69273-9•State Of Washington, Res. V. Robert G. Shaver, Jr., App.
State Of Washington, Res. V. Robert G. Shaver, Jr., App.
69273-9Washctapp13 avr. 2015
Texte intégral
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ROBERT GORDON SHAVER, JR., Appellant. No. 69273-9-1 <S3 —J, c~ UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: April 13, 2015 CO l_J -::: -a i PER CURIAM — Robert Shaver appeals his convictions for stalking, burglary, unlawful imprisonment, assault, and violations of a court order. He contends his right to a public trial was violated when the court took peremptory challenges in writing and later filed the written challenges in the record. We stayed the appeal pending State v. Slert. 181 Wn.2d 598, 334 P.3d 1088 (2014) (plurality opinion). We now lift the stay and affirm based on our recent decision in State v. Filitaula, Wn. App. , 339 P.3d 221, 222 (2014) (exercise of challenges for cause in writing did not constitute a courtroom closure and did not implicate public trial right where form containing written challenges was filed in court record); see also State v. Dunn, 180 Wn. App. 570, 575, 321 P.3d 1283 (2014), review denied, 181 Wn. 2d 1030, 340 P.3d 223 (2015); State v. Love, 176 Wn. App. 911, 920, 309 P.3d 1209 (2013), review granted. 181 Wn.2d 1029, 340 P.3d 228 (2015).
No. 69283-9-1/2 We lift the stay and affirm. FOR THE COURT: 041J Meckel, f. /Li*t^A,
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69273-9-| Respondent, V. ROBERT GORDON SHAVER, JR., UNPUBLISHED OPINION = : 2 Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FILED: April 13, 2015 ) PER CURIAM — Robert Shaver appeals his convictions for stalking, burglary, unlawful imprisonment, assault, and violations of a court order. He contends his right to a public trial was violated when the court took peremptory challenges in writing and later filed the written challenges in the record. We stayed the appeal pending State v. Slert, 181 Wn.2d 598, 334 P.3d 1088 (2014) (plurality opinion). We now lift the stay and affirm based on our recent decision in State v. Filitaula, Wh. App. __, 339 P.3d 221, 222 (2014) (exercise of challenges for cause in writing did not constitute a courtroom closure and did not implicate public trial right where form containing written challenges was filed in court record); see also State v. Dunn, 180 Wn. App. 570, 575, 321 P.3d 1283 (2014), review denied, 181 Wn. 2d 1030, 340 P.3d 223 (2015); State v. Love, 176 Wn. App. 911, 920, 309 P.3d 1209 (2013), review granted, 181 Wn.2d 1029, 340 P.3d 228 (2015). No. 69283-9-I/2 We lift the stay and affirm. FOR THE COURT: Jubb | wh (Seclée Kt, ! . Lack 7 Ve
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.