Constitution of Arkansas (2025 publisher edition) — Amendment 66: JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY COMMISSION .

amendment-66Arkansas Const. Amendment 66Constitution

Publisher edition notice: This collection preserves the complete constitutional appendix of the Secretary of State’s 2025 Election Laws and Constitution compilation: its preamble, twenty original articles, schedule and 104 published amendments, including annotations and explicit repealed notices. Repealed notices remain historical publisher context. Later amendments have not been independently verified.

Amendment 66
AMEND. 66. JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY COMMISSION .
(a) COMMISSION : Under the judicial power of the State, a Judicial Discipline and Disability
Commission is established and shall be comprised of nine persons: three justices or judges,
appointed by the Supreme Court; three licensed attorneys in good standing who are not justices
or judges, one appointed by the Attorney General, one by the President of the Senate, and one by
the Speaker of the House; and three members appointed by the Governor. The members
appointed by the Governor shall not be justices or judges, retired justices or judges, or attorneys.
Alternate members shall be selected and vacancies filled in the same manner.
(b) DISCIPLINE , SUSPENSION , LEAVE , AND REMOVAL : The Commission may initiate, and shall
receive and investigate, complaints concerning misconduct of all justices and judges, and
requests and suggestions for leave or involuntary disability retirement. Any judge or justice may
voluntarily request that the Commission recommend suspension because of pending disciplinary
action or leave because of a mental or physical disability. Grounds for sanctions imposed by the
Commission or recommendations made by the Commission shall be violations of the professional
and ethical standards governing judicial officers, conviction of a felony, or physical or mental
disability that prevents the proper performance of judicial duties. Grounds for suspension, leave,
or removal from office shall be determined by legislative enactment.
(c) D ISCIPLINE: If, after notice and hearing, the Commission by majority vote of the member-
ship determines that grounds exist for the discipline of a judge or justice, it may reprimand or
censure the judge or justice, who may appeal to the Supreme Court. The Commission may, if it
determines that grounds exist, after notice and hearing, and by majority vote of the membership,
recommend to the Supreme Court that a judge or justice be suspended, with or without pay, or
be removed, and the Supreme court, en banc, may take such action. Under this amendment, a
judge who also has executive or legislative responsibilities shall be suspended or removed only
from judicial duties. In any hearing involving a Supreme Court justice, all Supreme Court
justices shall be disqualified from participation.
(d) L EAVE AND RETIREMENT: If, after notice and hearing, the Commission by majority vote of the
membership determines that a judge or justice is unable because of physical or mental disability
to perform the duties of office, the Commission may recommend to the Supreme Court that the
judge or justice be granted leave with pay or be retired, and the Supreme Court, en banc, may
take such action. A judge or justice retired by the Supreme Court shall be considered to have
retired voluntarily as provided by law.
(e) VACANCIES: Vacancies created by suspension, the granting of leave or the removal of a judge
or justice, or vacancies created by disqualification of justices, shall be filled as provided by law.
(f) R ULES : The Supreme Court shall make procedural rules implementing this amendment
and setting the length of terms on the Commission.
(g) C UMULATIVE N ATURE: This amendment is alternative to, and cumulative with, impeach-
ment and address authorized by this Constitution.
709 Amend. 66 JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY

-- 722 of 883 --

Publisher’s Notes. This amendment, effective Decem-
ber 8, 1988, was proposed by S.J.R. 5 (see Acts 1987, p.
2880) and was adopted at the 1988 general election by a
vote of 431,864 for and 286,699 against.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.