State v. Tamar J. Nance

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tamar Javeell Nance, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-000172

Appeal From Lexington County
Debra R. McCaslin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-101
Submitted March 1, 2025 – Filed March 26, 2025

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Tamar Javeell Nance, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

THOMAS, HEWITT, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.