The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Liberty Insurance Corporation v. Arnold J. Moore, Jr.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY AND
LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 0639-05-3 	PER CURIAM
JULY 12, 2005
ARNOLD J. MOORE, JR.
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(James A.L. Daniel; Janine M. Jacob; Daniel, Vaughan, Medley &
Smitherman, P.C., on brief), for appellants.
Philip B. Baker; Sanzone & Baker, P.C., on brief), for appellee.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’
Compensation Commission and contend the commission erred as a matter of law in finding that
Arnold J. Moore, Jr. proved the surgical implantation of his spinal cord stimulator constituted
reasonable and necessary medical treatment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision for the reasons stated by the commission in
its final opinion. See Moore v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, VWC File No.
205-85-17 (Feb. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.