State v. Freddy R. Harris, III

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Freddy Ray Harris, III, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001165

Appeal From Darlington County
Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-411
Submitted October 1, 2025 – Filed December 10, 2025

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of
Columbia, and Freddy Ray Harris, III, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and THOMAS and CURTIS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.