In re Ronald Dwayne Whitfield — Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Texte intégral
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 22, 2026. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-26-00983-CV IN RE RONALD DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 5 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1284764 MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Ronald Dwayne Whitfield filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to compel the trial court to vacate prior orders, among other requested relief. Relator has been declared a vexatious litigant and is the subject of three pre- filing orders, prohibiting him from filing, pro se, new litigation without seeking the permission of the appropriate local administrative judge. See Tex. Civ. Prac. &
2 Rem. Code Ann. §§ 11.101, 11.102. The clerk of this court may not file an original proceeding or other matter presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a pre-filing order unless the litigant first obtains an order from the appropriate local administrative judge permitting the filing. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.103(a). On September 29, 2026, the clerk of this court notified relator that his original proceeding was subject to dismissal without further notice, unless within 10 days relator filed a copy of the order from the local administrative judge permitting the filing of his petition. In response to the notice, relator did not provide a copy of the pre-filing order permitting his petition or otherwise adequately respond to our notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the mandamus petition for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code § 11.1035(b); See In re Whitfield, No. 01-25-00392- CV, 2025 WL 1634097, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 10, 2025, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (dismissing vexatious litigant’s petition for writ of mandamus in absence of order from local administrative judge permitting filing of original proceeding). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bridges and Boatman.
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.