CourtListener 10160571•Ex Parte Maria Velasquez v. the State of Texas
Ex Parte Maria Velasquez v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10160571Txctapp722 oct. 2024
Texte intégral
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00305-CR
EX PARTE MARIA VELASQUEZ
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
October 22, 2024
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Maria Velasquez, proceeding pro se, filed an application for writ of habeas corpus
in this Court seeking relief from the trial court’s order placing her on deferred adjudication
community supervision for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See
Velasquez v. State, No. 07-23-00385-CR, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 4688, at *2 (Tex. App.—
Amarillo July 3, 2024, no pet.) (affirming the order of deferred adjudication).
Intermediate courts of appeals do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in
criminal law matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas
jurisdiction of intermediate appellate courts to civil cases); Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d
586, 588–89 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). That jurisdiction
instead rests with the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts.
See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05; 11.072 (outlining procedures for filing an
application for writ of habeas corpus in community supervision cases); Ex parte Hawkins,
885 S.W.2d at 588.
For these reasons, we dismiss Velasquez’s application for writ of habeas corpus
for want of jurisdiction.1
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
1 Velasquez may be entitled to habeas relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus with
the clerk of the court in which the community supervision was imposed. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.
art. 11.072.
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.