State Of Washington, Res. V. Robert G. Shaver, Jr., App.

69273-9Washctapp13 avr. 2015

Texte intégral

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
ROBERT GORDON SHAVER, JR.,
Appellant.
No. 69273-9-1
<S3 	—J, c~
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: April 13, 2015
CO
l_J
-::: -a i
PER CURIAM — Robert Shaver appeals his convictions for stalking, burglary,
unlawful imprisonment, assault, and violations of a court order. 	He contends his right
to a public trial was violated when the court took peremptory challenges in writing and
later filed the written challenges in the record. We stayed the appeal pending State
v. Slert. 181 Wn.2d 598, 334 P.3d 1088 (2014) (plurality opinion). We now lift the
stay and affirm based on our recent decision in State v. Filitaula, 	Wn. App. 	,
339 P.3d 221, 222 (2014) (exercise of challenges for cause in writing did not
constitute a courtroom closure and did not implicate public trial right where form
containing written challenges was filed in court record); see also State v. Dunn, 180
Wn. App. 570, 575, 321 P.3d 1283 (2014), review denied, 181 Wn. 2d 1030, 340
P.3d 223 (2015); State v. Love, 176 Wn. App. 911, 920, 309 P.3d 1209 (2013),
review granted. 181 Wn.2d 1029, 340 P.3d 228 (2015).
No. 69283-9-1/2
We lift the stay and affirm.
FOR THE COURT:
041J
Meckel, 	f.
/Li*t^A,

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69273-9-|
Respondent,

V.

ROBERT GORDON SHAVER, JR., UNPUBLISHED OPINION = : 2

Appellant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
) FILED: April 13, 2015
)

PER CURIAM — Robert Shaver appeals his convictions for stalking, burglary,
unlawful imprisonment, assault, and violations of a court order. He contends his right
to a public trial was violated when the court took peremptory challenges in writing and
later filed the written challenges in the record. We stayed the appeal pending State
v. Slert, 181 Wn.2d 598, 334 P.3d 1088 (2014) (plurality opinion). We now lift the

stay and affirm based on our recent decision in State v. Filitaula, Wh. App. __,

339 P.3d 221, 222 (2014) (exercise of challenges for cause in writing did not
constitute a courtroom closure and did not implicate public trial right where form

containing written challenges was filed in court record); see also State v. Dunn, 180

Wn. App. 570, 575, 321 P.3d 1283 (2014), review denied, 181 Wn. 2d 1030, 340

P.3d 223 (2015); State v. Love, 176 Wn. App. 911, 920, 309 P.3d 1209 (2013),

review granted, 181 Wn.2d 1029, 340 P.3d 228 (2015).

No. 69283-9-I/2

We lift the stay and affirm.

FOR THE COURT:

Jubb
| wh

(Seclée Kt, ! .

Lack 7
Ve

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.