In Re Frances Spanos Shelton v. the State of Texas

ACCEPTED
15-25-00152-CV
FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
10/6/2025 12:28 PM
No. 15-25-____-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
CLERK
FILED IN
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 15th COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTEENTH DISTRICT AUSTIN, TEXAS
10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM
AT AUSTIN
CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Clerk

IN RE FRANCES SPANOS SHELTON,
Relator.

On Mandamus from the 414th District Court
of McLennan County, Texas, Cause No. 2024-3035-5

RECORD IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Kirk L. Pittard Craig D. Cherry
State Bar No. 24010313 State Bar No. 24012419
kpittard@dpslawgroup.com ccherry@cjsjlaw.com
Rick Thompson Ryan C. Johnson
State Bar No. 00788537 State Bar No. 24048574
rthompson@dpslawgroup.com rjohnson@cjsjlaw.com
DURHAM, PITTARD & SPALDING, LLP Scott H. James
P.O. Box 224626 State Bar No. 24037848
Dallas, Texas 75222 sjames@cjsjlaw.com
(214) 946-8000 CHERRY JOHNSON SIEGMUND
(214) 946-8433 (fax) JAMES, PLLC
7901 Fish Pond Road, 2nd Floor
Waco, Texas 76710
(254) 732-2242
(866) 627-3509 (fax)

COUNSEL FOR RELATOR
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
TAB A

MR 00001
1291 MR 00002
1292 MR 00003
1293 MR 00004
1294 MR 00005
1295 MR 00006
1296 MR 00007
1297 MR 00008
1298 MR 00009
1299 MR 00010
TAB B

MR 00011
460 MR 00012
461 MR 00013
462 MR 00014
463 MR 00015
464 MR 00016
465 MR 00017
466 MR 00018
467 MR 00019
468 MR 00020
469 MR 00021
470 MR 00022
471 MR 00023
472 MR 00024
473 MR 00025
474 MR 00026
475 MR 00027
476 MR 00028
477 MR 00029
478 MR 00030
479 MR 00031
480 MR 00032
481 MR 00033
482 MR 00034
483 MR 00035
484 MR 00036
485 MR 00037
486 MR 00038
487 MR 00039
488 MR 00040
489 MR 00041
490 MR 00042
491 MR 00043
492 MR 00044
493 MR 00045
494 MR 00046
495 MR 00047
496 MR 00048
497 MR 00049
498 MR 00050
499 MR 00051
500 MR 00052
501 MR 00053
502 MR 00054
503 MR 00055
504 MR 00056
505 MR 00057
506 MR 00058
507 MR 00059
508 MR 00060
509 MR 00061
510 MR 00062
511 MR 00063
512 MR 00064
513 MR 00065
514 MR 00066
515 MR 00067
516 MR 00068
517 MR 00069
518 MR 00070
519 MR 00071
520 MR 00072
521 MR 00073
522 MR 00074
523 MR 00075
524 MR 00076
525 MR 00077
526 MR 00078
527 MR 00079
528 MR 00080
529 MR 00081
530 MR 00082
531 MR 00083
532 MR 00084
533 MR 00085
534 MR 00086
535 MR 00087
536 MR 00088
537 MR 00089
538 MR 00090
539 MR 00091
540 MR 00092
541 MR 00093
542 MR 00094
543 MR 00095
544 MR 00096
545 MR 00097
546 MR 00098
547 MR 00099
548 MR 00100
549 MR 00101
550 MR 00102
551 MR 00103
TAB C

MR 00104
553 MR 00105
554 MR 00106
555 MR 00107
556 MR 00108
557 MR 00109
558 MR 00110
559 MR 00111
560 MR 00112
TAB D

MR 00113
801 MR 00114
802 MR 00115
803 MR 00116
804 MR 00117
805 MR 00118
806 MR 00119
807 MR 00120
808 MR 00121
809 MR 00122
810 MR 00123
811 MR 00124
812 MR 00125
TAB E

MR 00126
817 MR 00127
818 MR 00128
819 MR 00129
TAB F

MR 00130
821 MR 00131
822 MR 00132
823 MR 00133
824 MR 00134
TAB G

MR 00135
827 MR 00136
828 MR 00137
TAB H

MR 00138
923 MR 00139
TAB I

MR 00140
9 MR 00141
10 MR 00142
11 MR 00143
12 MR 00144
13 MR 00145
14 MR 00146
15 MR 00147
16 MR 00148
17 MR 00149
18 MR 00150
19 MR 00151
TAB J

MR 00152
990 MR 00153
TAB K

MR 00154
956 MR 00155
957 MR 00156
958 MR 00157
959 MR 00158
960 MR 00159
961 MR 00160
962 MR 00161
963 MR 00162
964 MR 00163
965 MR 00164
966 MR 00165
967 MR 00166
968 MR 00167
969 MR 00168
970 MR 00169
971 MR 00170
972 MR 00171
973 MR 00172
974 MR 00173
975 MR 00174
976 MR 00175
977 MR 00176
978 MR 00177
979 MR 00178
980 MR 00179
981 MR 00180
982 MR 00181
983 MR 00182
984 MR 00183
985 MR 00184
986 MR 00185
987 MR 00186
988 MR 00187
989 MR 00188
990 MR 00189
991 MR 00190
992 MR 00191
993 MR 00192
994 MR 00193
995 MR 00194
996 MR 00195
997 MR 00196
998 MR 00197
999 MR 00198
1000 MR 00199
1001 MR 00200
1002 MR 00201
1003 MR 00202
1004 MR 00203
1005 MR 00204
1006 MR 00205
1007 MR 00206
1008 MR 00207
1009 MR 00208
1010 MR 00209
1011 MR 00210
1012 MR 00211
1013 MR 00212
1014 MR 00213
1015 MR 00214
1016 MR 00215
1017 MR 00216
1018 MR 00217
1019 MR 00218
1061 MR 00219
1062 MR 00220
1063 MR 00221
1064 MR 00222
1065 MR 00223
TAB L

MR 00224
1
1 REPORTER'S RECORD
VOLUME 2 OF 3 VOLUMES
2 TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 2024-3035-5
COURT OF APPEALS CAUSE NO. 10-25-00108-CV
3
FRANCES SPANOS SHELTON, )( IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
4 Plaintiff, )(
)(
5 VS. )(
)(
6 VERNON LEUSCHNER, )(
AND AS DURABLE POWER OF )(
7 ATTORNEY FOR KATHERINE )(
LEUSCHNER, ROBERT LEE SPANOS, )( 414TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
8 AND KATHRYN NICOLE LAWRIE, )(
Intervenors, )(
9 )(
VS. )(
10 )(
VERNON LEUSCHNER,INDIVIDUALLY,)(
11 AND KATHERINE LEUSCHNER, )(
Defendants. )( MCLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS
12 ______________________________________________________

13 MOTION TO RE-AFFIRM AND/OR DESIGNATE TRUSTEE
OF THE DOROTHY SPANOS LIVING TRUST
14

15 MOTION TO APPOINT RECEIVER
______________________________________________________
16

17

18 On the 4th day of March, 2025, the following proceedings

19 came on to be held in the above-titled and numbered cause

20 before the Honorable Ryan Luna, Judge Presiding, held in Waco,

21 McLennan County, Texas.

22 Proceedings reported by oral stenography.

23

24

25

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00225
77
1 there been any discussion with Judge Stem about who he thinks

2 ought to replace Malone?

3 MR. MCSWAIN: We're gonna talk about that.

4 That's one of the things. I'm gonna put Judge Stem on the

5 stand. I'm happy to do it now, or I'm happy to do it in

6 connection with the Receivership. Whatever you want to do.

7 THE COURT: Let's do it now.

8 MR. MCSWAIN: Do it now?

9 THE COURT: Yeah.

10 You need a break? Okay. Let's take a

11 five-minute break.

12 MR. MCSWAIN: Okay.

13 (Recess taken from 3:14 p.m. to 3:22 p.m.)

14 THE COURT: We are back on the record in

15 2024-3035-5.

16 (Witness sworn.)

17 THE COURT: If you'll have a seat, please.

18 JUDGE ROBERT STEM,

19 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:

20 DIRECT EXAMINATION

21 BY MR. MCSWAIN:

22 Q. Would you please state your name for the record,

23 Judge Stem.

24 A. Robert Stem.

25 Q. Okay. How long were you a district judge?

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00226
79
1 case. We've got the order that's already in evidence, where

2 you appointed the trust advisor in March of 2022.

3 Did you begin to serve at that point in time?

4 A. I did.

5 Q. As you sit here today, do you believe that that

6 order was issued by Judge Vik --

7 (Speaking simultaneously.)

8 A. Absolutely.

9 Q. (BY MR. MCSWAIN) -- jurisdiction? You think it was

10 issued with jurisdiction --

11 MR. CHERRY: Objection, Your Honor; calls for a

12 legal conclusion.

13 THE COURT: I'm sorry, can you ask the question

14 again so we can have a clean -- please?

15 Q. (BY MR. MCSWAIN) Do you think that Judge Vik had

16 jurisdiction when he issued that order?

17 MR. CHERRY: Objection, Your Honor; legal

18 conclusion.

19 THE COURT: Overruled.

20 A. Yes, sir.

21 Q. (BY MR. MCSWAIN) Have you done a lot of work since

22 March 2022, on this estate and this trust and trying to sort

23 things out?

24 A. Yes, sir.

25 Q. Tell the judge a little bit about what you have done

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00227
92
1 powers under 4.7 --

2 A. Yes.

3 Q. -- of the trust?

4 A. Correct.

5 Q. And did you feel, at the time, that -- based on her

6 actions, that you had the ability to remove her for cause?

7 A. Yes.

8 Q. There's been some discussion, and Ms. Shelton has

9 provided an audio recording of you -- I don't know, six or

10 eight or nine months later -- in a discussion with Josh White

11 and Ms. Shelton, where you told Ms. Shelton, "I did not remove

12 you for cause," or words to that effect?

13 A. Words to that effect.

14 Q. Okay. Did you tell her that?

15 A. Yeah.

16 Q. Okay. Why did you tell her that when you felt like

17 you could have removed for cause at the time?

18 A. Well, I mean, that's my nature. I mean, I was

19 practicing some degree of diplomacy at that time. We didn't

20 need to have a hard-hitting session. Kathy's side had

21 outlined -- and Fran had seen it -- a several-page letter

22 detailing what Kathy believed is violations of the trust,

23 okay? Mr. Palmer responded, and I had to make a call, okay?

24 Q. Okay.

25 A. My letter of May the 3rd just simply says, we need a

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00228
93
1 neutral, detached, and independent trustee, okay? And she was

2 not a neutral, detached, and independent trustee, okay? And

3 that's as far as I took it, okay?

4 Q. So to Judge Luna's -- so you ended up appointing

5 John Malone, and there's reference made that appointment in

6 this letter?

7 A. Correct.

8 Q. As John Malone served as trustee, did he discuss

9 with you, as trust advisor, on a regular basis, things that he

10 was doing, ought to be doing, thinking about doing? Did he

11 discuss those things with you?

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. Did the two of you work hand-in-hand to try to bring

14 this to a resolution somehow?

15 A. Yes.

16 Q. Did you think that the suit against John Malone was

17 righteous?

18 A. No. Baseless.

19 Q. Okay.

20 A. Clearly baseless.

21 Q. And I want to go back. And we're gonna talk about

22 that in just a minute. I want to go back.

23 Apparently, in the discussion that you had with

24 Mr. White and Ms Shelton five, six, seven, eight months after

25 you removed her as the trustee, your hour-long discussion with

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00229
94
1 them -- or at least part of it -- was recorded. Are you now

2 aware of that?

3 A. I am now. I wasn't then.

4 Q. Did Mr. White tell you that he was using his fancy

5 Apple Watch to record everything that y'all were talking

6 about?

7 A. No.

8 Q. Did he disclose to you, at the time, that he was

9 recording?

10 A. No.

11 Q. Okay. If he had told you, "I'd like to record what

12 we're talking about, you know, so that we can have that record

13 of it later, or so that my wife can take notes" -- which

14 apparently was the situation -- "and make sure she's

15 accurate," what would you have said?

16 A. I think John Malone and I would have discussed it

17 with him, and say, "Hey, why do you need to record this?"

18 Q. Okay.

19 A. But the fact is, he never disclosed that to us.

20 Q. Okay.

21 A. That, in my mind -- to everyone in this courtroom --

22 is a breach of a professional courtesy. And anyone who

23 participates in that, that is breach of professional

24 responsibility and courtesy.

25 MR. JAMES: Your Honor, I'm gonna object to

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00230
95
1 that last statement and ask it to be stricken from the record.

2 Josh White's not here to defend himself. There's no motion or

3 pleading regarding that. And it's improper for Judge Stem

4 just to make that ex parte statement on the record.

5 MR. MCSWAIN: Judge, they put it into the

6 filings in this court, along with an affidavit from Mr. White,

7 and have repeatedly utilized it in their briefing in this case

8 in front of you, and I think that it's fair for Judge Stem to

9 get to explain himself.

10 MR. JAMES: Your Honor, I'm not objecting to

11 the audio, I'm objecting to what Judge Stem just said on the

12 record.

13 THE COURT: I'll overrule the objection.

14 Mr. McSwain, if you could, if you think it's an

15 appropriate time to turn our attention to the reasons why you

16 think of a receiver is necessary?

17 MR. MCSWAIN: Yes, sir.

18 THE COURT: Thank you.

19 MR. MCSWAIN: I'm sorry. I'm just about there.

20 MR. JAMES: Your Honor, I would request a brief

21 cross-examination before he goes on to the receivership

22 argument, just so the record's clear. If you want me to

23 reserve it until later, that's fine, too. But I do have some

24 questions for Judge Stem.

25 THE COURT: Okay. Well, I'll certainly grant

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00231
101
1 issue with accounting when I came on. We got that done.

2 Maybe the attorneys can have an idea how much was in there.

3 Several hundred thousand dollars.

4 Q. Okay. Based on your experience, based on all the

5 discussions you've had with the parties, based on all that you

6 know that has gone on and the decisions that have to be made

7 about this real property, what do you think -- what do you

8 think needs to happen here to get the parties from where we

9 are right now, at each others' throats, to being done?

10 A. I have thought long and hard on this. The trust is

11 exhausted. There's no money left. This is an extraordinary

12 case. And it requires extraordinary measures. This is a time

13 where we need to save these people from themselves. There

14 will be nothing left. All these grandkids will be cheated out

15 of their inheritance. This ongoing litigation will exhaust

16 this trust. This is an extraordinary case that requires an

17 extraordinary ruling.

18 The only way to bring this to conclusion is not

19 through a successor trustee, but it's through a receivership

20 with some judicial protection to get this done. John Malone

21 and I worked hours and hours and hours trying to get this

22 done. And that man deserves a medal. He deserves a nod

23 toward the Nobel Peace Prize, not a ridiculous, baseless,

24 spiteful lawsuit. Shame on you guys. I'm sorry, Judge, but

25 this is -- enough is enough. I've seen these in court.

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00232
103
1 I'm gonna show you --

2 MR. JAMES: And if may I approach the witness,

3 Your Honor, this is in the actual trust document. The ELMO

4 seems to be pretty blurry over there, but I wanted to

5 reference Section 3.08 with the witness, if I may, Your Honor.

6 May I approach?

7 THE COURT: Yes.

8 Q. (BY MR. JAMES) There was a lot of talk earlier,

9 Judge Stem, about this real estate and how you believe that my

10 client, Fran Shelton, was not able to divide it appropriately

11 because, you know, she was biased or whatever your words were,

12 correct? Is that a fair summary of what you were saying?

13 A. I didn't say biased. I would say she was not

14 impartial.

15 Q. Would you say that -- again, you said you reviewed

16 the trust and wanted to follow it, that she would be an

17 interested party over that particular transaction because

18 she's always getting some of the land?

19 A. Yeah. She's getting some of the land, but more

20 importantly -- I mean, she put one of her children up front, a

21 clear violation of the trust.

22 Q. And I -- we'll get to that in a minute, the specific

23 language, in a minute. What I'm talking about -- there's a

24 definition in the trust of interested party. Have you read

25 that -- or interested trustee, sorry.

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00233
112
1 "her" being Fran, right -- "to be in such a dynamically

2 difficult situation?"

3 A. Yes.

4 Q. You also told my client, face-to-face, just as if

5 just the two of y'all were in the room, "There's an

6 appreciation of what you have done for this trust."

7 A. Correct.

8 Q. Didn't you also tell my client that she was put in a

9 horrible position by no fault of her?

10 A. Exactly.

11 Q. Didn't you also tell her that she's been put in an

12 enormously difficult position?

13 A. Yes.

14 Q. Did you not also say, sir -- and this is a verbatim

15 quote, "This is a family situation that was sideways by no

16 fault of your own"?

17 A. Correct.

18 Q. And then last, but not least, you told my client to

19 her face, seven months and two days after you sent this letter

20 that has no for-cause reason in it whatsoever -- you told her

21 that, "They were throwing laser beams at her." Is that a true

22 quote?

23 A. Yes.

24 Q. And when you're saying, "they," you're talking about

25 her sister Kathy and their side?

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00234
113
1 A. Correct.

2 Q. So, in other words, your decision -- not what you're

3 saying here today, but way back to almost over two years

4 ago -- it was 22 years months ago when she was removed,

5 correct?

6 A. May of 2023.

7 Q. Yeah. So around 22 months, a little less than 2

8 years ago; that's correct?

9 A. Correct.

10 Q. Isn't it true, sir, that way back when, you removed

11 Fran as trustee to protect her from all that was going in the

12 trust at that time?

13 A. We talked about it.

14 Q. Okay. That's not my question, though. I said,

15 isn't that true why you removed her?

16 A. That was one of the reasons. You've got my letter.

17 I think it speaks for itself.

18 Q. Well, I don't know that it speaks for itself. And

19 I'm not gonna go through it because the judge can read the

20 letter. But I would presume that if somebody was going to --

21 especially a trust advisor that had the duties that you had --

22 that you're going to put the details of why you were removing

23 a trustee, and you didn't put up that.

24 A. Not necessarily.

25 Q. Okay. Well, forget the "not necessarily" --

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00235
122
1 A. It was somewhere a million-two, to a million-five,

2 somewhere in that range.

3 Q. And isn't it true that there actually have been

4 offers to purchase that part, the 40 acres with the house, for

5 $1.45 million?

6 A. Yes. Both sides have made some offers.

7 Q. Exactly. But the highest offer during the time that

8 you've been the trust advisor was $1.45 million, correct?

9 A. I think that's correct. Yes.

10 Q. And, yet, John Malone -- and you acting as trust

11 advisor, did not agree to the sale, correct?

12 A. I don't think the contract was ever submitted.

13 Q. Okay. But an offer was made --

14 A. I think there was an offer made. Yes.

15 Q. But it was rejected by John Malone, correct?

16 A. I don't know that he rejected because it was ever

17 actual -- correct. John asked for a tract form, and it was

18 never submitted.

19 Q. And, again, contract or no contract, do you know who

20 made that offer to purchase that -- the highest offer?

21 A. I think it was Fran.

22 Q. Okay.

23 A. I'm not sure. Both sides made one.

24 Q. Kathy and her husband, Vernon, the opposing side,

25 they made an offer -- and again, let me back up.

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00236
123
1 That was agreeable for you as the trust advisor

2 and for John Malone as the Trustee. It was okay for the

3 family to bid on it, and they were gonna sell it to the

4 highest bidder, right?

5 A. Yeah, they should. It's family property.

6 Q. That's right.

7 In your opinion, it would be good to try to

8 keep it in the family if the price was correct?

9 A. That was my initial conversation right after I got

10 here; called everybody together and said, "Does anybody want

11 to buy the other one out? Let's keep this ranch together."

12 Q. And you've testified, and the trust document

13 amendment also says that it's supposed to be sold as

14 reasonable as practicable.

15 A. Sure.

16 Q. And it's your testimony that my clients were the

17 highest bidder on that, but that sale was never consummated?

18 A. Correct.

19 Q. Okay.

20 A. Never a contract submitted.

21 MR. JAMES: Your Honor, I have no further

22 questions at this time. I appreciate your time, Judge Stem.

23 THE WITNESS: Thank you.

24 MR. DUNNAM: Do you have a map, Mr. Firmin?

25 THE COURT: Here you go.

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00237
139
1 relate to 64.001 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. And

2 they don't relate to 114.008(a)(5) of the Texas Property Code.

3 Neither of those statutes include a requirement that you have

4 to exhaust all other remedies. In fact, under 114, it's just

5 one of many options that you can use to remedy a potential

6 breach of trust.

7 And, in this case, under 64.001, all you have

8 to have in order to be able to get a receivership is you've

9 gotta have a probable interest in the right of the property,

10 okay? All the -- everybody agrees here that the beneficiaries

11 have an interest in that property and in the trust, okay? We

12 talked about a plan of distribution for that. So there's no

13 question there's a probable right in interest of the property,

14 okay? It's part of the trust.

15 Then you have to show that the property or fund

16 must be in danger of being lost, removed, or materially

17 injured, okay? We already had a beneficiary sue an

18 independent special trustee because she didn't like the

19 decision that was going to happen. If you appoint another

20 trustee, it's the same thing. This trust is always going to

21 be losing money over time.

22 In fact, that was a concern Josh White raised

23 in a letter to Judge Stem and John Malone was his concern

24 about all the money being lost if litigation was filed, and

25 then a month later, they filed it, and caused all this other

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00238
140
1 money to be spent on 6,000-plus pages in discovery and

2 everything else that forced our hand to go file a lawsuit to

3 try to protect our rights.

4 If you appoint another independent trustee, a

5 corporate one, some other -- A: Judge Stem's already told you

6 that it's gonna be unlikely somebody's gonna want to do it.

7 Why would they want to, if they're going to be able to get

8 sued? If Ms. Shelton doesn't like what's going to happen when

9 someone exercises their discretion, she's gonna file a

10 lawsuit. You cloak someone with immunity as a receiver to

11 sell this property, you avoid that. There's not a way to stop

12 this from just devolving into years of wasted money if a

13 Receiver isn't appointed under 64.101 or under 114.

14 We've asked you to appoint James Volberding.

15 We've attached his exhibit as Exhibit A to our motion -- he's

16 out of Tyler -- as a receiver. He's happy to talk with you,

17 if you like. He's mentioned that to us. I've spoken to the

18 man one time. And his primary practice is on receiverships.

19 That's what he primarily does. He's well-qualified to do

20 this. He's gonna make the decisions that the parties

21 themselves have not been able to agree to.

22 We've given you evidence under 114.008 that has

23 been a breach of trust that has occurred or might occur. You

24 heard Judge Stem talk about things that Fran Shelton did that

25 were violation of the trust or interpretations of the trust

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00239
141
1 that were wrong when she was the trustee.

2 From the very beginning, she made accusations

3 of theft against Kathy's children that she had no evidence of

4 whatsoever that were there. That is not the action of a

5 person who can be a trustee or her husband to be a person

6 who's gonna be a trustee. Those are the type of people that

7 are showing vengeance of vindictiveness, for whatever reason

8 you want, trying to give acreage out of -- that clearly has to

9 be sold.

10 Front pasture? And you're gonna get 12 acres

11 there? Another plan was provided. She rejected that one. As

12 soon we request access easements back in January of 2023,

13 which by the way, is seven months before Fran Shelton swore

14 under verified pleading that we first raised that issue, she

15 as trustee, immediately denied the ability for us to get this

16 access easements as trustee because she didn't want to be able

17 to share a road. When you're the trustee and also the

18 beneficiary, you don't have the right to take off your hat,

19 favor some people, and not favor another.

20 Because there's been evidence of a breach of

21 trust, and Judge Stem's talked extensively about how those

22 things that occurred while he was trust advisor before she was

23 removed. Those are in the email. And if I need to prove

24 those up and admit them as evidence, I can. The fact is, a

25 breach of trust has occurred or might occur. If you put her

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00240
143
1 she picked the road to benefit herself, when she was serving

2 as trustee. Why does she get the road? The only reason we

3 were even willing to contemplate doing that was because

4 accesses are required by the Texas Supreme Court for easement

5 by necessity for a landlocked property, particularly when

6 there's not one.

7 And that's actually been given -- an

8 ingress-egress easement -- has actually been given by Dorothy

9 and Nick to Kathy Leuschner when she bought the rock house

10 back in the 1990s. We have a certified deed for that that I

11 could put into the record for you, where they granted an

12 easement to Kathy. The same property she's going to get

13 again, her parents gave her an easement. They want to know

14 what Dorothy wanted to do, that's what she did. She gave an

15 easement to Kathy.

16 So there is more than enough evidence here that

17 a breach of trust has occurred. And when a breach of trust

18 occurs, all there has to be is some evidence, and the Court

19 doesn't abuse their discretion. Those three cases that I gave

20 you: The Benson case, the Moody case, and the Price case,

21 dispel this myth that you have to exhaust all of the other

22 remedies.

23 And you've heard Judge Stem, a judge with an

24 impeccable reputation in this county -- and elsewhere -- who

25 told you that he believes that is the only way to get these

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00241
159
1 REPORTER'S RECORD
VOLUME 2 OF 3 VOLUMES
2 TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 2024-3035-5
COURT OF APPEALS CAUSE NO. 10-25-00108-CV
3
FRANCES SPANOS SHELTON, )( IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
4 Plaintiff, )(
)(
5 VS. )(
)(
6 VERNON LEUSCHNER, )(
AND AS DURABLE POWER OF )(
7 ATTORNEY FOR KATHERINE )(
LEUSCHNER, ROBERT LEE SPANOS, )( 414TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
8 AND KATHRYN NICOLE LAWRIE, )(
Intervenors, )(
9 )(
VS. )(
10 )(
VERNON LEUSCHNER,INDIVIDUALLY,)(
11 AND KATHERINE LEUSCHNER, )(
Defendants. )( MCLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS
12

13 _____________________________________________

14 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE
_____________________________________________
15

16 I, Jennifer Murphy, Official Court Reporter in

17 and for the 414th District Court of McLennan County, State of

18 Texas, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing contains

19 a true and correct transcription of all portions of evidence

20 and other proceedings requested in writing by counsel for the

21 parties to be included in this volume of the Reporter's

22 Record, in the above-styled and numbered cause, all of which

23 occurred in open court or in chambers and were reported by me.

24 I further certify that this Reporter's Record

25 of the proceedings truly and correctly reflects the exhibits,

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00242
160
1 if any, admitted by the respective parties.

2 WITNESS MY OFFICIAL HAND this, the 10th day of

3 April 2025.

4 __________/s/Jennifer Murphy__________

5 Jennifer Murphy, Texas CSR # 11894, CVR
Expiration Date: 09-30-2025
6 Official Court Reporter
414th District Court
7 McLennan County, Texas
501 Washington Avenue, Room 307
8 Waco, Texas 76501
(254)759-5914
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Jennifer Murphy, CSR, CVR
MR 00243
TAB M

MR 00244
MR 00245
MR 00246
MR 00247
MR 00248
MR 00249
MR 00250
MR 00251
MR 00252
MR 00253
MR 00254
MR 00255
MR 00256
MR 00257
MR 00258
MR 00259
MR 00260
MR 00261
MR 00262
MR 00263
MR 00264
MR 00265
MR 00266
MR 00267
MR 00268
MR 00269
MR 00270
MR 00271
MR 00272
MR 00273
MR 00274
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Kelly Blackburn on behalf of William Richard Thompson
Bar No. 788537
efile@dpslawgroup.com
Envelope ID: 106480768
Filing Code Description: Original Proceeding Petition
Filing Description: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Status as of 10/6/2025 1:37 PM CST

Associated Case Party: FrancesSpanosShelton

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

Kelly Blackburn efile@dpslawgroup.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Kirk Pittard kpittard@dpslawgroup.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Rick Thompson rthompson@dpslawgroup.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Craig Cherry 24012419 ccherry@cjsjlaw.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Ryan Johnson 24048574 rjohnson@cjsjlaw.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Scott James 24037848 sjames@cjsjlaw.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Associated Case Party: Vernon Leuschner

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

Angus McSwain 13861100 mcswain@thetexasfirm.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Mark Firmin 24099614 firmin@thetexasfirm.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Associated Case Party: Robert Spanos

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

James Dunnam 6258010 jimdunnam@dunnamlaw.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Andrea Mehta 24078992 andreamehta@dunnamlaw.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Mason Dunnam 24108079 masondunnam@dunnamlaw.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT

Associated Case Party: Hon. Judge Ryan Luna

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

Hon. Judge Ryan Luna 414th@mclennan.gov 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Kelly Blackburn on behalf of William Richard Thompson
Bar No. 788537
efile@dpslawgroup.com
Envelope ID: 106480768
Filing Code Description: Original Proceeding Petition
Filing Description: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Status as of 10/6/2025 1:37 PM CST

Associated Case Party: Aubrey Williams

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

Aubrey Williams 21512500 aubreyw9000@yahoo.com 10/6/2025 12:28:00 PM SENT