us-cms-medicare-manuals-pub-100-01-ge101c07•100-01 Medicare General Information, Eligibility and Entitlement Manual: Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements
100-01 Medicare General Information, Eligibility and Entitlement Manual: Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements
us-cms-medicare-manuals-pub-100-01-ge101c07100-01 Medicare General Information, Eligibility and Entitlement Manual: Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative RequirementsGuidance
General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement Manual Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements Table of Contents (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26) Transmittals for Chapter 7 10 - Contracting and Subcontracting – Not yet available 20 - Publishing by Contractors and Restrictions on Promotional Activity – Not yet available 30 - Records and Information Management Requirements and Responsibilities 30.10 - Records and Information Management Program 30.10.1 - Executive Order OMB M-23-07 Transition to Electronic Records 30.10.2 - Records Management Obligations 30.20 - Descriptions of Records 30.20.1 - Types of Record Schedules 30.20.2 - CMS Record Control Schedule 30.30 - Records Retention and Disposition 30.30.1 - CMS Records and Information Management Program Objectives 30.30.2 - Record Schedules Disposition Authority Numbered and Retention Periods 30.30.3 - Records Dispositioning Process 30.40 - National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Universal Electronic Records Management (UERM) Requirements 30.40.1 - Information System Requirements 30.50 - Contract Initiation and Expiration 30.50.1 - General Security Requirements 30.50.2 - System Documentation 30.50.3 - Sanitization of Government File and Information 30.50.4 - Notification 30.50.5 - Contractor Responsibility upon Physical Completion of the Contract 30.50.6 - Records Management and Retention 30.60 - Litigation Hold Obligations 30.60.1 - CMS Contractor Litigation Hold Certification Requirements 30.70 - Digitization Requirements 30.70.1 - Digitization Standards
30.70.2 - Validation Requirements 30.70.3 - Disposal of Original Source Records 30.80 - Record Storage 30.80.1 - Commercial Storage Facilities 30.80.2 - Standards for All Record Storage Facilities 30.80.3 - Transfer of Federal Records stored in Commercial Facilities 30.80.4 - Commercial Storage Facilities Inspections 30.90 - Annual Reporting 30.90.1 - Annual Report on Medicare Records Requirements 30.100 - Exhibits Exhibit A - CMS Certified and NARA approved Commercial Storage Facilities Exhibit B - Annual Report Template 40 – Shared System Maintainer, Part A/Part B (A/B)/Durable Medical Equipment (DME) Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) Responsibilities for System Releases 40.1 - Standardized Terminology for Claims Processing Systems 40.1.1 - Standard Terminology Chart 40.2 - Release Software 40.2.1 - Implementing Validated Workarounds for Shared System Claims Processing by All Medicare Contractors 40.3 – Shared System Testing Requirements for Shared System Maintainers, Single Testing Contractor (STC)/Beta Testers, and Part A/Part B (A/B) Durable Medical Equipment (DME) Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) 40.3.1 - Shared System Testing Requirements for Shared System Maintainers, Single Testing Contractor (STC), and DME MACs 40.3.2 – Minimum Testing Standards for Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC)/Beta Tester 40.3.3 - Testing Standards Applicable to all Beta Testers 40.3.4 - Testing Requirements Applicable to the CWF Beta Tester 40.3.5 – Part A/Part B (A/B) Durable Medical Equipment (DME) Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) (User) and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) Testing Requirements 40.3.6 - Testing Requirements Applicable to all CWF Data Centers (Hosts) 40.3.7 - Timeframe Requirements for all Testing Entities 40.3.8 - Testing Documentation Requirements 40.3.9 - Definitions 40.3.10 - Test Case Specification Standard 40.3.11 - Single Testing Contractor (STC) Non-Testable Conditions and Potential
Testing Impacts 40.3.12 – Next Generation Desktop (NGD) Requirements 50 - Contractor Implementation of Change Requests and Compliance with Technical Direction Letters 50.1 - CR Implementation Report (CRIR) Template 50.2 - TDL Compliance Report (TCR) Template 50.3 - Sample Cover Letter/Attestation Statement 50.4 - Change Request (CR) Definitions 50.4.1 - Issue Date 50.4.2 - Implementation Date 50.4.3 - Effective Date 50.4.4 - Date of Service 60 - Procedures for Modifying Shared System Edits and Capturing Audit Trail Data 60.1 - CMS Standard File for Reason Codes 70 - Change Management Process (Electronic Change Information Management Portal) 80 – Fee-For-Service Contractor Workload Transitions 80.1 – Transition Handbooks 90 - IDR Claims Sourcing from Shared Systems
30 - Records and Information Management Requirements and Responsibilities (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) CMS operates under the comprehensive records management framework established by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). This framework includes compliance with, but not limited to, The Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. 21, 29, 31, and 33); NARA regulations outlined in 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Chapter XII Subchapter B; Privacy Act of 1974 safeguarding policies (5 U.S.C. 552a) for protecting Federal records. Under the health insurance program, CMS bears the responsibility for developing and implementing comprehensive standards for records and information management (RIM) programs. This responsibility specifically includes key requirements to establish effective controls over record creation processes, ensure records contain adequate and proper documentation of contractor administration and operations, and to mandate that each contractor establish and maintain an active RIM program. Program Objectives: The RIM program shall provide economical and efficient management of records as specified in §30.10 of this manual, ensuring both compliance with federal standards and operational effectiveness. Federal record means “…all recorded information, regardless of form or characteristics, made or received by a Federal agency under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the United States Government or because of the informational value of data in them.” (See 44 U.S.C. §3301). (1) The term Federal record— (i) Includes HHS/CMS records. (ii) Does not include personal materials. (iii) Applies to records created, received, or maintained on behalf of HHS/CMS by contractors pursuant to their contract; and (iv) May include deliverables and documentation associated with deliverables. (2) Recorded information means all traditional forms of records, regardless of physical form or characteristics, including information created, manipulated, communicated, or stored in digital or electronic form. (See 44 U.S.C. 3301). (3) Personal materials mean documentary materials belonging to an individual that are not used to conduct agency business. Personal files are excluded from the definition of Federal records and are not owned by the Government. (See 36 CFR 1220.18). 30.10 - Records and Information Management Program (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26)
In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations and 44 U.S.C. Chapter 31 § 3102 (Establishment of program of management), CMS bears the responsibility for establishing and maintaining an active, ongoing program that ensures economical and efficient management of agency records. This responsibility specifically requires CMS to implement effective controls over the creation, maintenance, use, and disposition of records throughout current business operations, while ensuring adequate and proper documentation of contractor administration and operations. Additionally, each contractor shall establish and maintain their own active and continuous program for economic and efficient records management as specified in §30 of this manual. The program shall include, but is not limited to: • Effective controls over the creation, maintenance, and use of records in the conduct of current business. • In accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 3102 and 36 CFR § 1220.34, establish comprehensive controls over record lifecycle management throughout business operations • Implement standardized procedures for record creation, classification, and ongoing maintenance in accordance with NARA regulations at 36 CFR Chapter XII Subchapter B • Ensure proper documentation of contractor administration and operational activities in accordance with the Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. 21, 29, 31, and 33) • Procedures for identifying records of general interest or use to the public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and for posting such records in a publicly accessible electronic format. • In accordance with 5 CFR § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) requirements and Executive Order 13392 on improving agency disclosure of information, develop systematic procedures for identifying records suitable for public disclosure • In accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(2) and open government transparency mandates, establish protocols for posting such records in publicly accessible electronic formats • Maintain balance between transparency obligations and protection of sensitive information as defined by FOIA exemptions in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 552(b) • Cooperation with CMS in applying standards, procedures, and techniques designed to improve the management of records and information, promote the maintenance and security of records deemed appropriate for preservation, and facilitate the segregation and disposal of records of temporary value; and • In accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 2904 and 36 CFR § 1220.18, provide full cooperation with CMS in implementing records management standards and procedures • In accordance with 36 CFR § 1236.10, actively promote maintenance and security of records designated for preservation • In accordance with NARA-approved disposition schedules and 36 CFR § 1226, facilitate proper segregation and disposal of temporary records according to approved retention schedules
• Compliance with sections § 30.10 – 30.100 of this manual. • In accordance with the Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. § 21, 29, 31, and 33), ensure complete adherence to all provisions outlined in sections § 30.10 – 30.100 of this manual. • In accordance with NARA regulations outlined in 36 CFR Chapter XII Subchapter B, maintain compliance with federal records management laws • In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a) and 5 CFR § 552 (FOIA requirements), integrate compliance requirements into all records management processes to support open government transparency initiatives These requirements align with the comprehensive records management framework established by NARA and support CMS's responsibility for developing effective Records and Information Management (RIM) programs under the health insurance program, while ensuring full compliance with federal disclosure requirements and open transparency standards. Records identified by CMS as pertaining to current or potential investigations, litigation, or administrative actions, whether by the Office of Inspector General (OIG), Department of Justice (DOJ), or any other relevant federal body, may not be destroyed or altered in accordance with the Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 31) and applicable litigation hold requirements under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e). This includes but is not limited to: records related to ongoing Workers' Compensation claims, Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) set-aside arrangements, or those suspected of fraud, waste, abuse, or overutilization of services. These records shall be retained in accordance with litigation hold requirements and shall not be disposed of without explicit, written authorization from CMS, as failure to preserve relevant records may result in sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 37(e) and potential additional penalties under 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (obstruction of justice through destruction of records in federal investigations). Contractors shall ensure compliance with applicable federal records management requirements, including electronic records standards, metadata integrity, secure storage, access controls, and CMS-specific retention schedules and disposition authorities. 30.10.1 - Executive Order M-23-07 Transition to Electronic Records (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) Subject to the provisions of Executive Order M-23-07 Transition to Electronic Records, issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and NARA, CMS, and thereby all contractors, shall maintain a robust records management program that complies with the Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapters 21, 29, 31, and 33) and its regulations codified in 36 CFR Chapter XII Subchapter For purposes of this requirement, robust means a comprehensive, resilient, and fully functional records management process or system that incorporates adequate controls, security measures, and operational procedures capable of handling the complete lifecycle of federal records while maintaining compliance with all applicable federal laws and regulations.
CMS contractors are required to establish and maintain an active and continuing program for the economical and efficient management of the records outlined in §30.10 of this manual, in accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 3102 (Establishment of program of management) and 36 CFR § 1220.34 (Agency records management program requirements). For purposes of this requirement, cost effective means implementing records management practices that achieve maximum operational efficiency and regulatory compliance while minimizing unnecessary expenditures, utilizing appropriate technology solutions, and optimizing resource allocation to ensure sustainable long-term records management operations. The contractor's programs shall ensure that agency records are properly retained, stored, and destroyed according to their disposition schedules. This includes but is not limited to: • Ensure that all Federal records are created, retained, and managed in electronic formats, with appropriate metadata. • All permanent records shall be managed electronically, to the fullest extent possible, for eventual transfer and accession by NARA in an electronic format. This does not apply to permanent records accessioned into NARA or transferred for storage into Federal Records Centers before June 30, 2024. After June 30, 2024, CMS will transfer permanent records to NARA in electronic formats and with appropriate metadata, in accordance with NARA regulations and transfer guidance. • All temporary records in Federal agencies will be managed electronically, to the fullest extent possible through the record’s disposition. • Temporary, analog records that become eligible for transfer after June 30, 2024, shall be transferred to commercial storage facilities that meet NARA records storage requirements as specified in 36 CFR Part 1234. NARA will no longer accept transfers of permanent or temporary records in analog formats and will accept records only in electronic format and with appropriate metadata¹. • Digitization of temporary analog records shall be made in accordance with NARA regulations and guidance, including metadata requirements². The contractor shall ensure the ongoing evaluation, enhancement, and compliance of record classification and indexing systems to align with existing laws, regulations, or government-wide policies, including but not limited to 36 CFR Part 1236 and guidance from NARA. The contractor shall maintain records in an economic, secure, and efficient manner that ensures accessibility, integrity, and reliability for agency operations and oversight. 30.10.2 - Records Management Obligations (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) A. Applicability1 1 NARA's metadata requirements for digitization are comprehensively outlined in 36 CFR Subpart E (Electronic Records Management) and specifically detailed in NARA's guidance documents including "Metadata Guidance for
This clause applies to all Contractors whose employees create, work with, or otherwise handle Federal records regardless of the medium in which the record exists. B. Requirements 1. Contractor shall comply with all applicable records management laws and regulations, as well as NARA records policies, including but not limited to the Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapters. 21, 29, 31, 33), NARA regulations at 36 CFR Chapter XII Subchapter B, and those policies associated with the safeguarding of records covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a). These policies include the preservation of all records, regardless of form or characteristics, mode of transmission, or state of completion. 2. In accordance with 36 CFR § 1222.32, all data created for Government use and delivered to, or falling under the legal control of the Government are Federal records subject to the provisions of 44 U.S.C. chapters 21, 29, 31, and 33, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. § 552), as amended, and the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a), and shall be managed and scheduled for disposition only as permitted by statute or regulation. 3. In accordance with 36 CFR § 1222.32, Contractor shall maintain all records created for Government use or created in the course of performing the contract and/or delivered to, or under the legal control of the Government and shall be managed in accordance with Federal law. Electronic records and associated metadata shall be accompanied by sufficient technical documentation to permit understanding and use of the records and data. 4. CMS and its contractors are responsible for preventing the alienation or unauthorized destruction of records, including all forms of mutilation. Records may not be removed from the legal custody of CMS or destroyed except for in accordance with the provisions of the agency records schedules and with the written concurrence of the Contracting Officer and the Agency Records Officer. Willful and unlawful destruction, damage or alienation of Federal records is subject to the fines and penalties imposed by 18 U.S.C. § 2701. In the event of any unlawful or accidental removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records, Contractor shall report to CMS within 30 calendar days. 5. The Contractor shall immediately notify the appropriate Contracting Officer upon discovery of any inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures of information, data, documentary materials, records or equipment. Disclosure of non-public information is limited to authorized personnel with a need-to-know as described in contracts awarded by CMS Office of Acquisition & Grants Management (OAGM). The Contractor shall ensure that the appropriate personnel, administrative, technical, and physical safeguards the Transfer of Permanent Electronic Records" and related technical bulletins. For complete technical specifications and implementation guidance, refer to 36 CFR § 1236.10 through § 1236.34 and current NARA bulletins available at: https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/policy/transfer-guidance.html
are established to ensure the security and confidentiality of this information, data, documentary material, records and equipment are properly protected. The Contractor shall not remove material from Government facilities or systems, or facilities or systems operated or maintained on the Government’s behalf, without the express written permission of the Contracting Officer and Agency Records Officer. When information, data, documentary material, records and/or equipment is no longer required, it shall be returned to CMS control, or the Contractor shall safeguard it until otherwise directed. records returned to the Government shall be hand carried, mailed via certified mail, emailed, or securely electronically transmitted to the Contracting Officer or the Agency Records Officer. Destruction of records is expressly prohibited unless in accordance with Paragraph (4). 6. The Contractor (and any sub-contractor) is required to abide by Government and CMS guidance for protecting sensitive, proprietary information, classified, and controlled unclassified information. 7. The Contractor shall only use Government IT equipment for purposes specifically tied to or authorized by the contract and in accordance with CMS policy. 8. The Contractor shall not create or maintain any records containing any non-public CMS information that are not specifically tied to or authorized by the contract. 9. The Contractor shall not retain, use, sell, or disseminate copies of any deliverable that contains information covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 or that which is generally protected from public disclosure by an exemption or exclusion to the Freedom of Information Act. 10. CMS owns the rights to all data and records produced as part of all contracts. All deliverables under the contract are the property of the U.S. Government for which CMS shall have unlimited rights to use, dispose of, or disclose such data contained therein as it determines to be in the public interest. Any Contractor rights in the data or deliverables shall be identified as required by FAR 52.227-11 through FAR 52.227-20. 11. Training. All Contractor employees assigned to CMS contracts who create, work with, or otherwise handle records are required to take annual CMS provided records management training. The Contractor is responsible for confirming training has been completed according to agency policies, including initial training and any annual or refresher training. All contractor employees who have access to (1) Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Federal Information or a Federal information system or (2) personally identifiable information shall complete the CMS provided records management training required by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) before performing any work under their contract, and annually thereafter. The Contractor shall also ensure any applicable subcontractor compliance with this training requirement.
Contractor employees are expected to complete any new training requirements enacted by HHS or CMS whereby access to the course material has been provided. These courses are at no additional cost to the contract and the contractor is not required to provide documentation on such training unless specifically requested. The Government does not anticipate a contractor to develop a system specifically designed to track and monitor such trainings but will address the requirements under overall contract management and adherence to regulations as noted in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Training Records. The contractor shall maintain training records for all its employees working under this contract in accordance with HHS policy. D. Flow-down of requirements to subcontractors 1. The Contractor shall incorporate the substance of this clause, its terms and requirements including this paragraph, in all subcontracts awarded by CMS OAGM and require written subcontractor acknowledgment of same. 2. Violation by a subcontractor of any provision set forth in this clause will be attributed to the Contractor. 30.20 - Descriptions of Records (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) CMS Records Schedules ensure official CMS records, regardless of storage media, are preserved appropriately to satisfy legal, fiscal, regulatory, and operational requirements while providing economical and efficient records management in accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 3102 and 36 CFR § 1220.34. 30.20.1 - Types of Record Schedules (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) There are two types of records schedules, the CMS Records Control Schedule (RCS) approved by CMS and NARA, and the General Records Schedule (GRS). These schedules provide mandated instructions on the retention, transfer or destruction of records, documents, and materials. These schedules are media and classification neutral unless otherwise specified. 30.20.2 - CMS Record Control Schedule (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) Effective 2017, CMS adopted a Bucket approach to records scheduling and disposition. These records schedules identify the records accumulated by the contractor in administering the Medicare program and outline the disposal schedule for each type of record. The approved schedule provides disposition authority and instructions for program records and administrative records not covered by the GRS. According to the disposition authority schedule for temporary records, there are conditions when records are maintained for a longer period of time. See section 30.60 ” Litigation Holds”.
BUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS Bucke t 2 Administr ative Managem ent DAA- 0440- 2015- 0002- 0002 Non- substanti ve records that support leadershi p and/or general administr ation of all CMS programs . Includes backgrou nd files related to records in other buckets as well as records of leadershi p positions below the Administr ator and other principals . Medicare Beneficiary Correspondenc e Tempora ry 3 Cutoff at the end of the calendar year. Destroy no sooner than 3 years after cutoff but longer retention is authorize d.
BUCK
ET /
GRS
RECORD
SCHEDULE
NAME
DISPOSI
TION
AUTHOR
ITY
NUMBE
R
DESCRIPT
ION
RECORD
NAME/TYPE
FINAL
DISPOSI
TION
RETENT
ION
YEARS
DISPOSITI
ON
INSTRUCT
IONS
Bucke
t 3
Financial
Records
(Program
matic)
DAA-
0440-
2015-
0004-
0001
Financial
Records
(non-
GRS),
regardles
s of CMS
Program.
Includes
Medicare
Part A,
Part B,
Part C,
and Part
D;
Medicaid;
CHIP;
Affordabl
e Health
Care Act.
A/B MAC (A)
or HHH MAC FI
Billing
Records; A/B
MAC (B) or
DME MAC
Carrier Billing
Records;
Medicare
Benefit Check
Records ;
Reconsideratio
n and Hearing
Case Files -
Hospital
Insurance
Program
(Medicare
Appeals) ;
Review and
Fair Hearing
Case Files -
Supplementar
y Medical
Insurance
Program
(Medicare
Appeals) ;
MAC
Administrative
Budget
Estimate and
Cost Report
Form); Budget
request,
supplemental
budget
request, notice
Tempora
ry
7 Cutoff at
the end of
the
calendar
year.
Destroy
no sooner
than 7
year{s)
after
cutoff but
longer
retention
is
authorize
dBUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS of budget approval, interim expenditure report; Supplemental Budget Request; Notice of Budget Approval – The carrier/interm ediary’s certified funding authority for the fiscal year. Include all supporting schedules, correspondenc e and justification; Interim Expenditure Report – Cumulative fiscal year to date expenditures incurred by the carrier/interm ediary. Include all supporting schedules, correspondenc
BUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS e and justifications.; Final Administrative Cost Proposal – The final statement of expenditures for the fiscal year. This form is used as the basis for final settlement of allowable costs. Include all supporting schedules, correspondenc e, HHS or GAO audit reports on administrative cost and benefits payments; MAC Letter of Credit Files ); A/B MAC (A) or HHH MAC Payment Vouchers and Transmittal Files); A/B MAC (B) or DME MAC Payment Vouchers and Transmittal
BUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS Files); A/B MAC (A) or HHH MAC Monthly Financial Report Files); A/B MAC (B) or DME MAC Performance Report Files); A/B MAC (A) or HHH MAC Workload Reports Files); A/B MAC (B) or DME MAC Overpayment and Duplicate Charge Detection Activity Report Files); A/B MAC (A) or HHH MAC Cost Report Files); MAC Closing Agreements); Medicare Data Match Files); Provider Statistical and Reimbursemen t (PS&R) ); A/B MAC (B) or DME MAC Claims Processing File
BUCK
ET /
GRS
RECORD
SCHEDULE
NAME
DISPOSI
TION
AUTHOR
ITY
NUMBE
R
DESCRIPT
ION
RECORD
NAME/TYPE
FINAL
DISPOSI
TION
RETENT
ION
YEARS
DISPOSITI
ON
INSTRUCT
IONS
Bucke
t 4
Enrollmen
t Records
DAA-
0440-
2015-
0006-
0001
Enrollme
nt
Records
for all
CMS
Programs
. Includes
Medicare
Part A,
Part B,
Part
C, and
Part D;
Medicaid;
CHIP;
Affordabl
e Health
Care Act.
Initial
Enrollment
Questionnaire
Tempora
ry
7 Cutoff at
the end of
the
calendar
year.
Destroy
no sooner
than 7
year{s)
after
cutoff but
longer
retention
is
authorize
d
Bucke
t 5
Beneficiar
y Records
DAA-
0440-
2015-
0007-
0001
Records
that
facilitate
the
manage
ment of
beneficiar
ies (those
eligible
for all
CMS
programs
)
Medicare
Summary
Notices
(MSNs)
Tempora
ry
10 Cutoff at
the end of
the
calendar
year.
Retention
Period
Destroy
no sooner
than 10
year(s)
after
cutoff,
but
longer
retention
is
authorize
dBUCK
ET /
GRS
RECORD
SCHEDULE
NAME
DISPOSI
TION
AUTHOR
ITY
NUMBE
R
DESCRIPT
ION
RECORD
NAME/TYPE
FINAL
DISPOSI
TION
RETENT
ION
YEARS
DISPOSITI
ON
INSTRUCT
IONS
Bucke
t 6
Provider
and
Health
Plan
Records
DAA-
0440-
2015-
0008-
0001
Records
related to
health
care
providers
affiliated
with CMS
programs
. Records
related to
health
care
providers
affiliated
with CMS
systems
and
programs
. Includes
provider
applicatio
ns and
certificati
ons;
health
plan
records;
program
review
and audit
records;
hearing
files; and
administr
ative
records.
Ambulance
Supplier
Certification
Files ;
Requests for
Assistance
from District
Offices (DOs)
Tempora
ry
7 Cutoff at
the end of
the
calendar
year.
Retention
Period
Destroy
no sooner
than 7
year{s)
after
cutoff but
longer
retention
is
authorize
d,BUCK
ET /
GRS
RECORD
SCHEDULE
NAME
DISPOSI
TION
AUTHOR
ITY
NUMBE
R
DESCRIPT
ION
RECORD
NAME/TYPE
FINAL
DISPOSI
TION
RETENT
ION
YEARS
DISPOSITI
ON
INSTRUCT
IONS
Bucke
t 9
Complianc
e and
Integrity
DAA-
0440-
2015-
0012-
0001
Records
that
support
complian
ce and
integrity
activities
and
functions,
regardles
s of CMS
Program,
including
plans,
agreeme
nts;
administr
ative
records,
records
related to
surveys,
reviews,
and
audits;
reports;
and legal
records
related to
complian
ce and
integrity
operation
s.
Contract
Performance
Review Visit
Files
Tempora
ry
7 Cutoff at
the end of
the
calendar
year.
Retention
Period
Destroy
no sooner
than 7
year{s)
after
cutoff but
longer
retention
is
authorize
dBUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS Gener al Recor ds Sched ule (GRS 1.1) / GRS 1.1, ITEM 11 Financial Managem ent and Reporting Records DAA- GRS- 2013- 0003- 0002 This schedule covers records created by Federal agencies in carrying out the work of financial manage ment: procuring goods and services, paying bills, collecting debts, accountin g for all financial transacti ons, and monitorin g agencies' net worth. It does not apply to copies of records forwarde Procuring goods and services is the acquisition of physical goods, products, personal property, 011 capital assets, infrastructure services such as utilities, and contracted personnel services to be used by the Federal Government. Paying bills means disbursements of federal funds for goods and services and fulfilling financial obligations to grant and cooperative agreement recipients. Procurement and payment records include those such as: contracts Tempora ry 1 Destroy when business use ceases.
BUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS d to the Departm ent of Treasury or the Office of Manage ment and Budget in fulfillmen t of reporting requirem ents. These forwarde d copies serve unique business purposes at those agencies and are therefore scheduled separatel y as records of 0MB and Treasury requisitions purchase orders interagency agreements Military Interdepartme ntal Purchase Requests (MIPRs) printing requisitions to the Government Printing Office memoranda of agreement specifying a financial obligation solicitations/re quests for bids, quotations or proposals for contracts and competitive grants proposals, quotations, bids (accepted, rejected, unopened) for contracts and competitive grants contingent fee justifications legal and
BUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS financial instruments such as bond and surety records FAIR Act (A-76) records linked directly to specific procurement actions credit card/purchase card/charge card statements and supporting documentatio n vendor tax exemption records invoices leases recurring financial transactions such as utility and communicatio ns invoices documentatio n of contractual administrative requirements submitted by contractors such as status reports
BUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS Correspondenc e and papers pertaining to award, administration , receipt, inspection of and payment for goods and services in this list records of financing employee relocations
BUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS GRS 5.2: Item 020 Intermedi ary Records DAA- GRS- 2022- 0009- 0002 Intermedi ary records. Records that meet the following condition s: They exist for the sole purpose of creating a subseque nt record and they are not required to meet legal or fiscal obligatio ns, or to initiate, sustain, evaluate, or provide evidence of decision- making. This includes certain analog raw data used to create final print files; Medicare summary notices, standard paper remittance advices Tempora ry 1 Destroy upon creation or update of the final record, or when no longer needed for business use, whicheve r is later.
BUCK ET / GRS RECORD SCHEDULE NAME DISPOSI TION AUTHOR ITY NUMBE R DESCRIPT ION RECORD NAME/TYPE FINAL DISPOSI TION RETENT ION YEARS DISPOSITI ON INSTRUCT IONS and electronic source records for electronic systems that are not otherwise excluded. 30.30 - Records Retention and Disposition (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) The CMS Records schedule identifies records accumulated by contractors in administering the Medicare program and establishes disposition schedules for each record type. In accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 3303a and 36 CFR § 1226, contractors shall actively manage federal records disposition beyond storage and accessibility requirements.
30.30.1 - CMS Records and Information Management Program Objectives (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) In accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 2904 and 36 CFR § 1225.12, the CMS Records and Information Management Program establishes retention schedules for all CMS records to provide uniform guidelines for records retention and disposition; ensure compliance with legal, fiscal, and regulatory requirements; authorize disposal of obsolete records; promote efficient records management practices. 30.30.2 - Record Schedule Disposition Authority Numbers and Retention Periods (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) In accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 3303a and NARA-approved disposition authorities, Record Schedule Disposition Authority Numbers provide legal citations for retention and disposition authorizations for records created and maintained by CMS contractors supporting administrative, legal, regulatory, personnel, operational, and fiscal activities. The retention period refers to the legally mandated timeframe that records must be maintained before they are eligible for disposition (transfer to NARA or destruction), which varies based on the record type and its administrative, legal, or historical value. For example, Disposition Authority Number DAA-0440-2013-0001-0002 might authorize the retention of contractor performance evaluation records for seven years after contract completion before authorized destruction. No records shall be destroyed without documented concurrence from the Contractor, the COR/RLO, and the CMS Records Officer. 30.30.3 - Records Dispositioning Process (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) In accordance with 36 CFR § 1226.14 and as part of the Annual Report of Medicare Records, each calendar year contractors must review their file plans, complete comprehensive records inventories for both physical and electronic records, and identify records eligible for destruction. CMS will provide a template for annual reporting purposes. Contractors are required to complete an annual records management reporting process using CMS-provided templates. The process involves submitting three completed worksheets through the Annual Report Template (see Exhibit B), followed by a structured approval process that includes COR/RLO review with Division Director authorization, CMS Records Retention mailbox submission, RIM staff verification, and final CMS Records Officer approval. Once approved, contractors have 90 days to begin project execution. Vendors have flexibility in scheduling the destruction of authorized records but must maintain complete documentation of the destruction process. MACs shall inform CMS upon completion of destruction projects, with details included in the annual report. This streamlined system ensures federal compliance under 36 CFR regulations while maintaining proper oversight of Medicare program records disposition, with the critical requirement that no records may be destroyed without explicit CMS Records Officer approval.
Annual Review Requirements In accordance with 36 CFR § 1226.14, at the beginning of each calendar year, contractors shall: 1. Review the FILE PLAN worksheet tab 2. Complete the RECORDS INVENTORY worksheet tab for all physical and electronic records 3. Complete the REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSAL worksheet tab listing records eligible for destruction 4. Submit all worksheets in the Annual Report Template (Exhibit B). MACs must inform CMS upon completion of destruction projects, with details included in the annual report. Destruction Process In accordance with 36 CFR § 1228.170(b): 1. Authorization Period: Once approved, contractors have 90 days to begin project execution. MACs should inform CMS upon completion of destruction projects, with details included in the annual report. 2. Documentation: Destruction supervisor shall document destruction date, signature, official title, and return final authorization to CMS Records Retention mailbox. 30.40 - National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Universal Electronic Records Management (UERM) Requirements (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) The Universal ERM Requirements 2identify high level business needs for managing electronic records. They are baseline ERM program requirements derived from existing statutes, standards, NARA regulations, policy, and guidance. These requirements are based on the lifecycle of electronic records management and include the following sections. • Capture • Maintenance and Use • Disposal • Transfer • Metadata • Reporting 2 NARA Universal Electronic Records Management (UERM) Requirements provide the framework for federal agencies and their contractors to implement compliant electronic records management systems. These requirements establish the minimum functionality needed for records management in federal information systems. The complete UERM requirements can be accessed at: https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/policy/universal-erm- requirements.
These requirements address born-digital and digitized analog records. The requirements are either program requirements relating to the design and implementation of CMS’ Electronic Records Management policies and procedures; or system requirements that provide technical guidance in creating ERM tools and specifications for requirements a system will need to manage electronic records. 30.40.1 - Information System Requirements (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) In accordance with OMB Circular A-130, paragraph 8a(1)(k), and HHSAR Part 304, Administrative Matters (DEVIATION), Subpart 304.70, Records Management, contractors must integrate comprehensive records management and archival functions into all information system design, development, and implementation activities. This federal mandate requires contractors to maintain the same rigorous records management standards as CMS, ensuring proper access, maintenance, control, storage, disposition, and transfer capabilities for all records throughout their lifecycle. Compliance with these requirements is a contractual obligation that supports the integrity and accountability of Medicare program operations while meeting federal regulatory standards for information governance. Refer to HHSAR Part 304, Administrative Matters (DEVIATION). Subpart 304.70, Records Management for details. Legacy systems created before the mandate are grandfathered and can use semi-automated or manual processes for records management. MACs can manage records either through system functionality or manual methods such as Excel spreadsheets, as long as records are categorized by type and year to determine retention and eligibility for destruction. 30.50 - Contract Initiation and Expiration (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) Throughout the contract lifecycle, from initiation to expiration, contractors must maintain strict adherence to information security, privacy requirements, and systematic documentation standards to ensure seamless operations and proper contract closeout procedures. During contract initiation, contractors establish foundational security protocols and system development frameworks that must be sustained throughout the contract period, while contract expiration requires comprehensive documentation transfer, systematic sanitization of all government information and IT resources, proper disposal of records in accordance with federal guidelines, and certification of data purging from contractor-owned systems. The transition process requires proactive coordination with Contracting Officers (CO), Contracting Officer Representatives (COR), and Information System Security Officers (ISSO) to ensure all government assets are appropriately returned, all documentation requirements are fulfilled within specified timeframes, and all security protocols are maintained until final contract closeout is completed, thereby protecting sensitive government information while facilitating operational continuity.
30.50.1 - General Security Requirements (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) The Contractor shall comply with information security and privacy requirements, Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC) processes, HHS Enterprise Architecture requirements to ensure information is appropriately protected from initiation to expiration of the contract. All information systems development or enhancement tasks supported by the contractor shall follow the HHS EPLC framework and methodology or the CMS SDLC, as amended and in accordance with the HHS Contract Closeout Guide (2012). 30.50.2 - System Documentation (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) Contractors shall follow and adhere to HHS/CMS System Development Life Cycle requirements, at a minimum, for system development and provide system documentation at designated intervals (specifically, at the expiration of the contract) within the EPLC and CMS SDLC that require artifact review and approval. 30.50.3 - Sanitization of Government Files and Information (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) As part of contract closeout and at expiration of the contract, the contractor shall provide all required documentation in accordance with the CMS SDLC, as amended to the CO and/or COR to certify that, at the government's direction, all electronic and paper records are appropriately disposed of and all devices and media are sanitized in accordance with NIST SP 800-88, Guidelines for Media Sanitization. 30.50.4 – Notification (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) The Contractor shall continue to inform the CO, COR, and system ISSO as soon as possible before an employee stops working under agency contracts. This notification process shall be captured in the existing employee onboarding and offboarding enterprise system. 30.50.5 - Contractor Responsibilities upon Physical Completion of the Contract. (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) The contractor shall return all government information and IT resources (i.e., government information in non-government-owned systems, media, and backup systems) acquired during the term of this contract to the CO and/or COR. Additionally, the contractor shall provide a certification that all government information has been properly sanitized and purged from Contractor-owned systems, including backup systems and media used during contract performance, in accordance with HHS and/or CMS policies.
30.50.6 - Records Management and Retention (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) The contractor shall maintain all information in accordance with Executive Order 13556 - Controlled Unclassified Information, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) records retention policies and schedules and HHS Policy for Records Management and CMS policies and shall not dispose of any records unless authorized by HHS/CMS. If a contractor accidentally disposes of or destroys a record without proper authorization, he/she shall document and report the incident to the CMS Agency Records Officer and RIM staff in accordance with HHS/CMS policies. 30.60 - Litigation Hold Obligations (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) A litigation hold is a notification to recipients to retain information in the agency's possession, custody, or control relevant to those claims or defenses. When CMS reasonably anticipates litigation or litigation has commenced, CMS has a duty to take reasonable steps to preserve information relevant to any party's claims or defenses at issue in a manner that is proportional to the needs of the case. In accordance with (Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(b)(1), 37(e)), contractors shall personally take appropriate steps to preserve any responsive information that is in their possession, custody, or control. Accordingly, until notified otherwise, contractors shall preserve, and refrain from discarding, any and all responsive information related to a litigation hold. Steps shall be taken to suspend routine document retention, destruction policies and practices, including, but not limited to, those in the records schedule. Contractors must maintain strict confidentiality of litigation hold communications and may not share litigation hold information with external parties, including grantees, nonprofits, advocacy groups, legal representatives, providers, or suppliers. Preservation shall occur even if the information sought may ultimately be withheld as privileged, protected, classified, or confidential, or determined to be unreasonably burdensome to produce. If information subject to a litigation hold is destroyed, a court may impose sanctions, including the exclusion of evidence, the dismissal of a claim, the production of privileged information, and/or award costs and attorney fees against the government. When transferring responsibilities or ending CMS relationships, contractors must consult with the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and follow established litigation records management procedures to ensure continuity of litigation hold compliance and proper transfer of preserved documents. Documents include all forms of written material, whether in final or draft form, original or duplicates, complete or partial, official or unofficial. Examples include memoranda, reports, printed emails, maps, diagrams, correspondence, spreadsheets, presentation materials, and notes (including handwritten notes). Hardcopy documents shall be preserved even if they are duplicative of electronically stored information. The types of information related to the categories that shall be preserved include the following: A. Electronically Stored Information (ESI): Information that is stored electronically, regardless of the type of media, as opposed to information that is stored in hard copy
(i.e., on paper). ESI includes, but is not limited to, word processing files, e-mail messages, archived e-mails, metadata, text messages, other electronic communication including voicemail, telephone log entries, databases, scanned/static images (PDFs or TIFFs), Internet usage files, systems manuals, network access information, drafts, spreadsheets, data, PowerPoint presentations, calendar entries, address books, digital photographs or other digital images, audio recordings, floppy discs, CDs, DVDs, and flash memory media, including USB drives and memory cards for cameras and cell phones. ESI should be preserved in its originally created or native format. This information includes not only content stored on HHS computers, but can also include information stored on home computers, personal laptop computers, personal e-mail accounts, and PDAs or mobile phones such as Blackberries, iPhones, and Androids, if used for work. ESI shall be preserved even if it is duplicative of hardcopy documents. B. Metadata: Data typically stored electronically that describe characteristics of ESI, such as how ESI is formatted, or how, when or by whom ESI is collected, created, accessed, or modified. Metadata can be supplied by applications, users, or the file system. C. Tangible Things: Tangible things are items that are likely to have discoverable information such as equipment, laboratory samples, specimens, and photographs. 30.60.1 - CMS Contractor Litigation Hold Certification Requirements (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) When a Contractor receives a CMS Litigation Hold Memorandum from their contracting officer, the Contractor must immediately implement the litigation hold requirements and provide certification of compliance. The memorandum will be shared with Contractors when CMS components identify that the Contractor may possess potentially responsive documents relevant to ongoing or anticipated litigation. Upon receipt of the litigation hold memorandum, Contractors must follow these steps: • Immediately suspend all routine destruction or disposal of potentially responsive documents • Notify relevant personnel within the Contractor's organization about the litigation hold requirements • Implement preservation measures for all identified document categories and types • Conduct a comprehensive search for potentially responsive documents across all systems and storage locations • Maintain detailed records of all preservation actions taken • Provide written certification to CMS confirming implementation of the litigation hold by completing and signing the CMS Contractor Litigation Hold Certification & Information Form • Provide names of identified litigation hold custodians within their organization to the COR • Report any challenges or issues in implementing the hold to the CMS contracting officer Contractors must ensure full compliance with the litigation hold requirements until formally notified by CMS that the hold has been lifted. Failure to properly implement and maintain litigation hold requirements may result in legal consequences and potential contract violations.
30.70 - Digitization Requirements (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) In accordance with 84 FR 14266 (April 10, 2019) and federal regulations, CMS contractors must follow specific requirements when digitizing temporary federal records to ensure compliance with records management standards and facilitate the transition to electronic recordkeeping systems. In accordance with 36 CFR § 1236.32 and § 1236.34, contractors must meet all required digitization standards before designating digital versions as recordkeeping copies, validate the digitization process through documented procedures, and capture complete information from original source records including all pages and components. This comprehensive approach ensures that the digitized records maintain the integrity and completeness of the original documents while meeting federal regulatory requirements for electronic recordkeeping systems. As a CMS contractor, if you intend to digitally reproduce (digitize) temporary records to designate the digitized version as the recordkeeping copy and destroy the original source records, you shall: 1. In accordance with 36 CFR § 1236.32, digitize the records to meet all required standards 2. In accordance with 36 CFR § 1236.34, validate the digitization process When the digitized version becomes the designated recordkeeping copy, the original source record is reclassified as an intermediary record. You may dispose of these intermediary records in accordance with 36 CFR § 1236.36 and General Records Schedule (GRS) 5.2. 30.70.1 - Digitization Standards (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) When digitizing temporary records, you shall meet the following standards in accordance with 36 CFR § 1236.32: 1. Capture all information contained in the original source records 2. Include all pages or parts from the original source records 3. Ensure the digitized versions can be used for all purposes the original source records serve, including the ability to attest to transactions and activities 4. Implement protections against unauthorized deletions, additions, or alterations to the digitized versions 5. Ensure the digitized versions can be located, retrieved, accessed, and used throughout their entire retention period 30.70.2 - Validation Requirements (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26)
In accordance with 36 CFR § 1236.34: 1. You may establish your own validation process or utilize third-party processes to validate that digitized versions comply with the standards in 36 CFR § 1236.32 2. You shall document your validation process and retain that documentation for the life of the process or the life of any records digitized using that process, whichever is longer 3. Be aware that CMS and/or NARA may review your validation documentation as needed 30.70.3 - Disposing of Original Source Records (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) After successful digitization and validation: 1. In accordance with General Records Schedule (GRS) 5.2 and 36 CFR § 1236.36, you may destroy the original source records after digitization, subject to any pending legal constraints such as litigation holds 2. You shall treat the digitized versions (now the recordkeeping versions) with the same care and retention requirements as the original source records 3. You shall retain the digitized versions for the remaining portion of any retention period established by the applicable records schedule 4. You do not need to obtain CMS or NARA approval to destroy scheduled temporary records that have been properly digitized according to these requirements This guidance ensures your compliance with federal records management regulations while facilitating the transition to electronic recordkeeping systems. 30.80 - Record Storage (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) CMS has established comprehensive requirements for contractors utilizing commercial storage facilities to house Federal records. Under federal regulations 44 U.S.C. § 3102 and 36 CFR § 1220.34, contractors bear the same responsibility as CMS for ensuring all records in their physical custody are stored in appropriate facilities that meet federal standards. These requirements mandate that contractors ensure any commercial vendor housing Federal records be approved by CMS and certified by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in accordance with 36 CFR § 1234.12 and § 1234.30. The requirements include facility structural standards, environmental controls, fire safety measures, and comprehensive documentation processes, including mandatory submission of inspection checklists and certification letters to the CMS Records Officer at Records_Retention@cms.hhs.gov at least 120 days before transferring records. Additionally, NARA has the authority to conduct periodic inspections of commercial facilities and specific procedures are outlined for facility transfers,
ensuring that all Federal records remain protected and accessible while maintaining compliance with federal records management regulations throughout their lifecycle. 30.80.1 Commercial Storage Facilities (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) In accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 3102 and 36 CFR § 1220.34, CMS contractors are responsible for ensuring that all records in their physical custody are stored in appropriate space. Contractors shall adhere to the same requirements as CMS for records storage and management. Records centers and commercial records storage facilities are referred to collectively as records storage facilities. In accordance with 36 CFR § 1234.30, contractors may contract for commercial records storage services. However, before any agency records are transferred to a commercial records storage facility, contractors shall ensure that the facility meets all the requirements for an agency records storage facility set forth in subpart § 1234.30 and shall submit the required documentation to CMS. Contractors must verify facilities meet NARA standards, maintain contact information, and obtain certification copies, with inspections conducted by NARA every five years. contractors shall obtain and maintain copies of NARA inspection certifications from commercial storage facilities, ensuring compliance with CFR 1234 standards and annual updates of contact information. In accordance with 44 U.S.C. § 2904 and 36 CFR § 1234, NARA is authorized to promulgate standards, procedures, and guidelines to Federal agencies and their contractors with respect to the storage of records in commercial records storage facilities. NARA initiates facility inspections on a rotating five-year basis, and contractors are responsible for ensuring their facilities remain compliant and up to date with fire safety and climate control requirements. 30.80.2 - Standards for All Records Storage Facilities (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) A facility that is used to store Federal records, shall meet the minimum structural, environmental, property and fire safety standards as outlined in 36 CFR Part 1234 Facility Standards for Records Storage Facilities. The facility shall be constructed with non-combustible materials and building elements, including walls, columns and floors. CMS is responsible for ensuring that records in their legal custody are stored in appropriate space as outlined in this part. Under § 1232.18(a), agencies are responsible for initiating action to remove records from space that does not meet these standards if deficiencies are not corrected within 6 months after initial discovery of the deficiencies by NARA or the agency and to complete removal of the records within 18 months after initial discovery of the deficiencies. To store Federal records in a commercial records storage facility, you shall document that the facility meets the 36 CFR 1234 storage standards. You shall submit a Facility Standards for Record Storage Facilities Inspection Checklist (see Exhibit A) for all records storage facilities used to store CMS records to the CMS Records Officer at Records_Retention@cms.hhs.gov .
30.80.3 - Transfer of Federal Records stored in Commercial Facilities (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) If you are planning to relocate any Federal records to a different approved storage facility, provide the following information at least 120 days prior to the move date to the CMS Records Officer at: Records_Retention@cms.hhs.gov • Move date, • Name of the old and the new storage facility and address • Rough volume figure of how many cubic feet of records are involved. The contractor shall provide documentation demonstrating that the commercial facility meets the storage standards set in 36 CFR 1234 before beginning to transfer records to a commercial records storage facility,. Submit separate documentation for each individual facility that you will use. Contractors using a commercial vendor or planning to move records from one commercial facility to another that has not been certified and approved, shall complete the three documents listed below and submit to the CMS Records Officer at Records_Retention@cms.hhs.gov. • Inspection Checklist for Records Storage Facilities, • Certification letter from a Fire Protection Engineer and a Structural Engineer § 1234.12 What are the fire safety requirements that apply to records storage facilities, and • Description and volume of records Once certified and approved, you will receive notification that the facility is approved, and that it will be added to the list of approved facilities 30.80.4 - Commercial Storage Facilities Inspections (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) NARA is authorized to conduct periodic inspections of any commercial records storage facility used by CMS and its contractors for compliance with the 36 CFR 1234 Facility Standards for Records Storage Facilities. 1234.10(c): FEMA 100-year flood map (available at https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search) 1234.10(d): Appendix A (S4): AHJ Fire Marshall and/or Fire Department Inspection 1234.10(j): UL (Burglar) Alarm Central Monitoring Certificate 1234.10(k): Appendix A (S3): Security System Inspection 1234.10(m): Integrated Pest Management (IPM) service Inspection 1234 Appendix B (2b) & (2f): Annual Sprinkler System & Fire Alarm Inspections Upon request from the CMS RIM Staff, Contractors shall provide the Point of Contact for the commercial records storage facility prior to the inspections for coordinating scheduling the
inspections and providing an updated Facility Standards for Records Storage Facilities Inspection Checklist for each facility. 30.90 - Annual Reporting (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) Contractors are required to comply with the Annual Report of Medicare Records Requirements outlined in section 30.90 of this manual. This mandatory annual reporting process ensures that proper records management practices are maintained and meet federal regulatory compliance standards. At the beginning of each calendar year, contractors must conduct a comprehensive assessment of their records inventory and submit detailed file plans to CMS at Records_Retention@cms.hhs.gov. The contractor's assessment must cover all official records under their management, including those stored in electronic systems, databases, and commercial storage facilities, with special attention to identifying and protecting personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI). Contractors are responsible for documenting all record categories, retention schedules, storage locations, and volume assessments according to both CMS Records Schedule requirements and NARA General Record Schedule guidelines. This annual reporting requirement helps contractors maintain organized records management practices while supporting CMS's oversight responsibilities and ensuring the integrity and accessibility of records under the Contractor’s stewardship. 30.90.1 Annual Report of Medicare Records Requirements (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) Medicare contractors shall submit an Annual Report of Medicare Records at the beginning of each calendar year using the required Annual Report of Medicare Records template provided by CMS (see Exhibit B). Contractors must utilize the current template format specified by CMS to ensure standardized reporting and compliance with federal records management standards. The completed template must include all mandatory components and documentation as outlined in the provided format, and submissions that do not use the required template may be rejected or returned for correction.: Required Components 1. Records Inventory o Complete review of all official records o Electronic storage locations o Commercial storage facilities o Volume assessment o PII/PHI identification o Essential records designation o Special access requirements 2. File Plan o Use current template
o Record categories and types o Retention schedules o Location details o Volume information Process Steps 1. Review and Assessment o Consult CMS Records Schedule o Review NARA General Record Schedule o Document all storage locations o Identify sensitive information (PII/PHI) 2. Verification Checklist o Complete records categories o Accurate retention schedules o Current storage locations o Updated volume of information o Correct file plan template Submission • Due: Start of calendar year • Submit to: Records_Retention@cms.hhs.gov • Format: Current Annual Report template • Include: Complete inventory and file plan This annual report ensures proper records management and compliance with federal regulations while maintaining accurate tracking of Medicare records across all storage locations. 30.100 Exhibits (Rev. 13718; Issued: 04-10-26; Effective: 05-11-26; Implementation: 09-14-26) 30.100.1 Exhibit A. CMS-Certified and NARA-Approved Commercial Storage Facilities 30.100.3 Exhibit B. Annual Report Template
CMS Contractor Litigation Hold Certification & Information Form for
[Insert Case Name]
I. CERTIFICATION
I declare that, to the best of my information and belief, I have caused all appropriate personnel of
[insert name of CMS Contractor], including (but not limited to) those listed in Section II below,
to become aware and informed that (i) a Litigation Hold exists in the above-captioned matter; (ii)
this Litigation Hold imposes an ongoing duty to preserve and retain certain documents, records,
data, or files, whether maintained electronically or in hard copy, pertaining to the above-
captioned matter, and that are within the categories of information to be preserved, and (iii) this
Litigation Hold remains in effect until expressly advised by CMS that this litigation hold has
been lifted.
__________________________________________
______________________________________
Printed Name/Title Signature
________________________________
______________________________________
Contract Executed on date
II. INFORMATION ON POTENTIAL DOCUMENT CUSTODIANS
Please list the names and contact information (telephone numbers and e-mails) of all
individuals within your organization whom you have identified as potentially having responsive
information in their possession, custody, or control for this litigation hold. If you do not believe
your organization has potentially responsive information in its possession, custody, or control,
please note this in the space provided below with a brief explanation. Please attach additional
paper if needed.
This completed original form must be returned {SELECT ONE}[within fifteen business days of
the issuance date of this TDL in PDF file format] [by {insert date two weeks from notice}] to:
[Insert full contact information for COR]
NOTE: The requirements of this litigation hold are continuing; if you learn of any new
individuals who have potentially responsive information, or if any named custodian is leaving
your organization, please notify the OGC attorney for this litigation hold: [Insert name and
email address of OGC attorney]40 – Shared System Maintainer, Part A/Part B (A/B)/Durable Medical Equipment (DME) Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) Responsibilities for System Releases (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) 40.1 – Standardized Terminology for Claims Processing Systems (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) (Rev. 105 , Issued: 06-02-17, Effective: 07-03-17, Implementation: 07-03-17 ) The SSMs, MACs and the STC shall use standardized terminology to refer to common systems maintenance elements in all discussions, reporting, and documentation. Using common terminology will minimize confusion and misunderstanding for CMS, SSMs, MACs and the STC. The MACs and the STC shall examine their use of the system status information issued by the SSMs to determine if they have internal applications that need to be adjusted to adopt the standardized terminology. If they have internal systems or processes that must be modified to reflect the standardization required by this instruction, they shall make those changes to coincide with the shared system changes. 40.1.1 - Standard Terminology Chart (Rev. 105, Issued: 06-02-17, Effective: 07-03-17, Implementation: 07-03-17) STANDARD TERMINOLOGY DESCRIPTION QUESTION (QCN) Request for assistance and/or reported potential system problem. For questions, the MACs and the STC shall contact the SSM’s helpdesk to log their question. PROBLEM Confirmed system and/or documentation problem Change Request (CR) Any software modification made to the system as a result of a CMS mandate or maintainer initiated action CMS STATUS CMS needs take action by answering a question, finalizing an instruction, etc. NSC (non-system change) STATUS CMS CR does not require shared system change. May require A/B MAC maintenance RESEARCH STATUS The SSM completes high level review of required changes by analyzing them and determining the intent of the change request
REQUIREMENTS (REQS) STATUS The SSM finalizes the business requirements WALKTHROUGH STATUS The SSM presents the systems solution to the CR in a structured walkthrough discussion with CMS and Beta testers WORK STATUS The SSM completes technical design, coding and unit testing the system change
STANDARD TERMINOLOGY DESCRIPTION ALPHA TESTING Functional testing performed by the SSM, after successful unit testing of the new or modified code; which starts approximately ninety (90) days prior to the implementation of the Change Request. The testing verifies all changed components function appropriately within the full environment at the SSM site in a controlled environment. BETA TESTING This is the second phase of testing after Alpha testing. The goal of Beta testing is to identify and resolve any remaining defects before a product/software is released to a production environment. Beta testing begins eight weeks prior to the production implementation date of a quarterly release. The Beta tester continues to test all iterations of the code through the UAT testing phase until the release moves to production. The Beta tester continues to test for two weeks post production or until they are 100% completed, whichever comes first. User Acceptance Testing (UAT) MACs and DME MACs perform UAT testing during the four weeks prior to the production implementation date of a quarterly release. USER STATUS The SSM returns question to user to provide more information or examples, assess solution 40.2 - Release Software (Rev.: 128, Issued: 11-01-19, Effective: 12-03-19, Implementation: 12-03-19) Shared System Maintainers (SSMs) shall obtain approval from their Government Task Leader (GTL) before quarterly release software can be scheduled and installed. Control of System Changes SSMs shall use the same quarterly release schedule, (i.e., on or about October 1, January 1, April 1, and July 1). CMS will schedule each quarterly release. All follow-up release changes (except emergencies) to the quarterly schedule shall be held and released on a predetermined schedule in coordination with CMS. Unscheduled emergency changes released as problems are identified without prior approval. The schedule for a follow-up release of changes shall be forwarded to your GTL for prior approval.
When a system problem is identified, Medicare contractors (i.e. SSMs, the STC, MACs and CWF Hosts) shall submit documentation to their GTL outlining the problem and the reason correction is needed at this time. Section V of this instruction outlines the minimum information required by CMS for approval. Problem Priority Classifications for Follow-Up Releases Listed below are CMS’s problem priority classifications and examples. Priority 1 Classification Production: The problem prevents the accomplishment of a mission critical capability for which no acceptable workaround is known.* This priority also includes problems where code shall be fixed immediately in order for the normal production region functions or services to continue. For example, if the production region is down in a job resulting in an incomplete cycle or the system is pricing a significant volume of claims incorrectly causing over or under payment. These corrections shall be reported to the GTL the next business day. EXAMPLES: • ABENDS on-line or batch (Inability to run a cycle) • Inaccurate payment or no payment of claims (significant impact/high volume) • Necessary file updates cannot be accomplished (payment files, history files) • Interface failures affecting claims processing Beta/User Acceptance Testing: The problem would prevent the accomplishment of a mission critical capability if the current test software is moved into the production environment. This priority also includes problems where code shall be fixed immediately in order for the normal test region functions or services to continue. For example, if the test region is down in a job causing the cycle to not complete or the system is pricing claims incorrectly with a potentially significant claim volume or payment impact, the issue would be classified as a priority 1. EXAMPLES: • ABENDS; inability to run a cycle or test • Inaccurate payment or no payment of claims (potentially significant impact)
• Necessary file updates cannot be accomplished (payment files, history files) • Interface failures affecting test conditions Priority 2 Classification Production: The problem adversely affects the accomplishment of a mission critical capability so as to degrade performance and for which no acceptable work-around is known.* This means the problem adversely affects the payment of benefits with a small claim volume or payment impact, the completion of CMS required reporting, or inaccurate information is being sent providers, beneficiaries or CMS. For example, if the information on an outgoing document to the provider community or Medicare Summary Notice is incorrect, the issue would be classified as a priority 2. EXAMPLES: • Inaccurate payment or no payment of claims (small impact/low volume) • Inaccurate CMS required report • Inaccurate messages to the beneficiary, provider or CMS • ABENDs with limited impact (e.g. one contractor) Beta/User Acceptance Testing: The problem would adversely affect the accomplishment of a mission critical capability so as to degrade performance if current test software is moved into the production environment. This means the problem adversely affects the payment of benefits with a potentially small claim volume or payment impact, the completion of CMS required reporting, or inaccurate information is being sent to providers, beneficiaries or CMS. For example, if the information on an outgoing document to the provider community is incorrect, the issue would be classified as a priority 2. EXAMPLES: • Inaccurate payment or no payment of claims (potentially small impact) • Inaccurate CMS required report • Inaccurate messages to the beneficiary, provider or CMS
Priority 3 Classification Production: The problem adversely affects the accomplishment of mission critical capability so as to degrade performance and for which an acceptable workaround is known.* This means the problem could have significant impact but the work-around alleviates the impact. This allows the system maintainer adequate time to code a fix and sufficiently test before the corrected software is delivered for production installation. EXAMPLES: • Impact of problem could be significant or minimal • Problem correctable by contractor workaround* • ABENDs with an acceptable workaround* Beta/User Acceptance Testing: The problem would adversely impact the accomplishment of a mission critical capability so as to degrade performance if current test software is moved into the production environment. If moved into the production environment before correcting an acceptable workaround could be instituted to prevent the adverse impact. ** EXAMPLES: • Potential impact of problem could be significant or minimal • Problem affects CMS required reporting Priority 4 Classification Production: The problem is an operator inconvenience or annoyance, which does not affect a required mission essential capability. EXAMPLES: • Problems affects non-mission critical functions • Operational procedure with workload impact that should be automated • Impact of problem is minimal
• Correctable by contractor workaround* Beta/User Acceptance Testing: The problem is a test inconvenience or annoyance, which does not affect a required mission essential or test capability. If moved into the production environment before correcting, an acceptable workaround could be instituted to prevent the inconvenience. ** EXAMPLES: • Problem affects non-mission critical functions • Operational procedure with workload impact that should be automated • Impact of problem is minimal • Correctable by contractor workaround* Priority 5 Classification Production: All other documented system problems. These could include operator errors, an inability to reproduce the reported problem, a problem with insufficient information, or documentation errors. The system maintainer should request approval from the (GTL) before coding and implementing any system enhancements. EXAMPLES: • A/B and DME MACs requested enhancements • Documentation errors • Problem affects non-mission critical functions • Minimal impact Beta/User Acceptance Testing: All other documented system test problems. These could include operator errors, an inability to reproduce the reported problem, a problem with insufficient information, or test documentation errors. The system maintainer should work to correct these issues as soon as possible but any system enhancements should be discussed with the GTL.
EXAMPLES: • Test region or processing enhancements • Test documentation • Problem affects non-mission critical test functions • Minimal impact * An acceptable workaround is a temporary alternative solution to a confirmed problem in the shared system that will ensure the contractor is able to accomplish a mission critical capability. What makes the workaround “acceptable” is it shall be agreeable to both the maintainer and contractor and does not cause an excessive burden to the contractor. If the maintainer and A/B and DME MACs cannot come to an agreement on what is “acceptable” the decision will be made by CMS. ** CMS does not recommend using workarounds in the test region in order to “pass” test cases. The institution of a workaround should be used in order to implement a CMS mandate where the system maintainer may not have time to adequately code a fix before the software is delivered for production installation. 40.2.1 - Implementing Validated Workarounds for Shared System Claims Processing by All Medicare DME MACs (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) Medicare A/B, DME contractors shall implement workarounds within the shared systems for problems when formally defined as a Priority 3 or Priority 4 without obtaining written permission from a Project Officer or Regional Office. Shared system problems that are formally defined as a Priority 3 or a Priority 4 have acceptable workarounds which provide temporarily alternative solutions. In order for a A/B/DME MACs to implement a workaround, the shared system maintainer must first validate the problem, confirm that the workaround exists, is systematically viable and does not cause adverse effects. The implementation of such workarounds will eliminate delay in adjudication of Medicare claims and the payment to providers. Utilizing a Priority 3 or Priority 4 workaround shall not diminish the integrity of the shared systems and shall not include such actions as deactivating standard edits. The shared system’s priorities are formally defined at Section 40.2 of this chapter. 40.3 - Shared System Testing Requirements for Shared System Maintainers, Single Testing Contractor (STC)/Beta Testers, and Medicare A/B, Durable Medical Equipment (DME) Administrative Contractors (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) Medicare requires implementation of a limited number of shared systems that must be used by all MACs for the administrative responsibilities of Traditional Medicare (Part A, B and DME
claims). This eliminates the need for each A/B, DME MAC to repeat development of the base system as part of the complete system development life cycle (SDLC). CMS requires that the shared system quarterly release be subjected to the complete testing life cycle prior to production release. The goal is to ensure that all changes function as intended and that the implementation of changes does not degrade or otherwise unintentionally affect existing system capability and function prior to implementation. This requires that the shared system be subjected to all levels and types of testing including unit testing, integration testing, systems testing, functional testing, interface testing, performance testing, regression testing, and operational testing. Definitions are provided in subsection 40.3.9. The Shared System Maintainer and the Medicare A/B, DME MACs each have specific roles in testing the shared system quarterly release. Additionally, CMS contracts with a CMS Single Testing Contractor (STC) to act as a Beta tester for the FISS, MCS, VMS, and CWF shared systems respectively. The CMS Single Testing Contractor (STC) assumes primary responsibility for testing the Medicare Shared Systems. The STC will be fully responsible for meeting the requirements of the Beta tester as outlined in Chapter 7, Section 40.3, including all subsections. STC interface testing with HIGLAS will be initiated as a shadow test on Part A. The STC shall also initiate Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) testing. Three Medicare Contractor numbers have been established to accommodate STC testing. They are 00888 for MCS systems testing, 00388 for FISS systems testing, and 44410 for DMEMAC systems testing. This section identifies the testing responsibilities for each organization to ensure that each shared system quarterly release satisfies all CMS requirements. All organizations shall have processes in place to meet these requirements. Testing activities will generally begin 3 to 4 months in advance of the release date, particularly for shared system maintainers. 40.3.1 – Shared System Testing Requirements for Shared System Maintainers, Single Testing Contractor (STC), and DME MACs (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) Review subsection 40.3.9, Definitions, for a description of key testing terminology. 1. Maintainers of a Shared System shall plan and execute all the essential levels of testing. At a minimum this includes Unit testing, Integration testing, System testing, and Regression testing. Shared System Maintainers are also responsible for performing Interface Testing. 2. Beta testers may initiate testing at the integration level, but are primarily dedicated to testing at the system level, including regression testing. Beta testers are also responsible for performing Interface Testing, which includes full data exchanges between the shared system maintainers, and other systems. 3. Shared System Maintainers and Beta testers shall maintain a test environment that enables system-testing activities to replicate the production environment, as closely as required to effectively test. CMS provided all Beta testers with a date simulation tool to facilitate executing test cases with future dates (e.g., service dates, admission dates) without turning off edits or altering effective dates in the test environment.
40.3.2 – Minimum Testing Standards for Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC)/Beta Testers (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) 1. The Shared System Maintainers (SSMs), and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall fully test the quarterly release to ensure it is ready to be elevated to production. For the quarterly release to be considered fully tested, all the requirements contained within the release must be tested. Shared System Maintainers (SSMs) and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) must be able to demonstrate the degree to which each discrete requirement within a CR has been tested and by which test cases. It is therefore mandatory that the testers maintain traceability between test cases and the discrete requirements being implemented in the release. Additionally, for each CR or transmittal under test, the Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) must ensure that each discrete requirement specified in the Business Requirements section of any CR/transmittal has been fully tested. The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall specifically: • Maintain a repository of test requirements against which all test cases must be traced. • Prepare and execute a set of test cases that demonstrate the requirements were correctly implemented for all change requests within the quarterly release. • Maintain traceability between each test case and the requirement that the case was designed to test. 2. The Shared System Maintainers and Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall distinguish each test requirement with a unique Requirement Identifier. The Requirement Identifier must be a number or qualifier preceded by the CMS CR number and SSM CR number, separated by dashes. The format of the Requirement Identifier is: [SSM CR No.]-[CMS CR No.]- [Requirement No.], where: • SSM CR No. – is a number that identifies a CMS mandate or user change request under test. Free form text can also be used to identify changes not associated with maintainer CR numbers, e.g., “Regression” to indicate regression testing. Avoid spaces and use underscore symbol “_” instead. Dashes not allowed within this number; they are reserved for separation between the individual numbers in the Requirement Identifier. • CMS CR No. – is a minimum 4-digit number that identifies the CMS CR associated with the maintainer CR number. If no CMS CR is associated with a maintainer CR, use “0000”. Dashes are not allowed. Avoid spaces and use underscore symbol “_” instead. Dashes not allowed within this number; they are reserved for separation between the individual numbers in the Requirement Identifier. • Requirement No. – is a number that uniquely identifies the requirement with the CR. For any requirement taken from the Business Requirements section of a CMS CR, use the actual number from the Requirement # column. Do not repeat the CMS CR number. Dashes not allowed within this number; they are reserved for separation between the individual numbers in the Requirement Identifier.
Example: Maintainer CR 22522 corresponds to CMS CR 2634. Business Requirement 2.8 was taken directly from CMS CR 2634. The Requirement Identifier would be 22522- 2634-2.8. 3. The Shared System Maintainer and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall complete Test Case specifications that include specific input situations and the expected results associated with a single test purpose. Each test case specification must include the following: • A unique Test Case Identifier (which includes a cross-reference to the requirement in which the case is designed to test); • The specific objective or purpose of the case; • Input specifications (i.e., a description of the input situation[s]); • Output specifications (i.e., a description of the expected results); and • Intercase dependencies - in instances where the test results of one test case may impact other test cases, the test case specification must identify the other test case(s) and describe the relationship(s). Refer to section 40.3.10, Test Case Specification Standard, for the specific format required to electronically maintain test cases. 4. All Test Cases must contain a unique Test Case Identifier. The CMS standard for the Test Case Identifier is the Requirement Identifier, followed by a number that uniquely qualifies the test case specification, separated by a dash. The format of the Test Case Identifier is: [Requirement Identifier]-[Test Case Number], where: • Requirement Identifier – is the actual identifier of the requirement being testing by the case. • Test Case Number – is a number that uniquely qualifies the test case. This is generally a sequential number. This is necessary since more than one test case is often needed to test a single requirement. Dashes not allowed within this number; they are reserved for separation between the individual numbers in the Test Case Identifier. Example: Two test cases were developed to test the implementation of Requirement 22522-2634-2.8 (see example above). The unique Test Case Identifier for the two test cases would be 22522-2634-2.8-01 and 22522-2634-2.8-02. 5. The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall document and execute both positive and negative test cases to ensure the requirements of the release are correctly implemented. • Positive test cases are required to ensure that the system is directly fulfilling the requirements as specified. One or more positive test cases are required for each
requirement. As an example, if a program mandate effects a change for services beginning on July 1, a positive test case would include service dates in July or later and validate that the actual mandate was correctly implemented. • Negative test cases test cases are required to ensure that the system does not perform an incorrect action. As an example, if a program mandate effects a change for services beginning on July 1, a negative test case would ensure that implementing the mandate did not negatively impact claims with service dates prior to July 1. Unlike positive test cases, a negative test case may not be applicable to every requirement within a CR. Additionally, although due diligence might necessitate a negative test case, the need may be mitigated by an existing case in your regression test set. 6. The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall document all test cases and the actual results for each test case electronically. Each test case and the associated results must be stored in a test management repository (i.e., Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) tool) and must at a minimum contain the data elements outlined in the CMS Test Case specification standard. See subsection 40.3.10 for the Test Case specification standard. 7. The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall maintain a test log that provides a record of each test execution. Test Log requirements may be fulfilled by correctly using the ALM “run” feature (or an equivalent tool or approach) as outlined in the Quarterly Release Test Management User Guide. 8. The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall execute a full regression test set on their system for every quarterly release. Each testing entity shall perform regression testing within their designated testing window as outlined in subsection 40.3.7, Timeframe Requirements. 9. The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall perform interface testing. • The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall validate that all output files are correctly created by their system. The SSMs and STC shall validate that their system can accept and correctly process all input files. • The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall perform interface testing that includes full data exchanges (both ways) between the shared system and any principal claims processing adjudication or financial system (e.g., the CWF and HIGLAS respectively). The STC is required to perform data exchanges with HIGLAS after HIGLAS is implemented at the STC’s data center. • The Shared System Maintainers and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) shall complete an integrated system test coordinating the maintenance of test data baselines, such as beneficiary data, with the CWF Beta tester. 40.3.3 – Testing Standards Applicable to all Beta Testers (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15)
1. Each shared system maintainer and each beta tester shall complete integrated testing with the CWF Beta tester, using coordinated beneficiary data, in the execution of their test cases. All test cases involving CWF functionality (related to claims adjudication) must be executed in an integrated test with the CWF. This requires full data exchanges between testing entities including: • Satellite files being sent from the shared systems to the CWF Beta tester; and • Response files being sent from the CWF to the shared system Beta testers. 2. Each Beta tester shall: • Utilize the standard CMS Test Management tool and repository to documents all test cases and results. • Follow the procedures outlined in the Quarterly Release Test Management User Guide in order to complete the documentation of test runs and results. 3. Each STC/beta tester shall review all Shared System Maintainer release documentation for completeness, accuracy, and usability. Any questions, problems, or issues with the documentation shall be forwarded to both the Shared System Maintainer and CMS. 4. Each STC/beta tester shall conduct performance testing to reasonably assure that the system provides acceptable response times, throughput rates, and processing windows and can accommodate production workloads. 5. The CMS testing requirements outlined in section 40.3 may require the STC/beta tester to test a specific type of bill, specialty, or claim situation for which they do not possess the required level of expertise. In these instances, the STC/beta tester must partner with a Medicare A/B, DME MAC that possesses both the expertise and capabilities to test the specialty or claim type. As an example, should the STC/beta tester not have the operational capability or expertise to process Home Health claims, they are expected to partner with an A/B MAC (HHH) to complete the required HHA testing. Ultimately, the STC/beta tester is responsible for ensuring all test cases are exercised. Any partnerships that are established to complete the testing requirements shall be arranged and managed by the STC/beta tester. 40.3.4 - Testing Requirements Applicable to the CWF Beta Tester (Rev. 43; Issued: 03-30-07; Effective: 07-01-07; Implementation: 07-02-07) The CWF Beta tester shall act as a test host and exchange data with entities testing the FISS, MCS, and VMS shared systems. The testing entities include all shared system maintainers and the shared system Beta testers. 40.3.5 – Part A/Part B (A/B) Durable Medical Equipment (DME) Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) (User) and the Single Testing Contractor (STC) Testing Requirements (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15)
A/B, DME MACs are not mandated to prepare and execute test cases that cover Medicare business requirements implemented within the base system in standard system and CWF quarterly releases. Shared System Maintainers and the STC are fully responsible for testing the base functionality. The A/B, DME MAC (users) shall test their local/unique components and conduct a limited, end-to-end, operational test. 1. A/B, DME MACs shall fully test their local components and processing rules prior to production implementation of the quarterly release. This testing is applicable for all local components and processing rules modified since the previous quarterly release. A. A/B, DME MACs shall test any system components they maintain and implement to support claims processing in addition to the base system. This includes front-end and back-end components such as those for EDI entry and translation, EDI outbound processing, and printing (e.g., MSN generation). B. A/B, DME MACs shall test changes they make to user control files, facilities, and tables in order to implement new Medicare policy or business rules. Examples of these facilities include but are not limited to auto adjudication facilities (e.g., ECPS and MCS SCF) and the MCS SPITAB. C. A/B, DME MAC shall fully test any shared system functionality that was: - Developed by the shared system maintainer solely for them, or - Developed by the shared system maintainer under a special project in which they were the exclusive participant. An example would be a MAC working with CMS on a special demonstration project. In this example the MAC shall fully test the shared system functionality that was implemented for the demonstration project. 2. A/B, DME MACs shall complete a limited end-to-end operational test that incorporates the shared system release, integrated with their other claims processing components. These components include the front-end for claims receipt, translators, the CWF, the financials, and back-end EDI and report generation. The test must ensure that processing is contiguous from claims entry, to claims adjudication, and ultimately remittance and Medicare Summary Notice generation. Through contiguous processing, the interfaces between all key claims processing components must be exercised. The banking system interfaces such as National Clearing House (NCH) transfers need not be exercised. The test is limited in the number of test cases that are required, since shared system maintainers and the STC are testing the base functionality of the shared system. A. A/B, DME MACs shall ensure that the integrated systems software can complete cycles without system abends and produce the expected output. The A/B, DME Medicare Contractor shall ensure their operational test: • Exercises all claims entry points not fully incorporated in the base system such as paper and EMC front-end components; • Includes all allowable standard electronic formats and versions;
• Includes a variety of claims types; and • Includes all components that support their claims workload and interfaces to the shared system. B. The operational test shall include the most recent shared system release received prior to the initiation of the test. A/B, DME MACs shall initiate the test as required to ensure its completion and the reporting of any problem prior to production implementation. 3. CMS strongly encourages the shared system user community to promote: • Standardizing their system nationally, • Centralizing any table maintenance that implements national Medicare policy at the system maintainer level, and • Minimizing local variations. 4. A/B, DME MACs may perform additional testing on the shared system or duplicate Beta testing tasks as time permits. At the discretion of their Regional Offices, the A/B, DME MACs may be required to separately document any testing they perform in addition to their mandated testing. 5. A/B, DME MACs shall test any business rule or event with future dates that they code or set- up in their Auto Adjudication Software (AAS), prior to implementing the rule or event into production. Examples of AAS include but are not limited to ECPS, SCF, the Shack, and the Mill. a. A/B MACS shall submit their date simulation recommendations to the FISS FWG in advance and participate in discussions at the FWG calls, as required to reach consensus on a date simulation schedule. b. A/B MACS shall submit their date simulation recommendations to the MCS FWG in advance and participate in discussions at the FWG calls, as required to reach consensus on a date simulation schedule. c. DME MACS shall submit their date simulation recommendations to the DMOP TAG or the CFMTAG in advance and participate in discussions at the TAG calls, as required to reach consensus on a date simulation schedule. d. The FISS FWG, MCS FWG, and DMOP/CFM TAG shall use the “system date request process” to provide the VDC(s) their latest “run-date simulation” schedule for their FISS, MCS, and VMS UAT environments. e. The FWG or DMOP TAG shall maintain their “run-date simulation” schedule for a minimum of 14 calendars days in advance. Here is an example of a “run-date simulation” schedule:
Calendar Date System Run Date Calendar Date System Run Date Calendar Date System Run Date 10/8/2015 10/5/2015 10/17/2015 10/14/2015 10/26/2015 10/23/2015 10/9/2015 10/6/2015 10/18/2015 10/15/2015 10/27/2015 10/24/2015 10/10/2015 10/7/2015 10/19/2015 10/16/2015 10/28/2015 10/25/2015 10/11/2015 10/8/2015 10/20/2015 10/17/2015 10/29/2015 10/26/2015 10/12/2015 10/9/2015 10/21/2015 10/18/2015 10/30/2015 10/27/2015 10/13/2015 10/10/2015 10/22/2015 10/19/2015 10/31/2015 10/28/2015 10/14/2015 10/11/2015 10/23/2015 10/20/2015 10/1/2015 10/29/2015 10/15/2015 10/12/2015 10/24/2015 10/21/2015 10/2/2015 10/30/2015 10/16/2015 10/13/2015 10/25/2015 10/22/2015 10/3/2015 10/1/2015 f. The FISS FWG, MCS FWG, and DMOP/CFM TAG shall provide a copy of their “run-date simulation” schedule to their CWF test host. g. The FISS FWG and MCS FWG shall provide a copy of their “run-date simulation” schedule to the HIGLAS test site as required to accommodate their HIGLAS enabled contractors. 40.3.6 - Testing Requirements Applicable to all CWF Data Centers (Hosts) (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) Each CWF data center or CWF sector host shall: • Forward all satellite software and documentation to the satellites (contractors) to which they serve as the primary production host; • Install the CWF quarterly release software in a designated test region; • Make the designated test region available their satellites (users) for testing; • Coordinate test data, such as beneficiary data, with the user testers; • Process all satellite files submitted by the users and return all corresponding reply files generated for users; • Report release problems to the CWF Maintainer and CMS; • Verify with CMS that each of its satellites submitted at least one test file during user testing; and • The CWF Host shall support future date testing by the MACs.
• The CWF Host shall review date simulation schedule submitted by the FISS FWG, MCS FWG, and DMOP TAG. 40.3.7 - Timeframe Requirements for all Testing Entities (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) The SSMs, STC, and MAC shall operate under the testing timeframes shown below for each quarterly release: Timeframe Requirements for Testing Entities 1. The Medicare A/B, DME MAC or User testing period shall begin four weeks prior to production implementation. 2. The Beta testing period shall begin eight weeks prior to production implementation. The CWF and standard system Beta testers shall have an exclusive four-week testing timeframe prior to the initiation of user testing. • The Beta tester shall complete a functional System Test and Regression Test before the shared system is released to the User community. • Beta testing must also continue through the User testing period. The Beta tester may initiate performance testing during the user testing period. 3. Exclusive CWFM and SSM testing shall continue until Beta testing is initiated eight weeks prior to production implementation. The SSM and CWFM shall complete a Unit Test (on all components), Integration Test, System Test, and Regression Test prior to distributing the shared system release to the designated Beta tester. For all integration, system, and regression testing, the SSM shall use the most recent version of any third party or CMS provided software components (e.g., Pricer, OCE, MCE, Grouper) they are provided. The
SSM shall continue testing beyond the exclusive maintainer-testing window due to the late receipt of some third party or CMS provided software components such as the Pricers and OCE. 40.3.8 - Testing Documentation Requirements (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) 1. The SSM, STC, and MAC shall maintain documentation that fully demonstrates the requirements of this transmittal were met for each quarterly release. At a minimum the SSM, Beta tester, and MAC shall maintain the following test documentation to demonstrate full compliance: • Test Requirement and Test Case repository with traceability; • Test Log; • Test Status for the execution (run) of each test case (i.e., Pass, Fail, Not Run); • Actual Results for the run of each test case in which the actual results did not match the expected results; and • Documented proof of each test run, i.e., screen shots, scheduler job logs, etc. 2. The SSM, STC, and MAC shall: • Maintain all test documentation for the four quarterly releases prior to the current release under test. The documentation must be available for review by CMS (or its agent). • Document all software defects (problems) within the CMS specified repository such as INFOMAN. 3. The SSM shall communicate all confirmed software defects (problems) and fixes directly to CMS in writing through their CMS Maintenance Lead/(GTL) or other designee as specified by the CMS Project Officer. 4. A/B, DME MACs shall provide any testing documentation to their CMS regional office upon request. Additional requirements for selected shared system maintainers, STC, and CWF hosts may be contained in these organizations' individual contracts. Electronic screen shots may be incorporated/attached into the results of ALM has proof of online results. Test Log requirements may be fulfilled by correctly using the ALM “run” feature as outlined in the Quarterly Release Test Management User Guide. 40.3.9 - Definitions (Rev. 105, Issued: 06-02-17, Effective: 07-03-17, Implementation: 07-03-17) These definitions are provided to ensure common understanding.
Base Shared System - The FISS, MCS, VMS, or CWF system, which is routinely released by the Shared System Maintainers to their respective user community prior to any user customization. This includes all components released by the Shared System Maintainer, including but not limited to the claim adjudication subsystem, the financial subsystems, and other integrated components (i.e., Pricer, OCE, MCE, Grouper). Functional Testing – Testing to ensure that the functional requirements have been met. Functional testing is performed by the SSMs and the STC. Integration Testing – Testing combinations of interacting software components that make up parts of a system. Integration testing is performed by the SSMs, and the STC. Interface Testing – Testing conducted to evaluate whether subsystems or systems pass data. Interface testing is performed by the STC. Local Components – A Local Component as referenced in section 40.3 is any component or module that supports Medicare claims processing, but is not part of the Base System and is under the control and maintenance of the MAC. Maintainer – The Maintainer is an entity to which CMS directly contracts to maintain a Medicare claim processing shared system (FISS, MCS, VMS, or the Common Working File (CWF) system). The Maintainer, as referenced in section 40.3, does not refer to an entity to which a A/B or DME MAC subcontracts to operate their data center or perform other claim processing support activities. Operational Testing – Testing conducted to evaluate a system in its operational environment. Testing to ensure that the aggregate operational systems and their interfaces can be operated securely with the instructions provided. Operational Testing is performed by the SSMs and the A/B and DME MACs. Performance Testing – Testing that applies heavy transaction and processing loads to the system to ensure that response times, throughput rates, and processing windows remain acceptable and can accommodate production workloads. Performance Testing is performed by the STC. Regression Testing – Testing conducted on a system or components to verify that modifications have not caused unintended effects and that the system or components still complies with its requirements. Regression testing is performed by the SSMs and the STC. Regression Test Set – A set of selectable test cases designed to exercise a system over its functional capabilities and assure that it still works properly after changes have been applied. Requirement Identifier – A unique number assigned to each requirement comprised of the Shared System Maintainer CR Number, the CMS CR Number, and an alphanumeric element to uniquely qualify each requirement. For testing purposes CMS requires that each Test Case Identifier incorporate the Requirement Identifier to which it is traced. Stress Testing – Testing that applies a steadily increasing load to the system until it reaches the point where performance degrades to unacceptable levels. System Testing – Testing to discover any incorrect implementation of the requirements or incompatibilities in the software/hardware environment. System testing includes functional
testing, performance testing, and operational testing. System testing is performed by the SSMs and the STC. Test Case Specification – A description of an input situation and of the required results associated with a specific test objective or purpose. Test Case Identifier – A unique identifier assigned to each test case. Test Log – A chronological record of relevant detail about the execution of tests. Relevant details include run date, run time, test status, and actual results. Test Requirement - A specific requirement that is under test and to which one or more test cases are traced. Test requirements may be derived from various types of requirements i.e., business functional requirements, performance requirements etc. Note: Any well-written requirement that is “testable” may be considered a Test Requirement. Any requirement contained in the Business Requirements section of a CR or transmittal, also constitutes a test requirement. Test Set – A collection of test cases that have a common usage. Unit Testing – The testing of individual units (i.e., software components, modules) or groups of related units. It is the lowest level of testing and is usually performed by programmers. Unit testing may be both functional (requirements oriented) and structural (i.e. logic oriented, code coverage oriented). Unit testing is performed by the SSMs. 40.3.10 - Test Case Specification Standard (Rev. 97, Issued: 01-15-16, Effective: 09-21-15, Implementation: 09-21-15) Purpose: This standard establishes a controlled outline for the contents and presentation of a Test Case Specification used by the shared system maintainers and the STC. Applicability: This standard is applicable to all Test Case Specifications developed by the shared system maintainers and the STC. Data Element Description Allowable Values or Format Comments Test Case Specification Identifier Multi-part indicator that uniquely identifies the test case specification. See Test Case Specification Identifier Standard. Test Purpose A free form field that captures the intent of the test and identifies any key components of the test, e.g., specific codes. See attached example.
Input Specification A free form field that captures critical information used to exercise the system functionality. Information could be grouped into the following topics: Claim Data Requirements Claims History Beneficiary Information Provider Information See attached example. Intercase Dependencies (Predecessor Transaction Identifier) The test case specification identifier of the transaction that must be entered into and processed by the system prior to processing the transaction described by the test case specification. See Test Case Specification Identifier Standard. Output Specification A free form declarative statement that identifies the expected results from performing all the steps, as a collection, within the test. Test Type A one-character indicator to identify whether the test is positive or negative. P = Positive Test N = Negative Test ALM Plan Tab (Required User Defined Fields) Originator A one-character indicator to identify the originating entity (designer) of the test case. B = Beta C = CMS/QRTM M = Maintainer Test Status Summary indicator for a test case. PS = Passed FA= Failed NR = Not Run IN = Incomplete ID = Invalid Data IC = Invalid Case Required Test Execution (Run) Elements Test Results Free form declarative statement of actual results for a test case when the actual results do not match the expected results. Optional Information: Industry best practices demonstrate that additional granularity may be necessary to document discrete key test actions that should be executed and documented. These items are referred to as test steps. A test case specification may have one or more test steps. When documenting test steps, the following standard applies:
Step Number Unique identifier for each test step. “Step n” Where “n” is a sequential counter for each step starting at 1. There is at least one test step in each test case specification, but usually contains multiple test steps. Optional Test Case Elements Step Description A free form declarative statement that identifies the action taken to perform the test. The step description statement usually begins with a verb. Expected Step Results A free form declarative statement that identifies the expected results from performing the associated step description. Example #1 Test Case Identifier 4419-2825-5.2-001 Test Purpose To confirm that the A/B MAC (A) claims processing systems accept, process, and assign reason code 30 (Payment adjusted because the patient has not met the required eligibility, spend down, waiting or residency requirements) to Inpatient Hospital claims submitted on Type of bill (TOB) 111 (Hospital Inpatient Part A; admit through discharge) with Dates of Service (DOS) on 01/01/2004 when a beneficiary is not lawfully present in the United States. Input Specification Claims History None Beneficiary Information Beneficiary must be unlawfully present in United States. Beneficiary elected English as primary language Provider Information Provider Number Range = XX0001-XX0999 Claim Data Requirements TOB = 111 DOS = 01/01/2004 Intercase Dependencies None Output Specification Claim will be assigned reason code 30 indicating beneficiary is not lawfully present in the United States, generating MSN message 5.7 (Medicare payment may not be made for the item or service because on the date of service, you were not lawfully present in the United States). Test Type P Originator C Test Status PS Test Results Claim was assigned appropriate reason code
40.3.11 - Single Testing Contractor (STC) Non-Testable Conditions and Potential Testing Impacts (Rev. 125; Issued: 07-05-19, Effective: 08-05-19, Implementation: 08-05-19)
ID LOB STC Not Testable Conditions and Potential Testing Impacts 1 FISS, MCS, VMS Electronic Correspondence Referral System functionality (ECRS) - The STC does not interface with ECRS. 2 FISS, MCS, VMS Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) and/or Recovery Audit Contractor Data Warehouse (RACDW) - The STC does not interface with the RAC or the RACDW. The STC does have the ability to test RAC related changes in the shared system applications. 3 FISS, MCS, VMS Non-Base Job System Processing. The STC does not test non-base jobs. 4 FISS ECPS events – The STC does not test MAC controlled ECPS events. 5 VMS Super Op events - The STC does not test MAC controlled Super Op events. 6 MCS SCF Logic - The STC does not test MAC controlled SCF Logic. 7 FISS, MCS, VMS Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) - The STC does not test MAC LCD or medical policy. MACs conduct LCD and medical policy testing. 8 MCS Interactive Voice Response (IVR) - STC would not do end-to-end testing of MCS base system changes for the IVR. The STC does have the ability to test IVR related changes in the shared system. 9 MCS Automated Response Unit (ARU) - STC would not do end-to-end testing of MCS base system changes for the ARU. The STC does have the ability to test ARU related changes in the shared system. 10 FISS, MCS, VMS Optical Character Recognition (OCR) - The STC does not test changes to OCR functionality. 11 FISS, MCS, VMS, CWF Contractor ID specific logic – The STC is unable to conduct state or jurisdiction specific testing that requires a specific contractor number for processing. 12 FISS, MCS, VMS Printing – The STC does not have a print vendor and does not test backend print/mail functions.
13 FISS, MCS, VMS, CWF Testing that requires large volumes of data – The STC environment contains a limited number of claims. Thus, the STC may not be able to identify volume- related issues in its test environment. 14 FISS, MCS, VMS, CWF Runbooks are documentation artifacts maintained by the SSMs that provide instructions regarding how jobs are to be scheduled (daily, weekly, monthly, on request etc.) and predecessor/successor relationships for jobs that must precede or succeed, as well as containing comments on known abend return codes the job is programmed to return sometimes including instructions on how to rerun/restart each abend return code. As Runbooks are documentation in nature the STC does not test Runbooks. 15 CWF Enrollment Database (EDB) - The STC does not interface with the EDB system. 16 FISS, MCS, VMS, CWF Processes that are designed to only work in a test environment - Processes that are designed to only work in a test environment and will never be promoted or utilized in the production environments. This includes the internal testing facility (ITF), the CWF response generator, the HIGLAS response generator, and the MBI generator. 17 FISS, MCS, VMS Healthcare Integrated General Ledger Accounting System (HIGLAS) - The STC is not responsible for testing HIGLAS changes. The shared systems will continue to test HIGLAS. 18 FISS INFOMAN - The STC does not test CRs implemented by the FISS SSM that update the release identifier on the main CICS screen in the FISS application. 19 FISS, MCS, VMS, Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) - The STC does not conduct testing with financial institutions, and is therefore unable to test the EFT transactions. The STC inspects the EFT files created from the shared systems and processes them. 20 FISS, MCS Payment File Development Contractor (PFDC) - The STC does not interface with the PFDC system. Changes to the file are tested by the STC by manually sending and receiving a file. The STC inspects the files created from the shared systems and processes them. 21 FISS, MCS, VMS, CWF Integrated Data Repository (IDR) - The STC can test IDR file changes as part of the shared system, but the files are not automatically sent to the IDR contractor. STC manually sends files to the IDR contractor twice during the
release. The STC inspects the files for accuracy created from the shared systems and processes them. 22 FISS Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) - The STC does not interface with QIES. The STC inspects the files for accuracy created from the shared systems and processes them. 23 FISS, MCS, VMS, CWF Provider Statistical and Reimbursement System (PS&R) - The STC does not interface with the PS&R system. The STC inspects the files for accuracy created from the shared systems and processes them. 24 FISS, MCS, VMS, CWF Production Performance Monitoring System (PULSE) - The STC does not interface with PULSE. The STC inspects the files for accuracy created from the shared systems and processes them. 25 MCS Provider Enrollment System (PES) - The STC does not have the PES application that is used exclusively by the Railroad Retirement Board Specialty MAC. The STC is unable to test the PES application. 26 FISS, MCS, VMS Provider Enrollment Chain and Ownership (PECOS) - The STC does not utilize the PECOS system to generate enrollments. STC manually creates a file when needed for testing. 27 FISS, MCS, VMS Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) - The STC does not have connectivity with esMD. The STC does have the ability to test esMD related changes in the shared system. 28 CWF Affordable Care Organization (ACO) – The STC does not have connectivity with the ACO. The STC does have the ability to test ACO related changes in the shared system. 29 CWF CWF MBI (Medicare Beneficiary ID) XWALK - There are some connectivity tests that STC cannot execute since the XWALK in STC is set up differently compared to production. The XWALK in the STC environment is embedded in the CWF CICS region that houses all other STC CWF data whereas the XWALK in production is in a separate CICS region called Host K. The STC does not connect to Host K.
40.3.12 - Next Generation Desktop (NGD) Requirements (Rev. 105, Issued: 06-02-17, Effective: 07-03-17, Implementation: 07-03-17 ) CMS has fully deployed the Next Generation Desktop (NGD) to the contractors’ beneficiary customer service contact centers. The NGD is a multiple call center application that is used by Medicare Customer Service Representatives (CSRs) to answer inquiries and perform operations on behalf of CMS beneficiaries and the American public. The NGD is designed to pull customer service-needed information into a common desktop application. As such, the NGD requires data exchange with CMS shared systems (VMS, CWF, FISS, MCS) and standard systems (Enrollment Database (EDB)/Master Beneficiary Database (MBD), Master Beneficiary Record (MBR), Group Health Plan (GHP)/Maricopa Managed Care System (MMCS). Note: NGD may integrate with additional systems as future releases are developed. Because NGD integrates with the shared systems, periodic changes will be made to the NGD Integration Layer as a result of the shared systems quarterly release process. The NGD maintainer will be required to update NGD in shares systems quarterly releases (Jan, Apr, July, Oct.) The NGD maintainer will be required to perform the various activities associated with changes to the NGD (i.e., unit and system testing). In addition to the shared systems quarterly release schedule, the NGD will adhere to a separate quarterly functional release process for NGD-specific updates and defect correction. The NGD maintainer shall follow all of the requirements identified in Section 40.3 for the shared system maintainers except as indicated below: 1. Section 40.3.1 Maintainers and Beta Testers –Required Levels of Testing, #3 is not applicable to NGD Beta testers. 2. Section 40.3.2 (#2) Minimum Testing Standards for Maintainers and Beta Testers, for NGD naming conventions, the NGD Maintainer should refer to the NGD test Plan. 3. Section 40.3.2 (#4) Minimum Testing Standards for Maintainers and Beta Testers, for NGD test case identifiers, the NGD maintainer should refer to the NGD System Test Plan. 4. Section 40.3.7 Timeframe Requirements for Testing Entities – NGD testing timeframes are as follows: • The official NGD User Acceptance testing period conducted by the VCS Support Contractor shall begin 2 weeks prior to production implementation. • The overall NGD testing period shall begin 3 weeks prior to production implementation. The NGD VCS Support testers shall have an exclusive 1 week testing timeframe prior to the initiation of user testing (Validation testing) -The User Acceptance tester shall complete a functional System Test and Regression Test before the system is released to the User community.
• Exclusive NGD System Maintainer testing shall continue until User Acceptance testing is initiated 3 weeks prior to production implementation. The NGD Maintainer shall complete a Unit Test (on all components), Integration Test, System Test, and Regression Test prior to distributing the shared system release to the designated Beta Tester. 5. Section 40.3.8 Testing Documentation Requirements (#2) For NGD, documentation of all software defects (problems) should be through ClearQuest. 50 - Contractor Implementation of Change Requests and Compliance with Technical Direction Letters (Rev. 11395, Issued:05-04-2022, Effective:05-31-22, Implementation:05-31-22) POLICY Contractors shall implement all issued Change Requests (CRs) and comply with all issued Technical Direction Letters (TDLs). Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) shall prepare and transmit the quarterly Contractor Implementation of Change Request (CRIR) and Technical Direction Letter Compliance Reports (TCR) reports as directed below. The CRIR shall contain all CRs to be implemented within that fiscal quarter. If CMS omitted a CR that should have been included in the report, the contractor shall add the CR to the bottom of the report in red font. MACs are not required to report on or add Shared System Only CRs (i.e., no MAC Responsibility checked). The TCR shall contain all TDLs issued that fiscal quarter, with the exception of contractor- specific TDLs. TDLs issued to specific contractor(s) shall be added by that contractor at the bottom of the report in red font. If CMS omitted a TDL that should have been included in the report, the contractor shall add the TDL to the bottom of the report in red font. A CMS Central Office (CO) representative will notify the MACs via a TDL (within two weeks of the end of each fiscal quarter) that the CRIR and TCR reports are available to download on Electronic Change Information Management Portal (ECHIMP). MACs shall enter all applicable information into the reports. MACs shall upload the completed reports into the CMS ART system. MACs shall also then send the completed reports to the CMS CO mailbox at CR_IMPL_REPORTS@cms.hhs.gov. NOTE: There are no spaces in this email address. Underscore “_” separates the words CR_IMPL_REPORTS. The CRIR and TCR reports are due no later than the 28 th of the month in which the reports are due, as indicated below. If the report due date of the 28th falls on a weekend or a holiday; each MAC shall submit the report on the next business day following the due date. • Quarter 1 includes October, November, and December. The report for Quarter 1 is due no later than February 28th. • Quarter 2 includes January, February, and March. The report for Quarter 2 is due no later than May 28th.
• Quarter 3 includes April, May, and June. The report for Quarter 3 is due no later than August 28th. • Quarter 4 includes July, August, and September. The report for Quarter 4 is due no later than November 28th. Each MAC shall complete and submit one CRIR by jurisdiction, one TCR by jurisdiction, cover Letter/Attestation Statements, and if necessary, a separate explanation document. MACs with multiple jurisdictions may complete a separate sheet within a single Excel workbook for each jurisdiction. In addition, each contractor shall write and maintain written procedures on its change management process (i.e., Standard Operating Procedures – SOP). Elements should include, but are not limited to, written procedures for the timely processing of CMS instructions (issued CRs and TDLs) from the CMS DRI MAILBOX and CMS TDL MAILBOX, written procedures of the contractor’s CR and TDL distribution process (including, but not limited to, the dissemination of provider education information), written procedures for CR implementation and TDL compliance (including written documentation to verify implementation/compliance). Contractors shall retain the written documentation to verify CR and TDL implementation/compliance using CMS’s records retention guidelines. Upon request from CMS, contractors shall supply the written procedures of their change management process, as well as written documentation to verify CR and TDL implementation/compliance to CMS. Implementation Date I. Definition Refer to section 50.4.2 of this chapter for the definition of the implementation date. II. Supporting Information For any instruction affecting providers, regardless if there are Systems or Non-systems changes, CMS gives at least 90 days’ advance notice to the providers. That is, CMS must issue the instruction at least 90 days prior to the implementation date to give providers enough time to implement the instruction. The vehicle used to alert providers 90 days prior to an instruction’s implementation date is the CMS Quarterly Provider Update, which can be accessed at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/QuarterlyProviderUpdates/01_Overview.asp There are four exceptions to the 90 days’ advance notice policy: (1) the instruction is contractor specific and therefore does not affect providers; (2) the instruction is a correction/clarification where the previously issued instruction contained typos or errors of fact or omissions; (3) the instruction is a routine or recurring item (which qualifies it to be included on the Mid-Quarter List in the Provider Update); and (4) the instruction is approved by the CMS Administrator to be published immediately or by a certain date.
If a previously issued instruction is re-issued with revised MAC requirements and a revised implementation date is not specified, MACs shall comply with the revised instruction as soon as possible but no later than 10 business days from the CR’s date of issuance. For a system change, the Initiator of the CR will specify an implementation date that corresponds to one of the quarterly release dates. Usually, the quarterly release date will be the first Monday of the quarter. Non-recurring system changes are usually issued five months in advance of the implementation date. On occasion, an off-cycle release date can be approved by OSORA and/or the Administrator. This exception tends to occur most frequently with the implementation of National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) and corrections to finals. For a Non-system change that has no impact on providers, the Initiator of the CR may specify the implementation date as 30 days from issuance. For a Non-system change that has provider impact, the Initiator of the CR may specify the implementation date as 90 days from issuance. After the comment period ends and the Initiator of the CR has addressed all comments, he/she prepares a final CR package for CMS clearance. The last part of the CMS clearance process involves obtaining approval from the Medicare Change Control Board (MCCB). The MCCB, in consultation with the Initiator of the CR, will determine the time period needed for implementing each change request. After the clearance process is completed, the Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs/Issuances & Records Management Group (OSORA/IRMG) will insert the actual implementation date before issuing the CR as a final instruction. COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING THE QUARTERLY CR IMPLEMENTATION REPORT (CRIR) Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) shall complete the CR Implementation Report, as follows, for each jurisdiction. MACs with multiple jurisdictions may complete a separate sheet within a single Excel workbook for each jurisdiction. If CMS omitted a CR that should have been included in the report, the contractor shall add the CR to the bottom of the report in red font. MACs shall update the report in the same manner as a CMS CO entered CR, unless specifically instructed below to exclude specific items. Header Rows The report contains three header rows. 1. Header Row 1, Contains the title, “CR Implementation Report (CRIR) – Quarter X (MMM-MMM) YYYY,” where X is the number of the quarter, MMM-MMM are the months included in that quarter, and YYYY is the Calendar Year. This data will be completed by CMS CO. 2. Item 1: Header Row 2, MACs shall enter their Contractor Name and Jurisdiction identifier in Item 1 of the report. 3. Item 2: Header Row 2, MACs shall enter the “Date Report Submitted” to CMS in Item 2 of the report in MM/DD/YYYY. [This is the date the report is e-mailed to CMS CO.]
4. Item 3: Header Row 2, Report Due. This is the date the report is due to CMS CO. This date will be completed by CMS CO. 5. Item 4: Header Row 3, CRIR Contractor Contact (First Name, Last Name, Phone). MACs shall enter the first name, last name, and phone number of the individual CMS CO should contact to ask questions regarding information in this report. Contact must be knowledgeable on the contents of the report. Details Rows Below the header Rows, Detail Rows shall be completed as follows: 1. Item 5 (No.) - This field contains a consecutive number to track the number of CRs on the report. CMS CO will complete this field for all CRs included on the report. If the contractor adds additional CRs, they should continue numbering from the previous CMS entered row in red font. For example, if CMS included 15 CRs on the report, the contractor shall begin numbering in this field with 16 in red font. 2. Item 6 (CMS CR #) - CMS CO will complete this field with the CMS CR numbers implemented during the quarter. 3. Item 7 (CMS Transmittal #) - CMS CO will not complete this field. 4. Item 8 (Subject) - CMS CO will complete this field with the subject for all CMS CRs implemented during the quarter. 5. Item 9 (CMS Published Implementation Date MM/DD/YYYY) - CMS CO will complete this field with the CMS Published Implementation date in MM/DD/YYYY format for all CRs implemented during the quarter. 6. Item 10 (Applicable Workload? (“X” or blank)) - MACs shall complete this field with an “X” for all CRs applicable to their workload or leave the field blank if the CR is not applicable to their workload. The CR is considered applicable to the contractor if any of the business requirements in the CR were required to be implemented by the contractor in the reporting period. Note: Shared System Only CRs (with no MAC responsibility checked) are considered not applicable. 7. Item 11 (Completed by Implementation Date? (“Y”, “N”, or blank)) - MACs shall complete this field with a ‘Y” for all CRs implemented on or before the CMS Published Implementation Date indicated in Item 9. MACs shall complete this field with an “N” for all CRs that have not been implemented by the implementation date and MACs must select a Reason for Delay from Item 12. This field shall remain blank if the CR is not applicable to the contractor (i.e. Item 10 is blank). 8. Item 12 (Reasons for Delay (leave blank if implemented by due date)) - This field shall remain blank if the CR has been implemented on or before the CMS Published Implementation date (Item 11 is “Y”) or is not applicable to the contractor workload (i.e. Item 10 is blank). MACs shall select one of the following Reasons for Delay from the
drop-down list for all applicable CRs not completed by the CMS Published Implementation date indicated in Item 9 (i.e. Item 10 has an ‘x’ and Item 11 has a “N”): 01. Due date changed due to TDL 02. Due date changed due to CR 03. Retired: MLN delay is retired as a reason for delay 04. CMS delay of file transmission 05. System related delay 06. CR extension approved or pending 07. Deadline past quarter end date 08. Other Reason 01 (Due date changed due to TDL) - Applies only in situations where CMS has issued a TDL which directs contractors to hold claims and/or otherwise delay the work related to that specific CR. Reason 02 (Due date changed due to CR) – Applies only in the following situations: a. Correction final changed the CMS Published Implementation date to be different than the date indicated in Item 9; b. CR was rescinded/replaced with a different CR number that changed the CMS Published Implementation date to be different than the date indicated in Item 9; c. Correction or Rescinded/Replaced CR changed the due date of specific Business Requirements. Reason 03 (CMS MLN Matters® Article Delay) – Retired Reason 04 (CMS delay of file transmission) - Applies only in situations when the file needed to complete work indicated in the CR was not available timely (i.e., payment files related to annual recurring CRs such as the HCPCS, Pricer, and OPPS). Reason 05 (System related delay) – Applies only in the following situations: a. Shared System Maintainer (SSM) production problem prevents a MAC from completing a specific task in the CR; b. Non-MAC maintained system (e.g., PECOS, HIGLAS, CWF, etc.) production problem prevents a MAC from completing a specific task in the CR. Reason 06 (CR extension approved or pending) - Applies only in situations where CMS Contracting Officer Representative (COR) has approved an extension of the implementation date specifically referencing this CR. Reason 07 (Deadline past quarter end date) - Applies only in the following situations: a. CRs with multiple implementation dates;
b. CRs that contain instruction for work to be done after the implementation date listed in the CR. Reason 08 (Other) - Applies in all other situations where the implementation of the CR was delayed, and Reasons for Delay 01 through 07 do not apply. 9. Item 13 (Additional Explanation) - MACs shall enter additional comments regarding the implementation of this CR in this field if a Reason for Delay is selected. Do not update this field for CRs implemented timely. For the following Reasons for Delay, MACs shall include the following data: Reason 01 (Due date changed due to TDL) - TDL reference number (TDL-######) of the specific TDL which grants an extension and the date to which the extension was granted. Note the actual implementation date of the CR requirements. Reason 02 (Due date changed due to CR) - Issued date of the Correction final, CR number and issued date of replacement CR (if applicable), and the revised implementation date. Note the actual implementation date of the CR requirements. Reason 03 (MLN delay) – Retired Reason 04 (CMS delay of file transmission) - Name of the delayed file, date that the file was expected, and the date the file was actually received. Note the actual implementation date of the CR requirements. Reason 05 (System related delay) – Name of the system, specific production problem identification number, description of the issue, and resolution date (if applicable). Note the actual implementation date of the CR requirements. Reason 06 (CR extension approved or pending) - Name of COR, date approval received, and the revised due date. Note the actual implementation date of the CR requirements. Reason 07 (Deadline past quarter end date) - Note impacted business requirement numbers and the delayed implementation date(s). MACs shall add this CR to the bottom of the CRIR report in red font for the CRIR report of the quarter where MACs completed their work. Reason 08 (Other) – Explanation of the delay for situations not applicable to Reasons for Delay 01 through 07. Use the space allowed in Item 13. If additional space is needed, MACs may submit with the completed CR Implementation report on a separate explanation document. Provide the following information in a clear and concise manner: a. Cause of the delay; b. If not the entire CR, reference the specific delayed Business Requirements; c. Description of specific tasks that were delayed; d. Indicate what is the impact to the government and resolution of the issue that delayed the CR implementation; e. Note the actual implementation date of the CR requirements.
10. CRIR Totals. This section summarizes the totals for the detail rows. a. Item 14 (Total number of CRs in this report) - This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. NOTE: This formula sums both CRs added by CMS and any additional rows of CRs added by the contractor on the spreadsheet. b. Item 15 (Number of CRs applicable to the contractor) – This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. NOTE: This formula counts CRs that the contractor has indicated are applicable by marking an “X” in Column F. c. Item 16 (Number of applicable CRs completed by the Implementation Date) - This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. NOTE: This formula counts CRs that the contractor has indicated were implemented timely by marking a “Y” in Column G. d. Item 17 (% of applicable CRs completed by Implementation Date) - This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. This field reflects the percentage of applicable CRs completed by the Implementation date, regardless of CMS or contractor-controlled reasons for delay. NOTE: This formula calculates a percentage from Item 15 and Item 16. e. Item 18 (% of applicable CRs completed timely) - This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. This field reflects the percentage of applicable CRs implemented timely, regardless of contractor-controlled reasons for delay, as indicated by a selection of Reason for Delay 8 (Other). NOTE: This formula calculates a percentage from the total number of Reason for Delay 08 indicated in Item 19 and the total number of CRs applicable to the contractor in Item 15. 11. Each MAC shall complete and submit one CRIR report by jurisdiction, a cover Letter/Attestation Statement (located on tab 1 of the CRIR Report Template or the Sample in Section 50.3), and if necessary, a separate explanation document. MACs with multiple jurisdictions may complete a separate sheet within a single Excel workbook for each jurisdiction. By the quarterly due date, each MAC shall submit the CRIR report, via e-mail to the CMS CO mailbox. [The CMS CO mailbox is: CR_IMPL_REPORTS@cms.hhs.gov. NOTE: There are no spaces in this Web address. Underscore “_” separates the words CR_IMPL_REPORTS.] If the report due date of the 28 th falls on a weekend or a holiday, each contractor, including MACs, shall submit the report on the next business day following the due date. 12. Each MAC shall upload the report to the CMS ART system. COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING THE QUARTERLY TDL COMPLIANCE REPORT Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) shall complete the TDL Compliance Report (TCR) for each jurisdiction as follows. MACs with multiple jurisdictions may complete a separate sheet within a single Excel workbook for each jurisdiction (name each tab accordingly).
There are some TDLs not issued to all Contractors. If a MAC received a TDL in the reporting period, the TDL should be included on the report. If CMS omitted a TDL that should have been included in the report, the contractor shall add the TDL to the bottom of the report in red font. MACs shall update the report in the same manner as a CMS CO entered TDL, with the exception of Item 7 (CMS Component). For Contractor added rows, Item 7 may remain blank. Header Rows The report contains four header rows. 1. Header Row 1, Contains the title, “TDL Compliance Report (TCR) – Quarter X (MMM- MMM) YYYY,” where X is the number of the quarter, MMM-MMM are the months included in that quarter, and YYYY is the Calendar Year. This data will be completed by CMS CO. 2. Item 1: Header Row 2, MACs shall enter their Contractor Name and Jurisdiction identifier in Item 1 of the report. 3. Item 2: Header Row 2, MACs shall enter the “Date Report Submitted” to CMS in Item 2 of the report in MM/DD/YYYY format. [This is the date the report is e-mailed to CMS CO.] 4. Item 3: Header Row 2, Report Due. This is the date the report is due to CMS CO. This date will be completed by CMS CO. 5. Item 4: Header Row 3, TCR Contractor Contact (First Name, Last Name, Phone). MACs shall enter the first and last name of the individual CMS CO should contact to ask questions regarding information in this report. The contact must be knowledgeable on the contents of the report. Detail Rows Below the Header Rows, Detail Rows shall be completed as follows: 1.Item 5: No. This field contains a consecutive number to track the number of TDLs on the report. CMS CO will complete this field for all TDLs included on the report by CO. If the contractor adds additional TDLs, they should continue numbering from the previous CMS entered row in red font. For example, if CMS included 15 TDLs on the report, the contractor shall begin numbering in this field with 16 in red font. 2.Item 6: TDL #. CMS CO will complete this field with the TDL number for each public TDL issued during the quarter. 3.Item 7: CMS Component. CMS CO will complete this field with the CMS Component responsible for issuing the TDL. [If MACs added the TDL to the report, they do not need to complete item 7 for those TDLs.] 4.Item 8: Subject. CMS CO will complete this field with the subject for all TDLs issued during the quarter.
5.Item 9: CMS Issued Date MM/DD/YYYY. CMS CO will complete this field with the Issued date in MM/DD/YYYY format for all TDLs issued during the quarter. 6.Item 10: Applicable Workload? (“X” or blank). MACs shall complete this field with an “X” for all TDLs applicable to their workload or leave blank if the TDL is not applicable to their workload. The TDL is considered applicable to the contractor if any action in the TDL were required to be completed by the contractor in the reporting period. 7.Item 11: Contractor Compliance? (“Y”, “N” or blank). MACs shall complete this field with a “y” for all applicable TDLs that the contractor has received, reviewed and complied with the instructions in the TDL. MACs shall complete this field with a “n” for all applicable TDLs that the contractor has received and reviewed, but has not complied with the instructions in the TDL. This field shall remain blank if the TDL is not applicable to the contractor (i.e. Item 10 is blank). 8.Item 12: Reason for Delay (Leave blank if in compliance). This field shall remain blank if the TDL has been complied with on or before the due date (i.e. Item 11 is a “y”) or is not applicable to contractor workload (i.e. Item 11 is blank). If the contractor did not comply with the instructions in the TDL (i.e. Item 11 is a “n”), the contractor shall select one of the following reasons from the drop-down list in this field: 01. Due date changed due to TDL 02. Due date changed due to CR 03. System Changes Required to Comply 04. TDL extension approved or pending 05. Deadline past quarter end date 06. Other 01 (Due date changed due to TDL) – Applies only in situations where CMS has issued a subsequent TDL which corrects and/or replaces previous direction provided under the original TDL. 02 (Due date changed due to CR) - Applies only in situations where CMS has issued a CR that supersedes direction provided previously in this specific TDL. 03 (System Changes Required to Comply) – Applies only in the following situations: a. Shared System Maintainer (SSM) production problem prevents a MAC from completing a specific task in the TDL; b. Non-MAC maintained system (e.g., PECOS, HIGLAS, CWF, etc.) production problem prevents a MAC from completing a specific task in the TDL; c. MAC is unable to accomplish a specific task in the TDL without SSM system changes. 04 (TDL extension approved or pending) – Applies only in situations where the CMS Contracting Officer Representative (COR) has approved an extension of the due date specified in the TDL. 05 (Deadline past quarter end date) – Applies only in the situations where some or all of the tasks in the TDL are due to be completed beyond the reporting period of the TCR report.
06 (Other) – Applies in all other situations where compliance with the TDL was delayed, but Reasons for Delay 01 through 05 does not apply. 9.Item 13: Additional Explanation. MACs shall enter additional comments regarding the compliance of the TDL in this field if a Reason for Delay is selected in Item 12. Do not update this field for TDLs complied with timely. For the following Reasons for Delay (Item 12), MACs shall include the following data in Item 13: 01 (Due date changed due to TDL) – TDL reference number (TDL-######) of the specific TDL which corrects and replaces the previous TDL. Note the actual date of compliance with the TDL. 02 (Due date changed due to CR) – CR number and issued date of the CR which supersedes the TDL. Note the implementation date of the CR. 03 (System Changes Required to Comply) – If a production problem prevents compliance, provide: name of the system, specific production problem identification number, and resolution date (if applicable). Note the actual date of compliance with the TDL. If shared system changes are needed to comply, describe necessary change and any steps taken to notify CMS of the discrepancy. 04 (TDL extension approved or pending) – Name of the COR, date approval received, and the revised due date. Note the actual date of compliance with the TDL. 05 (Deadline past quarter end date) – Note specific tasks and the due dates beyond the TCR reporting period. MACs shall add this TDL to the bottom of the TCR report in red font for the TCR report of the quarter where MACs completed their work. 06 (Other) – Explanation of the delay for situations not applicable to Reasons for Delay 01 through 05. Use the space allowed in Item 13. If additional space is needed, MACs may submit with the completed TCR report a separate explanation document. Provide the following information in a clear and precise manner: a. Cause of the delay; b. If not the entire TDL, reference the specific delayed task; c. Description of specific tasks that were delayed; d. Indicate what is the impact to the government and resolution of the issue with the TDL implementation; e. Note the actual date of compliance with the TDL. 10. TCR Totals. This section summarizes the totals for the detail rows. a. Item 14 (Total number of TDLs in this report) – This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. NOTE: this formula sums both TDLs added by CMS and any additional rows of TDLs added by the contractor on the spreadsheet. b. Item 15 (Number of TDLs applicable to the contractor) – This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. NOTE: this formula counts TDLs that the contractor has indicated are applicable by marking an “x” in Column F.
c. Item 16 (Number of applicable TDLs by compliance date) – This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. NOTE: This formula counts TDLs that the contractor has indicated were completed timely by marking a “y” in Column G. d. Item 17 (% of applicable TDLs by compliance date) – This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. This field reflects the percentage of applicable TDLs complied with by the due date, regardless of CMS or contractor- controlled reasons for delay. NOTE: This formula calculates a percentage from Item 15 and Item 16. e. Item 18 (% of applicable TDLs completed timely) – This field is calculated. The contractor shall not update this field. This field reflects the percentage of applicable TDLs complied with timely, regardless of contractor-controlled reasons for delay, as indicated by a selection of Reason for Delay 6 (Other). NOTE: This formula calculates a percentage from the total number of Reason for Delay 06 indicated in Item 19 and the total number of TDLs applicable to the contractor in Item 15. 11. Each MAC shall complete and submit one TCR report by jurisdiction, a cover Letter/Attestation Statement (located on tab 1 of the TCR Report Template or in Section 50.3), and if necessary, a separate explanation document. MACs with multiple jurisdictions may complete a separate sheet within a single Excel workbook for each jurisdiction. By the quarterly due date, each MAC shall submit the TCR report, via e-mail to the CMS CO mailbox. [The CMS CO mailbox is: CR_IMPL_REPORTS@cms.hhs.gov. NOTE: There are no spaces in this Web address. Underscore “_” separates the words CR_IMPL_REPORTS.] If the report due date of the 28th falls on a weekend or a holiday, each contractor, including MACs, shall submit the report on the next business day following the due date. 12. Each MAC shall upload the report to the CMS ART system. 50.1 - CR Implementation Report (CRIR) Template (Rev. 90, Issued: 02-12-15, Effective: 08-28-14- Begin with Quarter 3 in 2014.Implementation: 08-28-14- Begin with Quarter 3 in 2014) Upon direction from CMS via a Technical Direction Letter, MACs shall download the updated CR Implementation Report Template from Electronic Change Information Management Portal (ECHIMP), Help page. From there, MACs shall click the link from the List of Documents for the CRIR Template. 50.2 - TDL Compliance Report (TCR) Template (Rev. 90, Issued: 02-12-15, Effective: 08-28-14- Begin with Quarter 3 in 2014.Implementation: 08-28-14- Begin with Quarter 3 in 2014) Upon direction from CMS via a Technical Direction Letter, MACs shall download the updated TCR Template from ECHIMP, Help page. From there, MACs shall click the link from the List of Documents for the TCR Template.
50.3 - Sample Cover Letter/Attestation Statement (Rev. 90, Issued: 02-12-15, Effective: 08-28-14- Begin with Quarter 3 in 2014.Implementation: 08-28-14- Begin with Quarter 3 in 2014) CR Implementation Report Contractor Name: Contractor/Jurisdiction Number: Date Report Submitted to CMS: [MM/DD/CCYY] Subject: Attestation Statement: Implementation of Change Requests, Qtr.__, FY__ [Include the appropriate quarter and fiscal year in the Subject line.] Attention: CMS Central Office (CO) Medicare Contractor Management Group (MCMG) In accordance with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Change Requests 2884, 6102, and 8598, I attest that all instructions required to be implemented within Quarter __ [1, 2, 3 or 4 – select appropriate quarter] of FY __ [Enter appropriate fiscal year.] have been implemented. Exceptions are explained in Item 13 of the CR Implementation Report or attached in a separate document. Sincerely, [Name of Contractor Certifying Official.] [Title of Contractor Certifying Official.] Technical Direction Letter Compliance Report Contractor Name:
Contractor/Jurisdiction Number: Date Report Submitted to CMS: [MM/DD/CCYY] Subject: Attestation Statement: Compliance with Technical Direction Letters, Qtr.__, FY__ [Include the appropriate quarter and fiscal year in the Subject line.] Attention: CMS Central Office (CO) Medicare Contractor Management Group (MCMG) In accordance with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Change Request 8598, I attest that all instructions required to be complied with within Quarter __ [1, 2, 3 or 4 – select appropriate quarter] of FY __ [Enter appropriate fiscal year.] have been complied with. Exceptions are explained in Item 13 of the TDL Compliance Report or attached in a separate document. Sincerely, [Name of Contractor Certifying Official.] [Title of Contractor Certifying Official.] 50.4 - Change Request (CR) Definitions (Rev. 66, Issued: 01-07-11, Effective: 02-08-11, Implementation: 02-08-11) 50.4.1 - Issue Date (Rev. 66, Issued: 01-07-11, Effective: 02-08-11, Implementation: 02-08-11) The date the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes a change request (CR). When a CR has passed through all phases of the change management process, it is then ready for publication; that is, the CMS is ready to make the instructions contained in the CR available to contractors, maintainers, providers, beneficiaries and/or any group or organization that may be affected, as appropriate. The CMS publishes CRs by posting them as Transmittals, on the CMS Web site. Note: The issue date is named “Date” on the Transmittal form, One-Time Notification, Recurring Update Notification, and the Standard CR forms. It is sometimes referred to as the “transmittal date.”
50.4.2 - Implementation Date (Rev. 66, Issued: 01-07-11, Effective: 02-08-11, Implementation: 02-08-11) The implementation date identified in a change request (CR) is the date by which Medicare fee- for-service contractors and shared system maintainers shall apply all changes detailed in the business requirements, unless otherwise specified. It is the date when all necessary updates to infrastructure, business processes and/or supporting technology changes shall be completed and operational in order to execute new/modified policy and procedure. For CRs that do not require changes to the shared systems (non-system changes), contractors are usually given 30 to 90 days from issuance to implement the CR. For CRs that do require changes to the shared systems (system changes), a date is specified that usually corresponds with one of the quarterly shared system release dates. The date is usually the first Monday of the quarter (for example, January 3, April 4, July 5, or October 3 for 2011). Unless otherwise stated, the implementation date is the same for all business requirements listed within a specific CR. In some instances, a separate implementation date(s) may be given for a particular business requirement(s) within a CR. Implementation and effective dates are frequently not the same. The list below contains the scenarios for the differences: • The effective date and implementation date are different because the first day of the quarter is not a Monday; • The effective date and the implementation date are different because the effective date occurs after the implementation date; • The effective date and the implementation date are different because the effective date occurs before the implementation date, but both dates are in the future; or • The effective date and the implementation date are different because the effective date occurs before the implementation date, and the effective date is in the past, while the implementation date is in the future. 50.4.3 - Effective Date (Rev. 66, Issued: 01-07-11, Effective: 02-08-11, Implementation: 02-08-11) The effective date identified in a change request (CR) is the date on which any new rules, laws, processes and/or policies become active. Beginning on this date, Medicare contractors shall apply the new rules to process Medicare claims according to their updated business processes and supporting technology.
The effective date is normally a mandated date resulting from legislation or a regulation. In the case of National Coverage Determinations (NCDs), the effective date is the first day the item or service that is the subject of the NCD is covered nationally under the Medicare Program. Effective dates are not always future dates; sometimes, they are in the past. When this happens, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) instructs contractors, using business requirements, how to process claims for the period between the effective date and the implementation date. Typically, the effective date is the first day of any given fiscal year quarter or the first day of the month. 50.4.4 - Date of Service (Rev. 66, Issued: 01-07-11, Effective: 02-08-11, Implementation: 02-08-11) The date of service (DOS) is the date a provider renders service to a beneficiary. Unless otherwise specified, the effective date of a change request is the date of service. For the purpose of processing claims, the effective date for applying processing rules, laws, processes, and/or policies is the date the beneficiary received a service from a provider. For Durable Medical Equipment (DME) claims with spanned dates of service, the ViPS Medicare System (VMS) will use only the “From” DOS as the date the supplier rendered a service to a beneficiary. For example, if a new rule or law became effective on January 1, 2011, and a beneficiary received service on December 27, 2010, then that service would not be covered under the new rule. If the beneficiary received the service on or after January 1, 2011, then that service would be covered by the new rule. More service-specific information on the Date of Service can be found in. Pub.100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual and Pub. 100-04, Medicare Claims Processing Manual. 60 - Procedures for Modifying Shared System Edits and Capturing Audit Trail Data (Rev. 23, Issued: 05-06-05; Effective: 10-01-05; Implementation: 10-03-05) POLICY Contractors must implement processes and procedures for adding, deleting, inactivating, bypassing or otherwise modifying all shared system edits. Contractors must also have the capability to document and track those modifications. Modifications to maintainer coded edits must additionally include documentation that provides the rationale for the modification, the expected duration of the change, the impact of the change with respect to potential over or underpayments, claims volumes, effect on providers and / or beneficiaries, etc. In addition, the claims operations manager or equivalent area manager must document approval of the edit modification followed by CMS approval before any maintainer coded edit change has been made. MACs shall examine their current processes for modifying shared system edits and adjust them to incorporate the appropriate levels of internal controls. These controls must be documented and available upon request for review by CMS or an auditor. In addition, contractors must limit the number of personnel with the security clearance to modify maintainer coded shared system edits to ten (10).
Should the reason for an edit modification be because of a shared system deficiency, that associated problem must be documented and reported to the maintainer by the contractor. The shared system maintainer and contractor must prioritize the appropriate systems changes to correct edit deficiencies and schedule them for correction as soon as possible via existing change management processes. Should there not be consensus with the contractors regarding schedule, CMS maintenance staff should be consulted. Shared system maintainers must have the capability to track edit changes made by a contractor to the maintainer coded shared system edits. The shared systems must be able to identify who modified the edit, what was modified and when the alteration was made. 60.1 - CMS Standard File for Reason Codes (Rev. 59, Issued: 10-30-09, Effective: 04-01-10, Implementation: 04-05-10) The A/B MAC (A) or (HHH) Edits Evaluation Workgroup is tasked with identifying the inventory of contractor inactivated edits, documenting the reasons why the edits are turned off, and making a decision as to whether they should remain inactive or not. Transmittal 338, (Change Request (CR) 5927) issued on May 2, 2008, created the ‘CMS Standard’ field within the existing FISS Reason Code File which contains the status that was determined by the A/B MAC (A) or (HHH) Edits Evaluation Workgroup for each individual code that was reviewed. The ‘CMS Standard’ field indicators are as follows: • ‘A’ = Active • ‘I’ = Inactive • ‘ ‘ = Blank NOTE: The terms ‘Active’ & ‘Inactive‘ are defined as: • Active = Reason code status is equal to ‘S’, ‘P’, ‘ ‘ (blank), ‘D’, ‘R’, ‘T’, or is not equal to ‘S MDLTD’; and • Inactive = Reason code status is equal to ‘A’ or is equal to ‘S MDLTD.’ Each quarter, as necessary, CMS will issue an updated CMS Standard File for Reason Codes which is loaded into the system by the FISS maintainer via a Recurring Update Notification. 70 - Change Management Process -- Electronic Change Information Management Portal (ECHIMP) (Rev. 100, Issued: 06-23-16; Effective: 07-05-16; Implementation: 07-05-2016) The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) Division of Change Management (DCM) is responsible for the coordination and distribution of the draft Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) Change Requests (CRs) for Point-of-Contact (POC) Review. To that end, the DCM has developed the Electronic Change Information Management Portal (ECHIMP), a user-friendly, Web-based application to streamline and automate the change management process. In September 2004, the initiators of the CRs began creating and submitting CRs to the DCM via ECHIMP. In the past, the DCM distributed the draft Medicare FFS CRs to only 15 contractor
POCs and shared system maintainers (SSMs) for POC review. The SSMs forwarded the CRs to their users for review which increased the time to market the CR and sometimes resulted in the submission of late comments. Therefore, beginning January 3, 2006, the DCM will continue to notify the CMS and SSM POCs of the draft Medicare FFS CRs that are in POC review and also notify all the Medicare FFS contractor POCs as well via ECHIMP 2.0. The DCM will implement ECHIMP 2.0 on a voluntary basis for its internal CMS staff. Initiators of CRs may create and submit a CR for POC review using ECHIMP 2.0 beginning January 3, 2006. However, effective February 6, 2006, ECHIMP 2.0 will be implemented on a mandatory basis (i.e., all CRs will be initiated, submitted and reviewed in ECHIMP 2.0). The POCs will continue to receive the POC Review e-mail for CRs initiated and submitted in ECHIMP 1.0 which will contain the CR and the attachments until February 6, 2006. In addition to receiving the POC review e-mail with the CR and the attachments, POCs will also receive the POC review e-mail alert for CRs that are initiated and submitted in ECHIMP 2.0 which will not contain the CR file and the attachments. However, these e-mail alerts will contain a link for the POCs to click to review and submit comments on the CR via ECHIMP 2.0. NOTE: Beginning February 6, 2006, contractors and maintainers should not reply to any e- mails from ECHIMP @cms.hhs.gov nor should they send any e-mail to eChimp@cms.hhs.gov. Effective February 6, 2006, we will not accept any e-mails sent to that address. The notification of the draft Medicare FFS CRs will be distributed via an E-mail from ECHIMP to the CMS, contractor and SSM POCs, which will no longer contain the files and documents associated with the draft CR. Once the POCs receive the e-mail notification from ECHIMP that notifies them that a CR is currently in POC review, they shall log in to ECHIMP via a link that will be provided in the E-mail notification. Once logged in, they shall review the draft CR and provide comments to CMS via ECHIMP by the POC Review Comment due date. To maintain as much efficiency as possible with such a large number of prospective reviewers, each POC may submit only one set of comments on behalf of their contractor or maintainer organization and that submission must be identified as such. If the CR impacts A/B MAC (A), A/B MAC (B), DME MAC and/or A/B MAC (HHH) and it makes more sense to submit the comments separately (to keep the content clear), then two sets of comments from the contractor site or maintainer organization will be acceptable. No response received will be considered a concurrence. NOTE: It is the responsibility of the POCs to notify appropriate staff that a CR has entered POC review and to share the information with them. Each individual who has access to ECHIMP will also have the ability to review, download and print the CR files and share the files, either electronically or hardcopy, with other staff members who do not have ECHIMP access. We believe that expanding the POC review process to all of the Medicare FFS contractors and SSMs will not only decrease the time to market the CRs, but will also increase the quality of the review of the CRs by allowing a wider audience of those potentially impacted by the change the opportunity to comment. We also believe that this expansion to the POC review process will reduce the number of late comments submitted as well as reduce the number of corrected CRs now necessary as a result of uncoordinated and/or untimely POC comments. CMS realizes that expanding the POC review process to all of the Medicare FFS contractors and SSMs could potentially cause a lack of efficiency and an administrative burden if the above- outlined POC review process is not adhered to. Therefore, we will pilot this expanded POC review process for approximately 3 months effective February 6, 2006. At the conclusion of the 3 months, we will evaluate the pilot and adjust the POC review process, if necessary.
Change Request Correction and Rescind Process Currently, the CR corrections and rescind process is a manual process, which is completed via email. CMS is automating the CR correction and rescind process utilizing the ECHIMP system. This CR implements the following processes: • CMS will begin distributing Medicare FFS CRs that are being corrected or rescinded for review via a notification from ECHIMP to the current POC Review recipients. These notifications will specify the type of review to be performed in the subject line of the email (i.e., POC, Correction or Rescind Review). All current POC Review recipients will receive the notifications whether they are impacted on the CR or not. The notifications will specify which Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) and Shared System Maintainers (SSMs) are impacted. • Impacted SSMs will review and comment on CRs during the CR's Correction or Rescind Review Period. • Impacted SSMs will update their estimates as a result of the correction or rescind. • Non-impacted SSMs and non-impacted MACs will be able to review and comment on the draft corrected or draft rescinded CRs in ECHIMP, if they so choose. CRs that have been corrected and rescinded prior to this automation will not be updated in ECHIMP. This process will apply to CR corrections and Rescinds initiated on or after July 5, 2016. 80 - Contractor Workload Transitions (Rev.108, Issue: 11-03-17, Effective: 12-04-17, Implementation: 12-04-17) Fee-for-Service contractor workload transitions occurred when a Medicare Administrative Contractor’s (MAC’s) period of performance ends or its contract is terminated. When either of these two circumstances occurs, the outgoing contractor is required to work with the new incoming contractor to transfer the Medicare workload without any disruption to providers and beneficiaries. During a transition, the outgoing contractor has responsibilities and processes for closing out its Medicare contract and shutting down its operation. It must also assist the new incoming contractor in its efforts to assume the Medicare claims administration functions. Concurrently, the incoming contractor is required to establish an operational infrastructure and ensure that all data, records, and functions are properly transferred from the outgoing contractor. Both parties have a responsibility to ensure that the transition is conducted seamlessly and that all contractual obligations are met during the transition. 80.1 - Transition Handbooks (Rev.108, Issue: 11-03-17, Effective: 12-04-17, Implementation: 12-04-17)
The Medicare Contractor Management Group (MCMG) in the Center for Medicare has developed a handbook in order to assist fee-for-service contractors with the transfer of Medicare workload from one contractor to another. This is found at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Contracting/Medicare-Administrative- Contractors/Resources-for-MACs.html Every Medicare workload transition will vary depending on the unique circumstances and environment of the Medicare contractors involved. There may be activities and processes described in the handbooks that, for various reasons, will not be applicable to a specific transition. There may also be activities that will need to be performed that the handbooks do not cover. The handbook cannot identify and address all of the variations that may occur during a workload transition. However, the overall activities described in the handbooks for managing a workload implementation or closeout project and the requirements contained therein for meetings, reporting, and providing information, data, and records are part of the IOM and incorporated by reference into the MAC contracts. 90 - Integrated Data Repository (IDR) Claims Sourcing from Shared Systems (Rev. 54, Issued: 10-01-08; Effective: 10-01-08; Implementation: 01-05-09) The CMS’ fraud investigation landscape is significantly different today than in the past as a result of program changes, such as the implementation of the Medicare Prescription Drug benefit, competitive selection of contractors responsible for claims administration and program integrity, such as Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) and PSCs, expansion of Medi- Medi and Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) programs, and advent of the Medicaid Integrity Program (MIP). CMS recognizes the need to significantly enhance the use of technology to improve its collaborative fraud fighting efforts as well as to establish a modernized data analysis capability for all of Program Integrity. Today, most Program Integrity contractors have built their own data warehouses and/or avenues for collecting, processing, analyzing data which serves their own individual needs. These distributed, regional approaches to data analysis do not lend themselves to national analyses, do not represent best practices, and do not take advantage of the cost savings that a centralized data repository would provide. All of these functions can be better served through a comprehensive set of common data structures and modern tools that encourage collaboration and innovation. The IDR goal - through incremental releases - is to be the centralized data repository for all Medicare data. The Program Safeguard Contractors (PSCs) cannot currently use the IDR exclusively because the source of claims data is the National Claims History (NCH). The limited NCH data record is inadequate to support the extensive fraud, waste and abuse investigations that need to be performed by PSCs. The Shared Systems data are the required data source for Program Integrity. The CR initiates the acquisition of the Shared Systems data for the IDR. Once the IDR has the required Shared Systems data, Program Integrity and their contractors will increase their ability to detect potential fraud, waste and abuse. FISS shall provide, in electronic format, all claims output for all A/B MACs (A) or (HHH) and claim types on a daily basis at the claims header and detail level for each of the three identified lifecycle phases required.
MCS shall provide, in electronic format, all claims output for all A/B MACs (B) and claim types on a daily basis at the claims header and detail level for each of the three identified lifecycle phases required. VMS shall provide, in electronic format, all claims output for all DME MACs and Certificates of Medical Necessity, as required with certain claims for payment, on a daily basis at the claims header and detail level for each of the three lifecycle phases required. The IDR Lifecycle Phase I is defined as the claim upon enumeration. The IDR Lifecycle Phase II is defined as the claim immediately after CWF adjudication. The IDR Lifecycle Phase III is defined as the claim once financial information has been posted to it.
Transmittals Issued for this Chapter Rev # Issue Date Subject Impl Date CR# R13718GI 04/10/2026 Records and Information Management Requirements Updates to Pub. 100-01, Medicare General Information, Eligibility and Entitlement Manual, Chapter 7, Section 30 09/14/2026 14324 R11395GI 05/04/2022 Updated Instructions for the Change Request Implementation Report (CRIR) and Technical Direction Letter (TDL) Compliance Report (TCR) 05/31/2022 12714 R128GI 11/01/2019 Update to General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement, Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements, Section 40.2 – Shared System Maintainer Responsibilities for Systems Releases 12/03/2019 11518 R125GI 07/05/2019 Internet Only Manual (IOM) - Update to General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement, Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements, Section 40.2 – Shared System Maintainer Responsibilities for Systems Releases, Section 40.3.11 Single Testing Contractor (STC) Non-Testable Conditions and Potential Testing Impacts 08/05/2019 11245 R124GI 05/17/2019 Update to Publication (Pub.) 100-01 to Provide Language-Only Changes for the New Medicare Card Project 06/18/2019 11240 R122GI 12/21/2018 Updated Instructions for the Change Request Implementation Report (CRIR) and Technical Direction Letter (TDL) Compliance Report (TCR) 05/28/2019 11067 R108GI 11/03/2017 MAC Transition Workload Handbook 12/04/2017 10329 R105GI 06/02/2017 Update to General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement, Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements, Section 40 – Shared System Maintainer Responsibilities for Systems Releases 07/03/2017 10062
R102GI 11/02/2016 Internet Only Manual (IOM) Publication 100-01 - General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement, Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements, Section 40 – Shared System Maintainer Responsibilities for Systems Releases 11/02/2016 9785 R100GI 06/23/2016 Medicare Fee-for-Service Change Request Correction and Rescind Process 07/05/2016 9455 R99GI 06/10/2016 Medicare Fee-for-Service Change Request Correction and Rescind Process – Rescinded and replaced by Transmittal 100 06/10/2016 9455 R97GI 01/15/2016 Internet Only Manual (IOM) Publication 100-01 - General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement, Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements, Section 40 – Shared System Maintainer Responsibilities for Systems Releases 09/21/2015 9219 R95GI 10/16/2015 Internet Only Manual (IOM) Publication 100-01 - General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement, Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements, Section 40 – Shared System Maintainer Responsibilities for Systems Releases – Rescinded and replaced by Transmittal 97 09/21/2015 9219 R93GI 08/21/2015 Internet Only Manual (IOM) Publication 100-01 - General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement, Chapter 7 - Contract Administrative Requirements, Section 40 – Shared System Maintainer Responsibilities for Systems Releases – Rescinded and replaced by Transmittal 95 09/21/2015 9219 R90GI 02/12/2015 Rescinds/Replaces CR 7468 - Updated Instructions for the Change Request Implementation Report (CRIR) and Technical Direction Letter (TDL) Compliance Report (TCR) 05/28/2015 8598 R88GI 08/25/2014 Rescinds/Replaces CR 7468 - Updated Instructions for the Change Request Implementation Report (CRIR) and Technical Direction Letter (TDL) 09/11/2014 8598
Compliance Report (TCR) – Rescinded and replaced by Transmittal 90 R87GI 08/08/2014 Update to Pub. 100-01, Chapter 7 for Language-Only Changes for ICD-10 Upon Implementati on of ICD-10 8639 R86GI 05/16/2014 Rescinds/Replaces CR 7468 - Updated Instructions for the Change Request Implementation Report (CRIR) and Technical Direction Letter (TDL) Compliance Report (TCR) – Rescinded and replaced by Transmittal 88 08/28/2014 8598 R83GI 03/07/2014 Update to Pub. 100-01, Chapter 7 for Language-Only Changes for ICD-10 – Rescinded and replaced by Transmittal 87 10/01/2014 8639 R75GI 12/30/2011 Contractor Implementation of Change Requests and Compliance With Technical Direction Letters – Rescinded and replaced by CR 8598 05/28/2012 7468 R66GI 01/07/2011 Change Request (CR) Definitions 02/08/2011 6592 R59GI 10/30/2009 The CMS Standard File for Reason Codes for the Fiscal Intermediary Shared System (FISS) 04/05/2010 6529 R57GI 02/20/2009 Implementing Validated Workarounds for Share System Claims Processing by Medicare Administrative Contractors (A/B MACs), Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractors (DMEMACs). Carriers, Regional Home Health Intermediaries (RHHIs) and Fiscal Intermediaries 03/20/2009 6379 R54GI 10/01/2008 IDR Claims Sourcing From Shared Systems-Implementation 01/05/2009 5949 R53GI 09/26/2008 Medicare Contractor Testing with Future Dates in the EDC 10/27/2008 6110 R52GI 07/11/2008 Change to CR Implementation Report Due Dates 08/11/2008 6102 R51GI 05/16/2008 IDR Claims Sourcing From Shared Systems-Implementation - Rescinded and Replaced by Transmittal 54 10/06/2008 5949
R46GI 07/20/2007 Implement New Contractor ID for Single Testing Contractor (STC) 01/07/2008 5648 R44GI 05/25/2007 Fee-for-Service Contractor Transition Handbooks 07/02/2007 5446 R43GI 03/30/2007 Clarification in Testing Instructions for Definition of “Local Components” 07/02/2007 5395 R38GI 05/26/2006 Files Maintenance Program Update to the Internet-Only Manual (IOM) 06/26/2006 5055 R34GI 01/06/2006 Change Management Process -- Electronic Change Information Management Portal (eChimp) 01/03/2006 4092 R33GI 12/30/2005 Change Management Process -- Electronic Change Information Management Portal (eChimp) 01/03/2006 4092 R30GI 10/28/2005 Initiate STC testing of the MCS for RRB and HIGLAS 04/03/2006 4150 R26GI 07/22/2005 Implement New Medicare Plan ID and Carrier Number for the Single Testing Contractor (STC) 10/03/2005 3978 R25GI 07/15/2005 Next Generation Desktop (NGD) Testing Requirements 08/15/2005 3493 R24GI 05/27/2005 2005 Scheduled Release for July Updates to Software Programs and Pricing/Coding Files 06/27/2005 3865 R23GI 05/06/2005 Procedures for Modifying Shared Systems Edits and Capturing Audit Trail Data 10/03/2005 3862 R17GI 02/25/2005 Review of Contractor Implementation of Change Requests (Replacement for expired CR 944) 03/01/2005 2884 R16GI 01/28/2005 Standard Terminology for Claims Processing Systems 04/04/2005 3596 R15GI 01/21/2005 Review of Contractor Implementation of Change Requests (Replacement for expired CR 944) 03/01/2005 2884 R08GI 07/30/2004 Establish Standard Terminology for Medicare Shared Systems 01/03/2005 3086
R06GI 05/2//2004 CMS Policy for Testing Quarterly Release of the Medicare Shared Systems and the CWF 08/01/2004 3011 R05GI 05/07/2004 Initial Publication of Chapter N/A 2765 Back to top of Chapter
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.