CourtListener 10354647•James Edward McAny v. XTO Energy Inc.
Texte intégral
In the
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-25-00001-CV
JAMES EDWARD MCANY, Appellant
V.
XTO ENERGY INC., ET AL., Appellee
On Appeal from the 4th District Court
Rusk County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2024-363
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 2, 2025, Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s October 3,
2024, order granting XTO’s special exceptions to Appellant’s original petition and ordering
Appellant to replead his suit as a trespass to try title suit. Our jurisdiction is constitutional and
statutory in nature. See TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.220 (Supp.). This
Court has jurisdiction to decide appeals from final judgments and from interlocutory orders as
permitted by the Texas Legislature. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.
2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1997, no writ) (per curiam). The
trial court has not entered a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order in this matter.
By letter dated January 28, 2025, we notified Appellant of this potential defect in our
jurisdiction and afforded him the opportunity to demonstrate proper grounds for our retention of
the appeal. We warned Appellant that if we did not receive an adequate response by
February 18, 2025, we would dismiss his appeal. Appellant did not file a response to our letter.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Charles van Cleef
Justice
Date Submitted: March 10, 2025
Date Decided: March 11, 2025
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.