State v. Robinson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Elizabeth Gail
Robinson, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-150

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 10,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Robinson appeals her probation
revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking her probation because
there was insufficient evidence to support a finding she violated the terms of
her probation.  After a thorough review
of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Robinson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.[1]

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.