Silver v. United States

592/1Supreme Court Of The United States25 janv. 2021

Texte intégral

1 Cite as: 592 U. S. ____ (2021)
G
ORSUCH, J., dissenting
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
SHELDON SILVER v. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 20–60. Decided January 25, 2021
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
J
USTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS joins,
dissenting from denial of certiorari.
Normally, extortion and bribery are treated as distinct
crimes. In Evans v. United States, 504 U. S. 255 (1992),
however, this Court conflated them for purposes of the
Hobbs Act when a public official is the defendant. Id., at
260. Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Scalia, T
HOMAS,
and B
REYER have all questioned that judgment. See id., at
278 (T
HOMAS, J., joined by Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia, J.,
dissenting); Ocasio v. United States, 578 U. S. ___, ___
(2016) (B
REYER, J., concurring) (slip op., at 1); id., at ___–
___ (T
HOMAS, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 1–2). I would have
granted this case to reconsider Evans in light of these
thoughtful criticisms.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.