence and adding “Except as otherwise provided in this sec- tion, the” in its place. 2. Paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(b)isamended by adding a sentence at the end of the para- graph. 3.Paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(b)(2)is amended by removing the language “se- cured by such contributed property” in the parenthetical. 4. Paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(b)(2)isfurther amended by removing the language “under section 752” in the parenthetical. 5.Paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(b)(5)is amended by removing the language “se- cured by such distributed property” in the parenthetical. 6. Paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(b)(5)isfurther amended by removing the language “under section 752” in the parenthetical. The addition reads as follows: §1.704–1 Partner’s distributive share. ***** (b) * * * (2) * * * (iv) * * * (b) * * * For liabilities assumed before June 24, 2003, references to liabilities in this paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(b) shall include only liabilities secured by the contributed or distributed property that are taken into account under section 752(a) and (b). ***** §1.704–2 [Amended] Par. 5. In §1.704–2, paragraph (b)(3) isamendedbyaddingthelanguage “or a §1.752–7 liability (as defined in §1.752–7(b)(3)(i)) assumed by the part- nership from a partner on or after June 24, 2003” at the end of the sentence. Par. 6. Section 1.704–3 is amended as follows: 1. The paragraph heading for (a)(7) is revised. 2. Two sentences are added to the end of paragraph (a)(7). 3. Paragraphs (a)(8)(ii) and (iii) are removed and reserved and paragraph (a)(8)(iv) is added. 4. Paragraph (a)(12) is added. 5. Two additional sentences are added at the end of paragraph (f). The revisions and additions read as fol- lows: §1.704–3 Contributed property. (a) * * * (7)Transfer of a partnership inter- est.* * * This rule does not apply to any person who acquired a partnership inter- est from a §1.752–7 liability partner in a transaction to which paragraph (e)(1) of §1.752–7 applies. See §1.752–7(c)(1). (8)Special rules—(i)Disposition in a nonrecognition transaction.* * * (ii) [Reserved] (iii) [Reserved] (iv)Capitalized amounts.Totheextent that a partnership properly capitalizes all or a portion of an item as described in para- graph (a)(12) of this section, then the item or items to which such cost is properly cap- italized is treated as section 704(c) prop- erty with the same amount of built-in loss as corresponds to the amount capitalized. ***** (12)§1.752–7 liabilities. Except as otherwise provided in §1.752–7, §1.752–7 liabilities (within the mean- ing of §1.752–7(b)(2)) are section 704(c) property (built-in loss property that at the time of contribution has a book value that differs from the contributing partner’s ad- justed tax basis) for purposes of applying the rules of this section. See §1.752–7(c). To the extent that the built-in loss associ- ated with the §1.752–7 liability exceeds the cost of satisfying the §1.752–7 liability (as defined in §1.752–7(b)(3)), the excess creates a “ceiling rule” limitation, within the meaning of §1.704–3(b)(1), subject to the methods of allocation set forth in §1.704–3(b), (c) and (d). ***** (f)Effective dates. ***Exceptas otherwise provided in §1.752–7(k), para- graphs (a)(8)(iv) and (a)(12) apply to §1.752–7 liability transfers, as defined in §1.752–7(b)(4), occurring on or after June 24, 2003. See §1.752–7(k). Par. 7. Section 1.704–4 is amended as follows: 1. The paragraph heading for (d)(1) is revised. 2. Paragraphs (d)(1)(ii) and (iii) are removed and reserved and paragraph (d)(1)(iv) is added. 3. Paragraph (g) is revised. The additions and revisions read as fol- lows: §1.704–4 Distribution of contributed property. (d)Special rules—(1)Nonrecogni- tion transactions, installment obligations, contributed contracts, and capitalized costs—(i)Nonrecognition transactions. *** (ii) [Reserved] (iii) [Reserved] (iv)Capitalized costs.Propertyto which the cost of section 704(c) property is properly capitalized is treated as section 704(c) property for purposes of section 704(c)(1)(B) and this section to the extent that such property is treated as section 704(c) property under §1.704–3(a)(8)(iv). See §1.737–2(d)(3) for a similar rule in the context of section 737. ***** (g)Effective dates. This section applies to distributions by a partnership to a part- ner on or after January 9, 1995, except that paragraph (d)(1)(iv) applies to distri- butions by a partnership to a partner on or after June 24, 2003. Par. 8. Section 1.705–1 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(8) to read as follows: June 27, 200513522005–26 I.R.B. §1.705–1 Determination of basis of partner’s interest. (a) * * * (8) For basis adjustments necessary to coordinate sections 705 and 358(h), see §1.358–7(b). For certain basis adjustments with respect to a §1.752–7 liability as- sumed by a partnership from a partner, see §1.752–7. ***** Par. 9. Section 1.737–2 is amended as follows: 1. The paragraph heading for (d)(3) is revised. 2. Paragraphs (d)(3)(ii) and (iii) are removed and reserved and paragraph (d)(3)(iv) is added. The additions and revisions read as fol- lows: §1.737–2 Exceptions and special rules. (d) * * * (3)Nonrecognition transactions, in- stallment sales, contributed contracts, and capitalized costs—(i)Nonrecognition transactions.*** (ii) [Reserved] (iii) [Reserved] (iv)Capitalized costs. Property to which the cost of section 704(c) property is properly capitalized is treated as section 704(c) property for purposes of section 737 to the extent that such property is treated as section 704(c) property under §1.704–3(a)(8)(iv). See §1.704–4(d)(1) for a similar rule in the context of section 704(c)(1)(B). ***** Par. 10. Section 1.737–5 is revised to read as follows: §1.737–5 Effective dates. Sections 1.737–1, 1.737–2, 1.737–3, and 1.737–4 apply to distributions by a partnership to a partner on or after January 9, 1995, except that §1.737–2(d)(3)(iv) applies to distributions by a partnership to a partner on or after June 24, 2003. Par. 11. Section 1.752–0 is amended as follows: 1. The section heading and introductory text of §1.752–0 are revised. 2. An entry for §1.752–1(a)(4) is added. 3. Entries for §1.752–1(a)(4)(i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) are added. 4. Entries for §1.752–6 and §1.752–7 are added. The revision and additions read as fol- lows: §1.752–0 Table of contents. This section lists the major paragraphs that appear in §§1.752–1 through 1.752–7. §1.752–1 Treatment of partnership liabilities. (a) * * * (4) Liability defined. (i) In general. (ii) Obligation. (iii) Other liabilities. (iv) Effective date. ***** §1.752–6 Partnership assumption of partner’s section 358(h)(3) liability after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003. (a) In general. (b) Exceptions. (1) In general. (2) Transactions described in Notice 2000–44. (c) Example. (d) Effective date. (1) In general. (2) Election to apply §1.752–7. §1.752–7 Partnership assumption of partner’s §1.752–7 liability on or after June 24, 2003. (a) Purpose and structure. (b) Definitions. (1) Assumption. (2) Adjusted value. (3) §1.752–7 liability. (i) In general. (ii) Amount and share of §1.752–7 lia- bility. (iii) Example. (4) §1.752–7 liability transfer. (i) In general. (ii) Terminations under section 708(b)(1)(B). (5) §1.752–7 liability partner. (i) In general. (ii) Tiered partnerships. (A) Assumption by a lower-tier partner- ship. (B) Distribution of partnership interest. (6) Remaining built-in loss associated with a §1.752–7 liability. (i) In general. (ii) Partial dispositions and assump- tions. (7) §1.752–7 liability reduction. (i) In general. (ii) Partial dispositions and assump- tions. (8) Satisfaction of §1.752–7 liability. (9) Testing date. (10) Trade or business. (i) In general. (ii) Examples. (c) Application of section 704(b) and (c) to assumed §1.752–7 liabilities. (1) In general. (i) Section 704(c). (ii)Section 704(b). (2) Example. (d) Special rules for transfers of partner- ship interests, distributions of partnership assets, and assumptions of the §1.752–7 li- ability after a §1.752–7 liability transfer. (1) In general. (2) Exceptions. (i) In general. (ii) Examples. (e) Transfer of §1.752–7 liability part- ner’s partnership interest. (1) In general. (2) Examples. (3) Exception for nonrecognition trans- actions. (i) In general. (ii) Examples. (f) Distribution in liquidation of §1.752–7 liability partner’s partnership interest. (1) In general. (2) Example. (g) Assumption of §1.752–7 liability by a partner other than §1.752–7 liability part- ner. (1) In general. (2) Consequences to §1.752–7 liability partner. (3) Consequences to partnership. (4) Consequences to assuming partner. (5) Example. (h) Notification by the partnership (or successor) of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability. (i) Special rule for amounts that are cap- italized prior to the occurrence of an event described in paragraphs (e), (f), or (g). (1) In general. (2) Example. 2005–26 I.R.B.1353June 27, 2005 (j) Tiered partnerships. (1) Look-through treatment. (2) Trade or business exception. (3) Partnership as a §1.752–7 liability partner. (4) Transfer of §1.752–7 liability by partnership to another partnership or cor- poration after a transaction described in paragraphs (e), (f), or (g). (i) In general. (ii) Subsequent transfers. (5) Example. (k) Effective dates. (1) In general. (2)Electiontoapplythissectiontoas- sumptions of liabilities occurring after Oc- tober 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003. (i) In general. (ii) Manner of making election. (iii) Filing of amended returns. (iv) Time for making election. Par. 12. In §1.752–1, paragraph (a)(4) is added to read as follows: §1.752–1 Treatment of partnership liabilities. (a) * * * (4)Liability defined—(i)In general. An obligation is a liability for purposes of section 752 and the regulations thereunder (§1.752–1 liability), only if, when, and to the extent that incurring the obligation— (A) Creates or increases the basis of any of the obligor’s assets (including cash); (B) Gives rise to an immediate deduc- tion to the obligor; or (C) Gives rise to an expense that is not deductible in computing the obligor’s tax- able income and is not properly chargeable to capital. (ii)Obligation. For purposes of this paragraph and §1.752–7, an obligation is any fixed or contingent obligation to make payment without regard to whether the obligation is otherwise taken into ac- count for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code. Obligations include, but are not limited to, debt obligations, environmen- tal obligations, tort obligations, contract obligations, pension obligations, obliga- tions under a short sale, and obligations under derivative financial instruments such as options, forward contracts, futures contracts, and swaps. (iii)Other liabilities. For obliga- tions that are not §1.752–1 liabilities, see §§1.752–6 and 1.752–7. (iv)Effective date. Except as other- wise provided in §1.752–7(k), this para- graph (a)(4) applies to liabilities that are incurredorassumedbyapartnershiponor after June 24, 2003. ***** §1.752–5(a) [Amended] Par. 13. In §1.752–5, paragraph (a) is amended by removing the language “Un- less” at the beginning of the first sentence and adding “Except as otherwise provided in §§1.752–1 through 1.752–4, unless” in its place. Par. 14. Section 1.752–6 is added to read as follows: §1.752–6 Partnership assumption of partner’s section 358(h)(3) liability after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003. (a)In general. If, in a transaction de- scribed in section 721(a), a partnership assumes a liability (defined in section 358(h)(3)) of a partner (other than a li- ability to which section 752(a) and (b) apply), then, after application of section 752(a) and (b), the partner’s basis in the partnership is reduced (but not below the adjusted value of such interest) by the amount (determined as of the date of the exchange) of the liability. For purposes of this section, the adjusted value of a part- ner’s interest in a partnership is the fair market value of that interest increased by the partner’s share of partnership liabili- ties under §§1.752–1 through 1.752–5. (b)Exceptions—(1)In general. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this sec- tion, the exceptions contained in section 358(h)(2)(A) and (B) apply to this section. (2)Transactions described in Notice 2000–44. The exception contained in section 358(h)(2)(B) does not apply to an assumption of a liability (defined in section 358(h)(3)) by a partnership as part of a transaction described in, or a trans- action that is substantially similar to the transactions described in, Notice 2000–44, 2000–2 C.B. 255. See §601.601(d)(2) of this chapter. (c)Example. The following example illustrates the principles of paragraph (a) of this section: Example. In 1999, A and B form partnership PRS. A contributes property with a value and basis of $200, subject to a nonrecourse debt obligation of $50 and a fixed or contingent obligation of $100 that is not a liability to which section 752(a) and (b) applies, in exchange for a 50% interestinPRS.Assumethat, after the contribution, A’s share of partnership liabil- ities under §§1.752–1 through 1.752–5 is $25. Also assume that the $100 liability is not associated with a trade or business contributed by A to PRS or with as- sets contributed by A to PRS. After the contribution, A’s basis in PRS is $175 (A’s basis in the contributed land ($200) reduced by the nonrecourse debt assumed by PRS ($50), increased by A’s share of partnership liabilities under §§1.752–1 through 1.752–5 ($25)). Because A’s basis in the PRS interest is greater than the adjusted value of A’s interest, $75 (the fair mar- ket value of A’s interest ($50) increased by A’s share of partnership liabilities ($25)), paragraph (a) of this section operates to reduce A’s basis in the PRS in- terest (but not below the adjusted value of that in- terest) by the amount of liabilities described in sec- tion 358(h)(3) (other than liabilities to which section 752(a)and(b)apply)assumedbyPRS.Therefore, A’s basis in PRS is reduced to $75. (d)Effective date—(1)In general.This section applies to assumptions of liabilities occurring after October 18, 1999, and be- fore June 24, 2003. (2)Election to apply §1.752–7. The partnership may elect, under §1.752–7(k)(2), to apply the provisions referenced in §1.752–7(k)(2)(ii) to all as- sumptions of liabilities by the partnership occurring after October 18, 1999, and be- fore June 24, 2003. Section 1.752–7(k)(2) describes the manner in which the election is made. §1.752–6T [Removed] Par. 15. Section 1.752–6T is removed. Par. 16. Section 1.752–7 is added to read as follows: §1.752–7 Partnership assumption of partner’s §1.752–7 liability on or after June 24, 2003. (a)Purpose and structure. The purpose of this section is to prevent the acceler- ation or duplication of loss through the assumption of obligations not described in §1.752–1(a)(4)(i) in transactions involv- ing partnerships. Under paragraph (c) of this section, any such obligation that is assumedbyapartnershipfromapartnerin a transaction governed by section 721(a) is treated as section 704(c) property. Para- graphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section provide rules for situations where a part- nership assumes such an obligation from a partner and, subsequently, that partner transfers all or part of the partnership in- terest, that partner receives a distribution June 27, 200513542005–26 I.R.B. in liquidation of the partnership interest, or another partner assumes part or all of that obligation from the partnership. These rules prevent the duplication of loss by prohibiting the partnership and any per- son other than the partner from whom the obligation was assumed from claiming a deduction, loss, or capital expense to the extent of the built-in loss associated with the obligation. These rules also prevent the acceleration of loss by deferring the partner’s deduction or loss attributable to the obligation (if any) until the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability (within the mean- ing of paragraph (b)(8) of this section). Paragraph (d) of this section provides a number of exceptions to paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section, including ade minimisexception. Paragraph (i) provides a special rule for situations in which an amount paid to satisfy a §1.752–7 liability is capitalized into other partnership prop- erty. Paragraph (j) of this section provides special rules for tiered partnership trans- actions. (b)Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: (1)Assumption. The principles of §1.752–1(d) and (e) apply in determining if a §1.752–7 liability has been assumed. (2)Adjusted value. The adjusted value of a partner’s interest in a partnership is the fair market value of that interest increased by the partner’s share of partnership liabil- ities under §§1.752–1 through 1.752–5. (3)§1.752–7 liability—(i)In general. A§1.752–7liabilityisanobligationde- scribed in §1.752–1(a)(4)(ii) to the extent that either — (A) The obligation is not described in §1.752–1(a)(4)(i); or (B) The amount of the obligation (un- der paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section) ex- ceeds the amount taken into account under §1.752–1(a)(4)(i). (ii)Amount and share of §1.752–7 li- ability. The amount of a §1.752–7 liabil- ity (or, for purposes of paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, the amount of an obliga- tion) is the amount of cash that a will- ing assignor would pay to a willing as- signee to assume the §1.752–7 liability in an arm’s-length transaction. If the obli- gation arose under a contract in exchange for rights granted to the obligor under that contract, and those contractual rights are contributed to the partnership in connec- tion with the partnership’s assumption of the contractual obligation, then the amount of the §1.752–7 liability or obligation is the amount of cash, if any, that a willing assignor would pay to a willing assignee to assume the entire contract. A partner’s share of a partnership’s §1.752–7 liability is the amount of deduction that would be allocated to the partner with respect to the §1.752–7 liability if the partnership dis- posed of all of its assets, satisfied all of its liabilities (other than §1.752–7 liabili- ties), and paid an unrelated person to as- sume all of its §1.752–7 liabilities in a fully taxable arm’s-length transaction (assum- ingsuchpaymentwouldgiverisetoanim- mediate deduction to the partnership). (iii)Example. In 2005, A, B, and C form part- nership PRS. A contributes $10,000,000 in exchange for a 25% interest in PRS and PRS’s assumption of a debt obligation. The debt obligation was issued for cash and the issue price was equal to the stated redemption price at maturity ($5,000,000). The debt obligation bears interest, payable quarterly, at a fixed rate of interest, which was a market rate of interest when the debt obligation was issued. At the time of the assumption, all accrued interest has been paid. Prior to the partnership assuming the obligation, in- terest rates decrease, resulting in the debt obligation bearing an above-market interest rate. Assume that, as a result of the decline in interest rates, A would have had to pay a willing assignee $6,000,000 to as- sume the debt obligation. The assumption of the debt obligation by PRS from A is treated as an assump- tion of a §1.752–1(a)(4)(i) liability in the amount of $5,000,000 (the portion of the total amount of the debt obligation that has created basis in A’s assets, that is, the $5,000,000 that was issued in exchange for the debt obligation ) and an assumption of a §1.752–7 liability in the amount of $1,000,000 (the difference between the total obligation, $6,000,000, and the §1.752–1(a)(4)(i) liability, $5,000,000). (4)§1.752–7 liability transfer—(i)In general. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this section, a §1.752–7 li- ability transfer is any assumption of a §1.752–7 liability by a partnership from a partner in a transaction governed by sec- tion 721(a). (ii)Terminations under section 708(b)(1)(B). In determining if a deemed contribution of assets and assumption of liability as a result of a technical termi- nation is treated as a §1.752–7 liability transfer, only §1.752–7 liabilities that were assumed by the terminating partner- ship as part of an earlier §1.752–7 liability transfer are taken into account and, then, only to the extent of the remaining built-in loss associated with that §1.752–7 liabil- ity. (5)§1.752–7 liability partner—(i)In general. A §1.752–7 liability partner is a partner from whom a partnership as- sumes a §1.752–7 liability as part of a §1.752–7 liability transfer or any person who acquires a partnership interest from the §1.752–7 liability partner in a transac- tion to which paragraph (e)(3) of this sec- tion applies. (ii)Tiered partnerships—(A)Assump- tion by a lower-tier partnership.If,in a §1.752–7 liability transfer, a partner- ship (lower-tier partnership) assumes a §1.752–7 liability from another partner- ship (upper-tier partnership), then both the upper-tier partnership and the partners of the upper-tier partnership are §1.752–7 liability partners. Therefore, paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section apply on a sale or liquidation of any partner’s in- terest in the upper-tier partnership and on a sale or liquidation of the upper-tier partnership’s interest in the lower-tier partnership. See paragraph (j)(3) of this section. If, in a §1.752–7 liability trans- fer, the upper-tier partnership assumes a §1.752–7 liability from a partner, and, subsequently, in another §1.752–7 liability transfer, a lower-tier partnership assumes that §1.752–7 liability from the upper-tier partnership, then the partner from whom the upper-tier partnership assumed the §1.752–7 liability continues to be the §1.752–7 liability partner of the lower-tier partnership with respect to the remaining built-in loss associated with that §1.752–7 liability. Any new built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability that is created on the assumption of the §1.752–7 lia- bility from the upper-tier partnership by the lower-tier partnership is shared by all the partners of the upper-tier partnership in accordance with their interests in the upper-tier partnership, and each partner of the upper-tier partnership is treated as a §1.752–7 liability partner with respect to that new built-in loss. See paragraph (e)(3)(ii),Example 3of this section. (B)Distribution of partnership in- terest. If, in a transaction described in §1.752–7(e)(3), an interest in a partnership (lower-tier partnership) that has assumed a §1.752–7 liability is distributed by a partnership (upper-tier partnership) that is the §1.752–7 liability partner with respect to that liability, then the persons receiving interests in the lower-tier partnership are §1.752–7 liability partners with respect to the lower-tier partnership to the same ex- tent that they were prior to the distribution. 2005–26 I.R.B.1355June 27, 2005 (6)Remaining built-in loss associated with a §1.752–7 liability.(i)In general. The remaining built-in loss associated with a §1.752–7 liability equals the amount of the §1.752–7 liability as of the time of the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by the partnership, reduced by the portion of the §1.752–7 liability previously taken into ac- count by the §1.752–7 liability partner un- der paragraph (j)(3) of this section and ad- justed as provided in paragraph (c) of this section and §1.704–3 for— (A) Any portion of that built-in loss as- sociated with the §1.752–7 liability that is satisfied by the partnership on or prior to the testing date (whether capitalized or de- ducted); and (B)Anyassumptionofallorpartofthe §1.752–7 liability by the §1.752–7 liabil- ity partner (including any assumption that occurs on the testing date). (ii)Partial dispositions and assump- tions. In the case of a partial disposition of the §1.752–7 liability partner’s part- nership interest or a partial assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by another partner, the remaining built-inloss associated with §1.752–7 liability is prorated based on the portion of the interest sold or the portion of the §1.752–7 liability assumed. (7)§1.752–7 liability reduction—(i)In general. The §1.752–7 liability reduction is the amount by which the §1.752–7 lia- bility partner is required to reduce the ba- sis in the partner’s partnership interest by operation of paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section. The §1.752–7 liability reduc- tion is the lesser of — (A) The excess of the §1.752–7 liability partner’s basis in the partnership interest over the adjusted value of that interest (as defined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section); or (B) The remaining built-in loss associ- ated with the §1.752–7 liability (as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section without regard to paragraph (b)(6)(ii) of this sec- tion). (ii)Partial dispositions and assump- tions. In the case of a partial disposition of the §1.752–7 liability partner’s partner- ship interest or a partial assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by another partner, the §1.752–7 liability reduction is prorated based on the portion of the interest sold or the portion of the §1.752–7 liability assumed. (8)Satisfaction of §1.752–7 liabil- ity—In general. A §1.752–7 liability is treated as satisfied (in whole or in part) on the date on which the partnership (or the assuming partner) would have been allowed to take the §1.752–7 liability into account for federal tax purposes but for this section. For example, a §1.752–7 lia- bility is treated as satisfied when, but for this section, the §1.752–7 liability would give rise to— (i) An increase in the basis of the part- nership’s or the assuming partner’s assets (including cash); (ii) An immediate deduction to the part- nership or to the assuming partner; (iii) An expense that is not deductible in computing the partnership’s or the assum- ing partner’s taxable income and not prop- erly chargeable to capital account; or (iv) An amount realized on the sale or other disposition of property subject to that liability if the property was disposed of by the partnership or the assuming partner at that time. (9)Testing date. The testing date is— (i) For purposes of paragraph (e) of this section, the date of the sale, exchange, orotherdispositionofpartorallofthe §1.752–7 liability partner’s partnership in- terest; (ii)Forpurposesofparagraph(f)ofthis section, the date of the partnership’s distri- bution in liquidation of the §1.752–7 liabil- ity partner’s partnership interest; and (iii) For purposes of paragraph (g) of this section, the date of the assumption (or partial assumption) of the §1.752–7 liabil- ity by a partner other than the §1.752–7 li- ability partner. (10)Trade or business—(i)In general. A trade or business is a specific group of activities carried on by a person for the pur- pose of earning income or profit, other than a group of activities consisting of acquir- ing, holding, dealing in, or disposing of financial instruments, if the activities in- cluded in that group include every opera- tion that forms a part of, or a step in, the process of earning income or profit. Such group of activities ordinarily includes the collection of income and the payment of expenses. The group of activities must constitute the carrying on of a trade or business under section 162(a) (determined as though the activities were conducted by an individual). (ii)Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of this paragraph (b)(10): Example 1. Corporation Y owns, manages, and derives rental income from an office building and also owns vacant land that may be subject to environmen- tal liabilities. Corporation Y contributes the land sub- ject to the environmental liabilities to PRS in a trans- action governed by section 721(a). PRS plans to de- velop the land as a landfill. The contribution of the vacant land does not constitute the contribution of a trade or business because Corporation Y did not con- duct any significant business or development activi- ties with respect to the land prior to the contribution. Example 2. For the past 5 years, Corporation X has owned and operated gas stations in City A, City B, and City C. Corporation X transfers all of the assets associated with the operation of the gas station in City A to PRS for interests in PRS and the assumption by PRS of the §1.752–7 liabilities associated with that gas station. PRS continues to operate the gas station in City A after the contribution. The contribution of the gas station to PRS constitutes the contribution of a trade or business. Example 3. For the past 7 years, Corporation Z has engaged in the manufacture and sale of household products. Throughout this period, Corporation Z has maintained a research department for use in connec- tion with its manufacturing activities. The research department has 10 employees actively engaged in the development of new products. Corporation Z con- tributes the research department to PRS in exchange for a PRS interest and the assumption by PRS of pen- sion liabilities with respect to the employees of the re- search department. PRS continues the research oper- ations on a contractual basis with several businesses, including Corporation Z. The contribution of the re- search operations to PRS constitutes a contribution of a trade or business. (c)Application of section 704(b) and (c)toassumed§1.752–7liabilities—(1) In general—(i)Section 704(c). Except as otherwise provided in this section, sections 704(c)(1)(A) and (B), section 737, and the regulations thereunder, apply to §1.752–7 liabilities. See §1.704–3(a)(12). How- ever, §1.704–3(a)(7) does not apply to any person who acquired a partnership inter- est from a §1.752–7 liability partner in a transaction to which paragraph (e)(1) of this section applies. (ii)Section 704(b). Section 704(b) and §1.704–1(b) apply to a post-contribution change in the value of a §1.752–7 liabil- ity. If there is a decrease in the value of a §1.752–7 liability that is reflected in the capital accounts of the partners un- der §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(f), the amount of the decrease constitutes an item of in- come for purposes of section 704(b) and §1.704–1(b). Conversely, if there is an in- crease in the value of a §1.752–7 liability that is reflected in the capital accounts of the partners under §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(f), June 27, 200513562005–26 I.R.B. the amount of the increase constitutes an item of loss for purposes of section 704(b) and §1.704–1(b). (2)Example. The following example illustrates the provisions of this paragraph (c): Example—(i)Facts. In2004,A,B,andCform partnership PRS. A contributes Property 1 with a fair market value and basis of $400X, subject to a §1.752–7 liability of $100X, for a 25% interest in PRS. B contributes $300X cash for a 25% interest in PRS, and C contributes $600X cash for a 50% interest in PRS. Assume that the partnership com- plies with the substantial economic effect safe harbor of §1.704–1(b)(2). Under §1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(b), A’s capital account is credited with $300X (the fair market value of Property 1, $400X, less the §1.752–7 liability assumed by PRS, $100X). In accordance with §§1.752–7(c)(1)(i) and 1.704–3, the partnership can use any reasonable method for section 704(c) purposes. In this case, the partnership elects the traditional method under §1.704–3(b) and also elects to treat the deductions or losses attributable to the §1.752–7 liability as coming first from the built-in loss. In 2005, PRS earns $200X of income and uses it to satisfy the §1.752–7 liability which has increased in value to $200X. Assume that the cost to PRS of satisfying the §1.752–7 liability is deductible by PRS. The $200X of partnership income is allocated according to the partnership agreement, $50X to A, $50X to B, and $100X to C. ABC Book Tax Book Tax Book Tax $300$400$300$300$600$600 Initial Contribution 50505050 100100 Income (25)(125)(25)(25)(50)(50) Satisfaction of Liability $325$325$325$325$650$650 (ii)Analysis. Pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, $100X of the deduction attributable to the satisfacti on of the §1.752–7 liability is specially al- located to A, the §1.752–7 liability partner, under section 704(c)(1)(A) and §1.704–3. No book item correspon ds to this tax allocation. The remaining $100X of deduction attributable to the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability is allocated, for both book and tax purpos es, according to the partnership agreement, $25XtoA,$25XtoB,and$50XtoC.Ifthepartner- ship, instead, satisfied the §1.752–7 liability over a number of years, the first $100X of deduction with re- spect to the §1.752–7 liability would be allocated to A, the §1.752–7 liability partner, before any deduc- tion wit h respect to the §1.752–7 liability would be allocated to the other partners. For example, if PRS were to satisfy $50X of the §1.752–7 liability, the $50X ded uction with respect to the §1.752–7 liability would be allocated to A for tax purposes only. No de- duction would arise for book purposes. If PRS later paid a f urther $100X in satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, $50X of the deduction with respect to the §1.752–7 liability would be allocated, solely for tax purpos es,toAandtheremaining$50Xwouldbeal- located, for both book and tax purposes, according to the partnership agreement. Under these circum- stance s, the partnership’s method of allocating the built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability is reasonable. (d)Special rules for transfers of part- nership interests, distributions of part- nership assets, and assumptions of the §1.752–7 liability after a §1.752–7 lia- bility transfer—(1)In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2) and (i) of this section, paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section apply to certain partnership transactions occurring after a §1.752–7 liability transfer. (2)Exceptions—(i)In general. Para- graphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section do not apply— (A) If the partnership assumes the §1.752–7 liability as part of a contribution to the partnership of the trade or business with which the liability is associated, and the partnership continues to carry on that trade or business after the contribution (for the definition of a trade or business, see paragraph (b)(10) of this section); or (B) If, immediately before the testing date, the amount of the remaining built-in loss with respect to all §1.752–7 liabili- ties assumed by the partnership (other than §1.752–7 liabilities assumed by the part- nership with an associated trade or busi- ness) in one or more §1.752–7 liability transfers is less than the lesser of 10% of the gross value of partnership assets or $1,000,000. (ii)Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of this paragraph (d)(2): Example 1. For the past 5 years, Corporation X, aCcorp oration, has been engaged in Business A and Business B. In 2004, Corporation X contributes Busi- ness A, in a transaction governed by section 721(a), to PRS in e xchange for a PRS interest and the assump- tion by PRS of pension liabilities with respect to the employees engaged in Business A. PRS plans to carry on Business A after the contribution. Because PRS has assumed the pension liabilities as part of a con- tribution to PRS of the trade or business with which the liabil ities are associated, the treatment of the pen- sion liabilities is not affected by paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section with respect to any transaction occurring after the §1.752–7 liability transfer of the pension liabilities. Example 2.(i)Facts. The facts are the same as in Example 1 , except that PRS also assumes from Cor- poration X certain pension liabilities with respect to the employees of Business B. At the time of the as- sumption , the amount of the pension liabilities with respect to the employees of Business A is $3,000,000 (the A liabilities) and the amount of the pension liabil- ities as sociated with the employees of Business B (the B liabilities) is $2,000,000. Two years later, Corpo- ration X sells its interest in PRS to Y for $9,000,000. At the ti me of the sale, the remaining built-in loss as- sociated with the A liabilities is $2,100,000, the re- maining built-in loss associated with the B liabilities is $900 ,000, and the gross value of PRS’s assets (ex- cluding §1.752–7 liabilities) is $20,000,000. Assume that PRS has no §1.752–7 liabilities other than those assume d from Corporation X. 2005–26 I.R.B.1357June 27, 2005 PRS Balance Sheet at Time of X’s Sale of PRS Interest (in millions) Assets Liabilities $20 Gross Assets (including Business A) ($2.1) A Liabilities (0.9)B Liabilities (ii)Analysis. The only liabilities assumed by PRS from Corporation X that were not assumed as part of Corporation X’s contribution of Business A were the B liabilities. Immediately before the testing date, the remaining built-in loss associated with the B li- abilities ($900,000) was less than the lesser of 10% of the gross value of PRS’s assets ($2,000,000) or $1,000,000. Therefore, paragraph (d)(2)(i)(B) of this section applies to exclude Corporation X’s sale of the PRS interest to Y from the application of paragraph (e)ofthissection. (e)Transfer of §1.752–7 liability part- ner’s partnership interest—(1)In general. Except as provided in paragraphs (d)(2), (e)(3), and (i) of this section, immedi- ately before the sale, exchange, or other disposition of all or a part of a §1.752–7 liability partner’s partnership interest, the §1.752–7 liability partner’s basis in the partnership interest is reduced by the §1.752–7 liability reduction (as defined in paragraph (b)(7) of this section). No de- duction, loss, or capital expense is allowed to the partnership on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability (within the mean- ing of paragraph (b)(8) of this section) to the extent of the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability (as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section). For purposes of section 705(a)(2)(B) and §1.704–1(b)(2)(ii)(b) only, the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability is not treated as a nondeductible, noncapital expenditure of the partnership. Therefore, the remaining partners’ capital accounts and bases in their partnership interests are not reduced by the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability. If the partnership (or any succes- sor) notifies the §1.752–7 liability partner of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liabil- ity, then the §1.752–7 liability partner is entitled to a loss or deduction. The amount of that deduction or loss is, in the case of a partial satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liabil- ity, the amount that the partnership would, but for this section, take into account on the partial satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability (but not, in total, more than the §1.752–7 liability reduction) or, in the case of a complete satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the remaining §1.752–7 liability reduction. To the extent of the amount that the partnership would, but for this section, take into account on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the character of that deduction or loss is determined as if the §1.752–7 liability partner had satisfied the liability. To the extent that the §1.752–7 liability reduction exceeds the amount that the partnership would, but for this section, take into account on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the character of the §1.752–7 liability partner’s loss is capital. (2)Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of paragraph (e)(1) of this section: Example 1.(i)Facts. In 2004, A, B, and C form partnership PRS. A contributes Property 1 with a fair market value of $5,000,000 and basis of $4,000,000 subject to a §1.752–7 liability of $2,000,000 in exchange for a 25% interestinPRS.Bcontributes $3,000,000 cash in exchange for a 25% interest in PRS, and C contributes $6,000,000 cash in exchange for a 50% interest in PRS. In 2006, when PRS has a section 754 election in effect, A sells A’s interest in PRS to D for $3,000,000. At the time of the sale, the basis of A’s PRS interest is $4,000,000, the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability is $2,000,000, and PRS has no liabilities (as defined in §1.752–1(a)(4)). Assume that none of the exceptions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section apply and that the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability would have given rise to a deductible expense to A. In 2007, PRS pays $3,000,000 to satisfy the liability. PRS Balance Sheet (in millions) Assets Liabilities/Equity Value Basis Value Basis $5$4 Property 1 $9$9 Cash $2 — §1.752–7 Liability Partner’s Equity: $3$4 A $3$3 B $6$6 C (ii)Sale of A’s PRS interest. Immediately be- fore the sale of the PRS interest to D, A’s basis in the PRS interest is reduced (to $3,000,000) by the §1.752–7 liability reduction,i.e.,thelesseroftheex- cess of A’s basis in the PRS interest ($4,000,000) over the adjusted value of that interest ($3,000,000), $1,000,000, or the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability, $2,000,000. Therefore, A neither realizes nor recognizes any gain or loss on the sale of the PRS interest to D. D’s basis in the PRS interest is $3,000,000. D’s share of the adjusted basis of partnership property, as determined under §1.743–1(d), equals D’s interest in the partnership’s previously taxed capital of $2,000,000 (the amount of cash that D would receive on a liquidation of the partnership, $3,000,000, increased by the amount of tax loss that would be allocated to D in the hypotheti- cal transaction, $0, and reduced by the amount of tax gain that would be allocated to D in the hypothetical transaction, $1,000,000). Therefore, the positive ba- sis adjustment under section 743(b) is $1,000,000. June 27, 200513582005–26 I.R.B. Computation of §1.752–7 Liability Reduction (in millions) 1. Basis of A’s PRS interest $4 2. Less adjusted value of A’s PRS interest(3) 3. Difference $1 4. Remaining built-in loss from §1.752–7 liability 2 5. §1.752–7 liability reduction (lesser of 3 or 4) $1 Gain/Loss on Sale of A’s PRS Interest (in millions) 1. Amount realized on sale $3 2. Less basis of PRS interest Original4 §1.752–7 liability reduction 1 Difference ($3) 3. Gain/Loss0 (iii)Satisfaction of §1.752–7 liability. Neither PRS nor any of its partners is entitled to a deduc- tion, loss, or capital expense upon the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability to the extent of the remain- ing built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability ($2,000,000). PRS is entitled to a deduction, how- ever, for the amount by which the cost of satisfying the §1.752–7 liability exceeds the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability. Therefore, in 2007, PRS may deduct $1,000,000 (cost to satisfy the §1.752–7 liability, $3,000,000, less the remain- ing built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liabil- ity, $2,000,000). If PRS notifies A of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, then A is entitled to an ordi- nary deduction in 2007 of $1,000,000 (the §1.752–7 liability reduction). PRS’s Deduction on Satisfaction of Liability (in millions) 1. Amount paid by PRS to satisfy §1.752–7 liability $3 2. Remaining built-in loss for §1.752–7 liability (2) 3. Differ ence $1 Example 2. The facts are the same as inEx- ample 1except that, at the time of A’s sale of the PRS interest to D, PRS has a nonrecourse liability of $4,0 00,000, of which A’s share is $1,000,000. A’s basis in PRS is $5,000,000. At the time of the sale of the PRS interest to D, the adjusted value of A’s int erest is $4,000,000 (the fair market value of the interest ($3,000,000), increased by A’s share of partnership liabilities ($1,000,000)). The difference betwe en the basis of A’s interest ($5,000,000) and the adju sted value of that interest ($4,000,000) is $1,000,000. Therefore, the §1.752–7 liability reduc- tion is $1,000,000 (the lesser of this difference or the remain ing built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability, $2,000,000). Immediately before the sale of the PRS interest to D, A’s basis is reduced from $5,000 ,000 to $4,0000,000. A’s amount realized on the sale of the PRS interest to D is $4,000,000 ($3,000,000 paid by D, increased under section 752(d ) by A’s share of partnership liabilities, or $1,000, 000). Therefore, A neither realizes nor rec- ognizes any gain or loss on the sale. D’s basis in the PRS interest is $4,000,000. Because D’s share of the adjust ed basis of partnership property is $3,000,000 (D’s share of the partnership’s previously taxed capital, $2,000,000, plus D’s share of partnership liabil ities, $1,000,000), the basis adjustment under section 743(b) is $1,000,000. PRS Balance Sheet (in millions) Asset s Liabilities/Equity Value Basis Value Basis $5$4 Property 1 $13$13 Cash $4 — $2 — Nonrecourse Debt §1.752–7 Liability Par tner’s Equity $3$5 A $3$4 B $6$8 C 2005–26 I.R.B.1359June 27, 2005 Computation of §1.752–7 Liability Reduction (in millions) 1. Basis of A’s PRS interest $5 2. Less adjusted value of A’s PRS interest Value of PRS interest 3 A’s share of nonrecourse debt 1 Total (4) 3. Difference between 1 and 2 1 4. Remaining built-in loss from §1.752–7 liability 2 5. §1.752–7 liability reduction (lesser of 3 or 4) $1 Gain/Loss on Sale of A’s PRS Interest (in millions) 1. Amount realized on sale Value of PRS interest $3 A’s share of nonrecourse debt 1 Total $4 2. Less basis of PRS interest Original $5 §1.752–7 liability reduction $1 Difference ($4) 3. Gain/Loss0 Examp le 3. ThefactsarethesameasinExam- ple 1, except that the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 li- ability would have given rise to a capital expense to AorP RS. Neither PRS nor any of its partners are entitled to a capital expense upon the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability to the extent of the remain- ing b uilt-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liabil- ity ($2,000,000). PRS may, however, increase the ba- sis of appropriate partnership assets by the amount by whi ch the cost of satisfying the §1.752–7 liability ex- ceeds the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability. Therefore, in 2007, PRS may cap- ita lize $1,000,000 (cost to satisfy the §1.752–7 liabil- ity, $3,000,000, less the remaining built-in loss asso- ciated with the §1.752–7 liability, $2,000,000) to the ap propriate partnership assets. If A is notified by PRS that the §1.752–7 liability has been satisfied, then A is entitled to a capital loss in 2007 as provided in para- gr aph (e)(1) of this section, the year of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability. (3)Exception for nonrecognition trans- actions—(i)In general. Paragraph (e)(1) of this section does not apply where a §1.752–7 liability partner transfers all or part of the partner’s partnership interest in a transaction in which the transferee’s basis in the partnership interest is deter- mined in whole or in part by reference to the transferor’s basis in the partnership interest. In addition, paragraph (e)(1) of this section does not apply to a distri- bution of an interest in the partnership (lower-tier partnership) that has assumed the §1.752–7 liability by a partnership that is the §1.752–7 liability partner (upper-tier partnership) if the partners of the upper-tier partnership that were §1.752–7 liability partners with respect to the lower-tier partnership prior to the dist ribution continue to be §1.752–7 liabil- ity p artners with respect to the lower-tier part nership after the distribution. See para graphs (b)(4)(ii) and (j)(3) of this sec- tion for rules on the application of this sec tion to partners of the §1.752–7 liabil- ity partner. (ii )Examples. The following examples ill ustrate the provisions of this paragraph (e) (3): Example 1. Transfer of partnership interest to lower-tier partnership.(i)Facts. In 2004, X con- tri butes undeveloped land with a value and basis of $2,000,000 and subject to environmental liabilities of $1,500,000 to partnership LTP in exchange for a 50% in terest in LTP. LTP develops the land as a landfill. In 2005, in a transaction governed by section 721(a), X contributes the LTP interest to UTP in exchange for a 50 % interest in UTP. In 2008, X sells the UTP interest to A for $500,000. At the time of the sale, X’s basis in UTP is $2,000,000, the remaining built-in loss asso- c iated with the environmental liability is $1,500,000, and the gross value of UTP’s assets is $2,500,000. The environmental liabilities were not assumed by L TP as part of a contribution by X to LTP of a trade or business with which the liabilities were associated. (See paragraph (b)(10)(ii),Example 1of this section.) ( ii)Analysis. Because UTP’s basis in the LTP in- terest is determined by reference to X’s basis in the LTP interest, X’s contribution of the LTP interest to U TP is exempted from the rules of paragraph (e)(1) of this section. Under paragraph (j)(1) of this section, X’s contribution of the LTP interest to UTP is treated as a contribution of X’s share of the assets of LTP and UTP’s assumption of X’s share of the LTP liabilities (including §1.752–7 liabilities). Therefore, X’s trans- fer of the LTP interest to UTP is a §1.752–7 liability transfer. The §1.752–7 liabilities deemed transferred by X to UTP are not associated with a trade or busi- ness transferred to UTP for purposes of paragraph (d)(2)(i)(A) of this section, because they were not as- soci ated with a trade or business transferred by X to LTP as part of the original §1.752–7 liability transfer. See paragraph (j)(2) of this section. Because none of the e xceptions described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section apply to X’s taxable sale of the UTP interest to A in 2008, paragraph (e)(1) of this section applies to t hat sale. Example 2. Transfer of partnership interest to corporation. The facts are the same as inExample 1, exc ept that, rather than transferring the LTP interest to UTP in 2005, X contributes the LTP interest to Corpo- ration Y in an exchange to which section 351 applies. Be cause Corporation Y’s basis in the LTP interest is determined by reference to X’s basis in that interest, X’s contribution of the LTP interest is exempted from th e rules of paragraph (e)(1) of this section. But see section 358(h) and §1.358–7 for appropriate basis ad- justments. Ex ample 3. Partnership merger.(i)Facts.In 2004, A, B, C, and D form equal partnership PRS1. A contributes Blackacre with a value and basis of $ 2,000,000 to PRS1 and PRS1 assumes from A $1,500,000 of pension liabilities unrelated to Black- acre. B, C, and D each contribute $500,000 cash t oPRS1. PRS1usesthecashcontributedbyB,C, and D ($1,500,000) to purchase Whiteacre. In 2006, PRS1 merges into PRS2 in an assets-over merger un- d er §1.708–1(c)(3). Assume that, under §1.708–1(c), PRS2 is the surviving partnership and PRS1 is the terminating partnership. At the time of the merger, the value of Blackacre is still $2,000,000, the remain- ing built-in loss with respect to the pension liabilities is still $1,500,000, but the value of Whiteacre has declined to $500,000. (ii)Deemed assumption by PRS2 of PRS1 liabili- ties. Under §1.708–1(c)(3), the merger is treated as a contribution of the assets and liabilities of PRS1 to PRS2, followed by a distribution of the PRS2 in- June 27, 200513602005–26 I.R.B. terestsbyPRS1inliquidationofPRS1. Because PRS2 assumes a §1.752–7 liability (the pension lia- bilities) of PRS1, PRS1 is a §1.752–7 liability part- ner of PRS2. Under paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(A) of this section, A is also §1.752–7 liability partner of PRS2 to the extent of the remaining $1,500,000 built-in loss associated with the pension liabilities. B, C, and D are not §1.752–7 liability partners with respect to PRS1. If the amount of the pension liabilities had increased between the date of PRS1’s assumption of those li- abilities from A and the date of the merger of PRS1 into PRS2, then B, C, and D would be §1.752–7 li- ability partners with respect to PRS2 to the extent of their respective shares of that increase. See paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this section. (iii)Deemed distribution of PRS2 interests. Para- graph (e)(1) does not apply to PRS1’s deemed dis- tribution of the PRS2 interests, because, under para- graph (b)(5)(ii)(B) of this section, all of the partners that were §1.752–7 liability partners with respect to PRS2 before the distribution,i.e., A, continue to be §1.752–7 liability partners after the distribution. Af- ter the distribution, A’s share of the pension liabilities now held by PRS2 will continue to be $1,500,000. Example 4. Partnership division; no shifting of §1.752–7 liability. The facts are the same as in Example 3, except that PRS1 does not merge with PRS2, but instead contributes Blackacre to PRS2 in exchange for PRS2 interests and the assumption by PRS2 of the pension liabilities. Immediately there- after, PRS1 distributes the PRS2 interests to A and B in liquidation of their interests in PRS1. The analysis is the same as inExample 3. After the assumption of the pension liabilities by PRS2, A is a §1.752–7 liability partner with respect to PRS2. After the distribution of a PRS2 interest to A, A continues to be a §1.752–7 liability partner with respect to PRS2, and the amount of A’s built-in loss with respect to the §1.752–7 liabilities continues to be $1,500,000. Therefore, paragraph (e)(1) of this section does not apply to the distribution of the PRS2 interests to A and B. Example 5. Partnership division; shifting of §1.752–7 liability. Thefactsarethesameasin Example 4, except that PRS1 distributes the PRS2 interests not to A and B, but to C and D, in liquidation of their interests in PRS1. After this distribution, A does not continue to be a §1.752–7 liability partner of PRS2, because A no longer has an interest in PRS2. Therefore, paragraph (e)(1) of this section applies to the distribution of the PRS2 interests to C and D. (f)Distribution in liquidation of §1.752–7 liability partner’s partnership interest—(1)In general. Except as pro- vided in paragraphs (d)(2) and (i) of this section, immediately before a distribution in liquidation of a §1.752–7 liability part- ner’s partnership interest, the §1.752–7 liability partner’s basis in the partnership interest is reduced by the §1.752–7 liability reduction (as defined in paragraph (b)(7) of this section). This rule applies before section 737. No deduction, loss, or capital expense is allowed to the partnership on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability (within the meaning of paragraph (b)(8) of this section) to the extent of the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability (as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section). For purposes of section 705(a)(2)(B) and §1.704–1(b)(2)(ii)(b) only, the remaining built-in loss associ- ated with the §1.752–7 liability is not treated as a nondeductible, noncapital ex- penditure of the partnership. Therefore, the remaining partners’ capital accounts and bases in their partnership interests are not reduced by the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability. If the partnership (or any successor) noti- fies the §1.752–7 liability partner of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, then the §1.752–7 liability partner is entitled to a loss or deduction. The amount of that deduction or loss is, in the case of a partial satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the amount that the partnership would, but for this section, take into account on the par- tial satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability (but not, in total, more than the §1.752–7 liability reduction) or, in the case of a complete satisfaction of the §1.752–7 li- ability, the remaining §1.752–7 liability reduction. To the extent of the amount that the partnership would, but for this section, take into account on satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the character of that deduction or loss is determined as if the §1.752–7 liability partner had satisfied the liability. To the extent that the §1.752–7 liability reduction exceeds the amount that the partnership would, but for this section, take into account on satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the character of the §1.752–7 liability partner’s loss is capital. (2)Example. The following example illustrates the provision of this paragraph (f): Example.(i)Facts. In 2004, A, B, and C form partnership PRS. A contributes Property 1 with a fair market value and basis of $5,000,000 subject to a §1.752–7 liability of $2,000,000 for a 25% interest in PRS. B contributes $3,000,000 cash for a 25% in- terest in PRS, and C contributes $6,000,000 cash for a 50% interest in PRS. In 2012, when PRS has a section 754 election in effect, PRS distributes Prop- erty 2, which has a basis and fair market value of $3,000,000, to A in liquidation of A’s PRS interest. At the time of the distribution, the fair market value of A’s PRS interest is still $3,000,000, the basis of that interest is still $5,000,000, and the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability is still $2,000,000. Assume that none of the exceptions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section apply to the distri- bution and that the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liabil- ity would have given rise to a deductible expense to A. In 2013, PRS pays $1,000,000 to satisfy the entire §1.752–7 liability. PRS Balance Sheet (in millions) Assets Liabilities/Equity Value Basis Value Basis $5$5 Property 1 $9$9 Cash $2 — §1.752–7 Liability Partner’s Equity: $3$5 A $3$3 B $6$6 C (ii)Liquidation of A’s PRS interest. Immediately before the distribution of Property 2 to A, A’s ba- sis in the PRS interest is reduced (to $3,000,000) by the §1.752–7 liability reduction,i.e.,thelesserofthe excess of A’s basis in the PRS interest ($5,000,000) over the adjusted value ($3,000,000) of that interest ($2,000,000) or the remaining built-in loss associ- ated with the §1.752–7 liability ($2,000,000). There- fore, A’s basis in Property 2 under section 732(b) is $3,000,000. Because this is the same as the part- nership’s basis in Property 2 immediately before the distribution, the partnership’s basis adjustment under section 734(b) is $0. 2005–26 I.R.B.1361June 27, 2005 Computation of §1.752–7 Liability Reduction (in millions) 1. Basis of A’s PRS interest $5 2. Less adjusted value of A’s PRS interest (3) 3. Difference $2 4. Remaining built-in loss from §1.752–7 liability 2 5. §1.752–7 liability reduction (lesser of 3 or 4) $2 (iii)Satisfaction of §1.752–7 liability.PRSis not entitled to a deduction, loss, or capital expense on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability to the extent of the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability ($2,000,000). Because this amount exceeds the amount paid by PRS to satisfy the §1.752–7 liability ($1,000,000), PRS is not en- titled to any deduction for the §1.752–7 liability in 2013. If, however, PRS notifies A of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, A is entitled to an ordinary deduction in 2013 of $1,000,000 (the amount paid in satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability) and a capital loss of $1,000,000 (the remaining §1.752–7 liability reduction). PRS’s Deduction on Satisfaction of Liability (in millions) Amount paid by PRS to satisfy §1.752–7 liability $1 Remaining built-in loss for §1.752–7 liability (2) Difference (but not below zero) $0 (g)Assumption of §1.752–7 liability by a partner other than §1.752–7 liability partner—(1)In general. If this paragraph (g) applies, section 704(c)(1)(B) does not apply to an assumption of a §1.752–7 lia- bility from a partnership by a partner other than the §1.752–7 liability partner. The rules of paragraph (g)(2) of this section apply only if the §1.752–7 liability partner is a partner in the partnership at the time of the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability from the partnership. The rules of para- graphs (g)(3) and (4) of this section apply to any assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by a partner other than the §1.752–7 lia- bility partner, whether or not the §1.752–7 liability partner is a partner in the partner- ship at the time of the assumption from the partnership. (2)Consequences to §1.752–7 liability partner. If, at the time of an assumption of a §1.752–7 liability from a partnership by a partner other than the §1.752–7 lia- bility partner, the §1.752–7 liability part- ner remains a partner in the partnership, then the §1.752–7 liability partner’s basis in the partnership interest is reduced by the §1.752–7 liability reduction (as defined in paragraph (b)(7) of this section). If the as- suming partner (or any successor) notifies the §1.752–7 liability partner of the satis- faction of the §1.752–7 liability (within the meaning of paragraph (b)(8) of this sec- tion), then the §1.752–7 liability partner is entitled to a deduction or loss. The amount of that deduction or loss is, in the case of a partial satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liabil- ity, the amount that the assuming partner would, but for this section, take into ac- count on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability (but not, in total, more than the §1.752–7 liability reduction) or, in the case of a complete satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the remaining §1.752–7 liability reduction. To the extent of the amount that the assuming partner would, but for this section, take into account on the satisfac- tion of the §1.752–7 liability, the charac- ter of that deduction or loss is determined as if the §1.752–7 liability partner had sat- isfied the liability. To the extent that the §1.752–7 liability reduction exceeds the amount that the assuming partner would, but for this section, take into account on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the character of the §1.752–7 liability part- ner’slossiscapital. (3)Consequences to partnership.Im- mediately after the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability from the partnership by a partner other than the §1.752–7 liabil- ity partner, the partnership must reduce the basis of partnership assets by the re- maining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability (as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section). The reduction in the basis of partnership assets must be al- located among partnership assets as if that adjustment were a basis adjustment under section 734(b). (4)Consequences to assuming partner. No deduction, loss, or capital expense is allowed to an assuming partner (other than the §1.752–7 liability partner) on the sat- isfaction of the §1.752–7 liability assumed from a partnership to the extent of the re- maining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability. Instead, upon the sat- isfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, the as- suming partner must adjust the basis of the partnership interest, any assets (other than cash, accounts receivable, or inven- tory) distributed by the partnership to the partner, or gain or loss on the disposition of the partnership interest, as the case may be. These adjustments are determined as if the assuming partner’s basis in the partner- ship interest at the time of the assumption were increased by the lesser of the amount paid (or to be paid) to satisfy the §1.752–7 liability or the remaining built-in loss as- sociated with the §1.752–7 liability. How- ever, the assuming partner cannot take into account any adjustments to depreciable ba- sis, reduction in gain, or increase in loss until the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 lia- bility. (5)Example. The following example illustrates the provisions of this paragraph (g): E xample.(i)Facts. In 2004, A, B, and C form partnership PRS. A contributes Property 1, a nonde- preciable capital asset with a fair market value and b asis of $5,000,000, in exchange for a 25% interest in PRS and assumption by PRS of a §1.752–7 liabil- ity of $2,000,000. B contributes $3,000,000 cash for a 25% interest in PRS, and C contributes $6,000,000 cash for a 50% interest in PRS. PRS uses the cash contributed to purchase Property 2. In 2007, PRS distributes Property 1, subject to the §1.752–7 lia- bility to B in liquidation of B’s interest in PRS. At the time of the distribution, A’s interest in PRS still has a value of $3,000,000 and a basis of $5,000,000, and B’s interest in PRS still has a value and basis of $3,000,000. Also at that time, Property 1 still has a value and basis of $5,000,000, Property 2 still has a value and basis of $9,000,000, and the remain- June 27, 200513622005–26 I.R.B. ing built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability still is $2,000,000. Assume that none of the excep- tions of paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section apply to the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by B and that the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability by A would have given rise to a deductible expense to A. In 2010, B pays $1,000,000 to satisfy the entire §1.752–7 li- ability. At that time, B still owns Property 1, which has a basis of $3,000,000. PRS Balance Sheet (in millions) Assets Liabilities/Equity Value Basis Value Basis $5$5 Property 1 $9$9 Property 2 $2 — §1.752–7 Liability Partner’s Equity: $3$5 A $3$3 B $6$6 C (ii)Assumption of §1.752–7 liability by B. Sec- tion 704(c)(1)(B) does not apply to the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by B. Instead, A’s basis in the PRS interest is reduced (to $3,000,000) by the §1.752–7 liability reduction,i.e.,thelesseroftheex- cess of A’s basis in the PRS interest ($5,000,000) over the adjusted value ($3,000,000) of that interest ($2,000,000), or the remaining built-in loss associ- ated with the §1.752–7 liability as of the time of the assumption ($2,000,000). PRS’s basis in Property 2 is reduced (to $7,000,000) by the $2,000,000 remain- ing built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liabil- ity. B’s basis in Property 1 under section 732(b) is $3,000,000 (B’s basis in the PRS interest). This is $2,000,000 less than PRS’s basis in Property 1 be- fore the distribution of Property 1 to B. If PRS has a section 754 election in effect for 2007, PRS may in- crease the basis of Property 2 under section 734(b) by $2,000,000. §1.752–7 Liability Reduction (in millions) 1. Basis of A’s PRS interest $5 2. Less adjusted value of A’s PRS interest (3) 3. Differ ence $2 4. Remaining built-in loss from §1.752–7 liability 2 5. §1.752–7 liability reduction (lesser of 3 or 4) $2 A’s Basis in PRS after Assumption by B (in millions) 1. Basis before assumption $5 2. Less §1.752–7 liability reduction (2) 3. Basis after assumption $3 PRS’s Basis in Property 2 after Assumption by B (in millions) 1. Basis before assumption $9 2. Less remaining built-in loss from §1.752–7 liability (2) 3. Plus section 734(b) adjustment (if partnership has a section 754 election) 2 4. Basis after assumption $9 (iii)Satisfaction of §1.752–7 liability.Bisnot entitled to a deduction on the satisfaction of the §1.7 52–7 liability in 2010 to the extent of the re- maining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability ($2,000,000). As this amount exceeds the amo unt paid by B to satisfy the §1.752–7 liability, B is not entitled to any deduction on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability in 2010. B may, however, incr ease the basis of Property 1 by the lesser of the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability ($2,000,000) or the amount paid to satisfy the §1.752–7 liability ($1,000,000). Therefore, B’s basis in Property 1 is increased to $4,000,000. If B notifies A of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, then A is entitled to an ordinary deduction in 2010 of $1,000,000 (the amount paid in satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability) and a capital loss of $1,000,000 (th e remaining §1.752–7 liability reduction). 2005–26 I.R.B.1363June 27, 2005 B’s Basis in Property 1 after Satisfaction of Liability (in millions) 1. Basis in Property 1 after distribution $3 2. Plus lesser of remaining built-in loss (2) or amount paid to satisfy liability ($1) 1 3. Basis in Property 1 after satisfaction of liability $4 (h)Notification by the partnership (or successor) of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability. For purposes of para- graphs (e), (f), and (g) of this section, notification by the partnership (or succes- sor) of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability must be attached to the §1.752–7 liability partner’s return (whether an orig- inal or an amended return) for the year in which the loss is being claimed and must include— (1) The amount paid in satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, and whether the amounts paid were in partial or complete satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability; (2) The name and address of the person satisfying the §1.752–7 liability; (3) The date of the payment on the §1.752–7 liability; and (4) The character of the loss to the §1.752–7 liability partner with respect to the §1.752–7 liability. (i)Special rule for amounts that are capitalized prior to the occurrence of an event described in paragraphs (e), (f), or (g)—(1)In general. If all or a portion of a §1.752–7 liability is properly capital- ized (capitalized basis) prior to an event described in paragraph (e), (f), or (g) of this section, then, before an event described in paragraph (e), (f), or (g) of this section, the partnership may take the capitalized ba- sis into account for purposes of comput- ing cost recovery and gain or loss on the sale of the asset to which the basis has been capitalized (and for any other purpose for which the basis of the asset is relevant), but after an event described in paragraph (e), (f), or (g) of this section, the partnership may not take any remaining capitalized ba- sis into account for tax purposes. (2)Example. The following example illustrates the provisions of this paragraph (i): Example.(i)Facts. In 2004, A and B form partnership PRS. A contributes Property 1, a nonde- preciable capital asset, with a fair market value and basis of 5,000,000, in exchange for a 25% interest in PRS and an assumption by PRS of a §1.752–7 liability of $2,000,000. B contributes $9,000,000 in cash in exchange for a 75% interest in PRS. PRS uses $7,000,000 of the cash to purchase Property 2, also a nondepreciable capital asset. In 2007, when PRS’s assets have not changed, PRS satisfies the §1.752–7 liability by paying $2,000,000. Assume that PRS is required to capitalize the cost of satisfying the §1.752–7 liability. In 2008, A sells his interest in PRS to C for $3,000,000. At the time of the sale, the basis of A’s interest is still $5,000,000. (ii)Analysis. On the sale of A’s interest to C, A realizes a loss of $2,000,000 on the sale of the PRS in- terest (the excess of $5,000,000, the basis of the part- nership interest, over $3,000,000, the amount realized on sale). The remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability at that time is zero because all of the §1.752–7 liability as of the time of the assump- tion of the §1.752–7 liability by the partnership was capitalized by the partnership. The partnership may not take any remaining capitalized basis into account for tax purposes. Gain/Loss on Sale of A’s PRS Interest (in millions) 1. Amount realized on sale $3 2. Less basis of PRS interest Original Basis $5 §1.752–7 liability reduction $0 Difference ($5) 3. Gain/Loss ($2) (iii)Partial Satisfaction. Assume that, prior to the sale of A’s interest in PRS to C, PRS had paid $1,500,000 to satisfy a portion of the §1.752–7 lia- bility. Therefore, immediately before the sale of the PRS interest to C, A’s basis in the PRS interest would be reduced (to $4,500,000) by the $500,000 remain- ing built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability ($2,000,000 less the $1,500,000 portion capitalized by the partnership at that time). On the sale of the PRS interest, A realizes a loss of $1,500,000 (the ex- cess of $4,500,000, the basis of the PRS interest, over $3,000,000, the amount realized on the sale). Nei- ther PRS nor any of its partners is entitled to a de- duction, loss, or capital expense upon the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability to the extent of the remain- ing built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability ($500,000). If PRS notifies A of the satisfaction of the remaining portion of the §1.752–7 liability, then A is entitled to a deduction or loss of $500,000 (the remaining §1.752–7 liability reduction). The partner- ship may not take any remaining capitalized basis into account for tax purposes. Gain/Loss on Sale of A’s PRS Interest (in millions) 1. Amount realized on sale $3 2. Less basis of PRS interest Original Basis $5 §1.752–7 liability reduction ($0.5) Difference ($4.5) 3. Gain/Loss ($1.5) (j)Tiered partnerships—(1)Look- through treatment. For purposes of this section, a contribution by a partner of an interest in a partnership (lower-tier part- nership) to another partnership (upper-tier partnership) is treated as a contribution June 27, 200513642005–26 I.R.B. by the partner of the partner’s share of each of the lower-tier partnership’s as- sets and an assumption by the upper-tier partnership of the partner’s share of the lower-tier partnership’s liabilities (includ- ing §1.752–7 liabilities). See paragraph (e)(3)(ii)Example 1of this section. In addition, a partnership is treated as having its share of any §1.752–7 liabilities of the partnerships in which it has an interest. (2)Trade or business exception.Ifa partnership (upper-tier partnership) as- sumes a §1.752–7 liability of a partner, and, subsequently, another partnership (lower-tier partnership) assumes that §1.752–7 liability from the upper-tier partnership, then the §1.752–7 liability is treated as associated only with any trade or business contributed to the upper-tier part- nership by the §1.752–7 liability partner. The same rule applies where a partnership assumes a §1.752–7 liability of a partner, and, subsequently, the §1.752–7 liability partner transfers that partnership interest to another partnership. See paragraph (e)(3)(ii)Example 1of this section. (3)Partnership as a §1.752–7 liability partner. If a transaction described in para- graph (e), (f), or (g)of this section oc- curs with respect to a partnership (upper- tier partnership) that is a §1.752–7 liabil- ity partner of another partnership (lower- tier partnership), then such transaction will also be treated as a transaction described in paragraph (e), (f), or (g) of this sec- tion, as appropriate, with respect to the partners of the upper-tier partnership, re- gardless of whether the upper-tier partner- ship assumed the §1.752–7 liability from those partners. (See paragraph (b)(5) of this section for rules relating to the treat- ment of transactions by the partners of the upper-tier partnership). In such a case, each partner’s share of the §1.752–7 lia- bility reduction in the upper-tier partner- ship is equal to that partner’s share of the §1.752–7 liability. The partners of the up- per-tier partnership at the time of the trans- action described in paragraph (e), (f), or (g) of this section, and not the upper-tier partnership, are entitled to the deduction or loss on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability. Similar principles apply where the upper-tier partnership is itself owned by one or a series of partnerships. This paragraph does not apply to the extent that §1.752–7(j)(4) applied to the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by the lower-tier partnership. (4)Transfer of §1.752–7 liability by partnership to another partnership or cor- poration after a transaction described in paragraph (e), (f), or (g)—(i)In general. If, after a transaction described in para- graph (e), (f), or (g) of this section with respect to a §1.752–7 liability assumed by a partnership (the upper-tier partnership), another partnership or a corporation as- sumes the §1.752–7 liability from the up- per-tier partnership (or the assuming part- ner) in a transaction in which the basis of property is determined, in whole or in part, by reference to the basis of the property in the hands of the upper-tier partnership (or assuming partner), then— (A) The upper-tier partnership (or as- suming partner) must reduce its basis in any corporate stock or partnership interest received by the remaining built-in loss as- sociated with the §1.752–7 liability, at the time of the transaction described in para- graph (e), (f), or (g) of this section (but the partners of the upper-tier partnership do not reduce their bases or capital accounts in the upper-tier partnership); and (B) No deduction, loss, or capital ex- pense is allowed to the assuming partner- ship or corporation on the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability to the extent of the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability. (ii)Subsequent transfers. Similar rules apply to subsequent assumptions of the §1.752–7 liability in transactions in which the basis of property is determined, in whole or in part, by reference to the basis of the property in the hands of the trans- feror. If, subsequent to an assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by a partnership in a transaction to which paragraph (j)(4)(i) of this section applies, the §1.752–7 liability is assumed from the partnership by a part- ner other than the partner from whom the partnership assumed the §1.752–7 liabil- ity, then the rules of paragraph (g) of this section apply. (5)Example. The following example illustrates the provisions of paragraphs (j)(3) and (4) of this section: Example—(i)Assumption of §1.752–7 liability by UTP and transfer of §1.752–7 liability partner’s interest in UTP. In 2004, A, B, and C form part- nership UTP. A contributes Property 1 with a fair market value and basis of $5,000,000 subject to a §1.752–7 liability of $2,000,000 in exchange for a 25% interest in UTP. B contributes $3,000,000 cash in exchange for a 25% interest in UTP, and C contributes $6,000,000 cash in exchange for a 50% interest in UTP. UTP invests the $9,000,000 cash in Property 2. In 2006, A sells A’s interest in UTP to D for $3,000,000. At the time of the sale, the basis of A’s UTP interest is $5,000,000, the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability is $2,000,000, and UTP has no liabilities other than the §1.752–7 liabilities assumed from A. Assume that none of the exceptions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section apply and that the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability would give rise to a deductible expense to A and to UTP. Under paragraph (e) of this section, immediately before the sale of the UTP interest to D, A’s basis in UTP is reduced to $3,000,000 by the $2,000,000 §1.752–7 liability reduction. Therefore, A neither realizes nor recognizes any gain or loss on thesaleoftheUTPinteresttoD.D’sbasisinthe UTP interest is $3,000,000. 2005–26 I.R.B.1365June 27, 2005 UTP Balance Sheet Prior to A’s Sale (in millions) Assets Liabilities/Equity Value Basis Value Basis $5$5 Property 1 $9$9 Property 2 $2 §1.752–7 Liability Partner’s Equity: $3$5 A(25%) $3$3 B (25%) $6$6 C (50%) $12$14 Total Equity Gain/Loss on Sale of A’s PRS Interest to D (in millions) 1. Amount realized on sale $3 2. Less basis of PRS interest Original $5 §1.752–7 liability reduction ($2) Difference ($3) 3. Gain/Loss0 (ii)Assumption of §1.752–7 liability by LTP from UTP. In 2008, at a time when the estimated amount of the §1.752–7 liability has increased to $3,500,000, UTP contributes Property 1 and Property 2, subject to the §1.752–7 liability, to LTP in exchange for a 50% interest in LTP. At the time of the contribution, Prop- erty 1 still has a value and basis of $5,000,000 and Property 2 still has a value and basis of $9,000,000. UTP’s basis in LTP under section 722 is $14,000,000. Under paragraph (j)(4)(i) of this section, UTP must reduce its basis in LTP by the $2,000,000 remain- ing built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liabil- ity (as of the time of the sale of the UTP interest by A). The partners in UTP are not required to re- duce their bases in UTP by this amount. UTP is a §1.752–7 liability partner of LTP with respect to the entire $3,500,000 §1.752–7 liability assumed by LTP. However, as A is no longer a partner of UTP, none of the partners of UTP (as of the time of the assumption of the §1.752–7 liability by LTP) are §1.752–7 liabil- ity partners of LTP with respect to the $2,000,000 re- maining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 li- ability (as of the time of the sale of the UTP interest by A). The UTP partners (as of the time of the assump- tion of the §1.752–7 liability by LTP) are §1.752–7 li- ability partners of LTP with respect to the $1,500,000 increase in the amount of the §1.752–7 liability of UTP since the assumption of that §1.752–7 liability by UTP from A. UTP Balance Sheet Immediately Before Contribution to LTP (in millions) Assets Liabilities/Equity Value Basis Value Basis $5$5 Property 1 $9$9 Property 2 $2 §1.752–7 Lia bility Assumed from A $1.5 Additional $3.5 Total Partner’s Equity: $2.625$3 D(25%) $2.625$3 B (25%) $5.25$6 C (50%) $10.5$12 Total Equi ty UTP’s Basis in LTP Immediately After Contribution (in millions) 1. Basis in assets $14 2. Less remaining built-in loss at time of A’s sale ($2) 3. UTP’s basis in LTP $12 (iii)Sale by UTP of LTP interest. In 2010, UTP sells its interest in LTP to E for $10,500,000. At the time of the sale, the LTP interest still has a value of $10,500,000 and a basis of $12,000,000, and the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability is $3,500,000. Under paragraph (e) of this section, immediately before the sale, UTP must reduce its basis in the LTP interest by the §1.752–7 liability reduction. Under paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability is $1,500,000 (remaining built-in loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability, $3,500,000, reduced by the amount of the §1.752–7 liability taken into account under paragraph (j)(4) of this section, $2,000,000). The difference between the June 27, 200513662005–26 I.R.B. basis of the LTP interest held by UTP ($12,000,000) and the adjusted value of that interest ($10,500,000) is also $1,500,000. Therefore, the §1.752–7 liability reduction is $1,500,000 and UTP’s basis in the LTP interest must be reduced to $10,500,000. In addi- tion, UTP’s partners must reduce their bases in their UTP interests by their proportionate shares of the §1.752–7 liability reduction. Thus, the basis of each of B’s and D’s interest in UTP must be reduced by $375,000 and the basis of C’s interest in UTP must be reduced by $750,000. In 2011, D sells the UTP interest to F. Computation of §1.752–7 Liability Reduction (in millions) 1. Basis of UTP’s LTP interest $12 2. Less adjusted value of UTP’s LTP interest ($10.5) 3. Difference between 1 and 2 $1.5 4. Remaining built-in loss from §1.752–7 liability $1.5 5. §1.752–7 liability reduction (lesser of 3 or 4) $1.5 Gain/Loss on Sale of UTP’s PRS Interest to E (in millions) 1. Amount realized on sale $10.5 2. Less basis of PRS interest Original $12 §1.752–7 liability reduction ($1.5) Difference ($10.5) 3. Gain/Loss $0 Partner’s Bases in UTP Interests after Sale of LTP Interest (in millions) BCD Basis prior to sale $3$6$3 Share of §1.752–7 liability Reduction ($0.375)($0.75)($0.375) Basis af ter sale $2.625$5.25$2.625 (iv)Ded uction, expense, or loss associated with the §1.752–7 liability by LTP. In 2012, LTP pays $3,500,000 to satisfy the §1.752–7 liability. Under paragr aphs (e) and (j)(4) of this section, LTP is not entitled to any deduction with respect to the §1.752–7 liability. Under paragraph (j)(3) of this section, UTP also is not entitled to any deduction with respect to the §1.752–7 liability. If LTP notifies A, B, C and D of the satisfaction of the §1.752–7 liability, then A is entit led to a deduction in 2012 of $2,000,000, B and D are each entitled to deductions in 2012 of $375,000, and C is entitled to a deduction in 2012 of $750,000. (k)Effective dates—(1)In general. This section applies to §1.752–7 liability transfers occurring onorafterJune24, 2003. For assumptions occurring after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003, see §1.752–6. For §1.752–7 liabil- ity transfers occurring on or after June 24, 2003 and before May 26, 2005, taxpay- ers may rely on the exception for trading and investment partnerships in paragraph (b)(8)(ii) of 1.752–7 (2003–2 C.B. 60; 68 FR 37434). (2)Election to apply this section to assumptions of liabilities occurring after October 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003—(i)In general. A partnership may elect to apply this section to all assump- tions of liabilities (including §1.752–7 lia- biliti es) occurring after October 18, 1999, and bef ore June 24, 2003. Such an elec- tion is binding on the partnership and all of its par tners. A partnership making such an electi on must apply all of the provisions of §1. 752–1 and §1.752–7, including §1.35 8–5T, §1.358–7, §1.704–1(b)(1)(ii) and (b )(2)(iv)(b),§1.704–2(b)(3), §1.70 4–3(a)(7), (a)(8)(iv), and (a)(12), §1.70 4–4(d)(1)(iv),§1.705–1(a)(8), §1.73 2–2(d)(3)(iv), and §1.737–5. (ii)M anner of making election.A part nership makes an election under this paragraph (k)(2) by attaching the foll owing statement to its timely filed retu rn: [Insert name and employer iden tification number of electing part- ners hip] elects under §1.752–7 of the Inc ome Tax Regulations to be subject to t he rules of §1.358–5T, §1.358–7, §1. 704–1(b)(1)(ii)and(2)(iv)(b), §1. 704–2(b)(3),§1.704–3(a)(7), (a) (8)(iv), and (a)(12), §1.704–4(d)(1)(iv), §1 .705–1(a)(8), §1.732–2(d)(3)(iv), and §1 .737–5 with respect to all liabilities (in- cl uding §1.752–7 liabilities) assumed by the part nership after October 18, 1999 and before June 24, 2003. In the statement, the par tnership must list, with respect to each li ability (including each §1.752–7 liabil ity) assumed by the partnership after Octobe r 18, 1999, and before June 24, 2003— (A) The name, address, and taxpayer ident ification number of the partner from whom t he liability was assumed; (B) Th e date on which the liability was assum ed by the partnership; (C) Th e amount of the liability as of the time o f its assumption; and (D) A d escription of the liability. (iii) Filing of amended returns.An elect ion under this paragraph (k)(2) will be valid only if the partnership and its part- ners p romptly amend any returns for open taxab le years that would be affected by the elect ion. (iv)T ime for making election. An elec- tion u nder this paragraph (k)(2) must be file d with any timely filed Federal income tax r eturn filed by the partnership on or af- ter S eptember 24, 2003, and on or before Dece mber 31, 2005. 2005–26 I.R.B.1367June 27, 2005 PART 602—OMB CONTROL NUMBERS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT Par. 17. The authority for part 602 continues to read as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C.7805. Par. 18. In §602.101, paragraph (b) is amended by adding an entry to the table in numerical order to read as follows: §602.101 OMB Control numbers. ***** (b) * * * CFR part or section where identified and described Current OMB control No. ***** 1.752–7........................................................... 1545–1843 ***** Mark E. Matthews, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. Approved May 16, 2005. Eric Solomon, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. (File d by the Office of the Federal Register on May 23, 2005, 11:17 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for May 26, 2005, 70 F.R. 30334) Section 2518.—Disclaimers 26 CFR 25.2518: Qualified disclaimers of property. (Also § 401; 1.401(a)(9)–5.) Individual Retirement Account (IRA); decedent; beneficiary’s dis- claimer.This ruling discusses whether a beneficiary’s disclaimer of a beneficial interest in a decedent’s IRA is a quali- fied disclaimer under section 2518 of the Code even though prior to making the dis- claimer, the beneficiary receives from the IRA the required minimum distribution for the year of the decedent’s death. Rev. Rul. 2005–36 ISSUE Is a beneficiary’s disclaimer of a ben- eficial interest in a decedent’s individual retirement account (IRA) a qualified dis- claimer under § 2518 of the Internal Rev- enue Code even though, prior to making the disclaimer, the beneficiary receives the required minimum distribution for the year of the decedent’s death from the IRA? FACTS Decedent dies in 2004. At the time of death, Decedent is the owner of an IRA described in § 408(a) with assets having a fair market value of $2,000x. Decedent’s “required beginning date,” as described in § 401(a)(9)(A), occurred prior to 2004, and accordingly Decedent was receiving an- nual distributions from the IRA prior to thetimeofdeath.However,atthetimeof death, Decedent had not received the re- quired minimum distribution for the 2004 calendar year. Situation 1: Under the terms of the IRA beneficiary designation pursuant to the IRA governing instrument, Dece- dent’s spouse, Spouse, is designated as the sole beneficiary of the IRA after Dece- dent’s death.A, the child of Decedent and Spouse, is designated as the beneficiary in the event Spouse predeceases Decedent. Three months after Decedent’s death, in accordance with § 1.401(a)(9)–5, A–4, of the Income Tax Regulations, the IRA custodian pays Spouse $100x, the required minimum distribution for 2004. No other amounts have been paid from the IRA since Decedent’s date of death. Seven months after Decedent’s death, Spouse executes a written instrument pur- suant to which Spouse disclaims the pe- cuniary amount of $600x of the IRA ac- count balance plus the income attributable to the $600x amount earned after the date of death. The income earned by the IRA between the date of Decedent’s death and the date of Spouse’s disclaimer is $40x. The disclaimer is valid and effective un- der applicable state law. Under applica- ble state law, as a result of the disclaimer, Spouse is treated as predeceasing Dece- dent with respect to the disclaimed prop- erty. As soon as the disclaimer is made, in accordance with the IRA beneficiary designation,A, as successor beneficiary is paid the $600x amount disclaimed, plus that portion of IRA income earned be- tween the date of death and the date of the disclaimer attributable to the $600x amount ($12x). Situation 2: The facts are the same as inSituation 1, except that, instead of disclaiming a pecuniary amount, Spouse validly disclaims, in the written instru- ment, 30 percent of Spouse’s entire in- terest in the principal and income of the balance of the IRA account remaining after the $100x required minimum dis- tribution for 2004 and after reduction for the pre-disclaimer income attributable to the $100x required minimum distribution ($2x). As soon as the disclaimer is made, in accordance with the beneficiary desig- nation,Ais paid 30 percent of the excess of the remaining account balance over $2x. Situation 3: The facts are the same as inSituation 1, except thatAis desig- nated as the sole beneficiary of the IRA after Decedent’s death, Spouse is desig- nated as the beneficiary in the eventA predeceases Decedent, and the $100x re- quired minimum distribution for 2004 is paid toA3 months after Decedent’s death. Seven months after Decedent’s death,A disclaims the entire remaining balance of the IRA account except for $2x, the in- come attributable to the $100x required minimum distribution paid toA.Assoon as the disclaimer is made, in accordance with the IRA beneficiary designation, the balance of the IRA account, less $2x, is distributed to Spouseas successor benefi- ciary.Areceives a total of $102x. June 27, 200513682005–26 I.R.B. LAW AND ANALYSIS Section 408(a) provides that the term “individual retirement account” means a trust created or organized in the United States for the exclusive benefit of an indi- vidual or his or her beneficiaries, but only if the written governing instrument cre- ating the trust meets certain specified re- quirements. Section 408(a)(6) provides that, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, rules similar to the rules of § 401(a)(9) and the incidental death benefit requirements of § 401(a) shall apply to the distribution of the entire interest of an individual for whose benefit an IRA trust is maintained. Under § 401(a)(9)(A), a trust will not constitute a qualified trust unless the plan provides that the entire interest of each em- ployee (i) will be distributed to such em- ployee not later than the required begin- ning date, or (ii) will be distributed, begin- ning not later than the required beginning date, in accordance with regulations, over the life of such employee or over the lives of such employee and a designated bene- ficiary (or over a period not extending be- yond the life expectancy of such employee or the life expectancy of such employee and a designated beneficiary). Under § 1.408–8, A–1, an IRA is subject to the required minimum distribu- tion rules of § 401(a)(9) and must satisfy the requirements of §§ 1.401(a)(9)–1 through 1.401(a)(9)–9 in the same manner as a plan, except as otherwise specified in § 1.408–8. Under § 1.408–8, A–1, for purposes of applying the rules of §§ 1.401(a)(9)–1 through 1.401(a)(9)–9, the IRA owner is substituted for the em- ployee. Under § 1.408–8, A–3, the term “required beginning date” means April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the IRA owner attains age 70 1 /2. Under § 1.401(a)(9)–4, A–1, a desig- nated beneficiary is an individual who is designated as a beneficiary either by the terms of the plan or by an affirmative elec- tion by the employee (or the employee’s surviving spouse) specifying the benefi- ciary. A beneficiary designated as such un- der the plan is an individual who is entitled to a portion of an employee’s benefit, con- tingent on the employee’s death or another specified event. Section 1.401(a)(9)–4, A–4, provides that the employee’s designated benefi- ciary generally will be determined based on the beneficiaries designated as of the employee’s date of death who remain beneficiaries as of September 30 th of the calendar year following the calendar year of the employee’s death. Gener- ally, any person who was a beneficiary as of the employee’s date of death, but is not a beneficiary as of that September 30 th (e.g., because the person receives the entire benefit to which the person is entitled before that September 30 th ), is not taken into account in determining the employee’s designated beneficiary for purposes of determining the distribution period for required minimum distributions after the employee’s death. Accordingly, if a person disclaims entitlement to the employee’s benefit by a disclaimer that satisfies § 2518 by that September 30 th , thereby allowing other beneficiaries to receive the disclaimed benefit instead, the disclaimant is not taken into account in determining the employee’s designated beneficiary. Under § 2518(a), if a person makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to any in- terest in property, then for estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer tax purposes, the disclaimed interest will be treated as if the interest had never been transferred to the disclaimant. Instead, the interest will be considered as having passed directly from the decedent to the person entitled to receive the property as a result of the dis- claimer. Under § 2518(b), the term “qualified disclaimer” means an irrevocable and un- qualified refusal by a person to accept an interest in property, but only if: (1) the re- fusal is in writing; (2) the writing is re- ceived by the transferor of the interest, his or her legal representative, or the holder of the legal title to the property to which the interest relates, not later than the date that is 9 months after the later of — (A) the date on which the transfer creating the interest in the person is made, or (B) the day on which the person attains the age of 21; (3) the person has not accepted the interest or any of its benefits; and (4) as a result of the refusal, the interest passes without any di- rection on the part of the person making the disclaimer and passes either—(A) to the spouse of the decedent, or (B) to a per- son other than the person making the dis- claimer. Section 25.2518–2(d)(1) of the Gift Tax Regulations provides that a qualified dis- claimer cannot be made with respect to an interest in property if the disclaimant has accepted the interest or any of its benefits, expressly or impliedly, prior to making the disclaimer. Acceptance is manifested by an affirmative act that is consistent with ownership of the interest in the property. Acts indicative of acceptance include: us- ing the property or the interest in the prop- erty; accepting dividends, interest, or rents from the property; and directing others to act with respect to the property or interest in the property. However, a disclaimant is not considered to have accepted the prop- erty merely because, under applicable lo- cal law, title to the property vests imme- diately on the decedent’s death in the dis- claimant. Section 25.2518–3 provides rules re- garding the circumstances under which an individual may make a qualified dis- claimer of less than the individual’s entire interest in property and may accept the bal- ance of the property. Section 25.2518–3(b) provides that a disclaimer of an undivided portion of a separate interest in property that meets the other requirements of a qualified disclaimer under § 2518(b) and the corresponding regulations is a qual- ified disclaimer. Under the regulations, each interest in property that is separately created by the transferor is treated as a sep- arate interest in property. An undivided portion of a disclaimant’s separate interest in property must consist of a fraction or percentage of each and every substantial interest or right owned by the disclaimant in the property and must extend over the entire term of the disclaimant’s interest in the property and in other property into which the property is converted. Section 25.2518–3(c) provides that the disclaimer of a specific pecuniary amount out of a pecuniary or nonpecuniary bequest or gift can be a qualified disclaimer pro- vided that no income or other benefit of the disclaimed amount inures to the bene- fit of the disclaimant either prior to or sub- sequent to the disclaimer. Following the disclaimer, the amount disclaimed and any income attributable to that amount must be segregated based on the fair market value of the assets on the date of the disclaimer or on a basis that is fairly representative 2005–26 I.R.B.1369June 27, 2005 of the value changes that may have oc- curred between the date of transfer and the date of the disclaimer. The regulation fur- ther provides that a pecuniary amount that is distributed to the disclaimant from the bequest prior to the disclaimer is treated as a distribution of corpus from the be- quest that does not preclude a disclaimer with respect to the balance of the bequest. However, the acceptance of a distribution from the bequest is considered an accep- tance of a proportionate amount of the in- come earned by the bequest. That income must be similarly segregated from the dis- claimed amount and cannot be disclaimed. The regulation provides a formula to de- termine the proportionate share of the in- come considered to be accepted by the dis- claimant, and thus, not eligible to be dis- claimed, as follows: Total amount of distributions received by the disclaimant out of gift or bequest Total value of the gift or bequest on the date of the transfer X Total amount of income earned by the bequest between the date of transfer and the date of disclaimer See§ 25.2518–3(d),Example 17(illustrat- ing a beneficiary’s qualified disclaimer of an interest in a brokerage account passing to the beneficiary when, prior to the dis- claimer, the beneficiary withdrew a pecu- niary amount from the account);see also § 25.2518–3(d),Example 19(regarding a pecuniary disclaimer funded on a basis that is fairly representative of value changes that occurred between the date of transfer and the date of the disclaimer). InSituations 1, 2, and 3, the benefi- ciary’s receipt of the $100x distribution from the IRA constitutes an acceptance of $100x of corpus, plus the income attribut- able to that amount. Based on the formula contained in § 25.2518–3(c), the amount of income attributable to the $100x distribu- tion that the beneficiary is deemed to have accepted, and therefore cannot disclaim, is $2x computed as follows: $100x (distribution) $2000x (date of death value of IRA) X $40x (IRA income from date of death to date of disclaimer) However, the beneficiary’s acceptance of these amounts does not preclude the beneficiary from making a qualified dis- claimer with respect to all or a portion of the balance of the IRA. Accordingly, inSituation 1,assuming the other requirements of § 2518(b) are satisfied, Spouse’s disclaimer constitutes a qualified disclaimer under § 2518(b) of the $600x pecuniary amount, plus $12x (the IRA income attributable to the disclaimed amount ($600x/$2000x X $40x)). InSituation 2, Spouse disclaims, in accordance with § 25.2518–3(b), an un- divided portion (30 percent) of Spouse’s principal and income interest in the re- maining IRA account balance, rather than a pecuniary amount as inSituation 1. However, as inSituation 1, Spouse’s re- ceipt of the $100x distribution also consti- tutes acceptance of $2x of income deemed attributable to the amount distributed. Spouse may not disclaim any portion of the $2x. Therefore, inSituation 2, assum- ing the other requirements of § 2518(b) are satisfied, Spouse’s disclaimer of 30 percent of Spouse’s entire interest in the principal and income of the balance of the IRA account remaining after the $100x required minimum distribution for 2004 and after reduction for the pre-disclaimer income attributable to that amount ($2x), constitutes a qualified disclaimer to the extent of 30 percent of the remaining IRA account balance after reduction for the $2x of income Spouse is deemed to have accepted (that is, .30 X [value of remain- ing account balance on date of disclaimer -$2x]). The results inSituations 1and2would be the same if the amount disclaimed, plus that portion of the post-death IRA income attributable to the disclaimed amount, is not distributed outright toA, but instead is segregated and maintained in a separate IRA account of whichAis the beneficiary as described in § 1.401(a)(9)–8, A–3.See also, § 1.401(a)(9)–8, A–2(a)(2). Separate accounts forAand Spouse may be made effective as of the date of Decedent’s death in 2004, and the 2004 required minimum distribution does not have to be allocated among the beneficiaries of the separate ac- counts for purposes ofthe separate account rules under § 1.401(a)(9)–8, A–3. InSituation 3,AdisclaimsA’s entire principal and income interest in the re- maining IRA account balance after the payment of the required minimum dis- tribution for 2004, except for $2x. As in Situations 1and2,A’s receipt of the $100x required minimum distribution also con- stitutes an acceptance of the $2x of income that is deemed attributable to the required minimum distribution that is distributed. Amay not disclaim any portion of the $2x. Therefore, inSituation 3,assumingthe other requirements of § 2518(b) are satis- fied,A’s disclaimer of the entire principal and income balance of the IRA remaining after the payment of the required minimum distribution for 2004, except for $2x (that is, 100% of value of the remaining account balance on the date of the disclaimer, less $2x) constitutes a qualified disclaimer. In addition, under § 1.401(a)(9)–4, A–4, any person who was a beneficiary of the employee’s benefit as of the date of the employee’s death, but is not a beneficiary as of September 30 th of the calendar year following the calendar year of the employee’s death, is not considered a designated beneficiary for purposes of §401(a)(9). InSituation 3,Aboth re- ceived the required minimum distribution amount and timely disclaimed entitlement to the entire balance of the IRA account June 27, 200513702005–26 I.R.B. on or before September 30, 2005. Ac- cordingly, ifAis paid the $2x of income attributable to the required minimum dis- tribution amount on or before September 30, 2005,Awill be treated as not entitled to any further benefit as of September 30, 2005, and therefore,Awill not be consid- ered a designated beneficiary of the IRA for purposes of § 401(a)(9). HOLDINGS A beneficiary’s disclaimer of a ben- eficial interest in a decedent’s IRA is a qualified disclaimer under § 2518 (if all of the requirements of that section are met), even though, prior to making the disclaimer, the beneficiary receives the required minimum distribution for the year of the decedent’s death from the IRA. The beneficiary may make a qualified disclaimer under § 2518 with respect to all or a portion of the balance of the ac- count, other than the income attributable to the required minimum distribution that the beneficiary received, provided that at the time the disclaimer is made, the disclaimed amount and the income attrib- utable to the disclaimed amount are paid to the beneficiary entitled to receive the disclaimed amount, or are segregated in a separate account. Further, a person disclaiming his or her entire remaining interest in an IRA will not be considered a designated beneficiary of the IRA for purposes of § 401(a)(9), if the qualified disclaimer is made on or before September 30 th of the calendar year fol- lowing the calendar year of the employee’s death, and if, on or before that September 30 th , the disclaimant is paid the income at- tributable to the required minimum distri- bution amount, so that the disclaimant is not entitled to any further benefit in the IRA after September 30 th of the calendar year following the calendar year of the em- ployee’s death. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue rul- ing is Susan H. Levy of the Office of As- sociate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries).For further informa- tion regarding this revenue ruling, contact Susan H. Levy at (202) 622–3090 (not a toll-free call). 2005–26 I.R.B.1371June 27, 2005 Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Weighted Average Interest Rates Update Notice 2005–46 This notice provides guidance as to the corporate bond weighted average interest rate and the permissible range of interest rates specified under § 412(b)(5)(B)(ii)(II) of the Internal Revenue Code. In ad- dition, it provides guidance as to the interest rate on 30-year Treasury securi- ties under § 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II), and the weighted average interest rate and permis- sible ranges of interest rates based on the 30-year Treasury securities rate. CORPORATE BOND WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTEREST RATE Sections 412(b)(5)(B)(ii) and 412(l)(7) (C)(i), as amended by the Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004, provide that the inter- est rates used to calculate current liability and to determine the required contribution under § 412(l) for plan years beginning in 2004 or 2005 must be within a permissible range based on the weighted average of the rates of interest on amounts invested con- servatively in long term investment grade corporate bonds during the 4-year period ending on the last day before the beginning of the plan year. Notice 2004–34, 2004–1 C.B. 848, pro- vides guidelines for determining the cor- porate bond weighted average interest rate and the resulting permissible range of in- terest rates used to calculate current liabil- ity. That notice establishes that the corpo- rate bond weighted average is based on the monthly composite corporate bond rate de- rived from designated corporate bond in- dices. The composite corporate bond rate for May 2005 is 5.41 percent. Pursuant to No- tice 2004–34, the Service has determined this rate as the average of the monthly yields for the included corporate bond in- dices for that month. The following corporate bond weighted average interest rate was determined for plan years beginning in the month shown below. For Plan Years Corporate Bond90% to 100% Beginning in:WeightedPermissible MonthYearAverageRange June20055.945.35 to 5.94 30-YEAR TREASURY SECURITIES WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTEREST RATE Section 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) defines the applicable interest rate, which must be used for purposes of determining the minimum present value of a participant’s benefit under § 417(e)(1) and (2), as the annual rate of interest on 30-year Treasury securities for the month before the date of distribution or such other time as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe. Section 1.417(e)–1(d)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the applica- bleinterestrateforamonthistheannual interest rate on 30-year Treasury securi- ties as specified by the Commissioner for that month in revenue rulings, notices or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Section 404(a)(1) of the Code, as amended by the Pension Funding Eq- uity Act of 2004, permits an employer to elect to disregard subclause (II) of § 412(b)(5)(B)(ii) to determine the max- imum amount of the deduction allowed under § 404(a)(1). The rate of interest on 30-year Treasury securities for May 2005 is 4.49 percent. Pursuant to Notice 2002–26, 2002–1 C.B. 743, the Service has determined this rate as the monthly average of the daily deter- mination of yield on the 30-year Treasury bond maturing in February 2031. The following 30-year Treasury rates were determined for the plan years begin- ning in the month shown below. For Plan Years 30-Year Treasury90% to 105%90% to 110% Beginning in:WeightedPermissiblePermissible MonthYearAverageRangeRange June20055.004.50 to 5.254.50 to 5.50 Drafting Information The principal authors of this notice are Paul Stern and Tony Montanaro of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For fur- ther information regarding this notice, please contact the Employee Plans’ tax- payer assistance telephone service at 1–877–829–5500 (a toll-free number), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday. Mr. Stern may be reached at 1–202–283–9703. Mr. Montanaro may be reached at 1–202–283–9714. The tele- phone numbers in thepreceding sentences are not toll-free. June 27, 200513722005–26 I.R.B. Application of Circular 230 to State or Local Bond Opinions Notice 2005–47 The purpose of this notice is to provide interim guidance and information con- cerning State or local bond opinions under Treasury Department Circular No. 230, 31 C.F.R. part 10 (Circular 230). Specifically, this notice provides (1) interim guidance relating to the definition ofState or local bond opinionin section 10.35(b)(9) of Cir- cular 230 and (2) information on changes to the requirements that are under consid- eration for State or local bond opinions. BACKGROUND On December 20, 2004, the Treasury Department and the IRS published in the Federal Register final regulations setting standards for practice before the IRS relat- ing to written advice provided by tax prac- titioners (the Final Covered Opinion Reg- ulations). The Treasury Department and the IRS simultaneously issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (the Proposed Reg- ulations) proposing standards for practice before the IRS relating to State or local bond opinions. Section 10.35 of the Final Covered Opinion Regulations is effective for written advice rendered after June 20, 2005, and section 10.39 of the Proposed Regulations is proposed to be effective no sooner than 120 days after final regulations are published in the Federal Register. Section 10.35 sets forth the require- ments applicable to covered opinions. A covered opinion is written advice (in- cluding electronic communications) that concerns one or more Federal tax issues arising from: (1) a listed transaction; (2) any plan or arrangement, the principal pur- pose of which is the avoidance or evasion of any tax; or (3) any plan or arrange- ment, a significant purpose of which is the avoidance or evasion of tax if the written advice (A) is a reliance opinion, (B) is a marketed opinion, (C) is subject to condi- tions of confidentiality, or (D) is subject to contractual protection. Written advice regarding a plan or arrangement having a significant purpose of tax avoidance or evasion is excluded from the definition of covered opinion if the written advice (1) concerns the qualification of a qualified plan, (2) is a State or local bond opinion, or (3) is included in documents required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Final Covered Opinion Regulations also adopt an exclusion for certain preliminary advice and allow prac- titioners to provide limited scope opinions in some circumstances. A State or local bond opinion is not sub- ject to the requirements of section 10.35, but will be subject to proposed section 10.39 when it is finalized. Under the Fi- nal Covered Opinion Regulations, aState or local bond opinionis defined as writ- ten advice with respect to a Federal tax issue included in any materials delivered to a purchaser of a State or local bond in connection with the issuance of the bond in a public or private offering, including an official statement (if one is prepared), that concerns only the excludability of in- terest on a State or local bond from gross income under section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code, the application of section 55 of the Internal Revenue Code to a State or local bond, the status of a State or lo- cal bond as a qualified tax-exempt obli- gation under section 265(b)(3) of the In- ternal Revenue Code, the status of a State or local bond as a qualified zone academy bond under section 1397E of the Internal Revenue Code, or any combination of the above. Under the Final Covered Opinion Regulations, written advice with respect to a Federal tax issue involving a State or lo- cal bond that does not meet this definition is subject generally to the standards in sec- tion 10.35. Written advice with respect to one of the four enumerated issues involv- ing a State or local bond that is delivered other than at the time of issuance is subject generally to the standards in section 10.35. INTERIM GUIDANCE Commentators have requested clarifi- cation regarding the scope of the defini- tion ofState or local bond opinionand the treatment of opinions relating to State or local bonds that may be subject to the stan- dards in section 10.35. In response to these comments, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that the definition ofState or local bond opinionin section 10.35 should be amended. Accordingly, the IRS will apply the following interim definition ofState or local bond opinion under section 10.35(b)(9) until the Trea- sury Department and the IRS amend the regulations: § 10.35 Requirements for covered opin- ions. ***** (b) * * * (9)State or local bond opinion.AState or local bond opinionis written advice (in- cluding electronic communications) that concerns — (i) The excludability of interest on a State or local bond from gross income un- der section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code; (ii) The status of a State or local bond as a qualified zone academy bond under sec- tion 1397E of the Internal Revenue Code; (iii) One or more other Federal tax is- sues reasonably related and ancillary to ad- vice described in paragraph (b)(9)(i) or (ii) of this section. Such issues include, but are not limited to— (A) The application of section 55 of the Internal Revenue Code to a State or local bond; (B) Whether a State or local bond has been reissued for Federal tax purposes; (C) The status of a State or local bond as a qualified tax-exempt obligation under section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; (D) The treatment of original issue dis- count or premium on a State or local bond under the Internal Revenue Code; and (E) Whether the organization that is borrowing the proceeds of the State or lo- cal bond is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; or (iv) Any combination of the above. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR INTERIM GUIDANCE This interim definition ofState or lo- cal bond opinionis applicable to opin- ions rendered after June 20, 2005. Thus, when the Final Covered Opinion Regula- tions go into effect, the requirements in section 10.35 for covered opinions will not apply to an opinion that meets the interim definition ofState or local bond opinion set forth in this notice. This relief applies regardless of whether the amendment to section 10.35 has been published prior to June 20, 2005. 2005–26 I.R.B.1373June 27, 2005 CHANGES TO PROPOSED SECTION 10.39 UNDER CONSIDERATION The Treasury Department and the IRS also are considering other modifications to the requirements for State or local bond opinions in the Proposed Regulations, in- cluding, but not limited to: adding a provi- sion that would permit a practitioner under certain circumstances to render an opinion that addresses less than all the significant Federal tax issues raised by a State or lo- cal bond issue; and permitting exclusions from the requirements of section 10.39 for opinions that would otherwise be State or local bond opinions if the opinion is a pre- liminary, post-filing, or negative opinion, or is in-house counsel advice, similar to the exclusions for these opinions from the re- quirements for covered opinions in section 10.35. DRAFTING I NFORMATION The principal authors of this notice are Heather L. Dostaler of the Office of As- sociate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Ad- ministration) and Vicki Tsilas of the Of- fice of Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Ex- empt/Government Entities). For further information regarding this notice, contact Heather L. Dostaler at (202) 622–4940 or Vicki Tsilas at (202) 622–3980 (not toll- free numbers). 26 CFR 601.105: Examination of returns and claims for refund, credit, or abatement; determination of correct tax liability. (Also Part 1, §§ 23, 137.) Rev. Proc. 2005–31 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This revenue procedure provides safe harbors for determining the finality of an adoption of a foreign-born child for federal income tax purposes. It final- izes the revenue procedure proposed in Notice 2003–15, 2003–1 C.B. 540. An- nouncement 2005–45, 2005–26 I.R.B. 1377, discusses the comments received in response to Notice 2003–15 and the changes made by this revenue procedure to the proposed revenue procedure. This revenue procedure also provides guidance on the treatment of re-adoption expenses. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND .01 Section 23 of the Internal Revenue Code allows a credit for qualified adoption expenses (QAE) paid or incurred by an in- dividual in connection with the adoption of an eligible child. Section 137 provides an exclusion from an employee’s gross in- come for QAE paid or incurred by the em- ployer under an adoption assistance pro- gram. See Notice 97–9, 1997–1 C.B. 365, for general guidance concerning the credit under § 23 and the exclusion under § 137. .02 QAE are defined in § 23(d)(1) and Notice 97–9 as reasonable and necessary adoption fees, court costs, attorney’s fees, traveling expenses (including amounts ex- pended for meals and lodging) while away from home, and other expenses directly re- lated to, and for the principal purpose of, the legal adoption of an eligible child by the taxpayer. .03 Under § 23(d)(2), an eligible child is an individual who has not attained age 18 or who is physically or mentally incapable of caring for himself. Section 23(d)(1)(C) provides that a stepchild is not an eligible child. .04 Section 23(a)(2)(A) provides the general rule that, for QAE paid or incurred before the taxable year in which the adop- tion is final, the credit is allowed in the taxable year that follows the taxable year in which the QAE are paid or incurred. For QAEpaidorincurredduringorafterthe taxable year in which the adoption is final, the credit is allowed for the taxable year in which the QAE are paid or incurred. Sec. 23(a)(2)(B). For a foreign adoption, how- ever, § 23(e) provides that (1) the credit is allowed only if the adoption becomes final, and (2) QAE paid or incurred in any taxable year before the taxable year in which the adoption becomes final are treated as paid or incurred in the taxable year in which the adoption becomes fi- nal. Rules similar to those under § 23(e) apply under § 137(e) for purposes of the exclusion for employer-provided adoption assistance. .05 The Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000, Pub. L. 106–279, 42 U.S.C. §§ 14901–14954 (IAA), will implement theHagueConventiononProtectionof Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (the Convention). See Senate Treaty Doc. 105–51 (Sept. 20, 2000). When the Convention enters into force in the United States, the IAA gen- erally will apply to Convention adoptions (adoptions in which both the sending and the receiving countries are parties to the Convention). .06 Section 301 of the IAA (42 U.S.C. § 14931) provides rules for certification of Convention adoptions. A Convention adoption subject to the IAA will be final for federal income tax purposes (1) in the taxable year for which the Secretary of State certifies as final an adoption subject to§301(b),or(2)intheyearinwhichthe state court enters a final decree of adoption for an adoption subject to § 301(c). .07 A discussion of the IAA and the Convention can be found in Hague Con- vention on Intercountry Adoption; Inter- country Adoption Act of 2000; Accredita- tion of Agencies; Approval of Persons; Preservation of Convention Records, 68 Fed. Reg. 54064 (September 15, 2003) (proposed rules to be codified at 22 C.F.R. pts. 96, 98). General information about foreign adoptions can be accessed through the Department of State web site athttp://www.state.govand the Depart- ment of Homeland Security web site at http://www.immigration.gov. SECTION 3. SCOPE This revenue procedure applies to tax- payers who claim the adoption credit or ex- clusion for QAE paid or incurred in con- nection with the adoption of a foreign-born child, except adoptions for which the Con- vention and the IAA determine finality. This revenue procedure does not apply to the adoption of a child who is a citizen or resident of the United States at the time the adoption process commences. SECTION 4. DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply for pur- poses of this revenue procedure. .01Foreign-born child.Aneligible child (within the meaning of § 23(d)(2)) who is not a citizen or resident of the United States at the time the adoption process commences. .02Orphan. A foreign-born child who is under the age of 16 at the time an immi- gration petition is filed on the child’s be- half, and (1) who has suffered the death or disap- pearance of, or abandonment or desertion June 27, 200513742005–26 I.R.B. by, or separation from or loss of, both par- ents, or (2) for whom the sole or surviving par- ent is incapable of providing the proper care and has in writing irrevocably re- leased the foreign-born child for emigra- tion and adoption. .03Foreign-sending country.The country of citizenship of a foreign-born child, or if the foreign-born child is not permanently residing in the country of citizenship, the country of the child’s ha- bitual residence before adoption. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.3(b) (2005). .04Competent authority.Acourtor governmental agency of the foreign-send- ing country with jurisdiction and authority to make decisions in matters of child wel- fare, including adoption (as provided in 8 C.F.R. § 204.3(b) (2005)). .05Home state. The state (including the District of Columbia and possessions) in which the adopted child and adoptive parents make their habitual residence in the United States, or in which the child is adopted. .06Full and final adoption. An adop- tion of an orphan in which the compe- tent authority of the foreign-sending coun- try enters a decree of adoption establishing a parent-child relationship under the laws of the foreign-sending country and both adoptive parents (in adoptions by two par- ents) or the sole adoptive parent (in adop- tions by one parent) see the orphan before or during the adoption proceeding. .07Simple adoption. Anadoptionof an orphan in which the competent author- ity of the foreign-sending country enters a decree of adoption establishing a par- ent-child relationship under the laws of the foreign-sending country, in which one or both of the adoptive parents do not see the orphan before or during the adoption pro- ceeding. .08Re-adoption. An adoption or other recognition proceeding under home state law occurring after the entry of a foreign- born child into the United States under an “immediate relative” IR2, IR3, or IR4 (simple adoption) visa. .09IR2 visa. A visa issued to a for- eign-born child who is not an orphan, who was adopted in the foreign-sending coun- try while under the age of 16 years, and who has been in the legal custody of, and has resided with, the adoptive parent or parents for at least 2 years. .10IR3 visa. A visa issued to an orphan after a full and finaladoption of the orphan has occurred in the foreign-sending coun- try. An IR3 visa is issued if (1) the compe- tent authority of the foreign-sending coun- try severs the parental rights of the biolog- ical or any previous adoptive parents and establishes a parent-child relationship be- tween the orphan and the adoptive parent or parents, and (2) both adoptive parents (in adoptions by two parents) or the sole adoptive parent (in adoptions by one par- ent) see the orphan before or during the adoption proceeding. .11IR4 visa. A visa issued to an or- phan if (1) a simple adoption occurs in the foreign-sending country, or (2) the compe- tent authority of the foreign-sending coun- try grants legal guardianship or custody ei- ther to the prospective adoptive parent or parents or to an individual or agency act- ing on behalf of the prospective adoptive parent or parents. SECTION 5. APPLICATION .01Finality of adoption of foreign-born child. (1)In general. For purposes of the adoption credit and the exclusion for em- ployer-provided assistance for QAE, the Internal Revenue Service will treat an adoption of a foreign-born child for which the Convention and the IAA do not deter- mine finality as final if: (a) a competent authority of a for- eign-sending country has entered a de- cree of adoption with respect to the for- eign-born child or has authorized the child to leave the foreign-sending country under a guardianship or legal custody arrange- ment; and (b) the child receives an IR visa from the Department of State. (2)Taxable year of finality safe har- bors. (a)Children who receive an IR2, IR3, or IR4 (simple adoption) visa.TheService will not challenge a taxpayer’s treatment of the adoption of a child who receives an IR2, IR3, or IR4 (if the child was adopted in a simple adoption) visa as final in: (i) The taxable year in which the com- petent authority enters a decree of adop- tion; or (ii) The taxable year in which a home state court enters a decree of re-adoption or the home state otherwise recognizes the decree of the foreign-sending country, if that taxable year is one of the next two tax- able years after the taxable year in which the competent authority enters the decree. (b)Children who receive an IR4 visa (guardianship or legal custody).TheSer- vice will not challenge a taxpayer’s treat- ment of the adoption of a child who was subject to a guardianship or legal custody arrangement and who receives an IR4 visa as final in the taxable year in which a home state court enters a decree of adoption. .02Re-adoption expenses.Otherwise qualified expenses paid or incurred in connection with a re-adoption satisfy the requirement that expenses be “reasonable and necessary” for purposes of determin- ing whether the expenses are QAE. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective for QAE paid or incurred after June 15, 2005. However, the Service will not challenge the time of finality of adoptions by taxpay- ers who apply this revenue procedure or Notice 2003–15 to QAE paid or incurred on or before June 15, 2005, in a taxable year for which the period of limitation un- der § 6511 has not expired. SECTION 7. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS Notice 2003–15 is modified and, as modified, is superseded. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue procedure is Marilyn E. Brookens of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting). For further information regarding this revenue pro- cedure, contact Ms. Brookens at (202) 622–4920 (not a toll-free number). 2005–26 I.R.B.1375June 27, 2005 Part IV. Items of General Interest Notice of Proposed Rulemaking by Cross-Reference to Temporary Regulations Assumption of Liabilities REG–106736–00 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regula- tions. SUMMARY: In this issue of the Bulletin, the IRS is issuing final and temporary reg- ulations (T.D. 9207) relating to the as- sumption of liabilities under section 752 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Those temporary regulations contain rules related to the assumption of certain liabilities un- der section 358(h). Thetextofthosetem- porary regulations also serves as the text of these proposed regulations. DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by August 24, 2005. ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR(REG–106736–00), room 5203, Internal Revenue Ser- vice, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Sta- tion, Washington, DC 20044. Submis- sions may be hand-delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–106736–00), Courier’s Desk, In- ternal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, or sent electronically, via the IRS Internet site at www.irs.gov/regsor via the Federal eRule- making Portal atwww.regulations.gov (IRS–REG–106736–00). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed reg- ulations, Doug Bates, at (202) 622–7550; concerning submissions of comments and/or requests for a public hearing, Sonya Cruse, (202) 622–7180 (not toll-free num- bers). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Explanation of Provisions Temporary regulations in this issue of the Bulletin amend 26 CFR Part 1 relat- ingtosection358(h)(1). Thetemporary regulations make unavailable the excep- tion to section 358(h)(1) that is set forth in section 358(h)(2)(B) (which applies where substantially all of the assets with which the liability is associated are transferred to the person assuming the liability as part of the exchange). The text of those temporary regulations also serves as the text of these proposed regulations. The preamble to the temporary regulationsexplains the amend- ments. Special Analyses It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory as- sessment is not required. It is hereby cer- tified that these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a substan- tial number of small entities. This certifi- cation is based upon the fact that the only impact of the regulations is to require tax- payers to calculate the basis of stock re- ceived in certain transactions more accu- rately. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advo- cacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact. Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing Before these regulations are adopted as final regulations, consideration will be giventoanywrittencomments(asigned original with eight (8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the IRS. All comments will be made available for public inspection and copying. A pub- lic hearing may be scheduled. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for the public hearing will be published in theFederal Register. Drafting Information The principal author of these regula- tions is Douglas Bates, Office of the As- sociate Chief Counsel (Corporate), IRS. However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development. ***** Proposed Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding an entry in numerical order to read, in part, as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * §1.358–5 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 358(h)(2). * * * Par. 2. Section 1.358–5 is added to read as follows: §1.358–5 Special rules for assumption of liabilities. [The text of proposed §1.358–5 is the same as the text of §1.358–5T published elsewhere in this issue of the Bulletin]. Mark E. Matthews, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on May 23, 2005, 11:17 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for May 26, 2005, 70 F.R. 30380) New Procedure for Filing Form 8693,Low-Income Housing Credit Disposition Bond Announcement 2005–43 Form 8693,Low-Income Housing Credit Disposition Bond,istobefiled with the Internal Revenue Service within 60 days after the date of disposition of the building or interest therein. Effective upon publication of this an- nouncement, Form 8693 (original and one June 27, 200513762005–26 I.R.B. copy) is to be filed at the following ad- dress: Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 331 Attn: LIHC Unit, DP 607 South Philadelphia Campus Bensalem, PA 19020 The IRS will return a copy of the ap- proved form. However, taxpayers are no longer required to attach that copy to their income tax return. Instead, taxpayers should keep the returned copy in their records. This treatment supersedes the current revision (February 1997) of Form 8693, which instructs taxpayers to attach the approved copy to their income tax return. Deletions From Cumulative List of Organizations Contributions to Which are Deductible Under Section 170 of the Code Announcement 2005–44 The name of an organization that no longer qualifies as an organization de- scribed in section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is listed below. Generally, the Service will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the Service is not precluded from disallowing a deduction for any contributions made after an or- ganization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation. If on the other hand a suit for declara- tory judgment has been timely filed, con- tributions from individuals and organiza- tions described in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on June 27, 2005, and would end on the date the court first deter- mines that the organization is not described in section 170(c)(2) as more particularly set forth in section 7428(c)(1). For indi- vidual contributors, the maximum deduc- tion protected is $1,000, with a husband and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in wholeorinpart,fortheactsoromissions of the organization that were the basis for revocation. E.N.Y.P. Charity Fund Brooklyn, NY Finality of Foreign Adoptions Announcement 2005–45 The Internal Revenue Service has is- sued Rev. Proc. 2005–31, 2005–26 I.R.B. 1374, which finalizes, with modifications, a revenue procedure proposed in Notice 2003–15, 2003–1 C.B. 540 (the proposed revenue procedure). This announcement discusses issues raised by comments re- ceived in response to Notice 2003–15 and the modifications to the proposed revenue procedure. BACKGROUND Section 23 of the Internal Revenue Code provides a credit for qualified adop- tion expenses (QAE) paid or incurred in connection with the adoption of an eligible child. Section 137 provides an exclusion from income for employer-provided adop- tion assistance. Notice 2003–15 proposed a revenue procedure to establish certain safe harbors for determining the finality of the adoption of a foreign-born child who has received an “immediate relative” (IR) visa from the Department of State. The proposed revenue procedure provided: (1) If the child receives an IR2 or an IR4 visa and enters the United States un- der a decree of simple adoption, the adop- tion will be treated as final in the tax- able year in which a home state court en- ters a decree of re-adoption or otherwise recognizes the adoption decree of the for- eign-sending country; (2) If the child receives an IR3 visa, the adoption will be treated as final in the tax- able year in which the competent authority enters the decree of adoption; and (3) If the child receives an IR4 visa and enters the United States under a guardian- ship or legal custody arrangement, the adoption will be treated as final in the taxable year in which a home state court enters a decree of adoption. The Service requested comments on the proposed revenue procedure. Several comments were received. COMMENTS Time of finality and alternative provisions Commentators disagreed that the adop- tion of a foreign-born child who receives an IR2 visa or who receives an IR4 visa and enters the United States under a de- cree of simple adoption should be final only upon action of the home state. The commentators suggested that the credit should be available earlier, when the for- eign-sending country enters a decree of adoption. The final revenue procedure adopts this suggestion and provides alter- native dates of finality for the adoption of a child who receives an IR2 or an IR3 visa, or who receives an IR4 visa and enters the United States under a decree of simple adoption. Taxpayers may treat these adoptions as final for federal income tax purposes: (a) In the taxable year in which the com- petent authority enters a decree of adop- tion; or (b) In the taxable year in which a home state enters a decreeof re-adoption or oth- erwise recognizes the decree of the for- eign-sending country, if that taxable year is one of the next two taxable years after the taxable year in which the competent authority enters the decree. Retroactivity A commentator expressed concern that the proposed revenue procedure, if ap- plied retroactively, would require taxpay- ers who had taken positions inconsistent with the proposed revenue procedure to file amended returns. Specifically, the commentator asserted that many taxpay- ers whose children received IR4 visas and entered the United States under a decree of simple adoption had claimed the credit in the year the competent authority of the for- eign-sending country entered the decree of adoption, rather than in the year that a state court re-adoption occurred. The final 2005–26 I.R.B.1377June 27, 2005 revenue procedure permits taxpayers to treat these adoptions as final in the year the competent authority enters the decree of adoption, and permits taxpayers to ap- ply Notice 2003–15 or the final revenue procedure to prior taxable years. The Intercountry Adoption Act A commentator questioned whether the proposed revenue procedure would apply after the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000 (IAA), Pub. L. 106–279, 114 Stat. 825, 42 U.S.C. §§ 14901–14954, implements the 1993 Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-opera- tion in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (the Convention). See Senate Treaty Doc. 105–51 (Sept. 20, 2000). In response to this comment, the final revenue procedure states that it does not apply to adoptions for which the Convention and the IAA determine finality. OTHER MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROPOSED REVENUE PROCEDURE Treatment of re-adoption expenses as QAE Section 23(d)(1) and Notice 97–9 de- fine QAE to include reasonable and neces- sary expenses relating to the legal adoption of an eligible child. In most adoptions of foreign-born children, the foreign-sending country has entered a decree of adop- tion before the child has been issued a visa. Many adoptive parents pay or incur expenses in connection with home state re-adoptions of their foreign-born children for practical reasons, such as obtaining a birth certificate issued in English, rather than because re-adoption is required by law. Therefore, the revenue procedure clarifies that otherwise qualified expenses paid or incurred in connection with a re-adoption do not fail the requirement that QAE must be “reasonable and neces- sary.” Effective date Notice 2003–15 proposed that the final revenue procedure would be effective for expenses paid or incurred after the date of its publication. The final revenue proce- dure is effective for QAE paid or incurred after the date of its publication. However, the Service will not challenge the time of finality of adoptions by taxpayers who ap- ply the final revenue procedure or Notice 2003–15 to QAE paid or incurred on or be- fore June 15, 2005, in a taxable year for which the period of limitation under § 6511 has not expired. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this notice is Marilyn E. Brookens of the Office of As- sociate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Ac- counting). For further information regard- ing this notice, contact Ms. Brookens at (202) 622–4920 (not a toll-free call). June 27, 200513782005–26 I.R.B. Definition of Terms Revenue rulings and revenue procedures (hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that have an effect on previous rulings use the following defined terms to describe the ef- fect: Amplifieddescribes a situation where no change is being made in a prior pub- lished position, but the prior position is be- ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if an earlier ruling held that a principle ap- plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the same principle also applies to B, the earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi- fied,below). Clarifiedis used in those instances where the language in a prior ruling is be- ing made clear because the language has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed. Distinguisheddescribes a situation where a ruling mentions a previously pub- lished ruling and points out an essential difference between them. Modifiedis used where the substance of a previously published position is being changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a principle applied to A but not to B, and the new ruling holds that it applies to both A and B, the prior ruling is modified because it corrects a published position. (Compare withamplifiedandclarified, above). Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub- lished ruling that is not considered deter- minative with respect to future transac- tions. This term is most commonly used in a ruling that lists previously published rul- ings that are obsoleted because of changes in laws or regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted because the substance has been included in regulations subsequently adopted. Revokeddescribes situations where the position in the previously published ruling is not correct and the correct position is beingstatedinanewruling. Supersededdescribes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than re- state the substance and situation of a previ- ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same po- sition published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single rul- ing a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings. If the new rul- ing does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of terms is used. For example,modifiedandsu- persededdescribes a situation where the substance of a previously published ruling is being changed in part and is continued without change in part and it is desired to restate the valid portion of the previously published ruling in a new ruling that is self contained. In this case, the previously pub- lished ruling is first modified and then, as modified, is superseded. Supplementedis used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original rul- ing has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the ad- ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series. Suspendedis used in rare situations to show that the previous published rul- ings will not be applied pending some future action such as the issuance of new or amended regulations, the outcome of cases in litigation, or the outcome of a Service study. Abbreviations The fol lowing abbreviations in current use and for merly used will appear in material publis hedintheBulletin. A—Individual. Acq.—A cquiescence. B—Individual. BE—Beneficiary. BK—Bank . B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals. C—Individual. C.B.—Cu mulative Bulletin. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations. CI—City. COOP—Coo perative. Ct.D.—Court Decision. CY—County. D—Decede nt. DC—Dummy Corporation. DE—Donee. Del. Order —Delegation Order. DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation. DR—Donor. E—Estate. EE—Employee. E.O.—Executive Order. ER—Emp loyer. ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act. EX—Executor. F—Fiduc iary. FC—Foreign Country. FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act. FISC—Fo reign International Sales Company. FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company. F.R.—Federal Register. FUTA—Fed eral Unemployment Tax Act. FX—Foreign corporation. G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum. GE—Grante e. GP—General Partner. GR—Grantor. IC—Insura nce Company. I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin. LE—Lessee. LP—Limited Partner. LR—Lessor. M—Minor. Nonacq.—No nacquiescence. O—Organization. P—Parent Corporation. PHC—Persona l Holding Company. PO—Possession of the U.S. PR—Partner. PRS—Pa rtnership. PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption. Pub. L.—Public Law. REIT—Re al Estate Investment Trust. Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure. Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling. S—Subsi diary. S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules. Stat.—Statutes at Large. T—Target Corporation. T.C.—Tax Court. T.D.—Treasury Decision. TFE—Trans feree. TFR—Transferor. T.I.R.—Technical Information Release. TP—Taxpay er. TR—Trust. TT—Trustee. U.S.C.—Uni ted States Code. X—Corporation. Y—Corporation. Z—Corporat ion. 2005–26 I.R.B.iJune 27, 2005 Numerical Finding List 1 Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 Announcements: 2005-1, 2005-1 I.R.B.257 2005-2, 2005-2 I.R.B.319 2005-3, 2005-2 I.R.B.270 2005-4, 2005-2 I.R.B.319 2005-5, 2005-3 I.R.B.353 2005-6, 2005-4 I.R.B.377 2005-7, 2005-4 I.R.B.377 2005-8, 2005-4 I.R.B.380 2005-9, 2005-4 I.R.B.380 2005-10, 2005-5 I.R.B.450 2005-11, 2005-5 I.R.B.451 2005-12, 2005-7 I.R.B.555 2005-13, 2005-8 I.R.B.627 2005-14, 2005-9 I.R.B.653 2005-15, 2005-9 I.R.B.654 2005-16, 2005-10 I.R.B.702 2005-17, 2005-10 I.R.B.673 2005-18, 2005-9 I.R.B.660 2005-19, 2005-11 I.R.B.744 2005-20, 2005-12 I.R.B.772 2005-21, 2005-12 I.R.B.776 2005-22, 2005-14 I.R.B.826 2005-23, 2005-14 I.R.B.845 2005-24, 2005-15 I.R.B.889 2005-25, 2005-15 I.R.B.891 2005-26, 2005-17 I.R.B.969 2005-27, 2005-16 I.R.B.918 2005-28, 2005-17 I.R.B.969 2005-29, 2005-17 I.R.B.969 2005-30, 2005-18 I.R.B.988 2005-31, 2005-18 I.R.B.996 2005-32, 2005-19 I.R.B.1012 2005-33, 2005-19 I.R.B.1013 2005-34, 2005-19 I.R.B.1014 2005-35, 2005-21 I.R.B.1095 2005-36, 2005-21 I.R.B.1095 2005-37, 2005-21 I.R.B.1096 2005-38, 2005-21 I.R.B.1097 2005-39, 2005-22 I.R.B.1151 2005-40, 2005-22 I.R.B.1152 2005-41, 2005-23 I.R.B.1212 2005-42, 2005-24 I.R.B.1257 2005-43, 2005-26 I.R.B.1376 2005-44, 2005-26 I.R.B.1377 2005-45, 2005-26 I.R.B.1377 Court Decisions: 2080, 2005-15 I.R.B.850 Notices: 2005-1, 2005-2 I.R.B.274 Notices— Continued: 2005-2, 2005-3 I.R.B.337 2005-3, 2005-5 I.R.B.447 2005-4, 2005-2 I.R.B.289 2005-5, 2005-3 I.R.B.337 2005-6, 2005-5 I.R.B.448 2005-7, 2005-3 I.R.B.340 2005-8, 2005-4 I.R.B.368 2005-9, 2005-4 I.R.B.369 2005-10, 2005-6 I.R.B.474 2005-11, 2005-7 I.R.B.493 2005-12, 2005-7 I.R.B.494 2005-13, 2005-9 I.R.B.630 2005-14, 2005-7 I.R.B.498 2005-15, 2005-7 I.R.B.527 2005-16, 2005-8 I.R.B.605 2005-17, 2005-8 I.R.B.606 2005-18, 2005-9 I.R.B.634 2005-19, 2005-9 I.R.B.634 2005-20, 2005-9 I.R.B.635 2005-21, 2005-11 I.R.B.727 2005-22, 2005-12 I.R.B.756 2005-23, 2005-11 I.R.B.732 2005-24, 2005-12 I.R.B.757 2005-25, 2005-14 I.R.B.827 2005-26, 2005-12 I.R.B.758 2005-27, 2005-13 I.R.B.795 2005-28, 2005-13 I.R.B.796 2005-29, 2005-13 I.R.B.796 2005-30, 2005-14 I.R.B.827 2005-31, 2005-14 I.R.B.830 2005-32, 2005-16 I.R.B.895 2005-33, 2005-17 I.R.B.960 2005-34, 2005-17 I.R.B.960 2005-35, 2005-21 I.R.B.1087 2005-36, 2005-19 I.R.B.1007 2005-37, 2005-20 I.R.B.1049 2005-38, 2005-22 I.R.B.1100 2005-39, 2005-21 I.R.B.1087 2005-40, 2005-21 I.R.B.1088 2005-41, 2005-23 I.R.B.1203 2005-42, 2005-23 I.R.B.1204 2005-43, 2005-24 I.R.B.1221 2005-44, 2005-25 I.R.B.1287 2005-45, 2005-24 I.R.B.1228 2005-46, 2005-26 I.R.B.1372 2005-47, 2005-26 I.R.B.1373 Proposed Regulations: REG-106736-00, 2005-26 I.R.B.1376 REG-108524-00, 2005-23 I.R.B.1209 REG-117969-00, 2005-7 I.R.B.533 REG-125443-01, 2005-16 I.R.B.912 REG-125628-01, 2005-7 I.R.B.536 REG-100420-03, 2005-24 I.R.B.1236 REG-105346-03, 2005-24 I.R.B.1244 Proposed Regulations— Continued: REG-129709-03, 2005-3 I.R.B.351 REG-148701-03, 2005-13 I.R.B.802 REG-148867-03, 2005-9 I.R.B.646 REG-159243-03, 2005-20 I.R.B.1075 REG-160315-03, 2005-14 I.R.B.833 REG-163314-03, 2005-14 I.R.B.835 REG-168892-03, 2005-25 I.R.B.1293 REG-102144-04, 2005-25 I.R.B.1297 REG-122847-04, 2005-13 I.R.B.804 REG-127740-04, 2005-24 I.R.B.1254 REG-130370-04, 2005-8 I.R.B.608 REG-130671-04, 2005-10 I.R.B.694 REG-131128-04, 2005-11 I.R.B.733 REG-134030-04, 2005-25 I.R.B.1339 REG-139683-04, 2005-4 I.R.B.371 REG-147195-04, 2005-15 I.R.B.888 REG-148521-04, 2005-18 I.R.B.995 REG-152354-04, 2005-13 I.R.B.805 REG-152914-04, 2005-9 I.R.B.650 REG-152945-04, 2005-6 I.R.B.484 REG-154000-04, 2005-19 I.R.B.1009 REG-158138-04, 2005-25 I.R.B.1341 REG-159824-04, 2005-4 I.R.B.372 REG-162813-04, 2005-19 I.R.B.1010 Revenue Procedures: 2005-1, 2005-1 I.R.B.1 2005-2, 2005-1 I.R.B.86 2005-3, 2005-1 I.R.B.118 2005-4, 2005-1 I.R.B.128 2005-5, 2005-1 I.R.B.170 2005-6, 2005-1 I.R.B.200 2005-7, 2005-1 I.R.B.240 2005-8, 2005-1 I.R.B.243 2005-9, 2005-2 I.R.B.303 2005-10, 2005-3 I.R.B.341 2005-11, 2005-2 I.R.B.307 2005-12, 2005-2 I.R.B.311 2005-13, 2005-12 I.R.B.759 2005-14, 2005-7 I.R.B.528 2005-15, 2005-9 I.R.B.638 2005-16, 2005-10 I.R.B.674 2005-17, 2005-13 I.R.B.797 2005-18, 2005-13 I.R.B.798 2005-19, 2005-14 I.R.B.832 2005-20, 2005-18 I.R.B.990 2005-21, 2005-16 I.R.B.899 2005-22, 2005-15 I.R.B.886 2005-23, 2005-18 I.R.B.991 2005-24, 2005-16 I.R.B.909 2005-25, 2005-17 I.R.B.962 2005-26, 2005-17 I.R.B.965 2005-27, 2005-20 I.R.B.1050 2005-28, 2005-21 I.R.B.1093 2005-29, 2005-22 I.R.B.1118 1 A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2004–27 through 2004–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2004–52, dated December 27, 2004. June 27, 2005ii2005–26 I.R.B. Revenue Procedures— Continued: 2005-30, 2005-22 I.R.B.1148 2005-31, 2005-26 I.R.B.1374 2005-32, 2005-23 I.R.B.1206 2005-33, 2005-24 I.R.B.1231 2005-34, 2005-24 I.R.B.1233 Revenue Rulings: 2005-1, 2005-2 I.R.B.258 2005-2, 2005-2 I.R.B.259 2005-3, 2005-3 I.R.B.334 2005-4, 2005-4 I.R.B.366 2005-5, 2005-5 I.R.B.445 2005-6, 2005-6 I.R.B.471 2005-7, 2005-6 I.R.B.464 2005-8, 2005-6 I.R.B.466 2005-9, 2005-6 I.R.B.470 2005-10, 2005-7 I.R.B.492 2005-11, 2005-14 I.R.B.816 2005-12, 2005-9 I.R.B.628 2005-13, 2005-10 I.R.B.664 2005-14, 2005-12 I.R.B.749 2005-15, 2005-11 I.R.B.720 2005-16, 2005-13 I.R.B.777 2005-17, 2005-14 I.R.B.823 2005-18, 2005-14 I.R.B.817 2005-19, 2005-14 I.R.B.819 2005-20, 2005-14 I.R.B.821 2005-21, 2005-14 I.R.B.822 2005-22, 2005-13 I.R.B.787 2005-23, 2005-15 I.R.B.864 2005-24, 2005-16 I.R.B.892 2005-25, 2005-18 I.R.B.971 2005-26, 2005-17 I.R.B.957 2005-27, 2005-19 I.R.B.998 2005-28, 2005-19 I.R.B.997 2005-29, 2005-21 I.R.B.1080 2005-30, 2005-20 I.R.B.1015 2005-31, 2005-21 I.R.B.1084 2005-32, 2005-23 I.R.B.1156 2005-33, 2005-23 I.R.B.1155 2005-34, 2005-22 I.R.B.1098 2005-35, 2005-24 I.R.B.1214 2005-36, 2005-26 I.R.B.1368 2005-37, 2005-26 I.R.B.1343 Tax Conventions: 2005-3, 2005-2 I.R.B.270 2005-17, 2005-10 I.R.B.673 2005-22, 2005-14 I.R.B.826 2005-30, 2005-18 I.R.B.988 Treasury Decisions: 9164, 2005-3 I.R.B.320 9165, 2005-4 I.R.B.357 9166, 2005-8 I.R.B.558 9167, 2005-2 I.R.B.261 9168, 2005-4 I.R.B.354 Treasury Decisions— Continued: 9169, 2005-5 I.R.B.381 9170, 2005-4 I.R.B.363 9171, 2005-6 I.R.B.452 9172, 2005-6 I.R.B.468 9173, 2005-8 I.R.B.557 9174, 2005-9 I.R.B.629 9175, 2005-10 I.R.B.665 9176, 2005-10 I.R.B.661 9177, 2005-10 I.R.B.671 9178, 2005-11 I.R.B.708 9179, 2005-11 I.R.B.707 9180, 2005-11 I.R.B.714 9181, 2005-11 I.R.B.717 9182, 2005-11 I.R.B.713 9183, 2005-12 I.R.B.754 9184, 2005-12 I.R.B.753 9185, 2005-12 I.R.B.749 9186, 2005-13 I.R.B.790 9187, 2005-13 I.R.B.778 9188, 2005-15 I.R.B.883 9189, 2005-13 I.R.B.788 9190, 2005-15 I.R.B.855 9191, 2005-15 I.R.B.854 9192, 2005-15 I.R.B.866 9193, 2005-15 I.R.B.862 9194, 2005-20 I.R.B.1016 9195, 2005-17 I.R.B.958 9196, 2005-19 I.R.B.1000 9197, 2005-18 I.R.B.985 9198, 2005-18 I.R.B.972 9199, 2005-19 I.R.B.1003 9200, 2005-23 I.R.B.1158 9201, 2005-23 I.R.B.1153 9202, 2005-24 I.R.B.1213 9203, 2005-25 I.R.B.1285 9204, 2005-25 I.R.B.1279 9205, 2005-25 I.R.B.1267 9206, 2005-25 I.R.B.1283 9207, 2005-26 I.R.B.1344 2005–26 I.R.B.iiiJune 27, 2005 Finding List of Current Actions on Previously Published Items 1 Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 Announcements: 2001-77 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2005-16, 2005-10 I.R.B.674 2005-19 Supplemented by Ann. 2005-39, 2005-22 I.R.B.1151 Notices: 88-30 Obsoleted by Notice 2005-4, 2005-2 I.R.B.289 88-132 Obsoleted by Notice 2005-4, 2005-2 I.R.B.289 89-29 Obsoleted by Notice 2005-4, 2005-2 I.R.B.289 89-38 Obsoleted by Notice 2005-4, 2005-2 I.R.B.289 97-19 Obsoleted in part by Notice 2005-36, 2005-19 I.R.B.1007 98-34 Obsoleted in part by Notice 2005-36, 2005-19 I.R.B.1007 2002-45 Amplified by Rev. Rul. 2005-24, 2005-16 I.R.B.892 2003-15 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-31, 2005-26 I.R.B.1374 2004-22 Modified and superseded by Notice 2005-30, 2005-14 I.R.B.827 2004-38 Obsoleted by T.D. 9186, 2005-13 I.R.B.790 2004-80 Clarified and modified by Notice 2005-22, 2005-12 I.R.B.756 Updated by Notice 2005-17, 2005-8 I.R.B.606 2005-4 Modified by Notice 2005-24, 2005-12 I.R.B.757 Notices— Continued: 2005-10 Modified by Notice 2005-38, 2005-22 I.R.B.1100 2005-17 Clarified and modified by Notice 2005-22, 2005-12 I.R.B.756 Proposed Regulations: REG-133791-02 Withdrawn by REG-134030-04, 2005-25 I.R.B.1339 REG-149519-03 Corrected by Ann. 2005-11, 2005-5 I.R.B.451 REG-163314-03 Corrected by Ann. 2005-32, 2005-19 I.R.B.1012 REG-114726-04 Corrected by Ann. 2005-10, 2005-5 I.R.B.450 REG-152945-04 Corrected by Ann. 2005-34, 2005-19 I.R.B.1014 Revenue Procedures: 84-58 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-18, 2005-13 I.R.B.798 84-78 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-34, 2005-24 I.R.B.1233 94-68 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-32, 2005-23 I.R.B.1206 98-16 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-11, 2005-2 I.R.B.307 2000-20 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-16, 2005-10 I.R.B.674 2001-22 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-12, 2005-2 I.R.B.311 2002-9 Modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2005-9, 2005-2 I.R.B.303 2003-32 Amplified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-20, 2005-18 I.R.B.990 Revenue Procedures— Continued: 2004-1 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-1, 2005-1 I.R.B.1 2004-2 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-2, 2005-1 I.R.B.86 2004-3 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-3, 2005-1 I.R.B.118 2004-4 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-4, 2005-1 I.R.B.128 2004-5 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-5, 2005-1 I.R.B.170 2004-6 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-6, 2005-1 I.R.B.200 2004-7 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-7, 2005-1 I.R.B.240 2004-8 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-8, 2005-1 I.R.B.243 2004-13 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-27, 2005-20 I.R.B.1050 2004-16 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-25, 2005-17 I.R.B.962 2004-18 Obsoleted in part by Rev. Proc. 2005-15, 2005-9 I.R.B.638 2004-24 Obsoleted by Rev. Proc. 2005-22, 2005-15 I.R.B.886 2004-35 Corrected by Ann. 2005-4, 2005-2 I.R.B.319 2004-60 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-10, 2005-3 I.R.B.341 2005-6 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2005-16, 2005-10 I.R.B.674 2005-8 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2005-16, 2005-10 I.R.B.674 1 A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2004–27 through 2004–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2004–52, dated December 27, 2004. June 27, 2005iv2005–26 I.R.B. Revenue Procedures— Continued: 2005-9 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2005-17, 2005-13 I.R.B.797 Revenue Rulings: 69-516 Obsoleted by T.D. 9182, 2005-11 I.R.B.713 76-96 Suspendedinpartby Rev. Rul. 2005-28, 2005-19 I.R.B.997 77-415 Obsoleted by T.D. 9182, 2005-11 I.R.B.713 77-479 Obsoleted by T.D. 9182, 2005-11 I.R.B.713 79-335 Modified and superseded by Rev. Rul. 2005-30, 2005-20 I.R.B.1015 82-34 Obsoleted by T.D. 9182, 2005-11 I.R.B.713 92-19 Supplemented in part by Rev. Rul. 2005-29, 2005-21 I.R.B.1080 92-63 Modified and superseded by Rev. Rul. 2005-3, 2005-3 I.R.B.334 95-63 Modified and superseded by Rev. Rul. 2005-3, 2005-3 I.R.B.334 2004-43 Revoked by Rev. Rul. 2005-10, 2005-7 I.R.B.492 2004-103 Superseded by Rev. Rul. 2005-3, 2005-3 I.R.B.334 Treasury Decisions: 8408 Corrected by Ann. 2005-28, 2005-17 I.R.B.969 9130 Corrected by Ann. 2005-29, 2005-17 I.R.B.969 9165 Revised by T.D. 9201, 2005-23 I.R.B.1153 Corrected by Ann. 2005-31, 2005-18 I.R.B.996 Treasury Decisions— Continued: 9166 Corrected by Ann. 2005-33, 2005-19 I.R.B.1013 9170 Corrected by Ann. 2005-13, 2005-8 I.R.B.627 Ann. 2005-35, 2005-21 I.R.B.1095 9187 Corrected by Ann. 2005-25, 2005-15 I.R.B.891 9196 Corrected by Ann. 2005-40, 2005-22 I.R.B.1152 9198 Corrected by Ann. 2005-41, 2005-23 I.R.B.1212 2005–26 I.R.B.vJune 27, 2005 INDEX Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 The abbreviation and number in parenthesis following the index entry refer to the specific item; numbers in roman and italic type following the parentheses refer to the Internal Revenue Bulletin in which the item may be found and the page number on which it appears. Key to Abbreviations: AnnAnnouncement CDCourt Decision DODelegation Order EOExecutive Order PLPublic Law PTEProhibited Transaction Exemption RPRevenue Procedure RRRevenue Ruling SPRStatement of Procedural Rules TCTax Convention TDTreasury Decision TDOTreasury Department Order EMPLOYEE PLANS Corporations, prohibited allocations of securities in an S corpo- ration (TD 9164) 3,320; (REG–129709–03) 3,351 Determination letters, issuing procedures (RP 6) 1,200 Full funding limitations, weighted average interest rate for: January 2005 (Notice 9) 4,369 February 2005 (Notice 19) 9,634 March 2005 (Notice 26) 12,758 April 2005 (Notice 34) 17,960 May 2005 (Notice 39) 21,1087 June 2005 (Notice 46) 26,1372 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA): Interaction with FMLA (REG–130370–04) 8,608 Portability rules (TD 9166) 8,558; correction (Ann 33) 19, 1013 Individual retirement account (IRA), beneficiary’s disclaimer of interest in decedent’s IRA after receipt of required minimum distribution (RR 36) 26,1368 Letter rulings: And determination letters, areas which will not be issued from: Associates Chief Counsel and Division Counsel (TE/GE) (RP 3) 1,118 Associate Chief Counsel (International ) (RP 7) 1,240 And information letters, procedures (RP 4) 1,128 User fees, request for letter rulings (RP 8) 1,243 Nonqualified deferred compensation, new section 409A (Notice 1) 2,274 Opinion and advisory letters, GUST program closing June 15, 2005 (Ann 36) 21,1095 Presidentially-declared disaster or combat zone, postponement of certain acts (RP 27) 20,1050 EMPLOYEE PLANS—Cont. Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 1.401(a)–20, amended; 1.417(a)(3)–1, amended; disclosure of relative values of optional forms of benefit (REG–152914–04) 9,650 26 CFR 1.401(k)–0, –2, –6, amended; 1.401(k)–1(f), revised; 1.401(m)–0, –5, amended; 1.401(m)–2, revised; designated Roth contributions to cash or deferred arrangements under section 401(k) (REG–152354–04) 13,805 26 CFR 1.409(p)–1, added; prohibited allocations of securi- ties in an S corporation (REG–129709–03) 3,351 26 CFR 54.9801–1, –2, –4, –5, –6, amended; 54.9801–7, added; 54.9831–1, amended; health coverage portability, tolling certain time periods and interaction with the Fam- ily and Medical Leave Act Under HIPAA Titles I & IV (REG–130370–04) 8,608 Qualified retirement plans: Automatic rollover, model language (Notice 5) 3,337 Benefits during phased retirement, REG–114726–04, hearing (Ann 10) 5,450 Cash or deferred arrangements under section 401(k), match- ing contributions or employee contributions under section 401(m) (TD 9169) 5,381 Disclosure of relative values of optional forms of benefit (REG–152914–04) 9,650 Master and prototype plans and volume submitter plans, opin- ion letters and advisory letters (RP 16) 10,674 Minimum funding standards, current liability, election to de- fer a net experience loss (Notice 40) 21,1088 Plan amendments, Volume Submitter (VS) practitioners (Ann 37) 21,1096 Required minimum distributions (TD 9130); correction (Ann 29) 17,969 Retroactive payment of benefits, remedial amendment period (RP 23) 18,991 Roth contributions, special rules (REG–152354–04) 13,805 Special rules regarding optional forms of benefit under de- fined contribution plans (TD 9176) 10,661 Valuation, section 412(i) plans (RP 25) 17,962 Regulations: 26 CFR 1.401(a)(9)–6, corrected; required distributions from retirement plans (TD 9130); correction (Ann 29) 17,969 26 CFR 1.401(k)–0, –1, revised; 1.401(k)–2 thru –6, added; 1.401(m)–0 thru –2, revised; 1.401(m)–3 thru –5, added; 1.410(b)–3, revised; 602.101, revised; cash or deferred ar- rangements under section 401(k) and matching contribu- tions or employee contributions under section 401(m) reg- ulations (TD 9169) 5,381 26 CFR 1.409(p)–1T, revised; prohibited allocations of secu- rities in an S corporation (TD 9164) 3,320 26 CFR 1.411(d)–4, Q&A–2(e), amended; elimination of forms of distribution in defined contribution plans (TD 9176) 10,661 26 CFR 54.9801–1 thru –6, added; 54.9801–1T thru –6T, removed; 54.9831–1, added; 54.9831–1T, removed; 54.9833–1, added; 54.9833–1T, removed; 602.101, amended; health coverage portability for group health June 27, 2005vi2005–26 I.R.B. EMPLOYEE PLANS—Cont. plans and group health insurance issuers under HIPAA Titles I & IV (TD 9166) 8,558;correction(Ann33)19, 1013 Technical advice to IRS employees (RP 5) 1,170 EMPLOYMENT TAX Exemption from levy for certain principal residences in absence of judicial approval, certain business assets in absence of ad- ministrative approval or jeopardy (TD 9189) 13,788 Forms: W-2, 2005, new code Z, Box 12 (Ann 5) 3,353 W-4, Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate (TD 9196) 19,1000; correction (Ann 40) 22,1152; (REG–162813–04) 19,1010 941 and Schedule B (Form 941), general rules and specifica- tions for substitutes (RP 21) 16,899 Letter rulings and information letters issued by Associate Of- fices, determination letters issued by Operating Divisions (RP 1) 1,1 Partnership’s contributions to partner’s Health Savings Account (HSA), S corporation’s contributions to HSAs of 2-percent shareholder-employees (Notice 8) 4,368 Presidentially-declared disaster or combat zone, postponement of certain acts (RP 27) 20,1050 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 31.3121(a)(2)–1, amended; sickness or accident dis- ability payments (REG–160315–03) 14,833 26 CFR 31.3401(a)–1, –4, amended; 31.3402(g)–1, (j)–1, amended; 31.3402(n)–1, revised; flat rate supplemental wage withholding (REG–152945–04) 6,484; hearing (Ann 34) 19,1014 26 CFR 31.3402(f)(2)–1, amended; 31.3402(f)(5)–1, amended; withholding exemptions (REG–162813–04) 19,1010 Publication 4436, General Rulesand Specifications for Substi- tute Form 941 and Schedule B (Form 941) (RP 21) 16,899 Regulations: 26 CFR 20.2032–1, revised; 301.9100–6T, amended; gross estate, election to value on alternate valuation date (TD 9172) 6,468 26 CFR 31.3402(f)(2)–1, amended; 31.3402(f)(2)–1T, added; 31.3402(f)(5)–1, amended; 31.3402(f)(5)–1T, added; with- holding exemptions (TD 9196) 19,1000; correction (Ann 40) 22,1152 26 CFR 301.6334–1, amended; property exempt from levy (TD 9189) 13,788 Student FICA exception: Application under sections 3121(b)(10) and 3306(c)(10)(B) (TD 9167) 2,261 Treatment of amounts paid by certain institutions of higher education (RP 11) 2,307 Technical Advice Memoranda (TAMs) and Technical Expedited Advice Memoranda (TEAMs) (RP 2) 1,86 Trust fund recovery penalty assessments (RP 34) 24,1233 EMPLOYMENT TAX—Cont. Withholding: Exemptions, Form W-4 (TD 9196) 19,1000; correction (Ann 40) 22,1152; (REG–162813–04) 19,1010 Supplemental wages (REG–152945–04) 6,484; hearing (Ann 34) 19,1014 Workers’ compensation, treatment of sickness or accident dis- ability payments (REG–160315–03) 14,833 ESTATE TAX Declaratory judgment pursuant to section 7479, exhausting ad- ministrative remedies prior to seeking (RP 33) 24,1231 Deferred annuity contracts, amounts received as income in re- spect of a decedent (IRD) (RR 30) 20,1015 Exemption from levy for certain principal residences in absence of judicial approval, certain business assets in absence of ad- ministrative approval or jeopardy (TD 9189) 13,788 Form 8854, Initial and Annual Expatriation Information State- ment, revised (Notice 36) 19,1007 Gross estate, election to value onalternate valuation date (TD 9172) 6,468 Individual retirement account (IRA), beneficiary’s disclaimer of interest in decedent’s IRA after receipt of required minimum distribution (RR 36) 26,1368 Letter rulings and information letters issued by Associate Of- fices, determination letters issued by Operating Divisions (RP 1) 1,1 Presidentially-declared disaster or combat zone, postponement of certain acts (RP 27) 20,1050 Regulations: 26 CFR 20.2032–1, revised; 301.9100–6T, amended; gross estate, election to value on alternate valuation date (TD 9172) 6,468 26 CFR 301.6334–1, amended; property exempt from levy (TD 9189) 13,788 Taxpayers expatriating after June 3, 2004, transition guidance (Notice 36) 19,1007 Technical Advice Memoranda (TAMs) and Technical Expedited Advice Memoranda (TEAMs) (RP 2) 1,86 Waiver of spousal right of election to insure qualification of char- itable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) or charitable remainder unitrust (CRUT) (RP 24) 16,909 EXCISE TAX Alcohol and biodiesel fuels, aviation grade kerosene, sales of gasoline to state and local governments and nonprofit organi- zations (Notice 4) 2,289; modification (Notice 24) 12,757 Diesel fuel and kerosene, nontaxable use, mandatory dye injec- tion systems (TD 9199) 19,1003; (REG–154000–04) 19,1009 Exemption from levy for certain principal residences in absence of judicial approval, certain business assets in absence of ad- ministrative approval or jeopardy (TD 9189) 13,788 Imposition of tax on heavy trucks and trailers sold at retail, body type classifications (RP 19) 14,832 2005–26 I.R.B.viiJune 27, 2005 EXCISE TAX—Cont. Letter rulings and information letters issued by Associate Of- fices, determination letters issued by Operating Divisions (RP 1) 1,1 Presidentially-declared disaster or combat zone, postponement of certain acts (RP 27) 20,1050 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 48.4082–1, amended; 48.4101–1, amended; diesel fuel and kerosene excise tax; dye injection (REG–154000–04) 19,1009 Regulations: 26 CFR 48.4082–1, amended; 48.4082–1T, added; 48.4101–1, amended; 48.4101–1T, added; 602.101, amended; diesel fuel and kerosene excise tax; dye injection (TD 9199) 19,1003 26 CFR 301.6334–1, amended; property exempt from levy (TD 9189) 13,788 Technical Advice Memoranda (TAMs) and Technical Expedited Advice Memoranda (TEAMs) (RP 2) 1,86 Trust fund recovery penalty assessments (RP 34) 24,1233 EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS Annual notice to donors regarding pending and settled declara- tory judgment suits (Ann 1) 1,257 Declaratory judgment suits (Ann 9) 4,380 Electronic filing of Forms 1120, 1120S, 990, and 990-PF, manda- tory (TD 9175) 10,665; (REG–130671–04) 10,694 Fees for copies of publicly available exempt organization mate- rial (TD 9173) 8,557 Forms 1120, 1120S, 990, and 990-PF, mandatory electronic filing (TD 9175) 10,665; (REG–130671–04) 10,694 Letter rulings: And determination letters, areas which will not be issued from, Associates Chief Counsel and Division Counsel (TE/GE) (RP 3) 1,118 And information letters, procedures (RP 4) 1,128 User fees, request for letter rulings (RP 8) 1,243 List of organizations classified as private foundations (Ann 7) 4, 377; (Ann 16) 10,702;(Ann20)12,772;(Ann23)14,845; (Ann 24) 15,889 Presidentially-declared disaster or combat zone, postponement of certain acts (RP 27) 20,1050 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 1.6011–5, added; 1.6033–4, added; 1.6037–2, added; 301.6011–5, added; 301.6033–4, added; 301.6037–2, added; returns required on magnetic me- dia (REG–130671–04) 10,694 Regulations: 26 CFR 1.6011–5T, added; 1.6033–4T, added; 1.6037–2T, added; 301.6011–5T, added; 301.6033–4T, added; 301.6037–2T, added; returns required on magnetic media (TD 9175) 10,665 26 CFR 301.6104(a), (b), (d), amended; authority to charge fees for furnishing copies of exempt organizations’ material open to public inspection (TD 9173) 8,557 EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS—Cont. Revocations (Ann 8) 4,380; (Ann 18) 9,660; (Ann 21) 12,776; (Ann 38) 21,1097; (Ann 44) 26,1377 Technical advice to IRS employees (RP 5) 1,170 GIFT TAX Exemption from levy for certain principal residences in absence of judicial approval, certain business assets in absence of ad- ministrative approval or jeopardy (TD 9189) 13,788 Form 8854, Initial and Annual Expatriation Information State- ment, revised (Notice 36) 19,1007 Individual retirement account (IRA), beneficiary’s disclaimer of interest in decedent’s IRA after receipt of required minimum distribution (RR 36) 26,1368 Interest, determination of qualified interests (TD 9181) 11,717 Letter rulings and information letters issued by Associate Of- fices, determination letters issued by Operating Divisions (RP 1) 1,1 Presidentially-declared disaster or combat zone, postponement of certain acts (RP 27) 20,1050 Regulations: 26 CFR 25.2702–0, –2, –3, –7, amended; qualified interests (TD 9181) 11,717 26 CFR 301.6334–1, amended; property exempt from levy (TD 9189) 13,788 Taxpayers expatriating after June 3, 2004, transition guidance (Notice 36) 19,1007 Technical Advice Memoranda (TAMs) and Technical Expedited Advice Memoranda (TEAMs) (RP 2) 1,86 Waiver of spousal right of election to insure qualification of char- itable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) or charitable remainder unitrust (CRUT) (RP 24) 16,909 INCOME TAX Accident and health reimbursement plans, amounts received (RR 24) 16,892 Accounting methods: Change to a method provided in sections 1.263(a)–4, 1.263(a)–5, and 1.167(a)–3(b) (RP 9) 2,303; modification (RP 17) 13,797 Economic performance requirement (TD 8408); correction (Ann 28) 17,969 Adjustments to gross income, Medicaid rebates (RR 28) 19,997 Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) Program for 2004 (Ann 27) 16,918 Alternative minimum tax (AMT), refinanced mortgage interest (RR 11) 14,816 Amended returns, qualified, John Doe summons (TD 9186) 13, 790; (REG–122847–04) 13,804 Annual notice to donors regarding pending and settled declara- tory judgment suits (Ann 1) 1,257 Application of section 108 to members of a consolidated group (TD 9192) 15,866 Archer MSAs, 2004 not a cut-off year (Ann 12) 7,555 June 27, 2005viii2005–26 I.R.B. INCOME TAX—Cont. Attorney contingent fee, included in litigant’s income (CD 2080) 15,850 Automatic consent to change to the alternative tax book value method of valuing assets for expense apportionment purposes (RP 28) 21,1093 Automobile owners and lessees, inflation adjustment for 2005 (RP 13) 12,759 Bankruptcy, definition of “pending” (RR 9) 6,470 Cafeteria plans, deferred compensation (Notice 42) 23,1204 Charitable contributions: Qualified intellectual property (Notice 41) 23,1203 Qualified vehicles (Notice 44) 25,1287 Charitable remainder trusts (CRTs), application of ordering rule (TD 9190) 15,855 Collection, extension of statute of limitations (REG–148701–03) 13,802 Corporations: Adjustment to net unrealized built-in gain (TD 9180) 11,714 Application of section 367 in cross border section 304 trans- actions (REG–127740–04) 24,1254 Clarification of section 1374 effective dates, S corporations (TD 9170) 4,363;correction(Ann13)8,627; correction (Ann 35) 21,1095; (REG–139683–04) 4,371 Controlled foreign corporations, dividends received deduc- tion under section 965 (Notice 10) 6,474 Deemed election to be an association taxable as a corporation for a qualified electing S corporation (TD 9203) 25,1285 Entity classification, classification of foreign entities, per se corporations (TD 9197) 18,985; (REG–148521–04) 18, 995 Formations, reorganizations, liquidations, transfer of no net value (REG–163314–03) 14,835; correction (Ann 32) 19, 1012 Guidance related to section 936 termination (Notice 21) 11, 727 Limitation on dividends received deduction (DRD) and other guidance, domestic reinvestment plan (Notice 38) 22,1100 Miscellaneous operating rules for successor persons, succession to items of the liquidating corporation (REG–131128–04) 11,733 Reorganizations under section 368(a)(1)(E) and section 368(a)(1)(F) (TD 9182) 11,713 S corporation, relief for late shareholders, Rev. Proc. 2004–35, correction (Ann 4) 2,319 Statutory mergers and consolidations pursuant to for- eign law involving one or more foreign corporations (REG–125628–01) 7,536 Transfers of assets or stock following a reorganization (REG–117969–00) 7,533 Credits: Adoption credit (RP 31) 26,1374; (Ann 45) 26,1377 Increasing research activities (TD 9205) 25,1267; (REG–134030–04) 25,1339 Low-income housing credit: 2005 population figures used for calculation (Notice 16) 8, 605 INCOME TAX—Cont. Satisfactory bond, “bond factor” amounts for the period: January through March 2005 (RR 1) 2,258 January through June 2005 (RR 16) 13,777 New markets tax credit (TD 9171) 6,452 Nonconventional source fuel credit, inflation adjustment fac- tor, reference price for CY 2004 (Notice 33) 17,960 Renewable electricity production credit and refined coal pro- duction credit, 2005 inflation adjustment (Notice 37) 20, 1049 Declaratory judgment suits (Ann 9) 4,380 Deferred annuity contracts, amounts received as income in re- spect of a decedent (IRD) (RR 30) 20,1015 Deposits made to suspend the running of interest on potential underpayments (RP 18) 13,798 Designation to take summoned testimony and receive summoned records (TD 9195) 17,958 Determination of bona fide resident of a U.S. possession, income derived from sources or effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within a U.S. possession (TD 9194) 20, 1016; (REG–159243–03) 20,1075 Disaster relief, qualified disaster, Indian Ocean tsunamis (Notice 23) 11,732 Disciplinary actionsinvolving attorneys,certified public accoun- tants, enrolled agents and enrolled actuaries (Ann 2) 2,319; (Ann 15) 9,654 Disclosure of return information: To the Bureau of the Census (TD 9188) 15,883; (REG–147195–04) 15,888 Written contracts or agreements, acquisition of property and services for tax administration (REG–148867–03) 9,646 Disguised sales, section 707, REG–149519–03, correction (Ann 11) 5,451 Disregarded entities, treatment asseparate entities in certain cir- cumstances (TD 9183) 12,754 Dollar approximate separate transactions method (DASTM), translation rate to be used fortransfers in determination of DASTM gain or loss (Notice 27) 13,795 Domestic production activities, income attributable to (Notice 14) 7,498 Dual consolidated loss (REG–102144–04) 25,1297 Electronic filing of Forms 1120, 1120S, 990, and 990-PF, manda- tory (TD 9175) 10,665; (REG–130671–04) 10,694 Entertainment expense deduction, business aircraft (Notice 45) 24,1228 Examinations, inspections, and reopenings (RP 32) 23,1206 Exemption from levy for certain principal residences in absence of judicial approval, certain business assets in absence of ad- ministrative approval or jeopardy (TD 9189) 13,788 Forms: 656, Offer in Compromise, revision, check-the-box (Ann 6) 4,377 941 and Schedule B (Form 941), general rules and specifica- tions for substitutes (RP 21) 16,899 1120, 1120S, 990, and 990-PF, mandatory electronic filing (TD 9175) 10,665; (REG–130671–04) 10,694 2005–26 I.R.B.ixJune 27, 2005 INCOME TAX—Cont. 8596, specifications for filing electronically or magnetically, Publication 1516 (RP 29) 22,1118 8693, Low-Income Housing Credit Disposition Bond, new procedure for filing (Ann 43) 26,1376 8854, Initial and Annual Expatriation Information Statement, revised (Notice 36) 19,1007 Frivolous tax returns, tax avoidance: Altering the jurat (RR 18) 14,817 Argument regarding waiver of social security benefits (RR 17) 14,823 Common frivolous arguments and schemes (Notice 30) 14, 827 Constitutionally based arguments (RR 19) 14,819 Protesting government policies and programs (RR 20) 14,821 Use of “straw man” claim (RR 21) 14,822 Guidance Priority List, recommendations for 2005-2006 (Notice 25) 14,827 Health Savings Account (HSA), high deductible health plan (HDHP) family coverage (RR 25) 18,971 Income tax liability, substantial understatement, addition to tax (TD 9174) 9,629 Information reporting: For acquisitions (Notice 7) 3,340 Relating to qualified intellectual property contributions (TD 9206) 25,1283; (REG–158138–04) 25,1341 Insurance companies: Electronic submission under Rev. Rul. 2005–6 (Notice 35) 21,1087 Insurance contract defined (RR 6) 6,471 Life insurance contract, attained age of insured under section 7702 (REG–168892–03) 25,1293 Premium stabilization reserves (RR 33) 23,1155 Prevailing state assumed interest rates, 2005 (RR 29) 21,1080 Tentative differential earnings rate (Notice 18) 9,634 Interest: Election to treat qualified dividend income as investment in- come (TD 9191) 15,854 Investment: Federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates for: January 2005 (RR 2) 2,259 February 2005 (RR 8) 6,466 March 2005 (RR 13) 10,664 April 2005 (RR 23) 15,864 May 2005 (RR 27) 19,998 June 2005 (RR 32) 23,1156 Rates: Underpayments and overpayments, quarter beginning: April 1, 2005 (RR 15) 11,720 July 1, 2005 (RR 35) 24,1214 Refinanced mortgage interest, alternative minimum tax (AMT) (RR 11) 14,816 Suspension applicability toamended returns (RR 4) 4,366 Interim guidance under new amendments to sections 6111, 6112, and 6708, extension of time in Notice 2004–80 (Notice 17) 8,606; extension of time in Notices 2004–80 and 2005–17 (Notice 22) 12,756 INCOME TAX—Cont. Interpretation of the phrase “plan (or series of related transac- tions)” under section 355(e) (TD 9198) 18,972; correction (Ann 41) 23,1212 Inventory: LIFO, price indexes used by department stores for: November 2004 (RR 5) 5,445 December 2004 (RR 12) 9,628 January 2005 (RR 22) 13,787 February 2005 (RR 26) 17,957 March 2005 (RR 34) 22,1098 April 2005 (RR 37) 26,1343 Leases, tax-exempt use property (Notice 29) 13,796 Letter rulings: And determination letters, areas which will not be issued from: Associates Chief Counsel and Division Counsel (TE/GE) (RP 3) 1,118 Associate Chief Counsel (International) (RP 7) 1,240 And information letters issued byAssociate Offices, determi- nation letters issued by Operating Divisions (RP 1) 1,1 Like-kind exchange of a principal residence (RP 14) 7,528 Listed transaction situations, extended period of limitations on assessment (RP 26) 17,965 Mortgage revenue bonds: And credit certificates, median income figures– 2005 (RP 22) 15,886 Obligations of state and local governments (TD 9204) 25, 1279 Net operating losses (Notice 20) 9,635 New procedure for filing Form 8693, Low-Income Housing Credit Disposition Bond (Ann 43) 26,1376 Nonqualified deferred compensation, new section 409A (Notice 1) 2,274 Optional 10-year writeoff, rules governing the time and manner for making and revoking an election under section 59(e) (TD 9168) 4,354 Partnerships: Application of section 83 to transfer of partnership interest in connection with the performance of services (Notice 43) 24, 1221 Assets-over partnership merger, gain or loss (RR 10) 7,492 Assumption of partner liabilities (TD 9207) 26,1344; (REG–106736–00) 26,1376 Diversification requirements for variable annuity, endow- ment, and life insurance contracts (TD 9185) 12,749 Equity for services (REG–105346–03) 24,1244 Installment obligations, treatment of property sold (TD 9193) 15,862 Mandatory basis adjustment under sections 734 and 743, electing investment partnership (Notice 32) 16,895 Partner’s distributive share, mergers (Notice 15) 7,527 Partnership’s contributionsto partner’s Health Savings Ac- count (HSA), S corporation’s contributions to HSAs of 2-percent shareholder-employees (Notice 8) 4,368 Regulated investment companies (RICs), tax-exempt bond partnership look-through II (RP 20) 18,990 June 27, 2005x2005–26 I.R.B. INCOME TAX—Cont. Requirement to pay withholding tax on effectively connected U.S. trade or business income allocable to foreign partners (TD 9200) 23,1158; (REG–108524–00) 23,1209 Return of partnership income (TD 9177) 10,671 Unified partnership audit procedures, applicability to disputes regarding ownership of residual interests in a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit (REMIC) (TD 9184) 12,753 Per diem allowances updated, 2005 (RP 10) 3,341 Practice before the Internal Revenue Service: Best practices (TD 9165) 4,357; correction (Ann 31) 18,996 Clarification (TD 9201) 23,1153 Interim guidance concerning state or local bond opinions (No- tice 47) 26,1373 State or local bond opinions (REG–159824–04) 4,372 Pre-Filing Agreement (PFA) program: Annual report for CY 2004, Large and Mid-Size Business Division (LMSB) (Ann 42) 24,1257 Procedures for resolving issues through pre-filing examina- tions (RP 12) 2,311 Presidentially-declared disaster or combat zone, postponement of certain acts (RP 27) 20,1050 Presidentially declared disasters, like-kind exchanges affected by (Notice 3) 5,447 Private activity bond volume cap, unused, extension of time to make carryforward election (RP 30) 22,1148 Private foundations, organizations now classified as (Ann 7) 4, 377; (Ann 16) 10,702;(Ann20)12,772;(Ann23)14,845; (Ann 24) 15,889 Proposed Regulations: 26 CFR 1.1–1, revised; 1.170A–1, revised; 1.861–3, –8, revised; 1.871–1, amended; 1.876–1, revised; 1.881–5, added; 1.884–0, amended; 1.901–1, revised; 1.931–1, revised; 1.932–1, revised; 1.933–1, amended; 1.934–1, re- vised; 1.935–1, amended; 1.937–1 thru –3, added; 1.957–3, revised; 1.1402(a)–12, revised; 1.6038–2, revised; 1.6046–1, revised; 301.6688–1, revised; 301.7701–3, amended; 301.7701(b)–1, revised; residence and source rules involving U.S. possessions and other conforming changes (REG–159243–03) 20,1075 26 CFR 1.41–0, amended; 1.41–6, –8, revised; credit for in- creasing research activities (REG–134030–04) 25,1339 26 CFR 1.83–3, –6, amended; 1.704–1, amended; 1.706–3, added; 1.707–1, amended; 1.721–1, revised; 1.761–1, amended; partnership equity for services (REG–105346–03) 24,1244 26 CFR 1.332–2, amended; 1.351–1, amended; 1.368–1, –2, amended; transactions involving the transfer of no net value (REG–163314–03) 14,835;correction(Ann32)19,1012 26 CFR 1.358–1, –6, amended; 1.367(a)–3, –8, amended; 1.367(b)–1, –3, –4, –6, revised; 1.367(b)–13, added; 1.884–2, amended; 1.884–2T, revised; revision of income tax regulations under sections 358, 367, and 884 dealing with statutory mergers or consolidations under section 368(a)(1)(A) involving one or more foreign corporations (REG–125628–01) 7,536 INCOME TAX—Cont. 26 CFR 1.358–5, added; assumption of liabilities (REG–106736–00) 26,1376 26 CFR 1.367(a)–3, amended; 1.367(b)–4, –6, amended; ap- plication of section 367 in cross border section 304 trans- actions; certain transfers of stock involving foreign corpo- rations (REG–127740–04) 24,1254 26 CFR 1.368–2(b), amended; statutory mergers and consol- idations (REG–117969–00) 7,533 26 CFR 1.475–0, amended; 1.475(a)–4, added; safe harbor for valuation under section 475 (REG–100420–03) 24,1236 26 CFR 1.1374–8, –10, amended; section 1374 effective dates (REG–139683–04) 4,371 26 CFR 1.1441–1, –3, –6, amended; 1.6049–5, amended; 301.6114–1, amended; revision to regulations relating to withholding of tax on certain U.S. source income paid to foreign persons and revisions to information reporting reg- ulations (REG–125443–01) 16,912 26 CFR 1.1446–6, added; 1.1464–1, amended; 1.6071–1, re- vised; 1.6091–1, amended; 1.6151–1, amended; 1.6302–2, revised; 1.6414–1, amended; 301.6302–1, revised; 301.6402–3, amended; 301.6722–1, revised; section 1446 regulations, withholding on effectively connected taxable income allocable to foreign partners (REG–108524–00) 23,1209 26 CFR 1.1502–13, –80, amended; miscellaneous operating rules for successor persons, succession to items of the liq- uidating corporation (REG–131128–04) 11,733 25 CFR 1.1502–21, amended; 1.1503(d)–0 thru –6, added; 1.6043–4T, amended; dual consolidated loss (REG–102144–04) 25,1297 26 CFR 1.6011–5, added; 1.6033–4, added; 1.6037–2, added; 301.6011–5, added; 301.6033–4, added; 301.6037–2, added; returns required on magnetic me- dia (REG–130671–04) 10,694 26 CFR 1.6050L–2, added; information returns by donees relating to qualified intellectual property contributions (REG–158138–04) 25,1341 26 CFR 1.6664–1, –2, amended; qualified amended returns (REG–122847–04) 13,804 26 CFR 1.7702–0, –3, added; attained age of insured under section 7702 (REG–168892–03) 25,1293 26 CFR 301.6103(j)(1)–1, revised; disclosure of return infor- mation to the Bureau of the Census (REG–147195–04) 15, 888 26 CFR 301.6103(n)–1, revised; disclosure of returns and return information in connection with written contracts or agreements for the acquisition of property and services for tax administration purposes (REG–148867–03) 9,646 26 CFR 301.6502–1, revised; collection after assessment (REG–148701–03) 13,802 26 CFR 301.7701–2, amended; classification of certain for- eign entities (REG–148521–04) 18,995 31 CFR 10.35, amended; 10.36, 10.38, revised; 10.39, added; 10.52, revised; regulations governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service (REG–159824–04) 4,372 2005–26 I.R.B.xiJune 27, 2005 INCOME TAX—Cont. Publications: 1220, changes affecting tax year 2004 filing of information returns (Ann 14) 9,653 1516, Specifications for Filing Form 8596, Electronically or Magnetically, for information returns for federal contracts (RP 29) 22,1118 4436, General Rules and Specifications for Substitute Form 941 and Schedule B (Form 941) (RP 21) 16,899 Qualified green building and sustainable design projects (Notice 28) 13,796 Qualified mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates, aver- age area and nationwide housing purchase prices for 2005 (RP 15) 9,638 Regulated investment company (RIC): Application of look-through rule to ownership of shares by segregated asset accounts (RR 7) 6,464 Designation of dividends (RR 31) 21,1084 Regulations: 26 CFR 1.41–0, amended; 1.41–6, –8, removed; 1.41–6T, –8T, added; credit for increasing research activities (TD 9205) 25,1267 26 CFR 1.45D–1, added; 1.45D–1T, removed; 602.101, re- vised; new markets tax credit (TD 9171) 6,452 26 CFR 1.59–1, added; 602.101, amended; optional 10-year writeoff of certain tax preferences (TD 9168) 4,354 26 CFR 1.143(g)–1, added; mortgage revenue bonds (TD 9204) 25,1279 26 CFR 1.163(d)–1, revised; 1.163–1T, removed; time and manner of making section 163(d)(4)(B) election to treat qualified dividend income as investment income (TD 9191) 15,854 26 CFR 1.170A–1, revised; 1.170A–1T, added; 1.243–3, revised; 1.702–1, revised; 1.861–3, –8, revised; 1.861–3T, added; 1.863–6, revised; 1.871–1, amended; 1.876–1, revised; 1.876–1T, added; 1.881–1, revised; 1.881–5T, added; 1.884–0, amended; 1.884–0T, added; 1.901–1, revised; 1.901–1T, added; 1.931–1, revised; 1.931–1T, added; 1.932–1, revised; 1.932–1T, added; 1.933–1, amended; 1.933–1T, added; 1.934–1, revised; 1.934–1T, added; 1.935–1, amended; 1.935–1T, added; 1.937–1T thru 3T, added; 1.957–3, revised; 1.957–3T, added; 1.957–4, re- moved; 1.1402(a)–11, –12, revised; 1.1402(a)–12T, added; 1.6038–2, revised; 1.6038–2T, added; 1.6046–1, amended; 1.6046–1T, added; 301.6688–1, revised; 301.6688–1T, added; 301.7701(b)–1, revised; 301.7701(b)–1T, added; 602.101(b), amended; residence and source rules involving U.S. possessions and other conforming changes (TD 9194) 20,1016 26 CFR 1.263A–9, –15, amended; 1.263A–9T, –15T, re- moved; uniform capitalization of interest expense in safe harbor sale and leaseback transactions (TD 9179) 11,707 26 CFR 1.337(d)–2, revised; 1.337(d)–2T, removed; 1.1502–20, –32, –32T, revised; 1.1502–20T(i), removed; 602.101, amended; loss limitation rules (TD 9187) 13,778; correction (Ann 25) 15,891 INCOME TAX—Cont. 26 CFR 1.355–0, amended; 1.355–7, added; 1.355–7T, re- moved; guidance under section 355(e), recognition of gain on certain distributions of stock or securities in connection with an acquisition (TD 9198) 18,972; correction (Ann 41) 23,1212 26 CFR 1.358–5T, –7, added; 1.704–1 thru –4, amended; 1.705–1, amended; 1.737–2, amended; 1.737–5, revised; 1.752–0, –1, –5, amended; 1.752–6, –7, added; 1.752–6T, removed; 602.101, amended; assumption of partner liabili- ties (TD 9207) 26,1344 26 CFR 1.368–1(b), amended; reorganizations under section 368(a)(1)(E) and section 368(a)(1)(F) (TD 9182) 11,713 26 CFR 1.461–4, amended; economic performance require- ment (TD 8408); correction (Ann 28) 17,969 26 CFR 1.488–1T, revised; 1.6661–1 thru –6, removed; 602.101, amended; substantial understatement of income tax liability (TD 9174) 9,629 26 CFR 1.664–1, amended; charitable remainder trusts (CRTs), application of ordering rule (TD 9190) 15,855 26 CFR 1.704–3, –4, amended; 1.737–2, amended; 1.737–5, revised; installment obligations and contributed contracts (TD 9193) 15,862 26 CFR 1.817–5, amended; diversification requirements for variable annuity, endowment, and life insurance contracts (TD 9185) 12,749 26 CFR 1.856–9, added; 1.1361–4, amended; 301.7701–2, amended; modification of check the box (TD 9183) 12,754 26 CFR 1.860F–4, amended; Real Estate Mortgage Invest- ment Conduits (REMICs) (TD 9184) 12,753 26 CFR 1.871–10, amended; 1.1443–1, amended; 1.1446–0 thru –5, –6T, –7, added; 1.1461–1, –2, amended; 1.1461–3, added; 1.1462–1, amended; 1.1463–1, amended; 301.6109–1, amended; 301.6721–1, amended; 602.101, amended; section 1446 regulations, withholding on ef- fectively connected taxable income allocable to foreign partners (TD 9200) 23,1158 26 CFR 1.1031(a)–2, amended; 1.1031(a)–2T, removed; 1.1031(j)–1(d), amended; additional rules for exchanges of personal property under section 1031(a) (TD 9202) 24, 1213 26 CFR 1.1374–3, amended; 1.1374–10, revised; adjustment to net unrealized built-in gain (TD 9180) 11,714 26 CFR 1.1374–8, –10, amended; 1.1374–8T, –10T, added; section 1374 effective dates (TD 9170) 4,363; correction (Ann 13) 8,627;correction(Ann35)21,1095 26 CFR 1.1502–11, –13, –19, –21, –21T, –32, –32T, –76, –80, –80T, amended; 1.1502–28, added; 1.1502–13T, –19T, –28T, removed; application of section 108 to members of a consolidated group (TD 9192) 15,866 26 CFR 1.6011–5T, added; 1.6033–4T, added; 1.6037–2T, added; 301.6011–5T, added; 301.6033–4T, added; 301.6037–2T, added; returns required on magnetic media (TD 9175) 10,665 26 CFR 1.6031(a)–1, amended; 1.6031(a)–1T, removed; re- turn of partnership income (TD 9177) 10,671 June 27, 2005xii2005–26 I.R.B. INCOME TAX—Cont. 26 CFR 1.6050L–2T, added; 602.101, amended; information returns by donees relating to qualified intellectual property contributions (TD 9206) 25,1283 26 CFR 1.6664–1T, –2T, added; 1.6664–2, amended; quali- fied amended returns (TD 9186) 13,790 26 CFR 301.6103(j)(1)–1, amended; 301.6103(j)(1)–1T, added; disclosure of return information to the Bureau of the Census (TD 9188) 15,883 26 CFR 301.6334–1, amended; property exempt from levy (TD 9189) 13,788 26 CFR 301.7602–1, revised; 301.7602–1T, removed; desig- nated IRS officer or employee under section 7602(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code (TD 9195) 17,958 26 CFR 301.7701–2(b)(8)(vi), added; 301.7701–2T, amended; classification of certain foreign entities (TD 9197) 18,985 26 CFR 301.7701–3, amended; 301.7701–3T, removed; deemed election to be an association taxable as a corpora- tion for a qualified electing Scorporation (TD 9203) 25, 1285 26 CFR 301.9100–1, revised; 301.9100–2 thru –7, added; 602.101, amended; testimony or production of records in a court or other proceeding (TD 9178) 11,708 31 CFR 10.33, amended; 10.35 thru 10.38, added; 10.52, amended; regulations governing practice before the Inter- nal Revenue Service (TD 9165) 4,357; correction (Ann 31) 18,996 31 CFR 10.35, amended; regulations governing practice be- fore the Internal Revenue Service (TD 9201) 23,1153 Reportable transaction understatement, penalty, special rule for amended returns, disqualified tax advisor (Notice 12) 7,494 Revocations, exempt organizations (Ann 8) 4,380; (Ann 18) 9, 660; (Ann 21) 12,776; (Ann 38) 21,1097; (Ann 44) 26,1377 Safe harbor: Elective safe harbor for valuation under section 475 for mark- ing to market (REG–100420–03) 24,1236 Sale and leaseback transactions, uniform capitalization of in- terest expense (TD 9179) 11,707 Section 901(j)(5) Presidential waiver, section 901(j)(1) no longer applies to Libya (RR 3) 3,334 Standard IndustrialClassification (SIC)system replaced by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) (TD 9202) 24,1213 Standard Industry Fare Level (SIFL) formula (RR 14) 12,749 State and local general sales tax deduction (Notice 31) 14,830 Stocks: Exchange of securities of foreign corporation, domestic cor- poration (Notice 6) 5,448 Loss disallowance on disposition of subsidiary stock by con- solidated group (TD 9187) 13,778;correction(Ann25)15, 891 Transfers of non-statutory stock options, executives (Ann 19) 11,744; supplemental information (Ann 39) 22,1151 Tax conventions: Mutual Agreement on U.K. pension arrangements (Ann 30) 18,988 INCOME TAX—Cont. U.S. and Swiss pension plans for tax treaty benefits, agree- ment (Ann 3) 2,270 U.S.-Austria income tax treaty, taxation of certain scholar- ships (Ann 22) 14,826 U.S.-New Zealand MAP Agreement regarding treatment of income derived through certain fiscally transparent entities (Ann 17) 10,673 Tax-exempt leasing involving defeasance (Notice 13) 9,630 Taxpayers expatriating after June 3, 2004, transition guidance (Notice 36) 19,1007 Technical Advice Memoranda (TAMs) and Technical Expedited Advice Memoranda (TEAMs) (RP 2) 1,86 TeleFile program, termination (Ann 26) 17,969 Testimony or production of records in a court or other proceeding (TD 9178) 11,708 Tonnage tax regime, election (Notice 2) 3,337 Undisclosed reportable transactions, assertion of penalty (Notice 11) 7,493 Waiver of spousal right of election to insure qualification of char- itable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) or charitable remainder unitrust (CRUT) (RP 24) 16,909 Withholding of tax on certain U.S. source income paid to for- eign persons and information reporting regulations, revisions (REG–125443–01) 16,912 SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAX Exemption from levy for certain principal residences in absence of judicial approval, certain business assets in absence of ad- ministrative approval or jeopardy (TD 9189) 13,788 Letter rulings and information letters issued by Associate Of- fices, determination letters issued by Operating Divisions (RP 1) 1,1 Partnership’s contributions to partner’s Health Savings Account (HSA), S corporation’s contributions to HSAs of 2-percent shareholder-employees (Notice 8) 4,368 Presidentially-declared disaster or combat zone, postponement of certain acts (RP 27) 20,1050 Regulations: 26 CFR 301.6334–1, amended; property exempt from levy (TD 9189) 13,788 Technical Advice Memoranda (TAMs) and Technical Expedited Advice Memoranda (TEAMs) (RP 2) 1,86 2005–26 I.R.B.xiiiJune 27, 2005 *U.S. Government Printing Office: 2005—314–048/20011
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.