State v. Timothy J. McKinney

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Timothy Joseph McKinney, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001693

Appeal From Spartanburg County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-251
Submitted May 1, 2026 – Filed May 27, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals David
Alexander, of Columbia, and Timothy Joseph McKinney,
pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry Joe Barnette, of
Spartanburg, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.2

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
On April 13, 2026, this court received Appellant's motion to amend his pro se
brief. We grant the motion and accept the brief as filed.
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.