State v. Akeem D. Hampton

CourtListener 10683975Scctapp1 oct. 2025

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Akeem Davon Hampton, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001726

Appeal From Lexington County
Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-325
Submitted September 1, 2025 – Filed October 1, 2025

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia; and
Akeem Davon Hampton, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

MCDONALD, HEWITT, and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.