2597061•Radisson Hotel Hampton and Erie Insurance Exchange v. Darlene Tisdale
Texte intégral
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, Beales and Senior Judge Fitzpatrick RADISSON HOTEL HAMPTON AND ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE MEMORANDUM OPINION* v. Record No. 2597-06-1 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 27, 2007 DARLENE TISDALE FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Robert A. Rapaport; Jennifer T. Atkinson; Clarke, Dolph, Rapaport, Hardy & Hull, P.L.C., on brief), for appellants. (Byron A. Adams, on brief), for appellee. Radisson Hotel Hampton and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Darlene Tisdale sustained her burden of proving her right carpal tunnel syndrome constituted a compensable ordinary disease of life. In addition to challenging the commission’s finding that claimant sustained her burden of proof, employer asserts that the commission misapplied Code § 65.2-401 by not requiring claimant to prove that her ordinary disease of life did not have causes other than her employment. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Tisdale v. Radisson Hotel Hampton, VWC File No. 224-87-58 (Sept. 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 - contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.