CourtListener 9498677•William Wayne Stedman v. the State of Texas
William Wayne Stedman v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 9498677Txctapp730 avr. 2024
Texte intégral
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00148-CR
WILLIAM WAYNE STEDMAN, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 251st District Court
Randall County, Texas
Trial Court No. 31844C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding
April 30, 2024
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, William Wayne Stedman, was convicted of indecency with a child by
sexual contact1 and sentenced, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, to ten years of
confinement. The trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this
is a plea bargain case from which Appellant has no right of appeal and that Appellant has
waived the right of appeal. The certification comports with the record before the Court.
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11(d).
Notwithstanding the certification, Appellant filed a notice of appeal, pro se, challenging
his conviction.
We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a
certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of
the record.” By letter of April 12, 2024, we notified Appellant of the consequences of the
trial court’s certification and directed him to show grounds for continuing the appeal.
Appellant filed a response but has failed to demonstrate a right to appeal his conviction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal based on the trial court’s certification. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.