State v. Kari K. Ryant

CourtListener 10331918Scctapp12 févr. 2025

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kari Kayshon Ryant, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-000911

Appeal From Orangeburg County
Heath P. Taylor, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-051
Submitted January 30, 2025 – Filed February 12, 2025

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia; and Kari Kayshon Ryant, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and MCDONALD and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.