CourtListener 10850237•State v. James E. Carson
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
James Edward Carson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2025-000178
Appeal From Richland County
Charles J. McCutchen, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-191
Submitted April 23, 2026 – Filed April 29, 2026
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Wesley Chandler Norville, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing, and Solicitor Byron E. Gipson, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.