In Re The Detention Of: C.b.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
In the Matter of the
Detention of C.B., 	No. 81545-8-I
DIVISION ONE
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
P ER CURIAM 	— 	C.B. 	appeals 	a 	14-day 	involuntary 	commitment. 	He
contends, and respondent Fairfax Hospital concedes, that the trial court failed to
comply with former RCW 71.34.740(2) (2019). 	We accept the concession.
Because the court failed to comply with its obligations regarding notice as to the
loss of C.B.’s constitutionally protected firearm rights, we reverse and remand.
This court held in In re Det. of T.C., 11 Wn. App. 2d 51, 62, 450 P.3d 1230
(2019) that former RCW 71.05.240(2) required the trial court to notify a person
facing commitment, before entry of a commitment order, that if the person refuses
to seek voluntary treatment and a commitment order is entered, they will lose their
firearm rights.1 We further held that lack of compliance with the statute that results
in the loss of the right to bear arms is an error that may be raised for the first time
on appeal. 	T.C., 11 Wn. App.2d at 61-62. 	As the hospital concedes, the court
failed to meet its express notice obligations as required by the statute, which
1 As amended in 2020, the current statute now allows either the court or the
prosecutor to provide the required notice. See L AWS OF 2020, ch. 302 § 39.

No. 81545-8-I/2
2
prejudicially affected C.B.’s constitutional right to possess firearms. 	We reverse
and remand for an order vacating the 14-day commitment finding.2
Reversed and remanded.
FOR THE COURT:
2 Because we reverse the order on this basis, it is unnecessary to reach
C.B.’s claim that technological difficulties during the hearing deprived him of his
constitutional right to counsel.