James Edward McAny v. XTO Energy Inc.

CourtListener 10354647Txctapp611 mars 2025

Texte intégral

In the
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-25-00001-CV

JAMES EDWARD MCANY, Appellant

V.

XTO ENERGY INC., ET AL., Appellee

On Appeal from the 4th District Court
Rusk County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2024-363

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 2, 2025, Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s October 3,

2024, order granting XTO’s special exceptions to Appellant’s original petition and ordering

Appellant to replead his suit as a trespass to try title suit. Our jurisdiction is constitutional and

statutory in nature. See TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.220 (Supp.). This

Court has jurisdiction to decide appeals from final judgments and from interlocutory orders as

permitted by the Texas Legislature. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.

2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1997, no writ) (per curiam). The

trial court has not entered a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order in this matter.

By letter dated January 28, 2025, we notified Appellant of this potential defect in our

jurisdiction and afforded him the opportunity to demonstrate proper grounds for our retention of

the appeal. We warned Appellant that if we did not receive an adequate response by

February 18, 2025, we would dismiss his appeal. Appellant did not file a response to our letter.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Charles van Cleef
Justice
Date Submitted: March 10, 2025
Date Decided: March 11, 2025

2

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.