CourtListener 9452845•In Re Magdoline Elhindi v. the State of Texas
In Re Magdoline Elhindi v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 9452845Txctapp1414 déc. 2023
Texte intégral
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed
December 14, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00828-CV
IN RE MAGDOLINE ELHINDI, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
295th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2023-29085
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 31, 2023, relator Magdoline Elhindi filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R.
App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Donna
Roth, presiding judge of the 295th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the
following: (1) the trial court’s September 25, 2023 order on defendant’s motion to
compel full and complete discovery responses to defendant’s amended first
response for admission, request for production, and interrogatories with respect to
the compelled production of a video; and (2) the trial court’s October 26, 2023
order on plaintiff’s [relator’s] motion for leave to provide video to the FBI and
defendant’s motion for sanctions with respect to the requirements that relator
provide a full and complete copy of the video to the real party in interest and wait
for confirmation of his receipt before leave is obtained to provide a copy of the
video to the FBI.
Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
2
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.